Re: [PROPOSAL][EXT] Submit NetBeans plugin for download from NetBeans.org
+1 rgds jan i On 30 March 2015 at 12:25, Carl Marcum cmar...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, I propose submitting the latest NetBeans plugin [1] to NetBeans.org for inclusion in their plugins downloads. Afterward I will update the wiki with the new location. I believe the plugin is now as functional for the current AOO version as is was for Ooo when it was available on NetBeans.org here [2]. The current way of distribution of the binary has been linking to different developers personal folders on people.apache.org as the latest updates are made. This results in multiple updates to the wiki to point at different locations as new updates are made. [3]. As updates are made lazy consensus could be used to update netbeans.org. If there are no objections to the above proposal within 72-hours then I will invoke Lazy Consensus and proceed to implement the above proposal. Thanks, Carl [1] http://people.apache.org/~cmarcum/devtools/org- openoffice-extensions-4.1.0.nbm [2] http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/2320/openoffice-org-api-plugin [3] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice_NetBeans_Integration - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: LDAP access
1) Should we kept this wizard? Answering to myself: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124183 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: LDAP access
Hi, On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 03:00:45PM +0100, FR web forum wrote: Hello dev team, Since AOO 4.1.0, LDAP driver has been removed. When you run File Wizards Address data source LDAP access don't work anymore. 1) Should we kept this wizard? 2) How use LDAP access now? You can't; the workaround (use another tool that can access LDAP and export to CSV, like Thunderbird) is no workaround. I'm working on a set of extensions to bring back the crippled functionality, but do not expect anything until June/July. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[PROPOSAL][EXT] Submit NetBeans plugin for download from NetBeans.org
Hi all, I propose submitting the latest NetBeans plugin [1] to NetBeans.org for inclusion in their plugins downloads. Afterward I will update the wiki with the new location. I believe the plugin is now as functional for the current AOO version as is was for Ooo when it was available on NetBeans.org here [2]. The current way of distribution of the binary has been linking to different developers personal folders on people.apache.org as the latest updates are made. This results in multiple updates to the wiki to point at different locations as new updates are made. [3]. As updates are made lazy consensus could be used to update netbeans.org. If there are no objections to the above proposal within 72-hours then I will invoke Lazy Consensus and proceed to implement the above proposal. Thanks, Carl [1] http://people.apache.org/~cmarcum/devtools/org-openoffice-extensions-4.1.0.nbm [2] http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/2320/openoffice-org-api-plugin [3] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice_NetBeans_Integration - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
English Dictionaries updated - 1-APR-2015
Hello! Just to inform everyone that I have updated the dictionaries for OpenOffice and Mozilla. Only the British one has been changed and it now has 738 new words since the previous version. In this version I focused a lot in the names of places and persons, since it is one of the biggest weaknesses in the dictionaries. The AOO may take a few days to trigger, but you can download it manually from its official site. Direct sites where it can be found: - AOO http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice - Mozilla (Firefox/Thunderbird/SeaMonkey) https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/british-english-dictionary-2 - Official project site (Proofing Tool GUI) http://marcoagpinto.cidadevirtual.pt/proofingtoolgui.html - Official project site (GitHub) https://github.com/marcoagpinto/aoo-mozilla-en-dict Please notice that I added a paragraph with some extra text at the bottom of GitHub to explain to people how to check if a word is already there. Could someone tell me if the text is okay or if should add/remove something? Thanks! Kind regards from your friend, Marco A.G.Pinto -- --
Re: [PROPOSAL][EXT] Submit NetBeans plugin for download from NetBeans.org
+1 On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Carl Marcum cmar...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, I propose submitting the latest NetBeans plugin [1] to NetBeans.org for inclusion in their plugins downloads. Afterward I will update the wiki with the new location. I believe the plugin is now as functional for the current AOO version as is was for Ooo when it was available on NetBeans.org here [2]. The current way of distribution of the binary has been linking to different developers personal folders on people.apache.org as the latest updates are made. This results in multiple updates to the wiki to point at different locations as new updates are made. [3]. As updates are made lazy consensus could be used to update netbeans.org. If there are no objections to the above proposal within 72-hours then I will invoke Lazy Consensus and proceed to implement the above proposal. Thanks, Carl [1] http://people.apache.org/~cmarcum/devtools/org- openoffice-extensions-4.1.0.nbm [2] http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/2320/openoffice-org-api-plugin [3] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice_NetBeans_Integration - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614
Re: ruby uno to control openoffice
But with the same PropertyAttribute.hdl i had built c++ sample
DocumentLoader.cxx,and it works .
