Re: Strange error while building OO for windows
I tried to build OpenOffice from svn's AOO413 tag today, this time successful. Still i have to say that the wiki page with step-by-step guide has some errors that i had to deal with(or it's outdated a bit). Things that I encountered so far: 1. Suggested ./configure option list in the wiki is missing a compulsory "--disable-directx" option(in case you are not building with DirectX of course). This is a minor complaint, as the ./configure script will inform you about missing options. 2. AOO413 build process will terminate with an error when running javadoc on some Java sources - most likely due to this breaking change in JDK8: http://blog.joda.org/2014/02/turning-off-doclint-in-jdk-8-javadoc.html. As result, building AOO413 with jdk8 seems impossible if there isn't an easy way to forward -Xdoclint:none option to javadoc. JDK 7 works. 3. It could be helpful to write somewhere in build instructions that dmake doesn't try to rebuild failed modules automatically if they aren't recognised as "changed". I only noticed this while reading https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Debug_Build_Problems, and AFAIK every other build system behaves differently(nmake, cmake/qmake, make ...) Building with symbols/debug mode enabled right now, should finish by tomorrow morning. Then i'll do something with it. 2017-05-01 13:50 GMT+02:00 Pavel Belski : > Hi all, > > currently i'm trying to build Open Office from svn sources, closely > following the guide in https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/ > Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7.2C_Windows_8.1.2C_Windows_10. > The trunk revision i currently have is > > Pavel@Pavel-PC /cygdrive/c/oosources/aoo-trunk > $ svn info > Pfad: . > Wurzelpfad der Arbeitskopie: /cygdrive/c/oosources/aoo-trunk > URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk > Relative URL: ^/openoffice/trunk > Basis des Projektarchivs: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf > UUID des Projektarchivs: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 > Revision: 1793265 > Knotentyp: Verzeichnis > Plan: normal > Letzter Autor: mseidel > Letzte geänderte Rev: 1793216 > Letztes Änderungsdatum: 2017-04-29 18:32:21 +0200 (Sa, 29. Apr 2017) > > Steps that are marked as "optional" on the Wiki page i skipped except for > usage of dbghelp.dll(i configured with --enable-dbgutil). While trying to > build with "build --all" everything goes fine until this: > > = > Building module gtest > = > > Entering /cygdrive/c/oosources/aoo-trunk/ext_libraries/gtest > > mkdir: cannot create directory './wntmsci12/misc/build/gtest-1.7.0/': > File exists > C:/oosources/aoo-trunk/main/solenv/gbuild/Package.mk:28: *** > gb_Deliver_deliver: file does not exist in solver, and cannot b. Stop.red: > /cygdrive/c/oosources/aoo-trunk/main/solver/420/ > wntmsci12/inc/gtest/gtest.h > dmake: Error code 2, while making './wntmsci12/misc/build/so_ > built_oo_gtest' > > 1 module(s): > gtest > need(s) to be rebuilt > > Reason(s): > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /cygdrive/c/oosources/aoo- > trunk/ext_libraries/gtest > > When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by > running: > > build --all:gtest > > As i understand it couldn't build some module and so doesn't find it on > the "deliver" step. The thing is, i don't see any compiler/linker error > messages and so have no idea what's up with this and where do i even start > trying to figure it out i also have no clue. Is this even something wrong > on my end or perhaps the svn trunk i have is unbuildable. What is OO dev > policy on acceptable build status of svn trunk revisions? > > Any ideas on what i should do next? >
Re: 4.1.4 blockers (Was: Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4))
Am 02.05.2017 um 23:51 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 02.05.2017 um 13:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski: On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: If we decide to get the new ASF logos for the installer, we should also update the setup icons for Windows/macOS and the Intro/About Dialog. But there has been a discussion with Andrea and Marcus whether to include such things or not... correct, new graphics cannot be a blocker for a release. Except the existing ones are broken. But this is not the case here. Sorry, but we should clearly think twice if a change is necessary for a bugfix release. Every change has its own risk. My 2 ct. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.4 blockers (Was: Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4))
Am 02.05.2017 um 13:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Raphael, >> >> Thank you for your effort! >> Hopefully Ariel will still be able to assist, but it is really time for a >> 4.1.4 RC. >> >> May I suggest that these "release blocker" should also be merged: >> >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127253 >> (Update the banners with the new ASF Logo) > +1: It would be nice to have a complete list of changes required to > backport from trunk though. Matthias if you want to go ahead and > handle this, +1 from me. If we decide to get the new ASF logos for the installer, we should also update the setup icons for Windows/macOS and the Intro/About Dialog. But there has been a discussion with Andrea and Marcus whether to include such things or not... First all commits for the Windows/macOS installer (including the initial commit from Raphael): r1774839 r1782101 r1782134 r1782198 r1782401 r1782502 r1783420 r1783943 r1784016 Now the commits for the setup icons (Windows/macOS): r1791897 r1792733 Finally the commit for the Intro-Screen/About-Dialog: r1791815 >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24 >> (Java not recognized after update to AOO 4.1.3) > REOPENED. > >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127341 >> (Update bundled dictionaries for AOO 4.1.4 release) >> > +1 as well... > >r1784925 r1784961 r1785175 r1793216 > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: 4.1.4 blockers (Was: Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4))
