Re: Does OpenOffice still use Serf?
How about trying to open an URL as a test case? Is serf moving away from SCONs? I ask since we want to move to SCONs. An experience exchange would be great. All the best Peter Am 13. November 2018 22:43:03 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel : >Hi Andrea, > >Am 13.11.18 um 22:23 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> I think it would be a good idea to upgrade Serf in our builds. >>> What about the others (real developers)? ;-) >> >> Years ago, we had to avoid upgrading Serf in 4.1.x as Serf had >started >> to require SCons for the build and we didn't want to introduce yet >> another build system since we already had too many. >> >> I see it still requires SCons, but probably we've included support >for >> SCons in trunk in the meantime, so... well, we decided we can live >> with yet another build system! Still, I doubt we can use it for 4.1.x >> as SCons integration would be needed and I don't think we support it >> in 4.1.x. > >I forgot to mention that I indeed build with trunk. And the build is >still going on, so anything can happen... ;-) > >I will keep you updated! > >Regards, > > Matthias > >> >> Regards, >> Andrea. >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: starting 4.1.7 and 4.2.0 Releases
Am 13.11.18 um 00:58 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 13.11.18 um 00:48 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Peter Kovacs wrote: I do not see your issue. Our release team works much faster then the dev team progresses on 4.2.0. There is a major difference between a 4.1.x and a new release like 4.2.0: for 4.2.0 we need the entire community, not only what you call the "release team" and developers (read: localization efforts, organized QA efforts, a possible public beta, a baseline update...). If you believe that 4.2.0 is only for developers you are underestimating the task. A 4.1.7 will keep the routine and knowledge active while we develop 4.2.0. We have many millions of users. We must provide some value with a release. This meant waiting 11 months (and counting) between 4.1.5 and 4.1.6; if 4.1.6 has no major regressions, we can surely wait some months before considering a 4.1.7 (again, in a non-emergency situation). But I would really like that we stop talking about this virtual 4.1.7 release and actually release 4.1.6 for real. Peter wanted to move the Release from the dev to the release area soon. I have already created a staged directory at SourceForge, so we can upload the binaries there. After that I think Marcus can test his new scripts for the download (test) page? sure, when the files are available I would like to test it. And as discussed before, we should simply copy the Release Notes from 4.1.5 and update them for 4.1.6. If nobody else is volunteering I can do it. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: starting 4.1.7 and 4.2.0 Releases
Am 13.11.18 um 08:04 schrieb Peter Kovacs: Release is now in the svn branch. I remove tonight the 4.1.5 release, any objections? So how much time do we need? is release date 16th November feasable? if there is no good reason against it, I would move this always to the weekend, as I think the most people can spend more time for a release than within the week with 1-2 hours in the evening. So, Saturday (btw, which time?) would fit better - at least for me for the download website. Marcus On 13.11.18 01:30, Peter Kovacs wrote: Andrea, I am just saying a 4.1.7 release has nothing to do with the efforts we have to organize for 4.2.0. I hope I upload now into the right place, but I have initiated the task. All the best Peter On 13.11.18 00:48, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Peter Kovacs wrote: I do not see your issue. Our release team works much faster then the dev team progresses on 4.2.0. There is a major difference between a 4.1.x and a new release like 4.2.0: for 4.2.0 we need the entire community, not only what you call the "release team" and developers (read: localization efforts, organized QA efforts, a possible public beta, a baseline update...). If you believe that 4.2.0 is only for developers you are underestimating the task. A 4.1.7 will keep the routine and knowledge active while we develop 4.2.0. We have many millions of users. We must provide some value with a release. This meant waiting 11 months (and counting) between 4.1.5 and 4.1.6; if 4.1.6 has no major regressions, we can surely wait some months before considering a 4.1.7 (again, in a non-emergency situation). But I would really like that we stop talking about this virtual 4.1.7 release and actually release 4.1.6 for real. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Linux icon changes in 4.1.6
Hi Andrea,
Am 13.11.18 um 21:54 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> This is not necessarily a bug, but I'd like to check on this: on
> Linux-64 (I haven't tried on other systems), if you are editing a file
> in Writer you'll get two different toolbar icons in 4.1.5 and 4.1.6.
Which desktop environment do you use?
Linux has so many different ones and on Ubuntu 18.04 (Gnome) it looks
like this [1]. The main icon is the Orb and all applications are grouped
under it.
>
> Comparison screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/wtNhT9k
>
> In short:
> - 4.1.5 (left): the Writer icon is shown
> - 4.1.6 (right): the generic ("orb") icon is shown
This is not caused by the icon change itself but by an additional entry
in the startcenter.desktop file.