How can i disable this feature of pre-processor
-Brick
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
It appears that OPTIONAL is defined to empty string in a pre-processor
definition.
This is probably a conflict with use of OPTIONAL as a way of controlling
code inclusion and not as name of a feature in a bit flag [;).
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Brick Ma [mailto:brickman...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 07:09
To: dev
Subject: ruby uno to control openoffice
Hi,All
There is a runo on github developed by hanya.
Ruby-UNO (Ruby-OpenOffice) native bridge.
http://wiki.github.com/hanya/RUNO/
I spend days to build the runo on window 7
with ActiveScriptRuby2.2, openoffice 3.4 and vs2010.
i got this error which i dont understand why .
E:\RUNO-master\include\com/sun/star/beans/PropertyAttribute.hdl(20) : error
C2513: 'const short' : no variable declared before '='
but in PropertyAttribute.hdl the line 20 is as the same style as other
line
static const ::sal_Int16 MAYBEVOID = (sal_Int16)1;
static const ::sal_Int16 BOUND = (sal_Int16)2;
static const ::sal_Int16 CONSTRAINED = (sal_Int16)4;
static const ::sal_Int16 TRANSIENT = (sal_Int16)8;
static const ::sal_Int16 READONLY = (sal_Int16)16;
static const ::sal_Int16 MAYBEAMBIGUOUS = (sal_Int16)32;
static const ::sal_Int16 MAYBEDEFAULT = (sal_Int16)64;
static const ::sal_Int16 REMOVEABLE = (sal_Int16)128;
static const ::sal_Int16 REMOVABLE = (sal_Int16)128;
static const ::sal_Int16 OPTIONAL = (sal_Int16)256;//line 20 error1
I commented line 20 ,build is OK.Then i try to open a docment.But error
comes.
require 'uno'
data = {'type' = 'socket', 'host' = 'localhost',
'port' = 2083, 'protocol' = 'urp'}
ctx = Uno::Connector.connect(data)
smgr = ctx.getServiceManager
desktop = smgr.createInstanceWithContext(
com.sun.star.frame.Desktop,ctx)//here error2 comes out
doc = desktop.loadComponentFromURL(private:factory/swriter, _blank, 0,
[])
doc.getText.setString(Hello Ruby!)
I really want to make it work.Buy it seems kind of hard for me now.
Did error1 yield error2 or something else wrong.
Any help would be appreciated.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: LDAP access
I'm working on a set of extensions to bring back the crippled functionality, but do not expect anything until June/July. Thanks for this good news I'd tried to use Base and OpenLDAP JDBC-Bridge without success. But unable to obtain informations with SQL request. Regards too - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Board report proposal, please comment before April 5.
Am 03/30/2015 06:36 PM, schrieb jan i: [...] but let us discuss changes in the tone/meaning. thanks for the report draft. Here are some remarks: 1. - CMS discussion, ... The Board should remember to look at the total cost of this change, not only the Infra costs. -- IMHO a good point. Thanks for mentioning this. 2. - Releases, ... Due to lack of volunteers (especially release manager) no work is active. -- I don't see a general problem of finding volunteers. IMHO only developers for bugfixing and the release manager for coordination are missing. 3. - priv...@openoffice.apache.org: - 507 emails sent to list (624 in previous quarter) -- Maybe a short senentence sould be added, like We will try to reduce the amount of unnecessary mails as it is a bit high for the private mailinglist. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Board report proposal, please comment before April 5.