Jim Jagielski wrote: On May 2, 2017, at 7:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127341 (Update bundled dictionaries for AOO 4.1.4 release) +1 as well... r1784925 r1784961 r1785175 r1793216 Backported to 4.1.4... It seems the Bugzilla bot was confused and didn't annotate the issue properly in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1793492 This is a bit of a mess. I've fixed it in the issue page. Probably, for next commits, you'd better ensure that "#i127341# Updated English dictionary" (or equivalent) is the first line of the commit, or manually post a comment to the issue as I did. Note: Ariel is the release manager so the "+" to the blocker should come from him. But since he's been unresponsive on the matter, and this is an obvious blocker, I felt right to go ahead and use my release manager privileges (left from 4.1.2) to mark the issue as a blocker myself. For other ones like the logo I would suggest a normal process like: the issue is nominated as blocker (set to "?"), consensus is built on the list and if nobody opposes in the standard 72 hours then someone with the right privileges accepts the issue as blocker (set to "+") and then code can be backported. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.4_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127341] Update bundled dictionaries for AOO 4.1.4 release
Andrea Pescetti has granted Matthias Seidel 's request for 4.1.4_release_blocker: Issue 127341: Update bundled dictionaries for AOO 4.1.4 release https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127341 --- Comment #6 from Andrea Pescetti --- Merged by jim to the AOO414 branch for OpenOffice 4.1.4 with r1793492 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1793492 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Centos5 builds (Was: Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4))
Jim Jagielski wrote: FWIW, I've kicked off a CentOS5.11 x64 build on my VM. My CentOS 64 builds are online and confirmed to be working by others who use it for daily tasks (see archives of this list, or just ask if you need a link). Unless you see a reason for making alternate ones, I think Windows would be a wiser investment of time. I've updated the wiki build page (https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step) with some updates, most due to CentOS5 is now EOL and some urls have changed. Plus, I needed to manually install File::Path So this would be https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation%2FBuilding_Guide_AOO%2FStep_by_step&diff=237941&oldid=237939 The new dependency is strange since I didn't recall needing it, but it might have come with some other component in case. And yes, the fact that CentOS 5 becomes unsupported is the reason for me to ask to modify our baseline in future (again, see archives of this list); but for sure not for 4.1.4. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Centos5 builds (Was: Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4))
Am 02.05.2017 um 22:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Since I'm not doing a Windows build, I assume we don't need to install > it and have it part of the SVN tag?? I am not so familiar with the procedure, but that sounds reasonable. So whoever does the Windows builds has to make sure to include msvcr100.dll, 32bit, version 10.00.40219.325 I think this is the most recent one and use it with AOO 4.1.3 on Windows for several month. > >> On May 2, 2017, at 3:35 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Am 02.05.2017 um 21:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski: On May 2, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Jim, https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24 We only have to make sure, that we bundle the most recent msvcr100.dll (32bit) for the windows build. (see: .../main/external/msvcp100/README_msvcX100.dll.txt) >>> Thx for the info, but I am totally Windows ignorant. When I go >>> to the link in the BZ page >>> >>> https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/download/details.aspx?id=26999 >>> >>> I get to a MS page where I click download and I get choices for 3 .exe >>> files, no .dll file. >>> >>> According to the BZ page, I should be able to: >>> >>> This should be updated to version 10.0.40219.325 from: >>> https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/download/details.aspx?id=26999 >>> for the 4.1.4 Release Candidate. >>> >>> So any help here would be appreciated! >> Yes, one of the 3 files (vcredist_x86.exe) is the runtime for 32bit. >> >> I installed it in a VM to get at the dll. >> >> I can send you a copy, but it is only used in the Windows builds... >> >> Regards, Matthias P.S.: I will come back later with a full list of commits for the ASF logos... >>> V. Cool. Thx! >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Centos5 builds (Was: Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4))
