Re: [Discuss] Vote on Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA
This has been the case for years. Recall that the binary builds are community convenience packages. > On Jul 10, 2022, at 4:51 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > Hi All, > > Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's signature and > not Jim's (the Release Manager). > The policy states [1] : > "All supplied packages MUST be cryptographically signed by the Release > Manager with a detached signature." > > I understand the logistics and that Matthias built the Windows binaries and > signed them. > Maybe we could consider Matthias Co-Release manager for this purpose ? > > [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-signing > > Best regards, > Carl > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Discuss] Vote on Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA
Hi Carl, Am 10.07.22 um 22:56 schrieb Carl Marcum: > On 7/10/22 4:51 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's >> signature and not Jim's (the Release Manager). >> The policy states [1] : >> "All supplied packages MUST be cryptographically signed by the >> Release Manager with a detached signature." >> >> I understand the logistics and that Matthias built the Windows >> binaries and signed them. >> Maybe we could consider Matthias Co-Release manager for this purpose ? >> >> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-signing >> >> Best regards, >> Carl >> > Or is it because these are convenience binaries it's different than > the source "official" release? I am not sure, but I provide the signed Windows binaries for some years now... In that way, I always was a Co-Release manager. ;-) Regards, Matthias > > Thanks, > Carl > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Discuss] Vote on Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA
On 7/10/22 4:51 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi All, Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's signature and not Jim's (the Release Manager). The policy states [1] : "All supplied packages MUST be cryptographically signed by the Release Manager with a detached signature." I understand the logistics and that Matthias built the Windows binaries and signed them. Maybe we could consider Matthias Co-Release manager for this purpose ? [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-signing Best regards, Carl Or is it because these are convenience binaries it's different than the source "official" release? Thanks, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Discuss] Vote on Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA
Hi All, Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's signature and not Jim's (the Release Manager). The policy states [1] : "All supplied packages MUST be cryptographically signed by the Release Manager with a detached signature." I understand the logistics and that Matthias built the Windows binaries and signed them. Maybe we could consider Matthias Co-Release manager for this purpose ? [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-signing Best regards, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
