RE: problem with web site staging build
Hello, We saw there was a problem with buildbot about the consultants listing for infolearn”. Is there anything we can do? Should we reapply/resend? This is the infolearn XML file ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? consultants consultant nameinfolearn - TEST4U.eu/name countryGlobal/country practiceCertification/practice practiceTraining/practice practiceDevelopment/practice description Infolearn offers a complete range of Apache OpenOffice (Writer, Calc, Impress, Base) in-application tests through TEST4U. TEST4U is an automated test which cooperates with the actual applications instead of flash simulation and can be used to: - prepare the students for certification examinations (e.g. ECDL/ICDL, DIPLOMA etc) - train and assess employees. TEST4U with its 700 000 users and 7 000 000 000 (yes 7 billion) served questions since 2003 is worldwide the only application that works with all these applications in a real working environment. /description websitehttps://www.test4u.eu/en/e-tests/apache-openoffice/website emaili...@test4u.eu/email phone+30 2310 888 771/phone /consultant /consultants Greeting from Greece The TEST4U Team -Original Message- From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2015 8:01 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: problem with web site staging build On 07/26/2015 12:48 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 25/07/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: I just committed the new consultants listing for infolearn to /openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/bizdev/consultants.html and much to my surprise, The buldbot has erred out. See info at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ooo-site-site-staging/builds/6/steps/c ompile/logs/stdio Reading the logs, it seems this has nothing to do with your specific updated, but rather with two filenames that use non-ASCII characters. I've fixed the two reported ones (well this is not necessarily a bug in the file names; they always worked so far, so this may be an issue with the new buildbot setup) to check: http://svn.apache.org/r1692695 http://svn.apache.org/r1692696 Let's see if this gets rid of warnings. The affected files were unused (even if I took care of renaming where helpful) and had names like (hoping they get rendered correctly in mail clients): excepții.css with a special t and ProjectMembersh…equestHelp.html with a literal ... character, of course due to some mistake. Regards, Andrea. Thanks for looking deeper into this, Andrea. The most recent buildbot log indicates we still have issues. So, it does look like a new issue with the buildbot setup at this point. -- MzK Way down deep, we're all motivated by the same urges. Cats have the courage to live by them. -- Jim Davis - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --- Αυτό το e-mail ελέγχθηκε για ιούς από το πρόγραμμα Avast antivirus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Please review unmatched closing tag in exported XHTML
The tag has no use for xml (DIV) and the comment before says it should be the end of the block before, yet an individual self-closing div comes, and breaks HTML browsers (divs need to be balanced, and it makes pages to appear nested the previous page). https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126398 Thanks. Sergio Zambrano Graphic artist - Web developer Ph: 1 (786) 554-0864 Skype: zambrano_sergio socialblogsitewebdesign.com
Re: [DISCUSS] RE: [DISCUSS] Calendar for New chair of AOO
On Thursday, July 30, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: It looks like two mileposts are the same, with August 16 (17 days from now) including Discuss. they are only partly the same. new candidates ends august 16th, giving the PMC tine to discuss. I suggest that the Discussion ends August 23 be removed. If you do that candidates entering the last days have hardly time to be discussed. I suggest that we can then have Voting ends backed up to August 28, 12 days from August 16. ok with me, if there is PMC consensus. This allows some slack time in case there is more to figure out before submitting the resolution to the board by Saturday, September 5. (Also, please note that this is on a major Holiday weekend in the United States, with Monday September 7 being the US Labor Day celebration.) board meeting is later, september 5th is my deadline for personal reasons. Rgds jan i - Dennis -Original Message- From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org javascript:;] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 03:39 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org javascript:; Subject: [DISCUSS] Would you like to be the new chair of AOO ? Hi. I will resign at the board meeting in September, so the current schedule looks like: Accept/Nominate/Discuss candidates until August 16th Discussion ends August 23th Voting ends September 4th Resolution send to board September 5th. New chair takes over immediately after the board meeting. [ ... ] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org javascript:; For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org javascript:; -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
Forecast for changes on AOO
Hi people I am returning slow. We have preview for new changes and versions ? Because ~one year old (2014-08-21) we were still AOO 4.0.1 [0]. 0 - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.1+Release+Notes -- Albino B Neto twitter.com/b1n0anb Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom! faw - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Would you like to be the new chair of AOO ?
