Re: [dev] Re: Building OO on Slackware and run it on Ubuntu
Does anyone know about this exception? (com::sun::star::lang::WrappedTargetRuntimeException) 2010/1/27 K S pgmb...@gmail.com Thank you, Michael, for your answer. Additional information: when OO crashes, the next exception appears: com::sun::star::lang::WrappedTargetRuntimeException And it looks like OO cannot open the odt document, which is created automatically when swriter starts. Kirill 2010/1/27 Michael Stahl michael.st...@sun.com hi Kirill, On 26/01/2010 13:22, K S wrote: Dear OpenOffice Community, Please help me in next problem. I have made an OO build on Slackware Linux with next configuration: ./configure --with-use-shell=bash --with-system-libs --without-system-jars --without-system-icu --without-system-agg --without-system-lpsolve --without-system-mspack --disable-mozilla --disable-pam --disable-build-mozilla --with-jdk-home=/home/administrator/Downloads/ComplementSoftware/jdk1.6.0_17 --without-system-hunspell --without-system-altlinuxhyph --disable-gconf --disable-gnome-vfs --with-ant-home=/home/administrator/Downloads/ComplementSoftware/apache-ant-1.7.1 The OO 3.1.0 was compilled without any errors. On Slackware OO works perfectly. But when I try to run this office on various systems (Fedora, Ubuntu) I obtain an error: some formats could not read (odp,odt, ppt, pptx) instead doc docx. When I call ./swriter command for example, the window appears with the message about OO crash and Please, tell me what do you think abouit the causes of such a problem. Thank you very much. the most likely cause is --with-system-libs. this will (obviously) link your OOo against the libraries installed on the system. if some other distro has the same libraries compiled with some different options from your distro, such that they are not binary compatible, then you can experience problems, or (if you're lucky) OOo will refuse to even start. but using only bundled libraries is not necessarily enough to create portable linux binaries; OOo does not bundle all libraries yet (even if a look at the source repository would give the impression), so you will likely still get problems if you run your OOo on a distro with older system libraries than the ones on the build system. here at Sun we build (essentially) against a chroot that contains some antique distro system libraries and headers, with (apparently) portable results. Sincerely yours, Kirill -- Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest. -- Mark Twain - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
RE: [dev] OO3.1 Build errors--- fatal error LNK1120: 10 unresolved externals
Dear mathias, Thank you for your reply, Yes, stlport is delivered successfully, Building module stlport /cygdrive/c/OOO310_m19/stlport - deliver -- version: 266154 Module 'stlport' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 323 files unchanged After that we have receivd LINK errors, Please see attached error log file and give to us your suggestions. Thank you Regards, Medwrite. -Original Message- From: Mathias Bauer [mailto:nospamfor...@gmx.de] Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:19 PM To: dev@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [dev] OO3.1 Build errors--- fatal error LNK1120: 10 unresolved externals Hi, meddictate wrote: Dear All, We are trying to build OO3.1 and we are using Windows XP and Cygwin. We have successfully done ./configure and bootstrap and source winenv.Set.sh. After that we are trying to do dmake, but that time we have received bellow error messages. Please See and give to us your suggestions. Are you sure that the stlport module has been built and delivered? Regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de. I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org Checking module list build -- version: - rmdir /tmp/3872 build -- version: - = Building module solenv /cygdrive/c/OOO310_m19/solenv - just for sideeffects... deliver -- version: 266154 Module 'solenv' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 1 files unchanged = Building module boost /cygdrive/c/OOO310_m19/boost - /cygdrive/c/OOO310_m19/boost/spirit - deliver -- version: 266154 Module 'boost' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 1183 files unchanged = Building module stlport /cygdrive/c/OOO310_m19/stlport - deliver -- version: 266154 Module 'stlport' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 323 files unchanged = Building module soltools /cygdrive/c/OOO310_m19/soltools/winunistd `../wntmsci12.pro/inc/unistd.h' is up to date /cygdrive/c/OOO310_m19/soltools/mkdepend -- Making: ../wntmsci12.pro/bin/makedepend.exe link /MACHINE:IX86 @C:/cygwin/tmp/mk3B5Diq Microsoft (R) Incremental Linker Version 9.00.30729.01 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. /MAP /OPT:NOREF -NODEFAULTLIB -RELEASE -DEBUG -INCREMENTAL:NO /SUBSYSTEM:CONSOLE /BASE:0x1b00 -out:../wntmsci12.pro/bin/makedepend.exe -map:../wntmsci12.pro/misc/makedepend.map ../wntmsci12.pro/obj/cppsetup.obj ../wntmsci12.pro/obj/ifparser.obj ../wntmsci12.pro/obj/include.obj ../wntmsci12.pro/obj/main.obj ../wntmsci12.pro/obj/parse.obj ../wntmsci12.pro/obj/pr.obj ../wntmsci12.pro/obj/collectdircontent.obj msvcrt.lib kernel32.lib user32.lib oldnames.lib stlport_vc71.lib collectdircontent.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __declspec(dllimport) public: __thiscall std::basic_stringchar,struct std::char_traitschar,class std::allocatorchar ::basic_stringchar,struct std::char_traitschar,class std::allocatorchar (class std::basic_stringchar,struct std::char_traitschar,class std::allocatorchar const ) (__imp_??0?