Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
Am 08.08.21 um 15:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > These are developer previews and not actual Releases so I don't think so. > Easy to add though. Thanks! I think they are needed when we publish builds as AOO project. Personal builds don't... Windows builds are also complete now! Regards, Matthias > >> On Aug 7, 2021, at 7:28 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Don't expect Windows binaries before tomorrow... ;-) >> >> BTW: Aren't we required to give signatures and hashes on the Apache server? >> >> Matthias >> >> Am 06.08.21 um 16:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski: On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: That's c9282f5c5c ? >>> Yep. That's right! Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0. >>> Yikes! >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
These are developer previews and not actual Releases so I don't think so. Easy to add though. > On Aug 7, 2021, at 7:28 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Don't expect Windows binaries before tomorrow... ;-) > > BTW: Aren't we required to give signatures and hashes on the Apache server? > > Matthias > > Am 06.08.21 um 16:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> >>> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: >>> >>> That's c9282f5c5c ? >> Yep. That's right! >>> Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only >>> single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0. >>> >> Yikes! >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
Don't expect Windows binaries before tomorrow... ;-) BTW: Aren't we required to give signatures and hashes on the Apache server? Matthias Am 06.08.21 um 16:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > >> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> That's c9282f5c5c ? > Yep. That's right! >> Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only >> single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0. >> > Yikes! > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > That's c9282f5c5c ? Yep. That's right! > > Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only > single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0. > Yikes! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
That's c9282f5c5c ? Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0. Matthias Am 06.08.21 um 13:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > I have tagged AOO420-Dev3-m3 and am working on the builds. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
I have tagged AOO420-Dev3-m3 and am working on the builds. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
I think I will tag tomorrow morning and start some builds :-) > On Aug 3, 2021, at 12:48 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Ready, when you are! ;-) > > Am 03.08.21 um 18:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS: >> >> Executive Summary (TL;DR ;-) >> >> A boolean setting is not recognized as a boolean. An exception is >> thrown when accessing it. The exception is swallowed and the XML >> files' contents are not written. >> >> >>> On Aug 3, 2021, at 5:13 AM, Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: >>> >>> I would be able to upload the Windows binaries now... >>> >>> @Jim: Can you create a tag on GitHub and provide macOS and Linux builds? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> Am 01.08.21 um 23:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi, Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on Git hash 494e99f846. Regards, Matthias Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi all, > > Next weekend? Any idea? > > Matthias > > Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi all, >> >> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >>> Hello All, >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Jim, Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Snapshot works for me Great! What do others think? Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time... >>> +1 >> I would have time this weekend... >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Ready, when you are! ;-) Am 03.08.21 um 18:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS: > > Executive Summary (TL;DR ;-) > > A boolean setting is not recognized as a boolean. An exception is > thrown when accessing it. The exception is swallowed and the XML > files' contents are not written. > > >> On Aug 3, 2021, at 5:13 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> I would be able to upload the Windows binaries now... >> >> @Jim: Can you create a tag on GitHub and provide macOS and Linux builds? >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> Am 01.08.21 um 23:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on >>> Git hash 494e99f846. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>>Matthias >>> >>> Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi all, Next weekend? Any idea? Matthias Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi all, > > Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >> Hello All, >> >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Snapshot works for me >>> Great! What do others think? >>> >>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time... >> +1 > I would have time this weekend... > > Regards, > >Matthias > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS: Executive Summary (TL;DR ;-) A boolean setting is not recognized as a boolean. An exception is thrown when accessing it. The exception is swallowed and the XML files' contents are not written. > On Aug 3, 2021, at 5:13 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > I would be able to upload the Windows binaries now... > > @Jim: Can you create a tag on GitHub and provide macOS and Linux builds? > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 01.08.21 um 23:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi, >> >> Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on >> Git hash 494e99f846. >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Next weekend? Any idea? >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi all, Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Hello All, > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Snapshot works for me >> Great! What do others think? >> >> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time... > +1 I would have time this weekend... Regards, Matthias >
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
I would be able to upload the Windows binaries now... @Jim: Can you create a tag on GitHub and provide macOS and Linux builds? Regards, Matthias Am 01.08.21 um 23:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi, > > Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on > Git hash 494e99f846. > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi all, >> >> Next weekend? Any idea? >> >> Matthias >> >> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: Hello All, On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Snapshot works for me > Great! What do others think? > > Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time... +1 >>> I would have time this weekend... >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi, Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on Git hash 494e99f846. Regards, Matthias Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi all, > > Next weekend? Any idea? > > Matthias > > Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi all, >> >> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >>> Hello All, >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Jim, Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Snapshot works for me Great! What do others think? Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time... >>> +1 >> I would have time this weekend... >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi all, Next weekend? Any idea? Matthias Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi all, > > Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >> Hello All, >> >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Snapshot works for me >>> Great! What do others think? >>> >>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time... >> +1 > I would have time this weekend... > > Regards, > > Matthias > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi all, Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Hello All, > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Snapshot works for me >> Great! What do others think? >> >> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time... > +1 I would have time this weekend... Regards, Matthias > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hello All, On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > > Snapshot works for me > > Great! What do others think? > > Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time... +1 -- Arrigo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi Jim, Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Snapshot works for me Great! What do others think? Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time... Matthias > >> On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:43 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> I'm ready for a dev3... >> That's great! >> >> Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot", >> maybe with the latest translations? >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Keith, Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi Keith, >> >> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? Regards, Matthias >>> Mathias; >>> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3 >>> build. >> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it >> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the >> translations. >>> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or >>> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we >>> will never get a 4.2 Release. >> Definitely! >> >> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this >> release. So we should now concentrate on them. >> > What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues > that > are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with > given the resources that we have for QA. Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0 > I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing > that 253 to a reasonable number. Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0 We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough. Regards, Matthias > Regards, > Keith > > > >> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations. >> >> Matthias >> >> >>> Keith >>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Jim, > > I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. > > That means 41+5 languages: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/ > 4.2.0- >>> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst > @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string > changes... > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on >> whether or not we are building the full language set? >> >>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3: >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Arrigo, Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Hello, > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The subject says it all... ;-) >> >> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated >> translations from Pootle here. > I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! Definitely! The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and release it! ;-) Regards, Matthias > And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! > > Regards, >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> >> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For >>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Snapshot works for me > On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:43 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I'm ready for a dev3... > > That's great! > > Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot", > maybe with the latest translations? > > Regards, > >Matthias > >> >>> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Keith, >>> >>> Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Keith, > > Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >> Mathias; >> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3 >> build. > Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it > at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the > translations. >> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or >> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we >> will never get a 4.2 Release. > Definitely! > > But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this > release. So we should now concentrate on them. > What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with given the resources that we have for QA. >>> Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0 >>> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing that 253 to a reasonable number. >>> Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0 >>> >>> We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> Regards, Keith > We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations. > > Matthias > > >> Keith >> >>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Jim, I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. That means 41+5 languages: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/ 4.2.0- >> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string changes... Regards, Matthias Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on > whether or not we are building the full language set? > >> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have created the directory structure for Dev3: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi Arrigo, >>> >>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: Hello, On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > The subject says it all... ;-) > > No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated > translations from Pootle here. I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! >>> Definitely! >>> >>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and >>> release it! ;-) >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! Regards, > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For > additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
@Mechtilde: Any thoughts on the translation? Regards, Matthias Am 23.07.21 um 16:43 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Jim, > > Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I'm ready for a dev3... > That's great! > > Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot", > maybe with the latest translations? > > Regards, > > Matthias > >>> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Keith, >>> >>> Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Keith, > > Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>>Matthias >>> >> Mathias; >> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3 >> build. > Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it > at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the > translations. >> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or >> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we >> will never get a 4.2 Release. > Definitely! > > But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this > release. So we should now concentrate on them. > What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with given the resources that we have for QA. >>> Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0 >>> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing that 253 to a reasonable number. >>> Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0 >>> >>> We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>>Matthias >>> Regards, Keith > We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations. > > Matthias > > >> Keith >> >>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Jim, I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. That means 41+5 languages: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/ 4.2.0- >> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string changes... Regards, Matthias Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on > whether or not we are building the full language set? > >> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have created the directory structure for Dev3: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi Arrigo, >>> >>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: Hello, On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > The subject says it all... ;-) > > No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated > translations from Pootle here. I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! >>> Definitely! >>> >>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and >>> release it! ;-) >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! Regards, > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For > additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi Jim, Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > I'm ready for a dev3... That's great! Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot", maybe with the latest translations? Regards, Matthias > >> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Keith, >> >> Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Keith, Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> > Mathias; > Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3 > build. Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the translations. > We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or > seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we > will never get a 4.2 Release. Definitely! But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this release. So we should now concentrate on them. >>> What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that >>> are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with >>> given the resources that we have for QA. >> Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0 >> >>> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing >>> that 253 to a reasonable number. >> Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0 >> >> We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough. >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >>> Regards, >>> Keith >>> >>> >>> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations. Matthias > Keith > >> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. >>> >>> That means 41+5 languages: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/ >>> 4.2.0- > Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst >>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string >>> changes... >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>>Matthias >>> >>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not we are building the full language set? > On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have created the directory structure for Dev3: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Arrigo, >> >> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >>> Hello, >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi all, The subject says it all... ;-) No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated translations from Pootle here. >>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! >> Definitely! >> >> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and >> release it! ;-) >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! >>> >>> Regards, - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For > additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