Hi Dennis I have absolutely no problem with your changes as long as September 5th remain unchanged. however as we both know, the opinion thst I should follow the idea of a single persone have been raised quite direct in private, do could you please endure PMC consensus to the proposal. With consensus I willchabfe it imidiatly. rgds jan i On Thursday, July 30, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: This is not a nomination statement. It is a comment and a procedural suggestion. COMMENT Jan, I am certain that you gave deep consideration to your decision to resign. I trust that you have other pursuits that are more satisfying and that you can now provide full devotion to. I wish you good fortune in all endeavors that you commit your considerable energies to. For me, your continued participation on the PMC, at whatever level you choose, will be welcome. PROPOSAL Two things, 1. If there is only one nominee at the end of discussion, I suggest that a (5-day or 7-day) lazy consensus period, not a [VOTE], be conducted for that candidate. This allows discussion on the specific candidate, including response to any objections, and the achievement of consensus without the awful situation that Louis Suarez-Potts endured in the previous determination of a Chair recommendation. 2. I think candidates should be current PMC members (although that could simply be a matter of stated qualifications in the process we are starting now). I base that on neither of the previous candidates being current PMC members. I found, for myself, on joining the PMC after the previous election, that I was definitely missing background and understanding of the status of the PMC and issues it was being faced with. I also missed seeing the way the outgoing Chair (i.e., Andrea Pescetti) provided examples as a PMC Chair. For those who consider this role, please consult and embrace the definition of PMC Chair responsibilities at https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair. - Dennis -Original Message- From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org javascript:;] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 03:39 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org javascript:; Subject: [DISCUSS] Would you like to be the new chair of AOO ? Hi. I will resign at the board meeting in September, so the current schedule looks like: Accept/Nominate/Discuss candidates until August 16th Discussion ends August 23th Voting ends September 4th Resolution send to board September 5th. New chair takes over immediately after the board meeting. [ ... ] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org javascript:; For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org javascript:; -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
Re: Forecast for changes on AOO
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Albino B Neto b...@riseup.net wrote: Hi people I am returning slow. We have preview for new changes and versions ? Because ~one year old (2014-08-21) we were still AOO 4.0.1 [0]. 0 - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.1+Release+Notes -- Albino B Neto twitter.com/b1n0anb Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom! faw Welcome back! We've been having some issues with buildbots lately, but the development builds we have can be obtained from: https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ We are working on a 4.1.2 release right now so everything you find in 4.2.0 builds will not be in 4.1.2. -- - MzK “The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” --Lao Tzu
English Dictionaries - Issue with Extension site
Hello! I was doing the monthly update and after uploading the OXT and filling-up the fields, I attempted to download it in order to check if it was working. It opened the usual SourceForge page but I got a warning on Firefox that the file wasn't found. So, I tried to reupload it and republish it and then unpublish the first one. I got a warning: This extension is currently not published, please contact the system administrator at aooad...@users.sourceforge.net to have it published. Now I can only access the extension page when I am logged in, otherwise I get an Access Denied: http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice I have already e-mailed the SourceForge guy but I was wondering if someone with administrator rights could make it work? Thanks! Kind regards, Marco A.G.Pinto -- --
T-Dose 2015 - Helpers wanted
Hello, T-DOSE is a free and yearly event held in The Netherlands to promote use and development of Free Software. This years event will be held on 28 and 29 November 2015 at the Fontys University of Applied Science in Eindhoven. Like in the last years Apache OpenOffice will have a booth there. Mechtilde und I will organize that booth. Helpers wanted! Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: problem with web site staging build
Am 07/30/2015 04:38 PM, schrieb | Stelios Lambropoulos |: We saw there was a problem with buildbot about the consultants listing for infolearn”. Is there anything we can do? Should we reapply/resend? thanks for coming back to this. Yes, it was already added to the SVN repository where the website is managed. But there is a little problem to get this also to the production webserver. There is nothing more you need to do. IMHO we need some more patience to get the problem fixed - especially now in the summer and therefore vacation time. @Andrea: Do you have a response from the Infra team - or a JIRA issue? Thanks Marcus -Original Message- From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2015 8:01 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: problem with web site staging build On 07/26/2015 12:48 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 25/07/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: I just committed the new consultants listing for infolearn to /openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/bizdev/consultants.html and much to my surprise, The buldbot has erred out. See info at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ooo-site-site-staging/builds/6/steps/c ompile/logs/stdio Reading the logs, it seems this has nothing to do with your specific updated, but rather with two filenames that use non-ASCII characters. I've fixed the two reported ones (well this is not necessarily a bug in the file names; they always worked so far, so this may be an issue with the new buildbot setup) to check: http://svn.apache.org/r1692695 http://svn.apache.org/r1692696 Let's see if this gets rid of warnings. The affected files were unused (even if I took care of renaming where helpful) and had names like (hoping they get rendered correctly in mail clients): excepții.css with a special t and ProjectMembersh…equestHelp.html with a literal ... character, of course due to some mistake. Regards, Andrea. Thanks for looking deeper into this, Andrea. The most recent buildbot log indicates we still have issues. So, it does look like a new issue with the buildbot setup at this point. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Starting Introduction to Contributing to Apache OpenOffice Module
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Ali Abbassi love_future_4w...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi my name is Ali looking to participate in open office project Welcome Ali. We suggest that new volunteers go through our Orientation modules: http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/index.html They will give you an overview of how the Apache Software Foundation works, and direct you to some areas of interest in Apache OpenOffice. We are to help make your volunteer experience successful! Sent from my iPhone -- - MzK “The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” --Lao Tzu
[DISCUSS] RE: [DISCUSS] Would you like to be the new chair of AOO ?
