Re: [dev] presenter view extension + fast search

2007-12-05 Thread a a
Hi,

thanks for replies. Which keyboard shortcut is there for fast navigation?

Regarding 2.nd issue. Does anyone know about plan for some kind of index for
it? Because it takes really long time to search for text in huge
presentations.

regards,
pb

On Dec 4, 2007 1:08 PM, Christian Lippka - Sun Microsystems Germany <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> yes it is planned that the presenter view will have a slide sorter like
> view that pops up when pressing a keyboard shortcut for fast navigation.
>
> Regards,
> Christian
>
> Rich wrote:
> > On 2007.12.03. 14:55, a a wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm Powerpoint user - would like to migrate to OOo Impress (for our
> >> church
> >> presentations).
> >>
> >>
> >> I have 2 remarks:
> >>
> >> - based on screenshots and specification (
> >> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Presenter_View) I still miss
> >> possibility to see more than one slide ahead. Is there any plan for
> >> implementing such a Powerpoint-like feature?
> >
> > given that this feature is being developed right now, this might be a
> > good moment to suggest such a possibility. i'm not completely sure, but
> > it looks like you can add your ideas at the end of the wiki page :)
> >
> >> - one more thing I would mention here is that we need really fast text
> >> search in presentation with over 1000 slides. Does anyone have any
> >> hint for
> >> this in OOo? Because in Powerpoint it works OK for us.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


Re: [dev] Re: About the OOo dialog layouting patches

2007-12-05 Thread Philipp Lohmann

Michael Meeks wrote:

Ultimately, it boils down to the fact that a purely generic dialog
solution is not really feasible: custom logic per dialog is necessary.
If people want to wrap that with a propert-set API (as we do already
though not an UNO one) - that is great ! at least, since I'm not hacking
on that I have no firm views :-)

My point is only - that this doesn't belong in the layout discussion
(per-se). We will always need:

nice property API <-> dialog implementation <-> widgets


Actually a nice property API would have a vetoable change listener API 
that would make somthing like


Application code <-> property API <-> layouter <-> widgets
^
|
v
 dialog property dependencies code

possible. "dialog property dependencies code" would be code that manages 
the relations between different properties (and would probably be near 
the application code, too) if they cannot be expressed as simple min/max 
values.


But you're right, this does not affect the layouting discussion.

Kind regards, pl

--
If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day;
if you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime.
 -- Author unknown

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[dev] Contribution to Open Office

2007-12-05 Thread Nand Kishore Sagi
Hi ,

 This is Nand Kishore Sagi from Freehold, NJ. I chanced across open
office while updating my java version. While browsing through the web site I
found that there were openings available for developers. I was intrested in
pursuing this opportunity.

  Please let me know how do I move on to join the team and become a
active contributor.

Thanks and Regards
Nand Kishore Sagi

703-342-8507


Re: [dev] Environment variables to be removed.

2007-12-05 Thread Rüdiger Timm
linkoo sets that variable (see solenv/bin/linkoo line 54). I do not know 
 though whether that's needed, i.e. whether  != 
. Michael?


Rüdiger


Philipp Lohmann wrote:

Hi,

STAR_RESOURCEPATH is used to set an alternative directory where to find 
resource files (other than /resources . If this is 
not necessary for thebuild environment anymore (which AFAIK was the 
original customer), is anyone else using it ? Or could I remove it form 
ResMgr ?


Kind regards, pl

Rüdiger Timm wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to remove some environment variables from
config_office/set_soenv.in for SRC680 source tree:
XPVERSION
GVERDIR
TF_PACKAGES
TF_FILEURL
TF_CFGDATA
TF_SVDATA
TF_SDBAPI
TF_UCB
STAR_RESOURCEPATH
STAR_REGISTRY
All those variables are not in use any more by our current code base.
  My question now is: does someone rely on any of them for whatever
purpose? As I said, they are obsolete for building OOo. I just do not
know what people are using for their own purposes. So, if you need any
of the variables listed above, please give me a note. If not I am going
to remove them on CWS rt24 probably next week.


Rüdiger

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] Environment variables to be removed.

2007-12-05 Thread Rüdiger Timm



Philipp Lohmann wrote:

Hi,

STAR_RESOURCEPATH is used to set an alternative directory where to find 
resource files (other than /resources . If this is 
not necessary for thebuild environment anymore (which AFAIK was the 


For SO internal environment (using setsolar) as far as I can see 
STAR_RESOURCEPATH got removed in 2002. That's why I am pretty sure it is 
not needed for standard builds any more.
Of course this does not say anything about anyone else using it, so your 
question holds valid.


Rüdiger


original customer), is anyone else using it ? Or could I remove it form 
ResMgr ?


Kind regards, pl

Rüdiger Timm wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to remove some environment variables from
config_office/set_soenv.in for SRC680 source tree:
XPVERSION
GVERDIR
TF_PACKAGES
TF_FILEURL
TF_CFGDATA
TF_SVDATA
TF_SDBAPI
TF_UCB
STAR_RESOURCEPATH
STAR_REGISTRY
All those variables are not in use any more by our current code base.
  My question now is: does someone rely on any of them for whatever
purpose? As I said, they are obsolete for building OOo. I just do not
know what people are using for their own purposes. So, if you need any
of the variables listed above, please give me a note. If not I am going
to remove them on CWS rt24 probably next week.


Rüdiger

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] Re: About the OOo dialog layouting patches

2007-12-05 Thread Philipp Lohmann

Mathias Bauer wrote:

Michael Meeks wrote:

Anyhow - it sounds like you guys would like to hack on layout, if so -
you're most welcome, there should be no problem with that: though of
course, making that easy requires getting the ABI breakage in awtfixes1
included.


Yes, you mentioned that already. IIRC it was a new virtual method in the
VCL Window class? That shouldn't be a problem, especially not on a code
line towards 3.0 Beta.


Not a problem since 2.0.4 which broke binary compatibility from sal up 
AFAIK. And I want to again state my support for this; layouting is the 
one vcl/toolkit feature we miss for a very long time.


Kind regards, pl

--
If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day;
if you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime.
 -- Author unknown

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] Environment variables to be removed.

2007-12-05 Thread Philipp Lohmann

Hi,

STAR_RESOURCEPATH is used to set an alternative directory where to find 
resource files (other than /resources . If this is 
not necessary for thebuild environment anymore (which AFAIK was the 
original customer), is anyone else using it ? Or could I remove it form 
ResMgr ?


Kind regards, pl

Rüdiger Timm wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to remove some environment variables from
config_office/set_soenv.in for SRC680 source tree:
XPVERSION
GVERDIR
TF_PACKAGES
TF_FILEURL
TF_CFGDATA
TF_SVDATA
TF_SDBAPI
TF_UCB
STAR_RESOURCEPATH
STAR_REGISTRY
All those variables are not in use any more by our current code base.
  My question now is: does someone rely on any of them for whatever
purpose? As I said, they are obsolete for building OOo. I just do not
know what people are using for their own purposes. So, if you need any
of the variables listed above, please give me a note. If not I am going
to remove them on CWS rt24 probably next week.


Rüdiger

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day;
if you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime.
 -- Author unknown

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]