Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-21 Thread Matthias Seidel
I installed the german DEB on Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit)

So far everything is working as expected...

regards

Matthias


Am 21.09.2016 um 01:04 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 17/09/2016 Mechtilde wrote:
>> Am 17.09.2016 um 07:25 schrieb Mechtilde:
>>> is there a first "nightly build for version 4.1.3 available?
>> I forgot:
>> my system is Debian 64-bit
>
> Buildbots aside (they were not working last time I checked), you can
> use the 4.1.3-dev builds at
>
> http://home.apache.org/~pescetti/openoffice-4.1.3-dev-r1761552/
>
> ...and I've already spammed three different threads, so I'll stop here!
>
> DEBs are completely untested, so testing is at your own risk as usual.
>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-20 Thread Andrea Pescetti

On 17/09/2016 Mechtilde wrote:

Am 17.09.2016 um 07:25 schrieb Mechtilde:

is there a first "nightly build for version 4.1.3 available?

I forgot:
my system is Debian 64-bit


Buildbots aside (they were not working last time I checked), you can use 
the 4.1.3-dev builds at


http://home.apache.org/~pescetti/openoffice-4.1.3-dev-r1761552/

...and I've already spammed three different threads, so I'll stop here!

DEBs are completely untested, so testing is at your own risk as usual.

Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-16 Thread Mechtilde

Am 17.09.2016 um 07:25 schrieb Mechtilde:
> Hello,
> 
> is there a first "nightly build for version 4.1.3 available?
I forgot:

my system is Debian 64-bit
> 
> Regards
> 
> Mechtilde
> 
> Am 15.09.2016 um 17:15 schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
>> In response to truckman;
>>>
>>> On 14 Sep, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
 Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4?

 4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut
 off additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but
 I'm open to arguments.
>>>
>>> Have all of the necessary download site changes made it from trunk to
>>> 4.1.3?  The released source tarball for 4.1.3 won't include anything in
>>> ext_sources that comes from svn, so we need to verify that bootstrap
>>> succeeds with an empty ext_sources directory.
>>>
>>
>> The content of ext_sources should be irrelevant.  We temporarily used
>> that directory when the project was in incubation but the idea was to
>> deprecate it much sooner. The dependencies were always meant to be
>> downloaded as part as the build process.
>>
>>
>>> It would also be nice to merge r1758093 from trunk to update
>>> configure.ac to suggest the proper download URL for the dmake source.
>>> The old URL no longer works.
>>>
>> Yes, that certainly should be done.
>>
>> Pedro.
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> 

-- 
Mechtilde Stehmann
--
## Apache OpenOffice.org
## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
## Debian
## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client
## PGP encryption welcome
## Key-ID 0x141AAD7F



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-16 Thread Mechtilde
Hello,

is there a first "nightly build for version 4.1.3 available?

Regards

Mechtilde

Am 15.09.2016 um 17:15 schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
> In response to truckman;
>>
>> On 14 Sep, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>>> Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4?
>>>
>>> 4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut
>>> off additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but
>>> I'm open to arguments.
>>
>> Have all of the necessary download site changes made it from trunk to
>> 4.1.3?  The released source tarball for 4.1.3 won't include anything in
>> ext_sources that comes from svn, so we need to verify that bootstrap
>> succeeds with an empty ext_sources directory.
>>
> 
> The content of ext_sources should be irrelevant.  We temporarily used
> that directory when the project was in incubation but the idea was to
> deprecate it much sooner. The dependencies were always meant to be
> downloaded as part as the build process.
> 
> 
>> It would also be nice to merge r1758093 from trunk to update
>> configure.ac to suggest the proper download URL for the dmake source.
>> The old URL no longer works.
>>
> Yes, that certainly should be done.
> 
> Pedro.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-- 
Mechtilde Stehmann
--
## Apache OpenOffice.org
## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
## Debian
## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client
## PGP encryption welcome
## Key-ID 0x141AAD7F



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-15 Thread Pedro Giffuni

In response to truckman;
>

On 14 Sep, Patricia Shanahan wrote:

Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4?

