problem with http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/maillist.html
Hi. Am I the only one, or is there a problem with http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/maillist.html I cannot see mails never than 22 November (independent if date/thread view) ? rgds jan I.
Re: problem with http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/maillist.html
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 10:23:57 +0100 jan i j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. Am I the only one, or is there a problem with http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/maillist.html I cannot see mails never than 22 November (independent if date/thread view) ? rgds jan I. With the URL as you give it, I get messages back to 12 November 2013, with a link for earlier messages at bottom. Perhaps you need to clear your browser cache? -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Compiling OpenOffice in OpenSolaris
Hello, Since there is no binary package for any version of Solaris x86, I am trying to compile OpenOffice on OpenSolaris in the hope that the resulting binaries will work in later versions. I have downloaded the source code and I did the following: $ export LD_ALTEXEC=/usr/bin/gld $ export ANT_HOME=/opt/gnu/ant/ $ export JAVA_HOME=/usr/java $ ./configure --with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 --with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz --disable-odk --with-lang=el en --with-junit=/extra/sources/OpenOffice/java/junit-4.11.jar --prefix=/opt/gnu $ source SolarisX86GccEnv.Set Then I did the following: $ cd instsetoo_native and when I give the build --all command I get the following: build -- version: 275224 = Building module solenv = Entering /extra/sources/OpenOffice/aoo-4.0.1/main/solenv ERROR! Could not detect compiler version! Please extend tg_compv.mk in solenv/inc. g++ -dumpversion returns 4.7.2 force_dmake_to_error dmake: Error executing 'force_dmake_to_error': No such file or directory dmake: Error code -1, while making 'compiler_version_error' 1 module(s): solenv need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /extra/sources/OpenOffice/aoo-4.0.1/main/solenv When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by running: build --all:solenv The system correctly finds the version of the compiler but it complains that it cannot find the compiler version. I guess this is a bug, but I don't know where to start. Can you please help me solve this problem so to actually start building? Best regards, Apostolos -- Apostols Syropoulos Xanthi, Greece
Re: problem with http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/maillist.html
On Nov 24, 2013 10:45 AM, Rory Oapos;Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 10:23:57 +0100 jan i j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. Am I the only one, or is there a problem with http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/maillist.html I cannot see mails never than 22 November (independent if date/thread view) ? rgds jan I. With the URL as you give it, I get messages back to 12 November 2013, with a link for earlier messages at bottom. Perhaps you need to clear your browser cache? going back is not the problem, I want to see 23 and 24. the newst I see is 22. rgds jan i -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [discussion] release mirror structure.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Andrew Rist wrote: On 11/22/2013 1:52 AM, jan i wrote: Not having the binaries on apache.org is for sure the simplest solution, and if we can decide that, then I am sure infra wont have a problem. Actually, it was Infra who pushed for having the Apache mirrors as a secondary mirror network, after we followed their advice not to offer binaries from the Apache mirrors as a primary channel due to size/bandwidth constraints. I like the idea to have a secondary mirror network at Apache, while I find it too much if this delays our releases or requires us to change our processes. what if we have single install with all langs at apache.org? that way it is there, but considerably smaller from a real estate perspective but allows us to preserve binaries. For user downloads @ sourceforge, we continue to have the 1 per lang downloads that focus on the user. This sounds odd at first, but it could actually be a good solution. The multi-language build can be added to the SourceForge ones with minimal overhead, and it can be uploaded to the Apache mirrors very quickly. We would still have the possibility (this is an important one) to measure interest for the individual language builds by analyzing the SourceForge download data, while we would have the multi-language build available on both SF and Apache for archival and for those users who find this easier than download language packs. Any estimate for how large this would be? I assume it would include all the dictionaries as well, yes? Another option could be to look at actual download numbers and package the most popular languages together, so maybe the top 15 languages or something like that. -Rob Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