Hi all Time for my first AOO Board report. I have prepared the board report see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2015+Mar You might notice that I prefer to use a much more direct tone, than Andrea did. That is NOT to say that Andrea did something wrong. You might also notice the layout is different, it is to make it fit the new reporter tool, which I wrote about earlier. I believe we are approaching a situation where we need board involvement, and therefore I prefer to show board to facts, so they are more prepared when/if we decide to ask for more. Please also be aware that the fact that we in reality have done nothing with Digital Signing and the MAC boxes, are things that partly will fall back on Infra (they spent quite a USD amount on us last year for these items) and therefore influence future requests from us. My intention is to commit the board report to the agenda April 5 (end of this week). Clearly if we have discussions that needs to be settled before committing the final report. The report is in Wiki, so all with access can change it, please change typos etc directly, but let us discuss changes in the tone/meaning. Rgds jan I
cwiki content.
Hi. I just took some time looking at the content of the cwiki, and have a few suggestions: I suggest we remove: Project planning, page states *Warning: this page refers to the Incubation phase, ended in October 2012. *Either we should have a real project plan in there or remove it. Actually a lot of the top level pages have not been touched since 2011. I recomend we move (not delete) all top level pages below a new page archive, so we can see in the menu system what is actually in use. thouughts ? rgds jan I
Re: Board report proposal, please comment before April 5.
On 30 March 2015 at 19:16, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 03/30/2015 06:36 PM, schrieb jan i: [...] but let us discuss changes in the tone/meaning. thanks for the report draft. Here are some remarks: 1. - CMS discussion, ... The Board should remember to look at the total cost of this change, not only the Infra costs. -- IMHO a good point. Thanks for mentioning this. 2. - Releases, ... Due to lack of volunteers (especially release manager) no work is active. -- I don't see a general problem of finding volunteers. IMHO only developers for bugfixing and the release manager for coordination are missing. 3. - priv...@openoffice.apache.org: - 507 emails sent to list (624 in previous quarter) -- Maybe a short senentence sould be added, like We will try to reduce the amount of unnecessary mails as it is a bit high for the private mailinglist. Marcus good points (including you other email, saving me to cause an extra email). I have updated the proposal, just changed your words a little bit. Please have a look. rgds jan i - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Board report proposal, please comment before April 5.
Am 03/30/2015 07:29 PM, schrieb jan i: On 30 March 2015 at 19:16, Marcusmarcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 03/30/2015 06:36 PM, schrieb jan i: [...] but let us discuss changes in the tone/meaning. thanks for the report draft. Here are some remarks: 1. - CMS discussion, ... The Board should remember to look at the total cost of this change, not only the Infra costs. -- IMHO a good point. Thanks for mentioning this. 2. - Releases, ... Due to lack of volunteers (especially release manager) no work is active. -- I don't see a general problem of finding volunteers. IMHO only developers for bugfixing and the release manager for coordination are missing. 3. - priv...@openoffice.apache.org: - 507 emails sent to list (624 in previous quarter) -- Maybe a short senentence sould be added, like We will try to reduce the amount of unnecessary mails as it is a bit high for the private mailinglist. Marcus good points (including you other email, saving me to cause an extra email). I have updated the proposal, just changed your words a little bit. Please have a look. thanks :-) Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Board report proposal, please comment before April 5.
Am 03/30/2015 11:41 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 03/30/2015 09:36 AM, jan i wrote: Hi all Time for my first AOO Board report. I have prepared the board report see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2015+Mar You might notice that I prefer to use a much more direct tone, than Andrea did. That is NOT to say that Andrea did something wrong. You might also notice the layout is different, it is to make it fit the new reporter tool, which I wrote about earlier. I believe we are approaching a situation where we need board involvement, and therefore I prefer to show board to facts, so they are more prepared when/if we decide to ask for more. Please also be aware that the fact that we in reality have done nothing with Digital Signing and the MAC boxes, are things that partly will fall back on Infra (they spent quite a USD amount on us last year for these items) and therefore influence future requests from us. My intention is to commit the board report to the agenda April 5 (end of this week). Clearly if we have discussions that needs to be settled before committing the final report. The report is in Wiki, so all with access can change it, please change typos etc directly, but let us discuss changes in the tone/meaning. Rgds jan I Jan -- I think this report is fine as it stands. But I don't understand this sentence The HP depend on the features of CMS. under Issues. What is HP? Other than that...OK. that means homepage. ;-) Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Board report proposal, please comment before April 5.
