Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.14-RC1 as GA
Hi all > The Release Candidate is good for production/GA: > >[x] yes / +1 > >[ ] no / -1 > > My vote is based on > >[x] binding (member of PMC) > >[X] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform [Linux Ubuntu > 18.04 x64] > >[X] I have tested the binary RC on platform [Linux Ubuntu 20.04 x64; > Windows 10 Home 22H2 x64] I checked the SHA256 and SHA512 CRCs for the Linux x64 and Windows x86 main installer in en-US and for the PT language pack binary I switched UI language under Linux Ubuntu 20.04 x64 and Windows 10 Home 22H2 x64 by using the en-US installer plus the PT language pack. On Linux Ubuntu 20.04 x64 I opened ODT, ODS, ODP, ODG and ODF as well as DOC, XLS, PPT and DOCX, XLSX and PPTX files without any issues. All the best, Pedro - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [MWiki] Account creation
Arverne wrote: Hello, Could you create a personnal account to participate to french OpenOffice Wiki ? My pseudo could be : arverne73 My name : J-Paul Thanks Account Arvene73 has been created and a random password has been sent to your e-mail. You will be asked on first login to create a new assword of your choosing. Regards Keith N. McKenna - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Request Mwiki account
club.a...@free.fr wrote: Thanks to create an account with my username: acsi Account Asci created and a random password has been sent to yuor e-mail address. On forst login you should be asked for a new password of your own choosing. Regards Keith N. McKenna - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: User Installation Process Feedback
Hi, Am 15.02.23 um 18:05 schrieb Yury Tarasievich: > On 15/02/2023 19:39, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > >> I documented 8 projects that tried to achieve that and compared them >> in the attached spreadsheet, and there are more. > > The document is a beaut, but you've excluded Flatpak and Snap, one of > which you sort of condemn and one of which you recommend, nevertheless. > > Why not AppImage, for which half a work is already there, AFAIU ? (I > mean `installed` method of packaging) So it hasn't got sandboxing. Is > it such a big deal? I don't think we need sandboxing in the first place. An easy to install package for Linux would be good, so maybe we can try to do an Appimage package after the release of AOO 4.1.14? Regards, Matthias > > Also, any new packaging method would have to integrate into the > existing build framework? Which isn't exactly a model of clarity and > robustness? > > -Yury > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