$basic_str...@du?$char_traits@d...@std@@v?$alloca...@d@2@@std@@q...@abv01@@Z) referenced in function public: __thiscall std::logic_error::logic_error(class std::basic_stringchar,struct std::char_traitschar,class std::allocatorchar const ) (??0logic_er...@std@@q...@abv?$basic_string@du?$char_tra...@d@std@@v?$alloca...@d@2@@1@@Z) collectdircontent.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __declspec(dllimport) public: __thiscall std::basic_stringchar,struct std::char_traitschar,class std::allocatorchar ::~basic_stringchar,struct std::char_traitschar,class std::allocatorchar (void) (__imp_??1?$basic_str...@du?$char_traits@d...@std@@v?$alloca...@d@2@@std@@q...@xz) referenced in function public: virtual __thiscall std::logic_error::~logic_error(void) (??1logic_er...@std@@u...@xz) collectdircontent.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __declspec(dllimport) bool __cdecl std::operatorchar,struct std::char_traitschar,class std::allocatorchar (class std::basic_stringchar,struct std::char_traitschar,class std::allocatorchar const ,class std::basic_stringchar,struct std::char_traitschar,class std::allocatorchar const ) (__imp_??$?mdu?$char_tra...@d@std@@v?$alloca...@d@1@@std@@ya_nabv?$basic_str...@du?$char_traits@d...@std@@v?$alloca...@d@2@@0...@0@Z) referenced in function public: bool __thiscall std::lessclass std::basic_stringchar,struct std::char_traitschar,class std::allocatorchar ::operator()(class std::basic_stringchar,struct std::char_traitschar,class std::allocatorchar const ,class std::basic_stringchar,struct
[dev] Changes to Site/Product Elements due to Oracle Acquisition
All, With the acquisition of Sun Microsystems by Oracle now being closed we'll see some immediate changes to our site and product. This reflects the fact that Oracle replaces Sun in its role as part of the OpenOffice.org project. * source header The copyright notice will be altered in all files on trunk and the templates adjusted too. * license file in installation set The copyright notice will be changed. * splash screen / about box The current splash screen (thanks to Jacek) will be kept in memory after the many times we have seen it in more than a year. But it's time to start a refreshment as soon as 3.2 is released for the splash screen and about box because the current visuals do not get along well with new colors and shapes the superseding sponsor logo introduces. To accommodate that initially these elements will carry only the OpenOffice.org logo, the modified text and the sponsor logo on white background. For a new splash we count on an effort run by the OOo project. * site footer The logo and the trademark attribution notice will be adapted. These are the most visible and pressing occurrences. I'm sure there are many more that we have to consider. This will happen over time. For more general information see the news pointing to the Oracle + Sun Product Strategy Webcast series at http://www.openoffice.org/news/#oraclesun Greetings Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Words of thanks and thoughts for the future WAS Re: [dev] Changes to Site/Product Elements due to Oracle Acquisition
Hi Stefan, all, Stefan Taxhet wrote (28-01-10 12:50) With the acquisition of Sun Microsystems by Oracle now being closed we'll see some immediate changes to our site and product. This reflects the fact that Oracle replaces Sun in its role as part of the OpenOffice.org project. [...] Let me take this opportunity to express some thoughts and feelings to the Sun team working on OpenOffice.org. And I hope and trust that, in doing so, I reflect the opinion of the vast majority of the members of our community. Some words of thanks are in its place, in my opinion, although essentially we continue to work with the same people. In the first place for all the good work done on the product and the project in the past nearly ten years. In moments of joy and excitement and also in times of problems and sadness. Further, I feel thankful for you all continuing the work in the long period of uncertainty that has just been closed. I know many of us were hopeful and confident, but still, one first has to see it really. I'm glad that now this period is closed, finished. People knowing me, will recognize that I'm not shy to raise my voice when (IMO) something is wrong, sub-optimal, and has room for improvement. Either be it in the software, either in how we work together. And I hope that I may be able to continue cooperating in this spirit for a long time to come. Enjoying the so often positive attitude of the team, and well meant steps to an even brighter future. I am really exited about OpenOffice.org being part of Oracle and trust that this new situation will give the project great opportunities. That all in the project may enjoy. Best wishes to all, Cor -- Your office 2010 software: the new OpenOffice.org Cor Nouws - nl.OpenOffice.org marketing contact - Community Council member - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Changes to Site/Product Elements due to Oracle Acquisition
On 01/28/10 12:50, Stefan Taxhet wrote: * source header The copyright notice will be altered in all files on trunk and the templates adjusted too. I'm confident you won't forget to fix in that process also the issues raised in the VCS Keywords in License Headers thread on this mailing list, right? -Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] LINK : fatal error LNK1181: cannot open input file 'stlport_vc71.lib'
Dear All, Dear All, We are trying to build OO3.1.1 and we are using Windows XP and Cygwin. We have successfully done ./configure and bootstrap and source winenv.Set.sh. After that we are trying to do dmake, but that time we have received bellow error messages. Making: ../wntmsci12.pro/bin/makedepend.exe link /MACHINE:IX86 @C:/cygwin/tmp/mksBZV6l Microsoft (R) Incremental Linker Version 9.00.30729.01 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. /MAP /OPT:NOREF -NODEFAULTLIB -RELEASE -DEBUG -INCREMENTAL:NO /SUBSYSTEM:CONSOLE /BASE:0x1b00 -out:../wntmsci12.pro/bin/makedepend.exe -map:../wntmsci12. pro/misc/makedepend.map ../wntmsci12.pro/obj/cppsetup.obj ../wntmsci12.pro/obj/ifparser.obj ../wntmsci12.pro/obj/include.obj ../wntmsci12.pro/obj/main.obj ../wntmsci12.pro/obj/parse.obj ../wntmsci12.pro/obj/pr.obj ../wntmsci12.pro/obj/collectdircontent.obj msvcrt.lib kernel32.lib user32.lib oldnames.lib stlport_vc71.lib LINK : fatal error LNK1181: cannot open input file 'stlport_vc71.lib' rmdir /cygdrive/c/DOCUME~1/ADMINI~1/LOCALS~1/Temp/3936 But stlport was successfully delivered :/cygwin/bin/touch.exe ./wntmsci12.pro/misc/build/so_predeliver_so_stlport deliver -- version: 266154 Module 'stlport' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 323 files unchanged How to solve this issue?? Please give to us your suggestions. Thank you Regards, Medwrite. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Help ! how to get the source code for some really old OOo projects and build them ?
Dear OOo developers, I am doing some investigation on the concurrency bug detection, and I am studying some old concurrency bugs. And I feel OpenOffice has very detailed bug report and thus make a very good candidate for the study. For example, I am looking at this bug : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44627 It is said that the version is 680m79 and Target milestone:OOo 2.0.2. However, I am not sure how to get the source code of this or how to check it out from CVS or SVN. And it would be great if there is some document about how to build this very old OOo. I did manage to download some source code tarball from some unofficial OOo website. One of the tarballs is labeled as OOo_2.0.0_src.tar.gz and the other tarball that is labeled as OOo_2.0.1_src.tar.gz. I am not sure if I have downloaded the right one for the bug I need to study in the first place. And When I was trying to build the whole thing according to http://tools.openoffice.org/dev_docs/build_linux.html, I came across various issues with the JDK version and ANT version. After I googled around, I am using JDK 1.4.2 and ANT 1.6.2. There are still some other issues that I find pretty hard to resolve even after googling. So I am trying to ask this: (1) is there a way that I can check out the legacy code, furthermore, from the bug report how can I tell which tag or branch of the source code I should download/checkout (2) is there any document regarding what the system requirement for a particular build, such like the java version, c/c++ version etc (3) once I have retrieved the source code, is it true that I can always just follow http://tools.openoffice.org/dev_docs/build_linux.html to build the software ? Thank you very much again ! Wei
[dev] Re: license question: np_sdk/mozsrc/npunix.c
Hi, Anyone have a chance to look at these question? yours, Julius On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Julius Davies juliusdav...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The [np_sdk/mozsrc/npunix.c] source file appears to be licensed under MPL-1.1. It's not tri-licensed under the usual GPL/LGPL/MPL combination most files are. Meanwhile [np_sdk/mozsrc/npwin.cpp] in the same directory is tri-licensed uner GPL/LGPL/NPL. I have two questions: 1. Do these files ever get combined together in a resulting binary file? 2. Could the MPL-1.1 licensed [np_sdk/mozsrc/npunix.c] source file cause license compatibility problem for OpenOffice, since it's GPL-incompatible according to the FSF? -- yours, Julius Davies 250-592-2284 (Home) 250-893-4579 (Mobile) http://juliusdavies.ca/logging.html -- yours, Julius Davies 250-592-2284 (Home) 250-893-4579 (Mobile) http://juliusdavies.ca/logging.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: license question: np_sdk/mozsrc/npunix.c
Julius Davies schrieb: Hi, Anyone have a chance to look at these question? yes, we're currently looking into this, please expect an update soon, Martin yours, Julius On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Julius Davies juliusdav...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The [np_sdk/mozsrc/npunix.c] source file appears to be licensed under MPL-1.1. It's not tri-licensed under the usual GPL/LGPL/MPL combination most files are. Meanwhile [np_sdk/mozsrc/npwin.cpp] in the same directory is tri-licensed uner GPL/LGPL/NPL. I have two questions: 1. Do these files ever get combined together in a resulting binary file? 2. Could the MPL-1.1 licensed [np_sdk/mozsrc/npunix.c] source file cause license compatibility problem for OpenOffice, since it's GPL-incompatible according to the FSF? -- yours, Julius Davies 250-592-2284 (Home) 250-893-4579 (Mobile) http://juliusdavies.ca/logging.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
