[dev] A question about embeding the Office into a browser
Hello All, Our team faced a question recently. When we embeded the office into a browser,some of the menu are invalid.(become gray) Who responsible for this aspect and can help us? Wait for your answer Regards, LiuTao liutao 2008-04-10
[dev] A question about embeding the Office into a browser
Sorry all, I didn't received the mail in the dev list.So I send it again. Hello All, Our team faced a question recently. When we embeded the office into a browser,some of the menu are invalid.(become gray) Who responsible for this aspect and can help us? Wait for your answer Regards, LiuTao liutao 2008-04-10
Re: [dev] A question about embeding the Office into a browser
Hi LiuTao Almost an year back I faced a problem regarding embeding OpenOffice in browser but could not succeed. I made an applet showing the OpenOffice, but failed to embed/view the applet in browser. I posted the problem on openoffice forum but did not get a satisfactory answer, so I could not move further. If you have done this, can you please help me how to do this? Your help will be much appreciated. Here are the links where I posted the problem. http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?t=52788 http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=discussmsgNo=60811 Joseph Bashir - Original Message - From: liutao [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev dev@openoffice.org Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:39 PM Subject: [dev] A question about embeding the Office into a browser Sorry all, I didn't received the mail in the dev list.So I send it again. Hello All, Our team faced a question recently. When we embeded the office into a browser,some of the menu are invalid.(become gray) Who responsible for this aspect and can help us? Wait for your answer Regards, LiuTao liutao 2008-04-10 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] BBT Font Launch
BBT font A Free Font that replaces the k / K english european alphabets for another shape for spiritual / philosophical reasons. When you press k / K .you get a different shape! This is for users and developers bundling the font on their software applications. Downloads: http://savannah.gnu.org/submissions_uploads/BBT_Download.zip http://www.filecart.com/details/37343/434/BBT.php ___ Yahoo! For Good helps you make a difference http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] Proposal: SDK as optional package of the office installation
Hi, i have investigated a little bit into the SDK to make it working/running with the new 3 layer office - OO.org 3.0. The SDK as it is doesn't work with the new structure and i would like to propose to make the SDK as an *optional* package of the normal office installation because it would simplify the whole SDK usage and configuration a lot. It's no really new idea and i have it mind for a long time. But now it seems to be the perfect time because the old structure doesn't work anymore and have to be changed anyway. The only disadvantage so far is that the download becomes a little bit bigger. For the linux distros it shouldn't be a problem because they do it anyway on their own and for example on Ubuntu the SDK packages install already in a sub directory under the office installation. Some more reasons why i think it would be a good move 1. it would ease the use and the configuration of the SDK a lot 2. everything in place if you want to program with or for OO.org 3. the *big* DevGuide (html and PDF) are removed anyway since 2.4 - the DevGuide is in the wiki online available 4. we can include the API IDL reference in the office help system. It's currently completely missing. Macro programmer have only a StarBasic runtime help but no API reference. 5. examples becomes independent. In the long term i would prefer NetBeans, Eclipse and MS Studio example projects as separate downloads or in cvs and documented in the wiki. Example would be easier to use, easier to maintain. 6. the support of different IDE's would be also simplified What do you think? I would like to make this change for OO.org 3.0 and the visible impact is small. More or less only the GUI installer are effected and will offer tow additional optional installation options. Everything else should be minor issues. The impact for localization is small. Only two short names and descriptions for the new module sin the GUI installer. There is no need to translate the SDK completely. At least not for 3.0. From my point of view it doesn't make sense to translate the IDL reference. We can think about the other SDK html files but as mentioned before there is no need for 3.0. Please share your opinions as well as your complains for this proposal as soon as possible here on the list. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Problem in developing oo extension
Dinesh Chothe wrote: Hello, I am developing one Oo extension using Oo2.4 ,java,NeBeans,Windows-Xp. By this I have added some menus to my OO menubar. Now by clicking on menu item I can able to access documents contents. How to access this text's font?Which method will give me this? How to replace some specific fonts text with other text? Can I able to access each word's Font? well that are normal API questions and i would suggest that you better ask on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Anyway, i assume that you have used our NB plugin to create the addon skeleton. You will find a m_xFrame member variable that will give you access to the document. for example XTextDocument xDoc = (XTextDocument) UnoRuntime.queryInterface(XTextDocument.class, m_xFrame.getController().getModel()); XText xText = xDoc.getText(); See all the available examples online or in the SDK for further hints how to use the API. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Proposal: SDK as optional package of the office installation
Hi Jürgen, On Thursday, 2008-04-10 14:33:23 +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The only disadvantage so far is that the download becomes a little bit bigger. How much is a little bit, now that the DevGuide isn't included anymore? What do you think? I think this would be a good move, so +1 from me. Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. SunSign 0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304 7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't send personal mail to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use for mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. pgpYNPddSfOuL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [dev] Proposal: SDK as optional package of the office installation
Eike Rathke wrote: Hi Jürgen, On Thursday, 2008-04-10 14:33:23 +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The only disadvantage so far is that the download becomes a little bit bigger. How much is a little bit, now that the DevGuide isn't included anymore? linux ~10MB, Solaris ~7,7MB, Windows ~8MB Juergen What do you think? I think this would be a good move, so +1 from me. Eike - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] GoOOCon 2008 streaming
Hi, GoOOoCon 2008 (http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/GoOOCon_2008, a local OOo-developer-focused conference) starts tomorrow! :-) It begins at 9:00 CEST, and will be streamed through: http://stream.adminit.cz/ For questions, we decided to use IRC - please join #go-oo channel on irc.freenode.net, and write your questions there; they will be forwarded to the speakers. Looking forward to seeing you there! Regards, Jan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Long paths on Windows
Hi, a short question's regarding path's: Is it generally a good idea to have space's and the version number (for example OOo-dev 3.0, Basis 3.0,...) inside the oo install path's ? This can be a trouble source too, if one needs to do installation using simple batch scripts ... Oliver GnuPG key 0xCFD04A45: 8822 057F 4956 46D3 352C 1A06 4E2C AB40 CFD0 4A45 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[dev] AddOn Update Feed Mechanism
Dear all, I try to use OOo Update Mechanism using feed. I wonder how to put a text in description Area ? Currently there is: No descriptions available for this extension. Cordially PS: I use this file: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? description xmlns=http://openoffice.org/extensions/update/2006; xmlns:xlink=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink; identifier value=com.versusoft.packages.ooo.odt2dtbook.Odt2DaisyDTBookAddOn/ update-website src xlink:href=http://odt2dtbook.sourceforge.net/; lang=en / /update-website publisher name xlink:href=http://odt2dtbook.sourceforge.net/; lang=enVincent Spiewak/name /publisher update-download src xlink:href=http://odt2dtbook.sourceforge.net/latest/Odt2DaisyDTBookAddOn-0.0.2.oxt; / /update-download release-notes src xlink:href=http://odt2dtbook.sourceforge.net/latest/release-notes_en.txt; lang=en / /release-notes version value=0.0.2 / /description -- -- - Vincent Spiewak - www.versusoft.com - --
