Re: [dev] change Xcu with extension
Hi, I've tried the stuff which is explained in the docu. I want to change the paths in Path.xcu, but everything except finalized fails. I can't change the entries with replace, fuse or modify which is default. Only finalized is working and changes the entries. But when i set the entries finalize, of course , they aren't editable any longer, but that is not good they should be editable. Below is again the code example. What should i do? Maybe the entry mandatory is the reason why i cant change the entry, is it possible to change that? sponmonster wrote: FOR Example: Paths.xcu node oor:name=Gallery oor:op=fuse oor:mandatory=true node oor:name=InternalPaths node oor:name=$(insturl)/share/gallery oor:op=fuse/ /node prop oor:name=WritePath value$(userurl)/gallery/value /prop /node ---myPath.xcu here i change the path within the extension node oor:name=Gallery prop oor:name=UserPaths oor:type=oor:string-list oor:finalized=true valuefile:///D:/DATEN/benutzer/OpenOffice/gallery/value /prop prop oor:name=WritePath oor:type=xs:string oor:finalized=true valuefile:///D:/DATEN/benutzer/OpenOffice/gallery/value /prop /node -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/change-Xcu-with-extension-tp28081556p28105397.html Sent from the openoffice - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] change Xcu with extension
Hi, I've tried the stuff which is explained in the docu. I want to change the paths in Path.xcu, but everything except finalized fails. I can't change the entries with replace, fuse or modify which is default. Only finalized is working and changes the entries. But when i set the entries finalize, of course , they aren't editable any longer, but that is not good they should be editable. Below is again the code example. What should i do? Maybe the entry mandatory is the reason why i cant change the entry, is it possible to change that? sponmonster wrote: FOR Example: Paths.xcu node oor:name=Gallery oor:op=fuse oor:mandatory=true node oor:name=InternalPaths node oor:name=$(insturl)/share/gallery oor:op=fuse/ /node prop oor:name=WritePath value$(userurl)/gallery/value /prop /node ---myPath.xcu here i change the path within the extension node oor:name=Gallery prop oor:name=UserPaths oor:type=oor:string-list oor:finalized=true valuefile:///D:/DATEN/benutzer/OpenOffice/gallery/value /prop prop oor:name=WritePath oor:type=xs:string oor:finalized=true valuefile:///D:/DATEN/benutzer/OpenOffice/gallery/value /prop /node -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/change-Xcu-with-extension-tp28081556p28105403.html Sent from the openoffice - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] change Xcu with extension
Hi, have you tried, for example: Path.xcu: node oor:name=AutoText prop oor:name=UserPaths valuefile:///D:/Data/Global_Autotext_1 file:///D:/Data/Global_Autotext_2/value /prop prop oor:name=WritePath valuefile:///X:/User/Autotext/value /prop /node Common.xcu: node oor:name=Path node oor:name=Current prop oor:name=AutoText oor:type=oor:string-list value xsi:nil=true / /prop /node /node -- GnuPG key 0xCFD04A45: 8822 057F 4956 46D3 352C 1A06 4E2C AB40 CFD0 4A45 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [dev] change Xcu with extension
On 04/01/10 09:33, sponmonster wrote: I've tried the stuff which is explained in the docu. I want to change the paths in Path.xcu, but everything except finalized fails. I can't change the entries with replace, fuse or modify which is default. Only finalized is working and changes the entries. But when i set the entries finalize, of course , they aren't editable any longer, but that is not good they should be editable. Below is again the code example. What should i do? If the user already explicitly set those path values (via the GUI), they are marked as modified in the user layer which is higher than the extensions layer (where your Paths.xcu ends up), so your changes would only become visible if you make them finalized (which makes configmgr ignore any higher layers for those settings). That would explain what you see. -Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] change Xcu with extension
Hi thanks for your help, but i found the mistake i made it was the mandatory flag in the original Paths.xcu when i set oor:mandatory=false in the extension xcu-file the default operation modify takes place, the entrie is overwritten and it still is editable, so it works :) but thanks for your answer -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/change-Xcu-with-extension-tp28081556p28105656.html Sent from the openoffice - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: Problems building OOO320_m14 on Windows.