On 03/30/2015 09:36 AM, jan i wrote: Hi all Time for my first AOO Board report. I have prepared the board report see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2015+Mar You might notice that I prefer to use a much more direct tone, than Andrea did. That is NOT to say that Andrea did something wrong. You might also notice the layout is different, it is to make it fit the new reporter tool, which I wrote about earlier. I believe we are approaching a situation where we need board involvement, and therefore I prefer to show board to facts, so they are more prepared when/if we decide to ask for more. Please also be aware that the fact that we in reality have done nothing with Digital Signing and the MAC boxes, are things that partly will fall back on Infra (they spent quite a USD amount on us last year for these items) and therefore influence future requests from us. My intention is to commit the board report to the agenda April 5 (end of this week). Clearly if we have discussions that needs to be settled before committing the final report. The report is in Wiki, so all with access can change it, please change typos etc directly, but let us discuss changes in the tone/meaning. Rgds jan I Jan -- I think this report is fine as it stands. But I don't understand this sentence The HP depend on the features of CMS. under Issues. What is HP? Other than that...OK. -- - MzK “What is the point of being alive if you don't at least try to do something remarkable?” -- John Green, An Abundance of Katherines - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Board report proposal, please comment before April 5.
On 03/30/2015 02:52 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 03/30/2015 11:41 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 03/30/2015 09:36 AM, jan i wrote: Hi all Time for my first AOO Board report. I have prepared the board report see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2015+Mar You might notice that I prefer to use a much more direct tone, than Andrea did. That is NOT to say that Andrea did something wrong. You might also notice the layout is different, it is to make it fit the new reporter tool, which I wrote about earlier. I believe we are approaching a situation where we need board involvement, and therefore I prefer to show board to facts, so they are more prepared when/if we decide to ask for more. Please also be aware that the fact that we in reality have done nothing with Digital Signing and the MAC boxes, are things that partly will fall back on Infra (they spent quite a USD amount on us last year for these items) and therefore influence future requests from us. My intention is to commit the board report to the agenda April 5 (end of this week). Clearly if we have discussions that needs to be settled before committing the final report. The report is in Wiki, so all with access can change it, please change typos etc directly, but let us discuss changes in the tone/meaning. Rgds jan I Jan -- I think this report is fine as it stands. But I don't understand this sentence The HP depend on the features of CMS. under Issues. What is HP? Other than that...OK. that means homepage. ;-) Marcus Thank you! -- - MzK “What is the point of being alive if you don't at least try to do something remarkable?” -- John Green, An Abundance of Katherines - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: cwiki content.
Am 03/30/2015 07:14 PM, schrieb jan i: I just took some time looking at the content of the cwiki, and have a few suggestions: I suggest we remove: Project planning, page states *Warning: this page refers to the Incubation phase, ended in October 2012. *Either we should have a real project plan in there or remove it. Actually a lot of the top level pages have not been touched since 2011. I recomend we move (not delete) all top level pages below a new page archive, so we can see in the menu system what is actually in use. thouughts ? sounds reasonable. Spring is coming, so let's do a little spring-cleaning. There is already a page archive. BTW: When working on this please move the entry archive to the end of the navigation area. It shouldn't be one of the first entries there. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: cwiki content.
On 03/30/2015 10:14 AM, jan i wrote: Hi. I just took some time looking at the content of the cwiki, and have a few suggestions: I suggest we remove: Project planning, page states *Warning: this page refers to the Incubation phase, ended in October 2012. *Either we should have a real project plan in there or remove it. Actually a lot of the top level pages have not been touched since 2011. I recomend we move (not delete) all top level pages below a new page archive, so we can see in the menu system what is actually in use. thouughts ? rgds jan I I would be in favor of removing the warning statement from the CWIKI Project Planning page, but nothing else until we take a longer look. Some of the information under this can be archived but this would make the information more difficult to find if we needed it. -- - MzK “What is the point of being alive if you don't at least try to do something remarkable?” -- John Green, An Abundance of Katherines - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