Since I'm not doing a Windows build, I assume we don't need to install it and have it part of the SVN tag?? > On May 2, 2017, at 3:35 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 02.05.2017 um 21:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> On May 2, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24 >>> >>> We only have to make sure, that we bundle the most recent msvcr100.dll >>> (32bit) for the windows build. >>> (see: .../main/external/msvcp100/README_msvcX100.dll.txt) >> Thx for the info, but I am totally Windows ignorant. When I go >> to the link in the BZ page >> >> https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/download/details.aspx?id=26999 >> >> I get to a MS page where I click download and I get choices for 3 .exe >> files, no .dll file. >> >> According to the BZ page, I should be able to: >> >> This should be updated to version 10.0.40219.325 from: >> https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/download/details.aspx?id=26999 >> for the 4.1.4 Release Candidate. >> >> So any help here would be appreciated! > > Yes, one of the 3 files (vcredist_x86.exe) is the runtime for 32bit. > > I installed it in a VM to get at the dll. > > I can send you a copy, but it is only used in the Windows builds... > > >> >>> Regards, Matthias >>> >>> P.S.: I will come back later with a full list of commits for the ASF >>> logos... >>> >> V. Cool. Thx! >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Centos5 builds (Was: Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4))
Am 02.05.2017 um 21:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> On May 2, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24 >> >> We only have to make sure, that we bundle the most recent msvcr100.dll >> (32bit) for the windows build. >> (see: .../main/external/msvcp100/README_msvcX100.dll.txt) > Thx for the info, but I am totally Windows ignorant. When I go > to the link in the BZ page > > https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/download/details.aspx?id=26999 > > I get to a MS page where I click download and I get choices for 3 .exe > files, no .dll file. > > According to the BZ page, I should be able to: > >This should be updated to version 10.0.40219.325 from: > https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/download/details.aspx?id=26999 >for the 4.1.4 Release Candidate. > > So any help here would be appreciated! Yes, one of the 3 files (vcredist_x86.exe) is the runtime for 32bit. I installed it in a VM to get at the dll. I can send you a copy, but it is only used in the Windows builds... > >> Regards, Matthias >> >> P.S.: I will come back later with a full list of commits for the ASF >> logos... >> > V. Cool. Thx! > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Centos5 builds (Was: Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4))
> On May 2, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24 > > We only have to make sure, that we bundle the most recent msvcr100.dll > (32bit) for the windows build. > (see: .../main/external/msvcp100/README_msvcX100.dll.txt) Thx for the info, but I am totally Windows ignorant. When I go to the link in the BZ page https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/download/details.aspx?id=26999 I get to a MS page where I click download and I get choices for 3 .exe files, no .dll file. According to the BZ page, I should be able to: This should be updated to version 10.0.40219.325 from: https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/download/details.aspx?id=26999 for the 4.1.4 Release Candidate. So any help here would be appreciated! > Regards, Matthias > > P.S.: I will come back later with a full list of commits for the ASF > logos... > V. Cool. Thx! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Centos5 builds (Was: Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4))
Hi Jim, https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24 We only have to make sure, that we bundle the most recent msvcr100.dll (32bit) for the windows build. (see: .../main/external/msvcp100/README_msvcX100.dll.txt) Regards, Matthias P.S.: I will come back later with a full list of commits for the ASF logos... Am 02.05.2017 um 20:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Went OK... Will now kick off a x32 build... > > These are test builds, since we still have 2 backports pending:: > >> On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Raphael, >> >> Thank you for your effort! >> Hopefully Ariel will still be able to assist, but it is really time for a >> 4.1.4 RC. >> >> May I suggest that these "release blocker" should also be merged: >> >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127253 >> (Update the banners with the new ASF Logo) > +1: It would be nice to have a complete list of changes required to > backport from trunk though. Matthias if you want to go ahead and > handle this, +1 from me. > > >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24 >> (Java not recognized after update to AOO 4.1.3) > REOPENED. > > >> On May 2, 2017, at 9:27 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> FWIW, I've kicked off a CentOS5.11 x64 build on my VM. >> >> I've updated the wiki build page >> (https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step) >> with some updates, most due to CentOS5 is now EOL and some urls >> have changed. Plus, I needed to manually install File::Path >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Centos5 builds (Was: Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4))