This is not a nomination statement. It is a comment and a procedural suggestion. COMMENT Jan, I am certain that you gave deep consideration to your decision to resign. I trust that you have other pursuits that are more satisfying and that you can now provide full devotion to. I wish you good fortune in all endeavors that you commit your considerable energies to. For me, your continued participation on the PMC, at whatever level you choose, will be welcome. PROPOSAL Two things, 1. If there is only one nominee at the end of discussion, I suggest that a (5-day or 7-day) lazy consensus period, not a [VOTE], be conducted for that candidate. This allows discussion on the specific candidate, including response to any objections, and the achievement of consensus without the awful situation that Louis Suarez-Potts endured in the previous determination of a Chair recommendation. 2. I think candidates should be current PMC members (although that could simply be a matter of stated qualifications in the process we are starting now). I base that on neither of the previous candidates being current PMC members. I found, for myself, on joining the PMC after the previous election, that I was definitely missing background and understanding of the status of the PMC and issues it was being faced with. I also missed seeing the way the outgoing Chair (i.e., Andrea Pescetti) provided examples as a PMC Chair. For those who consider this role, please consult and embrace the definition of PMC Chair responsibilities at https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair. - Dennis -Original Message- From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 03:39 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Would you like to be the new chair of AOO ? Hi. I will resign at the board meeting in September, so the current schedule looks like: Accept/Nominate/Discuss candidates until August 16th Discussion ends August 23th Voting ends September 4th Resolution send to board September 5th. New chair takes over immediately after the board meeting. [ ... ] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: [DISCUSS] RE: [DISCUSS] Calendar for New chair of AOO
It looks like two mileposts are the same, with August 16 (17 days from now) including Discuss. I suggest that the Discussion ends August 23 be removed. I suggest that we can then have Voting ends backed up to August 28, 12 days from August 16. This allows some slack time in case there is more to figure out before submitting the resolution to the board by Saturday, September 5. (Also, please note that this is on a major Holiday weekend in the United States, with Monday September 7 being the US Labor Day celebration.) - Dennis -Original Message- From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 03:39 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Would you like to be the new chair of AOO ? Hi. I will resign at the board meeting in September, so the current schedule looks like: Accept/Nominate/Discuss candidates until August 16th Discussion ends August 23th Voting ends September 4th Resolution send to board September 5th. New chair takes over immediately after the board meeting. [ ... ] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[DISCUSS] Would you like to be the new chair of AOO ?
Hi. I will resign at the board meeting in September, so the current schedule looks like: Accept/Nominate/Discuss candidates until August 16th Discussion ends August 23th Voting ends September 4th Resolution send to board September 5th. New chair takes over immediately after the board meeting. The reason for my resignation is an ongoing disagreement between part of the PMC and myself. I expected the PMC to be willing to make changes when I was elected, but at least my way seems to be counterproductive. The 2 main discrepancies are: - the board reports which, even though discussed publicly, have been the cause of negative discussions after being sent to board - the attempt to make a cooperation with LO, caused many discussions, but ended with adding restrictions, that made it impossible for me to continue the attempt. I do not want to go deeper into details, since it does not help finding a new chair. As a volunteer I want to work, where the work makes a positive difference, and not cause endless negative discussions. I hope a new chair can help unite the PMC and help drive the project forward. The PMC was informed about this July 24th, and after some discussions, the time has come to find new candidates. Please use this mail thread to announce yourself as a candidate, or to nominate someone else (remark that person must state whether or not the nomination is accepted). There are no formal limits to being a nominee, apart from committer status. The rules for the vote, will depend on the number of candidates but is basically a majority vote, with PMC votes being binding. rgds jan i.
