Version trunk in bugzilla

[Mechtilde]

Hello,

can we get the version "trunk2 in bugzilla to track the issues which
comms there and are not in the 420-dev branch.

Kind regards

-- 
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Apache OpenOffice
## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
## Debian Developer
## PGP encryption welcome
## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899  39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Building AOO under Debian9

[Mechtilde]

Hello Jim,

Am 17.01.19 um 15:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Well, the error I was hitting is fixed, yeah.
> 
> You may need to blow away main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/* and rebuild

Yes I did so.

I do a  and then there were no unxlngx6.pro/* in
main/instsetoo_native. But it doesn't work. I get the messabe:

Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory
/home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/de_inprogress/DEBS
(
/home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/de_inprogress/DEBS/openoffice-de-base-4.2.0-1-linux-4.9-x86_64
/home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/de_inprogress/DEBS/openoffice-de-base-4.2.0-1-linux-4.9-x86_64.deb)
in function: determine_new_packagename (packagepool)stopping

I use r1851632 on my Debian 9.


-- 
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Apache OpenOffice
## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
## Debian Developer
## PGP encryption welcome
## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899  39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Forum help support

[David Robley]

I believe the interaction referred to may be on the AOO forum in the 
topic https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15=96638


On 19/1/19 5:17 am, Dave Fisher wrote:

Hi -

Sorry about your experience. Unfortunately this mailing list strips 
attachments. Please resend to priv...@openoffice.apache.org and someone will 
look into this. We are all volunteers so it might take some time.

Regards,
Dave

Sent from my iPhone


On Jan 18, 2019, at 10:05 AM, Barb Gruhl  wrote:

Hi, Is this the kind of treatment you allow from your support members on the 
help forum? This is not be helpful it is being a bully. I have included a 
screen shot of the response I am talking about.

Barb Gruhl

Virus-free. www.avast.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Cheers
--
David Robley

You can name your salary here. I call mine Fred.
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: beanshell

[Pedro Giffuni]

Hi 

Sorry for noticing late.

beanshell was relicensed under an Apache License starting with bsh 2.0b5.

Apparently I had something to do with breaking the beanshell build 
(thanks for fixing): on FreeBSD we use the external (prepackaged) 
beanshell which is 2.0b6.


Pedro.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Forrum help support

[JD]

Hi Barb,
I never saw that post... SOrry.
But I have to say that you need to develop a much thicker skin
when you subscribe to ANY Mailing List.
Believe it or not, there billions of humans who would love to
hurt someone. It is the nature of the world. So develop the
good attitude of not responding to such abuse.
Why?
Because that is exactly what the bully wants to see! That s/he was able 
to hurt you.


Kind Regards,

JD

On 01/18/2019 11:05 AM, Barb Gruhl wrote:
Hi, Is this the kind of treatment you allow from your support members 
on the help forum? This is not be helpful it is being a bully. I have 
included a screen shot of the response I am talking about.


Barb Gruhl

 
	Virus-free. www.avast.com 
 





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Forrum help support

[Dave Fisher]

Hi -

Sorry about your experience. Unfortunately this mailing list strips 
attachments. Please resend to priv...@openoffice.apache.org and someone will 
look into this. We are all volunteers so it might take some time.

Regards,
Dave

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 18, 2019, at 10:05 AM, Barb Gruhl  wrote:
> 
> Hi, Is this the kind of treatment you allow from your support members on the 
> help forum? This is not be helpful it is being a bully. I have included a 
> screen shot of the response I am talking about.
> 
> Barb Gruhl
> 
>   Virus-free. www.avast.com
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Forrum help support

[Barb Gruhl]

Hi, Is this the kind of treatment you allow from your support members on
the help forum? This is not be helpful it is being a bully. I have included
a screen shot of the response I am talking about.

Barb Gruhl


Virus-free.
www.avast.com

<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: beanshell

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Am 18.01.19 um 16:34 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Hrmmm... doing a re-build w/ --enable-beanshell causes as break in
> scripting/java:
>
> 
> /Users/jim/src/asf/AOO42X/main/scripting/java/com/sun/star/script/framework/provider/beanshell/ScriptProviderForBeanShell.java:232:
>  error: package bsh does not exist
> catch (bsh.EvalError e) {
>
> not sure if this was/is in any way connected to the removal
> from CatB.
>
> Anyone else try building 4.2.x/trunk w/ beanshell?