Went OK... Will now kick off a x32 build... These are test builds, since we still have 2 backports pending:: > On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Raphael, > > Thank you for your effort! > Hopefully Ariel will still be able to assist, but it is really time for a > 4.1.4 RC. > > May I suggest that these "release blocker" should also be merged: > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127253 > (Update the banners with the new ASF Logo) +1: It would be nice to have a complete list of changes required to backport from trunk though. Matthias if you want to go ahead and handle this, +1 from me. > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24 > (Java not recognized after update to AOO 4.1.3) REOPENED. > On May 2, 2017, at 9:27 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > FWIW, I've kicked off a CentOS5.11 x64 build on my VM. > > I've updated the wiki build page > (https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step) > with some updates, most due to CentOS5 is now EOL and some urls > have changed. Plus, I needed to manually install File::Path > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Apache OpenOffice NG
On 5/2/2017 8:42 AM, Jorg Schmidt wrote: From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] The issue that I see is that our end-user community is not the same as, for example, subversion... I would hazard that the vast majority of AOO users have no idea what "open source" means and the distinction between being a source-only project and "source-only-but-we-also-provide- community-builds" would be lost on them... +1 Jorg Currently, if someone finds advertising or malware in their AOO installation we can tell them to download AOO only through our download link. What would we do in that situation if we did not provide downloadable binaries? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Apache OpenOffice NG
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > The issue that I see is that our end-user community is not the same > as, for example, subversion... I would hazard that the vast majority > of AOO users have no idea what "open source" means and the distinction > between being a source-only project and > "source-only-but-we-also-provide- > community-builds" would be lost on them... +1 Jorg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.4 blockers (Was: Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4))
> On May 2, 2017, at 7:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127341 >> (Update bundled dictionaries for AOO 4.1.4 release) >> > > +1 as well... > > r1784925 r1784961 r1785175 r1793216 > Backported to 4.1.4... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Centos5 builds (Was: Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4))
FWIW, I've kicked off a CentOS5.11 x64 build on my VM. I've updated the wiki build page (https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step) with some updates, most due to CentOS5 is now EOL and some urls have changed. Plus, I needed to manually install File::Path - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Centos5 builds (Was: Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4))
I have 2 CentOS5 VMs setup, one 32bit the other 64. Is anyone else on task for doing 4.1.4 build for these platforms or should I give it a go? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.4 blockers (Was: Re: Release 4.1.3 (4.1.4))
> On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Raphael, > > Thank you for your effort! > Hopefully Ariel will still be able to assist, but it is really time for a > 4.1.4 RC. > > May I suggest that these "release blocker" should also be merged: > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127253 > (Update the banners with the new ASF Logo) +1: It would be nice to have a complete list of changes required to backport from trunk though. Matthias if you want to go ahead and handle this, +1 from me. > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127176#c24 > (Java not recognized after update to AOO 4.1.3) REOPENED. > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127341 > (Update bundled dictionaries for AOO 4.1.4 release) > +1 as well... r1784925 r1784961 r1785175 r1793216 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Apache OpenOffice NG
Exactly. It seems just a distraction to me, unless I've missed hidden or untold bonus points. R 2017-05-02 13:11 GMT+02:00 Jim Jagielski : > The issue that I see is that our end-user community is not the same > as, for example, subversion... I would hazard that the vast majority > of AOO users have no idea what "open source" means and the distinction > between being a source-only project and "source-only-but-we-also-provide- > community-builds" would be lost on them... > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
Re: Apache OpenOffice NG
The issue that I see is that our end-user community is not the same as, for example, subversion... I would hazard that the vast majority of AOO users have no idea what "open source" means and the distinction between being a source-only project and "source-only-but-we-also-provide- community-builds" would be lost on them... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