"StartupWMClass=OpenOffice 4.1.6"
If you remove it you get the "old" behavior (but also a blurry icon when
doing Alt-Tab).
>
> Was this done on purpose? I believe the old ones are more informative,
> as it usually happens to have, say, a Writer and a Calc document open
> at the same time.
Somehow on purpose, as it looked OK on all systems I could test...
>
> If your system does not come with a bottom toolbar, you will still
> notice the difference in the top toolbar by switching between the two
> instances.
Do you have by any chance something like "icon grouping" enabled?
>
> On the other hand, the new high-resolution icons look really nice, as
> I already noted.
I would only call them higher resolution icons... ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
[1] https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/Ubuntu%2018.04_AOO.png
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Does OpenOffice still use Serf?
> On November 13, 2018 at 10:08 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > 2. All WebDAV operations. You can find somewhere in Bugzilla a patch > that didn't make it to 4.1.2 due to excessive complexity (build > requirements). The Serf upgrade was meant to supplement WebDAV fixes in > 4.1.2. > > So you might want to focus testing on these two scenarios (the second > one will probably be tricky). I can help with testing this feature. I use AOO for editing files on a webdav folder. I use Windows 7 Pro, Ubuntu 16.04 and 18.04 (all x64) Let me know when the builds are ready ;) Regards, Pedro - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Does OpenOffice still use Serf?
Matthias Seidel wrote: I forgot to mention that I indeed build with trunk. And the build is still going on, so anything can happen... ;-) The current lack of time only allows me to contribute with memories from the past when I was actually able to do stuff... but if I recall correctly there are two important test scenarios where we use Serf: 1. Update checks for OpenOffice and extensions. 2. All WebDAV operations. You can find somewhere in Bugzilla a patch that didn't make it to 4.1.2 due to excessive complexity (build requirements). The Serf upgrade was meant to supplement WebDAV fixes in 4.1.2. So you might want to focus testing on these two scenarios (the second one will probably be tricky). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Linux icon changes in 4.1.6
Hagar Delest wrote: Are you talking about the desktop panel? I use Xubuntu (18.10 on 64bit) and I do see the Writer/Calc/... icons, not the orb. I see the difference more or less in every context where an icon is associated with the window in GNOME (so Xubuntu may be different). So for example: - in the bottom bar listing open windows (if you have it) - in the top bar next to the title of the active window - in the Alt-Tab dialog to switch windows see https://imgur.com/a/EM3yTpU where both 4.1.6 and 4.1.5 were open on an empty Writer document. This is not a bug, even though one might want to mention it in the Release Notes as a minor UI change. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Does OpenOffice still use Serf?
Hi Andrea, Am 13.11.18 um 22:23 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> I think it would be a good idea to upgrade Serf in our builds. >> What about the others (real developers)? ;-) > > Years ago, we had to avoid upgrading Serf in 4.1.x as Serf had started > to require SCons for the build and we didn't want to introduce yet > another build system since we already had too many. > > I see it still requires SCons, but probably we've included support for > SCons in trunk in the meantime, so... well, we decided we can live > with yet another build system! Still, I doubt we can use it for 4.1.x > as SCons integration would be needed and I don't think we support it > in 4.1.x. I forgot to mention that I indeed build with trunk. And the build is still going on, so anything can happen... ;-) I will keep you updated! Regards, Matthias > > Regards, > Andrea. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Does OpenOffice still use Serf?
On 13.11.2018 22:23, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> I think it would be a good idea to upgrade Serf in our builds. >> What about the others (real developers)? ;-) > > Years ago, we had to avoid upgrading Serf in 4.1.x as Serf had started > to require SCons for the build and we didn't want to introduce yet > another build system since we already had too many. I can surely relate to that ... > I see it still requires SCons, The 1.3.x branch does, but for 1.4.x and trunk, you can use CMake for most purposes. The CMake build currently doesn't support GSSAPI and BROTLI compression, but other than that it is (in my not so humble opinion) superior to the SCons build. > but probably we've included support for SCons in trunk in the > meantime, so... well, we decided we can live with yet another build > system! Still, I doubt we can use it for 4.1.x as SCons integration > would be needed and I don't think we support it in 4.1.x. That's OK, any kind of testing, even with OO trunk, would be welcome. The only other Serf consumer I can test is Subversion, adding even one more would make out real-life testing increase by 100%. :) -- Brane - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Linux icon changes in 4.1.6
Le 13/11/2018 à 21:54, Andrea Pescetti a écrit :
This is not necessarily a bug, but I'd like to check on this: on Linux-64 (I
haven't tried on other systems), if you are editing a file in Writer you'll get
two different toolbar icons in 4.1.5 and 4.1.6.
Comparison screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/wtNhT9k
In short:
- 4.1.5 (left): the Writer icon is shown
- 4.1.6 (right): the generic ("orb") icon is shown
Was this done on purpose? I believe the old ones are more informative, as it
usually happens to have, say, a Writer and a Calc document open at the same
time.
If your system does not come with a bottom toolbar, you will still notice the
difference in the top toolbar by switching between the two instances.
On the other hand, the new high-resolution icons look really nice, as I already
noted.
Regards,
Andrea.
Are you talking about the desktop panel? I use Xubuntu (18.10 on 64bit) and I
do see the Writer/Calc/... icons, not the orb.
Hagar
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Does OpenOffice still use Serf?
Matthias Seidel wrote: I think it would be a good idea to upgrade Serf in our builds. What about the others (real developers)? ;-) Years ago, we had to avoid upgrading Serf in 4.1.x as Serf had started to require SCons for the build and we didn't want to introduce yet another build system since we already had too many. I see it still requires SCons, but probably we've included support for SCons in trunk in the meantime, so... well, we decided we can live with yet another build system! Still, I doubt we can use it for 4.1.x as SCons integration would be needed and I don't think we support it in 4.1.x. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Does OpenOffice still use Serf?
On 13.11.2018 21:49, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Branko, Hi all, > > Am 13.11.18 um 12:39 schrieb Branko Čibej: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm writing here because I believe OpenOffice uses Serf as its HTTP >> client; at least I did find version 1.2.1 mentioned in the patch files >> in ext_libraries/serf. > It is even mentioned on your project page. ;-) Yes, and in our Board reports, one of which I posted today ... and that made me wonder and eventually write a mail to this list. :) -- Brane - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Linux icon changes in 4.1.6
This is not necessarily a bug, but I'd like to check on this: on
Linux-64 (I haven't tried on other systems), if you are editing a file
in Writer you'll get two different toolbar icons in 4.1.5 and 4.1.6.
Comparison screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/wtNhT9k
In short:
- 4.1.5 (left): the Writer icon is shown
- 4.1.6 (right): the generic ("orb") icon is shown
Was this done on purpose? I believe the old ones are more informative,
as it usually happens to have, say, a Writer and a Calc document open at
the same time.
If your system does not come with a bottom toolbar, you will still
notice the difference in the top toolbar by switching between the two
instances.
On the other hand, the new high-resolution icons look really nice, as I
already noted.
Regards,
Andrea.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Does OpenOffice still use Serf?
Hi Branko, Hi all, Am 13.11.18 um 12:39 schrieb Branko Čibej: > Hi all, > > I'm writing here because I believe OpenOffice uses Serf as its HTTP > client; at least I did find version 1.2.1 mentioned in the patch files > in ext_libraries/serf. It is even mentioned on your project page. ;-) > I would like to ask for help from the OpenOffice developers to test the > next release of Serf. We — the Apache Serf project — are in the (very > slow) process of finally releasing Serf version 1.4.0, and it would be > helpful if we could get some feedback from testing it. I would not call me a developer, but I just started a build of OpenOffice on Windows with Serf 1.3.9 (instead of 1.2.1). So far no problems. But I don't know where it is used and what to look for... > This version should be source-compatible with 1.2.1, but the build > system has been completely changed since then; the supported build uses > scons but there's also a fairly complete CMake build. Major improvements > include support for HTTP/2, FCGI, CRL, OCSP stapling and OCSP requests, > OpenSSL 1.1.x and and of course a large number of bug fixes. For > details, see: https://s.apache.org/9259 > > If you're able and willing to help, please respond here, or post to > . I think it would be a good idea to upgrade Serf in our builds. What about the others (real developers)? ;-) Regards, Matthias > Thanks! > > -- Brane > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: starting 4.1.7 and 4.2.0 Releases
Peter Kovacs wrote: I am just saying a 4.1.7 release has nothing to do with the efforts we have to organize for 4.2.0. OK, got it! Let's work together on finishing 4.1.6 and then we will have plenty of time for discussing about the next releases. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: starting 4.1.7 and 4.2.0 Releases
Am 13.11.18 um 08:39 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 13.11.18 um 08:04 schrieb Peter Kovacs: Release is now in the svn branch. I remove tonight the 4.1.5 release, any objections? If you speak of https://www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.5/ our project page [1] still points to it, so please wait until the page is updated after the final release... +1 In general, it would be good to have a working release at hand in case something is wrong with the new one and we need to do a (kind of) rollback. Marcus [1] https://openoffice.apache.org/downloads.html So how much time do we need? is release date 16th November feasable? On 13.11.18 01:30, Peter Kovacs wrote: Andrea, I am just saying a 4.1.7 release has nothing to do with the efforts we have to organize for 4.2.0. I hope I upload now into the right place, but I have initiated the task. All the best Peter On 13.11.18 00:48, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Peter Kovacs wrote: I do not see your issue. Our release team works much faster then the dev team progresses on 4.2.0. There is a major difference between a 4.1.x and a new release like 4.2.0: for 4.2.0 we need the entire community, not only what you call the "release team" and developers (read: localization efforts, organized QA efforts, a possible public beta, a baseline update...). If you believe that 4.2.0 is only for developers you are underestimating the task. A 4.1.7 will keep the routine and knowledge active while we develop 4.2.0. We have many millions of users. We must provide some value with a release. This meant waiting 11 months (and counting) between 4.1.5 and 4.1.6; if 4.1.6 has no major regressions, we can surely wait some months before considering a 4.1.7 (again, in a non-emergency situation). But I would really like that we stop talking about this virtual 4.1.7 release and actually release 4.1.6 for real. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Refresh Pootle for Translation 4.2
Mechtilde wrote: as already wrote, I try to work on translation update. Now I could get an actual *.sdf file from source code. Thanks, Mechtilde! Could you please start from my notes at https://s.apache.org/Dukc and copy them to a wiki page (or, if you don't like wiki, to a text file to be then copied to a wiki page) so that you can take advantage of what I already wrote and fix it? After preparing a build directory there I could start localize successful. OK, so for example my item 1 from the link above --- 1. A full checkout of trunk; I believe some of the tools are built during the build process, but I'm using a fully built tree anyway. --- should be improved to say that you don't actually need a full build (but you still need to initialize the build process). I could also create *.pot file with oo2po from *.sdf file. There I get many *.pot files in different directories. I assume you will be looking at German with more attention, right? I recommend to just start with one language, since having all SDF files is useless anyway (Pootle has only a selection of languages). Once we get a few languages working, generalizing won't be hard. Now I downloaded a *.zip file from Pootle with the previous German translation. Must I do it for every language manually? How can I do it effectivly? I would suggest this: do the same steps as I did for French and Portuguese in the discussion above. Let's check if we get to the same conclusions, i.e., that Pootle is in a bad state that does not correspond to any release. Then I can look for the next steps. Please note that, as I wrote, we need to go the opposite direction: from Pootle to SDF. But we need to re-learn both flows, so it's really good if you repeat all the process from my earlier notes. So your next major steps would be: - Exporting German from Pootle (not to Pootle) and build 4.1.6 (not 4.2.0) based on it - Understanding the "malformed string" error messages when doing the above and their impact on the resulting build; this is where I stopped on 31 Dec last year, and I think nobody has done further work ever since. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: do I need 2 disk images of Apache Open Office?
On 2018-11-13 12:46 a.m., Peter Kovacs wrote: What is a disk image? OpenOffice is packed as one executable dmg file. A .dmg file is a disk image. -- _ Larry I. Gusaas Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada Website: http://larry-gusaas.com "An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs." - Edgard Varese - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: do I need 2 disk images of Apache Open Office?
On 2018-11-12 6:22 p.m., Ron Slayton wrote: I see in finder on my MacBook Pro that I have 2 disk images on my MacBook. Is that normal. years ago when I started using AOO I may have mistakingly loaded 2 versions, although I'm not sure. If I delete one version for disk space reasons is that likely anything negative could happen? RonS You do not need any .dmg files providing you properly installed Apache OpenOffice. Check in your Applications folder for OpenOffice.org -- As a courtesy I have sent a copy of this reply to you as well as to the mailing list. Do Not reply to me personally but just to the list at - replies to my personal email address will be ignored. Since you are not subscribed to this list you may not see all the replies to your query.To subscribe Apache OpenOffice mailing lists go to http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html For user support you can also use The OpenOffice.org Community Forum http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/ _ Larry I. Gusaas Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada Website: http://larry-gusaas.com "An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs." - Edgard Varese
Re: Refresh Pootle for Translation 4.2
Hello, as already wrote, I try to work on translation update. Now I could get an actual *.sdf file from source code. After preparing a build directory there I could start localize successful. I could also create *.pot file with oo2po from *.sdf file. There I get many *.pot files in different directories. Now I downloaded a *.zip file from Pootle with the previous German translation. Must I do it for every language manually? How can I do it effectivly? Then I can look for the next steps. Please help! Kind regards -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Apache OpenOffice ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows ## Debian Developer ## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: starting 4.1.7 and 4.2.0 Releases
Okay I need to check. 4.1.5 delete as last step, check. Am 13. November 2018 11:32:20 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel : >Hi Peter, > >Am 13.11.18 um 08:04 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >> Release is now in the svn branch. > >There are a lot of languages missing... > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openoffice/4.1.6/binaries/ > >https://www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.6/binaries/ > >Regards, > > Matthias > >> >> I remove tonight the 4.1.5 release, any objections? >> >> So how much time do we need? is release date 16th November feasable? >> >> On 13.11.18 01:30, Peter Kovacs wrote: >>> Andrea, >>> >>> I am just saying a 4.1.7 release has nothing to do with the efforts >we >>> have to organize for 4.2.0. >>> >>> I hope I upload now into the right place, but I have initiated the >task. >>> >>> All the best >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> On 13.11.18 00:48, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Peter Kovacs wrote: > I do not see your issue. Our release team works much faster then >the dev > team progresses on 4.2.0. There is a major difference between a 4.1.x and a new release like 4.2.0: for 4.2.0 we need the entire community, not only what you >call the "release team" and developers (read: localization efforts, organized QA efforts, a possible public beta, a baseline >update...). If you believe that 4.2.0 is only for developers you are underestimating the task. > A 4.1.7 will keep the routine and knowledge active while we >develop > 4.2.0. We have many millions of users. We must provide some value with a release. This meant waiting 11 months (and counting) between 4.1.5 >and 4.1.6; if 4.1.6 has no major regressions, we can surely wait some months before considering a 4.1.7 (again, in a non-emergency >situation). But I would really like that we stop talking about this virtual >4.1.7 release and actually release 4.1.6 for real. Regards, Andrea. >- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Does OpenOffice still use Serf?
Hi all, I'm writing here because I believe OpenOffice uses Serf as its HTTP client; at least I did find version 1.2.1 mentioned in the patch files in ext_libraries/serf. I would like to ask for help from the OpenOffice developers to test the next release of Serf. We — the Apache Serf project — are in the (very slow) process of finally releasing Serf version 1.4.0, and it would be helpful if we could get some feedback from testing it. This version should be source-compatible with 1.2.1, but the build system has been completely changed since then; the supported build uses scons but there's also a fairly complete CMake build. Major improvements include support for HTTP/2, FCGI, CRL, OCSP stapling and OCSP requests, OpenSSL 1.1.x and and of course a large number of bug fixes. For details, see: https://s.apache.org/9259 If you're able and willing to help, please respond here, or post to . Thanks! -- Brane - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: starting 4.1.7 and 4.2.0 Releases
Hi Peter, Am 13.11.18 um 08:04 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Release is now in the svn branch. There are a lot of languages missing... https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openoffice/4.1.6/binaries/ https://www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.6/binaries/ Regards, Matthias > > I remove tonight the 4.1.5 release, any objections? > > So how much time do we need? is release date 16th November feasable? > > On 13.11.18 01:30, Peter Kovacs wrote: >> Andrea, >> >> I am just saying a 4.1.7 release has nothing to do with the efforts we >> have to organize for 4.2.0. >> >> I hope I upload now into the right place, but I have initiated the task. >> >> All the best >> >> Peter >> >> On 13.11.18 00:48, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Peter Kovacs wrote: I do not see your issue. Our release team works much faster then the dev team progresses on 4.2.0. >>> There is a major difference between a 4.1.x and a new release like >>> 4.2.0: for 4.2.0 we need the entire community, not only what you call >>> the "release team" and developers (read: localization efforts, >>> organized QA efforts, a possible public beta, a baseline update...). >>> If you believe that 4.2.0 is only for developers you are >>> underestimating the task. >>> A 4.1.7 will keep the routine and knowledge active while we develop 4.2.0. >>> We have many millions of users. We must provide some value with a >>> release. This meant waiting 11 months (and counting) between 4.1.5 and >>> 4.1.6; if 4.1.6 has no major regressions, we can surely wait some >>> months before considering a 4.1.7 (again, in a non-emergency situation). >>> >>> But I would really like that we stop talking about this virtual 4.1.7 >>> release and actually release 4.1.6 for real. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Andrea. >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