4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut
off additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but
I'm open to arguments.


Have all of the necessary download site changes made it from trunk to
4.1.3?  The released source tarball for 4.1.3 won't include anything in
ext_sources that comes from svn, so we need to verify that bootstrap
succeeds with an empty ext_sources directory.



The content of ext_sources should be irrelevant.  We temporarily used 
that directory when the project was in incubation but the idea was to

deprecate it much sooner. The dependencies were always meant to be
downloaded as part as the build process.



It would also be nice to merge r1758093 from trunk to update
configure.ac to suggest the proper download URL for the dmake source.
The old URL no longer works.


Yes, that certainly should be done.

Pedro.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Don Lewis
On 14 Sep, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4?
> 
> 4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut 
> off additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but 
> I'm open to arguments.

Have all of the necessary download site changes made it from trunk to
4.1.3?  The released source tarball for 4.1.3 won't include anything in
ext_sources that comes from svn, so we need to verify that bootstrap
succeeds with an empty ext_sources directory.

It would also be nice to merge r1758093 from trunk to update
configure.ac to suggest the proper download URL for the dmake source.
The old URL no longer works.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Patricia Shanahan

Good argument. I've granted it 4.1.3 release blocker.

On 9/14/2016 10:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

All other OSX 10.11 "blockers" can be worked around by
adding some depedencies (like openssl...) but this one
stops configure in its tracks.


On Sep 14, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

4.1.3 won't build on 10.11 w/o this since the Xcode provided just
has the 10.11 SDX and configure doesn't see it and so the configure
process dies. You have to hand edit configure to push thru.


On Sep 14, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Patricia Shanahan  wrote:

Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4?

4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut off 
additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but I'm open to 
arguments.

On 9/14/2016 9:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

Didn't see this addressed so opened a new blocker:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127113


On Sep 13, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan  wrote:

Please make sure all patches for 4.1.3 are checked in to the AOO413 branch.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
All other OSX 10.11 "blockers" can be worked around by
adding some depedencies (like openssl...) but this one
stops configure in its tracks.

> On Sep 14, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> 4.1.3 won't build on 10.11 w/o this since the Xcode provided just
> has the 10.11 SDX and configure doesn't see it and so the configure
> process dies. You have to hand edit configure to push thru.
> 
>> On Sep 14, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Patricia Shanahan  wrote:
>> 
>> Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4?
>> 
>> 4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut off 
>> additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but I'm open 
>> to arguments.
>> 
>> On 9/14/2016 9:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Didn't see this addressed so opened a new blocker:
>>> 
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127113
>>> 
 On Sep 13, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan  wrote:
 
 Please make sure all patches for 4.1.3 are checked in to the AOO413 branch.
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
4.1.3 won't build on 10.11 w/o this since the Xcode provided just
has the 10.11 SDX and configure doesn't see it and so the configure
process dies. You have to hand edit configure to push thru.

> On Sep 14, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Patricia Shanahan  wrote:
> 
> Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4?
> 
> 4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut off 
> additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but I'm open 
> to arguments.
> 
> On 9/14/2016 9:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Didn't see this addressed so opened a new blocker:
>> 
>>  https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127113
>> 
>>> On Sep 13, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Please make sure all patches for 4.1.3 are checked in to the AOO413 branch.
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Patricia Shanahan

Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4?

4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut 
off additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but 
I'm open to arguments.


On 9/14/2016 9:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

Didn't see this addressed so opened a new blocker:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127113


On Sep 13, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan  wrote:

Please make sure all patches for 4.1.3 are checked in to the AOO413 branch.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
Didn't see this addressed so opened a new blocker:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127113

> On Sep 13, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan  wrote:
> 
> Please make sure all patches for 4.1.3 are checked in to the AOO413 branch.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org