I am not sure, but Linux32 and Windows builds (AOO42X) from buildbot
were unsuccessful.

Will force new builds with your latest commits...

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>> On Jan 17, 2019, at 2:58 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> I just noticed that when including CatB components, beanshell
>> is not included in trunk/4.2.x but IS with 4.1.x
>>
>> Any idea why the change?
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: beanshell

[Jim Jagielski]

Hrmmm... doing a re-build w/ --enable-beanshell causes as break in
scripting/java:


/Users/jim/src/asf/AOO42X/main/scripting/java/com/sun/star/script/framework/provider/beanshell/ScriptProviderForBeanShell.java:232:
 error: package bsh does not exist
catch (bsh.EvalError e) {

not sure if this was/is in any way connected to the removal
from CatB.

Anyone else try building 4.2.x/trunk w/ beanshell?

> On Jan 17, 2019, at 2:58 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> I just noticed that when including CatB components, beanshell
> is not included in trunk/4.2.x but IS with 4.1.x
> 
> Any idea why the change?
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.x development branch created

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Dave,

Am 18.01.19 um 06:54 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> What action is there to take? It is a valid action by a downstream. Do we 
> wish they posted changes upstream? Yes! Can we require it? No!

It was just a funny side note for a fork that claims to be the "real"
successor of OpenOffice.org.

They forked in 2011(?) but list copyright back to 2000. Maybe here is
some action to be taken?

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jan 17, 2019, at 9:19 PM, Peter Kovacs  wrote:
>>
>> The Question is:
>>
>> Do we want to take action here or not?
>>
>>
>>> On 17.01.19 21:19, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Marcus,
>>>
 Am 17.01.19 um 20:42 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 17.01.19 um 13:41 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Two of my commits were immediately picked by LO. [1] [2]
>
> Always nice to see, that down streaming still works for the fork... :-D
 sure, better then to draw this on their own.

 Again with a note who has tested and reviewed it  - which is totally
 fine - but no hint where it comes from and who is the author. They
 still don't want to tell where they get the code from.
>>> Not exactly, Pilot_Pirx is me... ;-)
>>>
>>> But now it looks like I would have committed it directly to LO, while
>>> they just monitor aoo/trunk and take what they can use. [1]
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>Matthias
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://github.com/LibreOffice/core/commit/1170f10906a9bca78782df6ab1b6a4e20cf0435a
>>>
 Is this redicioulous or just sad? I don't know. :-(

 Marcus



> [1]
> https://github.com/LibreOffice/core/commit/28dee1129c7a9c4da34b9253aefd6c6b2df1a073
>
> [2]
> https://github.com/LibreOffice/core/commit/9796738e1149a99f8b3ff687b0f72264ba3a56ff
>
>
>> Am 14.01.19 um 16:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> At this stage, I think just back porting (svn merge) to the AOO42X
>> branch is fine.
>> As we get close to a release, we'll need to either have an RM
>> approve it
>> or so something like creating a STATUS file, with a list of proposed
>> backports
>> and requiring at least 3 +1s to backport (ie: RTC)
>>
>>> On Jan 14, 2019, at 10:40 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> Am 09.01.19 um 21:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> On Jan 9, 2019, at 3:46 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>
> Ahh... something w/ the cppuhelper stuff. Obviously, some UDK
> issue I'm thinking...
>>> How is the process to get commits merged from trunk to AOO42X?
>>>
>>> I adjusted some pointers for Windows and Linux:
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1851110
>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=185
>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1851214
>>>
>>> Additionally I updated some pointers for OS/2. I know that Bitwise is
>>> already working on a port of 4.2.0, so they would be useful.
>>>
>>> Since it took me several attempts it would be easier, if I would
>>> commit
>>> them directly. ..
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
 Yeppers... for sure it's the udk versioning, which is more a Linux
 thing than a macOS (or Windows) thing.

 Will look into either hacking around it or something else. I
 thought I had fixed it. Obviously not :(
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature