[status] Static webside migration
Hello all, Can everyone interested in this topic give a short status? Short ping on the current availability. And list any impediments or difficulties that he currently sees where others can help with. I would very much like to see this take some drive. And I would love to see George delivering something, so we can review committer status in the near future. (As I do with any other volunteer knocking on our door.) Thanks All the Best Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
FOSDEM Dev room
Hello all, Deadline is today. I am sorry I failed to come up with a proper application fo this event. Maybe Andrea, can you enter one on the short notice? If we get the room I would create a talk and support our dev room, but it is not primary motivation at the moment. I think it is much more important that we do active recruiting. And I want to support this activity. We have so far not managed to bring one new volunteer into OpenOffice. But I feel that the volunteer rate of active participants is dropping slowly. I am sorry on the late moment, I am really feel bad about this, especially because I promised to Mechtilde to take care of this. :( All the Best Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1
Prioritizing the publication of the source tarball would be helpful. I can't publish the updated FreeBSD port until that happens, and the binary packages won't be available until a couple days after that. On 19 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release > > Am 19.09.19 um 23:07 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> OK, thanks. Once I find, again, the 4.1.7-RC1 release Wiki page, I'll start >> the process :) >> >>> On Sep 19, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: >>> >>> Am 19.09.19 um 23:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Has anyone tested the rebuilt Linux distros? >>> Yes, I did. Forgot to mention it in my updated vote. >>> >>> Matthias >>> > On Sep 19, 2019, at 3:42 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 19.09.19 um 16:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > IMHO this vote is done and should be closed. I don't think that we get > any more feedback. > > Time for the release. > >> Just FYI: >> I will be without Internet access from Saturday to Sunday. >> If RC1 will be voted to be released I can help with the process until >> Friday and will be happy to join again on Sunday (late) evening >> (European Time). > I'm available to enable the download on Friday evening or from Saturday > early afternoon on over the weekend (all European time). > > Marcus > > > >> Am 16.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Cast vote >>> On Sep 11, 2019, at 1:31 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: In order to finalize the release, I jump in for Jim, who is traveling. :-) Please take your vote. The Release Candidate is good for production: [X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on [X] binding (member of PMC) [X] I have build and tested the RC from source [X] I have tested the binary RC > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: FOSDEM 2020
I do not feel good with these claims, but I am fine to use them. On 19.09.19 14:21, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Am 19.09.19 um 14:17 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: >> Hello and thank you very much. >> >> There is only one question left: >> >> Am 19.09.19 um 13:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Description of project(s) for publication: Apache OpenOffice is the Free and Open Productivity Suite to handle office tasks. The roots of Apache OpenOffice go back more than twenty years, creating a mature and powerful product. >>> Apache OpenOffice is a Free and Open Productivity Suite to handle >>> office tasks. The roots of Apache OpenOffice go back more than twenty >>> years, creating a mature and powerful product. >>> >> "The Free and Open Productivity Suite" is our claim. > If we use it as a term like above it makes sense... > > What do others think? > > Regards, > > Matthias > >> The other Free office suite claims: "Fun Project" and "Fantastic People". >> >> Their advertisement is: >> >> "LibreOffice 6: >> "The best office suite gets even better" – ZDNet" >> >> Is there a reason not use our claim? (Which is also printed on our roll up.) >> >> Kind regards >> Michael >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release Am 19.09.19 um 23:07 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > OK, thanks. Once I find, again, the 4.1.7-RC1 release Wiki page, I'll start > the process :) > >> On Sep 19, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Am 19.09.19 um 23:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Has anyone tested the rebuilt Linux distros? >> Yes, I did. Forgot to mention it in my updated vote. >> >> Matthias >> On Sep 19, 2019, at 3:42 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 19.09.19 um 16:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel: IMHO this vote is done and should be closed. I don't think that we get any more feedback. Time for the release. > Just FYI: > I will be without Internet access from Saturday to Sunday. > If RC1 will be voted to be released I can help with the process until > Friday and will be happy to join again on Sunday (late) evening > (European Time). I'm available to enable the download on Friday evening or from Saturday early afternoon on over the weekend (all European time). Marcus > Am 16.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Cast vote >> >>> On Sep 11, 2019, at 1:31 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >>> >>> In order to finalize the release, I jump in for Jim, who is traveling. >>> :-) >>> >>> Please take your vote. >>> >>> The Release Candidate is good for production: >>> >>> [X] yes / +1 >>> >>> [ ] no / -1 >>> >>> My vote is based on >>> >>> [X] binding (member of PMC) >>> >>> [X] I have build and tested the RC from source >>> >>> [X] I have tested the binary RC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1
sorry that I did not find the time for tests, and could only view from the peanut gallery. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.7 On 19.09.19 23:07, Jim Jagielski wrote: > OK, thanks. Once I find, again, the 4.1.7-RC1 release Wiki page, I'll start > the process :) > >> On Sep 19, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Am 19.09.19 um 23:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Has anyone tested the rebuilt Linux distros? >> Yes, I did. Forgot to mention it in my updated vote. >> >> Matthias >> On Sep 19, 2019, at 3:42 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 19.09.19 um 16:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel: IMHO this vote is done and should be closed. I don't think that we get any more feedback. Time for the release. > Just FYI: > I will be without Internet access from Saturday to Sunday. > If RC1 will be voted to be released I can help with the process until > Friday and will be happy to join again on Sunday (late) evening > (European Time). I'm available to enable the download on Friday evening or from Saturday early afternoon on over the weekend (all European time). Marcus > Am 16.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Cast vote >> >>> On Sep 11, 2019, at 1:31 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >>> >>> In order to finalize the release, I jump in for Jim, who is traveling. >>> :-) >>> >>> Please take your vote. >>> >>> The Release Candidate is good for production: >>> >>> [X] yes / +1 >>> >>> [ ] no / -1 >>> >>> My vote is based on >>> >>> [X] binding (member of PMC) >>> >>> [X] I have build and tested the RC from source >>> >>> [X] I have tested the binary RC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1
OK, thanks. Once I find, again, the 4.1.7-RC1 release Wiki page, I'll start the process :) > On Sep 19, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 19.09.19 um 23:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Has anyone tested the rebuilt Linux distros? > Yes, I did. Forgot to mention it in my updated vote. > > Matthias > >> >>> On Sep 19, 2019, at 3:42 PM, Marcus wrote: >>> >>> Am 19.09.19 um 16:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> >>> IMHO this vote is done and should be closed. I don't think that we get any >>> more feedback. >>> >>> Time for the release. >>> Just FYI: I will be without Internet access from Saturday to Sunday. If RC1 will be voted to be released I can help with the process until Friday and will be happy to join again on Sunday (late) evening (European Time). >>> I'm available to enable the download on Friday evening or from Saturday >>> early afternoon on over the weekend (all European time). >>> >>> Marcus >>> >>> >>> Am 16.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Cast vote > >> On Sep 11, 2019, at 1:31 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >> >> In order to finalize the release, I jump in for Jim, who is traveling. >> :-) >> >> Please take your vote. >> >> The Release Candidate is good for production: >> >> [X] yes / +1 >> >> [ ] no / -1 >> >> My vote is based on >> >> [X] binding (member of PMC) >> >> [X] I have build and tested the RC from source >> >> [X] I have tested the binary RC >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1
Am 19.09.19 um 23:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Has anyone tested the rebuilt Linux distros? Yes, I did. Forgot to mention it in my updated vote. Matthias > >> On Sep 19, 2019, at 3:42 PM, Marcus wrote: >> >> Am 19.09.19 um 16:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> >> IMHO this vote is done and should be closed. I don't think that we get any >> more feedback. >> >> Time for the release. >> >>> Just FYI: >>> I will be without Internet access from Saturday to Sunday. >>> If RC1 will be voted to be released I can help with the process until >>> Friday and will be happy to join again on Sunday (late) evening >>> (European Time). >> I'm available to enable the download on Friday evening or from Saturday >> early afternoon on over the weekend (all European time). >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >>> Am 16.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Cast vote > On Sep 11, 2019, at 1:31 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > In order to finalize the release, I jump in for Jim, who is traveling. :-) > > Please take your vote. > > The Release Candidate is good for production: > > [X] yes / +1 > > [ ] no / -1 > > My vote is based on > > [X] binding (member of PMC) > > [X] I have build and tested the RC from source > > [X] I have tested the binary RC >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1
Has anyone tested the rebuilt Linux distros? > On Sep 19, 2019, at 3:42 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 19.09.19 um 16:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > IMHO this vote is done and should be closed. I don't think that we get any > more feedback. > > Time for the release. > >> Just FYI: >> I will be without Internet access from Saturday to Sunday. >> If RC1 will be voted to be released I can help with the process until >> Friday and will be happy to join again on Sunday (late) evening >> (European Time). > > I'm available to enable the download on Friday evening or from Saturday early > afternoon on over the weekend (all European time). > > Marcus > > > >> Am 16.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Cast vote >>> On Sep 11, 2019, at 1:31 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: In order to finalize the release, I jump in for Jim, who is traveling. :-) Please take your vote. The Release Candidate is good for production: [X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on [X] binding (member of PMC) [X] I have build and tested the RC from source [X] I have tested the binary RC > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1
Am 19.09.19 um 16:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel: IMHO this vote is done and should be closed. I don't think that we get any more feedback. Time for the release. Just FYI: I will be without Internet access from Saturday to Sunday. If RC1 will be voted to be released I can help with the process until Friday and will be happy to join again on Sunday (late) evening (European Time). I'm available to enable the download on Friday evening or from Saturday early afternoon on over the weekend (all European time). Marcus Am 16.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Cast vote On Sep 11, 2019, at 1:31 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: In order to finalize the release, I jump in for Jim, who is traveling. :-) Please take your vote. The Release Candidate is good for production: [X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on [X] binding (member of PMC) [X] I have build and tested the RC from source [X] I have tested the binary RC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1
Just FYI: I will be without Internet access from Saturday to Sunday. If RC1 will be voted to be released I can help with the process until Friday and will be happy to join again on Sunday (late) evening (European Time). Regards, Matthias Am 16.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Cast vote > >> On Sep 11, 2019, at 1:31 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> In order to finalize the release, I jump in for Jim, who is traveling. :-) >> >> Please take your vote. >> >> The Release Candidate is good for production: >> >> [X] yes / +1 >> >> [ ] no / -1 >> >> My vote is based on >> >> [X] binding (member of PMC) >> >> [X] I have build and tested the RC from source >> >> [X] I have tested the binary RC >> >> >> All the Best >> Petko >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: git revision missing when building 4.1.7 from the source tarball
Hi Jim, Am 19.09.19 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> On Sep 18, 2019, at 1:43 AM, Don Lewis wrote: >> >> If you build 4.1.7 starting with the source tarball, the git revision >> isn't included in the build result because the source tarball doesn't >> include the .git directory. That is needed so that 'git log' can find >> the most recent commit hash. I wasn't able to find a reasonable subset >> of the .git contents that would allow this to work. >> >> This problem was probably also present with svn, but nobody noticed. > It was actually. That is because the RCversion is determined at build time. > We could, when we make the src distribution store that info away in a file > someplace, but that would involve changing the build process (and > SvnRevision.pm) accordingly. > > Maybe something for 4.2.x and trunk? +1 Matthias > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: FOSDEM 2020
Hi Michael, Am 19.09.19 um 14:17 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: > Hello and thank you very much. > > There is only one question left: > > Am 19.09.19 um 13:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > >>> Description of project(s) for publication: >>> >>> Apache OpenOffice is the Free and Open Productivity Suite to handle >>> office tasks. The roots of Apache OpenOffice go back more than twenty >>> years, creating a mature and powerful product. >> Apache OpenOffice is a Free and Open Productivity Suite to handle >> office tasks. The roots of Apache OpenOffice go back more than twenty >> years, creating a mature and powerful product. >> > "The Free and Open Productivity Suite" is our claim. If we use it as a term like above it makes sense... What do others think? Regards, Matthias > > The other Free office suite claims: "Fun Project" and "Fantastic People". > > Their advertisement is: > > "LibreOffice 6: > "The best office suite gets even better" – ZDNet" > > Is there a reason not use our claim? (Which is also printed on our roll up.) > > Kind regards > Michael > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: FOSDEM 2020
Hello and thank you very much. There is only one question left: Am 19.09.19 um 13:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Description of project(s) for publication: >> >> Apache OpenOffice is the Free and Open Productivity Suite to handle >> office tasks. The roots of Apache OpenOffice go back more than twenty >> years, creating a mature and powerful product. > > Apache OpenOffice is a Free and Open Productivity Suite to handle > office tasks. The roots of Apache OpenOffice go back more than twenty > years, creating a mature and powerful product. > "The Free and Open Productivity Suite" is our claim. The other Free office suite claims: "Fun Project" and "Fantastic People". Their advertisement is: "LibreOffice 6: "The best office suite gets even better" – ZDNet" Is there a reason not use our claim? (Which is also printed on our roll up.) Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: git revision missing when building 4.1.7 from the source tarball
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 1:43 AM, Don Lewis wrote: > > If you build 4.1.7 starting with the source tarball, the git revision > isn't included in the build result because the source tarball doesn't > include the .git directory. That is needed so that 'git log' can find > the most recent commit hash. I wasn't able to find a reasonable subset > of the .git contents that would allow this to work. > > This problem was probably also present with svn, but nobody noticed. It was actually. That is because the RCversion is determined at build time. We could, when we make the src distribution store that info away in a file someplace, but that would involve changing the build process (and SvnRevision.pm) accordingly. Maybe something for 4.2.x and trunk? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: FOSDEM 2020
Hi Michael, Small corrections inside: Am 17.09.19 um 09:57 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: > Hello, > > we are planning to join next FOSDEM like we did in the past. To get a > booth (stand) we have to write a request. The deadline for this request > will come soon. > > Among other things we have to answer two questions. With help from Peter > I sketched a text for this purpose. > > Feel free to criticize this draft: > > """ > Description of project(s) for publication: > > Apache OpenOffice is the Free and Open Productivity Suite to handle > office tasks. The roots of Apache OpenOffice go back more than twenty > years, creating a mature and powerful product. Apache OpenOffice is a Free and Open Productivity Suite to handle office tasks. The roots of Apache OpenOffice go back more than twenty years, creating a mature and powerful product. > > The software looks and feels familiar and is instantly usable by anyone > who has used a competitive product. It has many millions of users and > still millions of downloads each year. The software looks and feels familiar and is instantly usable by anyone who has used a competitive product. It has many millions of users and still millions of downloads every year. > > Apache OpenOffice is supported by a global community of friendly > volunteers, happy to provide assistance to newcomers and advanced users > alike. > > > > Why does it fit FOSDEM? > > Apache OpenOffice is one of most popular Free Software products as in Apache OpenOffice is one of most popular Free Software products in > europe and worldwide and has a long history of project development. With > only a few volunteers left, we struggle to satisfy the needs and wishes > of our users. FOSDEM is one of the best occasions to meet new developers > and to interest them in our project. We will use the stand to present > the needs we have. This ranges from web design and programming over > application and extension development, towards documentation, > translation and community management in popular media. > """ > > I am no native speaker, so please improve my poor english. I am not a native speaker, too. So my corrections may be inappropriate. Regards, Matthias > > Kind regards > Michael > > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