I'm ready for a dev3... > On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Keith, > > Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> Hi Keith, >>> >>> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? > > Regards, > >Matthias > Mathias; Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3 build. >>> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it >>> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the >>> translations. We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we will never get a 4.2 Release. >>> Definitely! >>> >>> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this >>> release. So we should now concentrate on them. >>> >> What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that >> are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with >> given the resources that we have for QA. > > Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0 > >> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing >> that 253 to a reasonable number. > Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0 > > We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough. > > Regards, > >Matthias > >> >> Regards, >> Keith >> >> >> >>> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations. >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> Keith > Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Jim, >> >> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. >> >> That means 41+5 languages: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/ >> 4.2.0- Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst >> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string >> changes... >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on >>> whether or not we are building the full language set? >>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, I have created the directory structure for Dev3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ Regards, Matthias Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Arrigo, > > Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >> Hello, >> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The subject says it all... ;-) >>> >>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated >>> translations from Pootle here. >> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! > Definitely! > > The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and > release it! ;-) > > Regards, > > Matthias > >> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! >> >> Regards, >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For >>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >>> >>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi Keith, Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi Keith, >> >> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? Regards, Matthias >>> Mathias; >>> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3 >>> build. >> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it >> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the >> translations. >>> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or >>> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we >>> will never get a 4.2 Release. >> Definitely! >> >> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this >> release. So we should now concentrate on them. >> > What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that > are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with > given the resources that we have for QA. Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0 > I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing > that 253 to a reasonable number. Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0 We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough. Regards, Matthias > > Regards, > Keith > > > >> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations. >> >> Matthias >> >> >>> Keith >>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Jim, > > I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. > > That means 41+5 languages: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/ > 4.2.0- >>> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst > @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string > changes... > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on >> whether or not we are building the full language set? >> >>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3: >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>>Matthias >>> >>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Arrigo, Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Hello, > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The subject says it all... ;-) >> >> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated >> translations from Pootle here. > I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! Definitely! The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and release it! ;-) Regards, Matthias > And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! > > Regards, >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> >> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For >>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Keith, > > Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >> Mathias; >> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3 >> build. > Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it > at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the > translations. >> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or >> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we >> will never get a 4.2 Release. > > Definitely! > > But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this > release. So we should now concentrate on them. > What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with given the resources that we have for QA. I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing that 253 to a reasonable number. Regards, Keith > We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations. > > Matthias > > >> Keith >> >>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Jim, I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. That means 41+5 languages: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/ 4.2.0- >> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string changes... Regards, Matthias Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on > whether or not we are building the full language set? > >> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have created the directory structure for Dev3: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi Arrigo, >>> >>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: Hello, On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > The subject says it all... ;-) > > No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated > translations from Pootle here. I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! >>> Definitely! >>> >>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and >>> release it! ;-) >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>>Matthias >>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! Regards, > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For > additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
That'd be great! Regards, Aivaras 2021-06-29 13:00, Matthias Seidel rašė: Updated translations should be part of every 4.2.x release in the future.
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi Aivaras, Am 27.06.21 um 10:29 schrieb Aivaras Stepukonis: > Hi, > > I welcome any step that brings us closer to v4.2. There has been done > quite a bit in the translations that sits in Pootle for years without > reaching the users. We should be updating the translations more often. That is one of the goals of AOO 4.2.0: Bringing back translations and the ability to introduce changes in the UI/Help. I started on this project years ago working on translation, just to see, that it didn't find its way into a release. I know that this can be frustrating... Updated translations should be part of every 4.2.x release in the future. Regards, Matthias > > Regards, > > Aivaras > > 2021-06-26 17:55, Matthias Seidel rašė: >> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. >>> >>> That means 41+5 languages: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst >>> >>> >>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string >>> changes... >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not we are building the full language set? > On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have created the directory structure for Dev3: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Arrigo, >> >> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >>> Hello, >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi all, The subject says it all... ;-) No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated translations from Pootle here. >>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! >> Definitely! >> >> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and >> release it! ;-) >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! >>> >>> Regards, - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi Keith, Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> > Mathias; > Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3 build. Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the translations. > We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or > seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we will > never get a 4.2 Release. Definitely! But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this release. So we should now concentrate on them. We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations. Matthias > > Keith > >> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. >>> >>> That means 41+5 languages: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0- > Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst >>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string >>> changes... >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not we are building the full language set? > On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have created the directory structure for Dev3: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Arrigo, >> >> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >>> Hello, >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi all, The subject says it all... ;-) No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated translations from Pootle here. >>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! >> Definitely! >> >> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and >> release it! ;-) >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! >>> >>> Regards, - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi Matthias, On 6/27/21 12:17 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Carl, Am 27.06.21 um 13:16 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi Matthias, On 6/26/21 10:55 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? That's okay with me. I hope you are OK with doing a dev3? ;-) Sorry, yes I'm okay with a dev3 :) Best regards, Carl Regards, Matthias Best regards, Carl Regards, Matthias Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Jim, I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. That means 41+5 languages: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string changes... Regards, Matthias Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not we are building the full language set? On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, I have created the directory structure for Dev3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ Regards, Matthias Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Arrigo, Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: Hello, On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, The subject says it all... ;-) No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated translations from Pootle here. I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! Definitely! The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and release it! ;-) Regards, Matthias And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! Regards, - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi Carl, Am 27.06.21 um 13:16 schrieb Carl Marcum: > Hi Matthias, > > On 6/26/21 10:55 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? > > That's okay with me. I hope you are OK with doing a dev3? ;-) Regards, Matthias > > Best regards, > Carl > >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. >>> >>> That means 41+5 languages: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst >>> >>> >>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string >>> changes... >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not we are building the full language set? > On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have created the directory structure for Dev3: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Arrigo, >> >> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >>> Hello, >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi all, The subject says it all... ;-) No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated translations from Pootle here. >>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! >> Definitely! >> >> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and >> release it! ;-) >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! >>> >>> Regards, - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi Matthias, On 6/26/21 10:55 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? That's okay with me. Best regards, Carl Regards, Matthias Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Jim, I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. That means 41+5 languages: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string changes... Regards, Matthias Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not we are building the full language set? On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, I have created the directory structure for Dev3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ Regards, Matthias Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Arrigo, Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: Hello, On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, The subject says it all... ;-) No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated translations from Pootle here. I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! Definitely! The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and release it! ;-) Regards, Matthias And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! Regards, - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi, I welcome any step that brings us closer to v4.2. There has been done quite a bit in the translations that sits in Pootle for years without reaching the users. We should be updating the translations more often. Regards, Aivaras 2021-06-26 17:55, Matthias Seidel rašė: 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? Regards, Matthias Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Jim, I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. That means 41+5 languages: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string changes... Regards, Matthias Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not we are building the full language set? On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, I have created the directory structure for Dev3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ Regards, Matthias Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Arrigo, Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: Hello, On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, The subject says it all... ;-) No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated translations from Pootle here. I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! Definitely! The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and release it! ;-) Regards, Matthias And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! Regards, - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? > > Regards, > > Matthias > Mathias; Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3 build. We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we will never get a 4.2 Release. Keith > Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Jim, >> >> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. >> >> That means 41+5 languages: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0- Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst >> >> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string >> changes... >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on >>> whether or not we are building the full language set? >>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, I have created the directory structure for Dev3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ Regards, Matthias Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Arrigo, > > Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >> Hello, >> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The subject says it all... ;-) >>> >>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated >>> translations from Pootle here. >> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! > Definitely! > > The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and > release it! ;-) > > Regards, > >Matthias > >> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! >> >> Regards, >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For >>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? Regards, Matthias Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Jim, > > I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. > > That means 41+5 languages: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst > > @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string > changes... > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or >> not we are building the full language set? >> >>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3: >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>>Matthias >>> >>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Arrigo, Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Hello, > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The subject says it all... ;-) >> >> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated >> translations from Pootle here. > I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! Definitely! The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and release it! ;-) Regards, Matthias > And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! > > Regards, >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi Jim, I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. That means 41+5 languages: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string changes... Regards, Matthias Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or > not we are building the full language set? > >> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have created the directory structure for Dev3: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi Arrigo, >>> >>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: Hello, On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > The subject says it all... ;-) > > No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated > translations from Pootle here. I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! >>> Definitely! >>> >>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and >>> release it! ;-) >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>>Matthias >>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! Regards, > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not we are building the full language set? > On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have created the directory structure for Dev3: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi Arrigo, >> >> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >>> Hello, >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi all, The subject says it all... ;-) No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated translations from Pootle here. >>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! >> Definitely! >> >> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and >> release it! ;-) >> >> Regards, >> >>Matthias >> >>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! >>> >>> Regards, > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi all, I have created the directory structure for Dev3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ Regards, Matthias Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Arrigo, > > Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >> Hello, >> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The subject says it all... ;-) >>> >>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated >>> translations from Pootle here. >> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! > Definitely! > > The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and > release it! ;-) > > Regards, > > Matthias > >> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! >> >> Regards, smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi Arrigo, Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Hello, > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The subject says it all... ;-) >> >> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated >> translations from Pootle here. > I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! Definitely! The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and release it! ;-) Regards, Matthias > > And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! > > Regards, smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hello, On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > The subject says it all... ;-) > > No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated > translations from Pootle here. I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big! Regards, -- Arrigo http://rigo.altervista.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi all, The subject says it all... ;-) No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated translations from Pootle here. Regards, Matthias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