Hi Heiner. So what build system should I have been using? I was simply using the guide available here: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide/Building_on_Windows dmake seems to create makefile.mk from the makefile.rc file.and this is then called from dmake. Are there some switches I am missing? - - - - - - - - - Áframsendur póstur - - - - - - - - - - From: Jens-Heiner Rechtien jens-heiner.recht...@sun.com To: dev@openoffice.org Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:22:53 +0200 Subject: Re: [dev] Re: Problems building OOO320_m14 on Windows. Hi Kristján, both the CWS changefileheader3 and the OOO320 milestone m14 have certainly been build several times before release. It's just that only very few developers still use the ancient makefile.rc - a nice example for the evils of having multiple build systems. I wasn't even aware that it still exists ... Will be fixed in the next milestone. Regards, Heiner Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson wrote: Ok I see the problem now, it seems that the makefile.rc was messed up when changing copyright notice and invalid remarks where created: http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO320/diff/659920c8492d/makefile.rc This means that the current OOO320_m14 release can't be built directly from source without first fixing makefile.rc. This is amazing, no one has actually tried to test build the release? Þann 29. mars 2010 20:51, skrifaði Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson kristjanbja...@gmail.com: I am trying to build OOO320_m14 on Windows in CygWin 1.5.25 Here is my configure: ./configure \ --disable-nss-module \ --with-use-shell=bash \ --disable-activex \ --disable-directx \ --disable-epm \ --disable-atl \ --disable-build-mozilla \ --with-cl-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0/VC \ --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/Winapps/Java/ant \ --with-frame-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v6.1 \ --with-psdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v6.1 \ --with-midl-path=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v6.1/Bin \ --with-asm-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0/VC/Bin \ --with-jdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Winapps/Java/jdk16 \ --with-csc-path=/cygdrive/c/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v3.5 After running dmake I get this error: dmake: makefile.mk: line 3: Warning: -- Duplicate target [OR] dmake: makefile.mk: line 3: Error: -- Expecting macro or rule defn, found neither Can somebody help me with this?
Re: [dev] Re: Problems building OOO320_m14 on Windows.
Hi Kristján, what most developers do is, strangely, written in a footnote in the windows build section. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide/Building_on_Windows#cite_note-Foot8-7 But it doesn't really signify, doing a 'dmake' in SRC_ROOT is documented in the build guide and thus should work as well. Regards, Heiner Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson wrote: Hi Heiner. So what build system should I have been using? I was simply using the guide available here: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide/Building_on_Windows dmake seems to create makefile.mk from the makefile.rc file.and this is then called from dmake. Are there some switches I am missing? - - - - - - - - - Áframsendur póstur - - - - - - - - - - From: Jens-Heiner Rechtien jens-heiner.recht...@sun.com To: dev@openoffice.org Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:22:53 +0200 Subject: Re: [dev] Re: Problems building OOO320_m14 on Windows. Hi Kristján, both the CWS changefileheader3 and the OOO320 milestone m14 have certainly been build several times before release. It's just that only very few developers still use the ancient makefile.rc - a nice example for the evils of having multiple build systems. I wasn't even aware that it still exists ... Will be fixed in the next milestone. Regards, Heiner Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson wrote: Ok I see the problem now, it seems that the makefile.rc was messed up when changing copyright notice and invalid remarks where created: http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO320/diff/659920c8492d/makefile.rc This means that the current OOO320_m14 release can't be built directly from source without first fixing makefile.rc. This is amazing, no one has actually tried to test build the release? Þann 29. mars 2010 20:51, skrifaði Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson kristjanbja...@gmail.com: I am trying to build OOO320_m14 on Windows in CygWin 1.5.25 Here is my configure: ./configure \ --disable-nss-module \ --with-use-shell=bash \ --disable-activex \ --disable-directx \ --disable-epm \ --disable-atl \ --disable-build-mozilla \ --with-cl-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0/VC \ --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/Winapps/Java/ant \ --with-frame-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v6.1 \ --with-psdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v6.1 \ --with-midl-path=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v6.1/Bin \ --with-asm-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0/VC/Bin \ --with-jdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Winapps/Java/jdk16 \ --with-csc-path=/cygdrive/c/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v3.5 After running dmake I get this error: dmake: makefile.mk: line 3: Warning: -- Duplicate target [OR] dmake: makefile.mk: line 3: Error: -- Expecting macro or rule defn, found neither Can somebody help me with this? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development
Le Thu, 1 Apr 2010 01:03:35 +0200, Thorsten Behrens t...@openoffice.org a écrit : Cor Nouws wrote: What I currently see is a big chasm between Sun/Oracle people, who unanimously reject my candidature on various grounds, and the rest Are you really sure about that? I've only read three or four opinions. And not all that strong. So IMO your statement does make the contrast look harder than it is. And that is - sorry that I have to notice - contrary to what you state below here. Hi Cor, hm, at least this is my perception. I saw four public statements, ranging from mounting a campaign, endorsement of that campaign, seeing conflict of interest, and being a bit scared. I may have managed to appear a bit less scary, but have not yet received any indication that, with the clarifications, I may now be acceptable. ;) Charles' question was about my view, which is subjective of course, and my brain reading capabilities are limited. I'd love to be proven wrong, and profoundly apologize to those I might have unintentionally misrepresented. Thanks for keeping an eye on this, and the moderation, -- Thorsten Thorsten, it's actually not what I have asked you. I have asked you how you feel about the OOo community, and its unity. You don't need brain reading capabilities for this :-) So I'm waiting for your answer here, although for me, your nomination is perfectly acceptable. As Eric just replied to this thread I would however like to clarify a point here: FOSS does not entail democracy. It never had, never will, and no, your patches don't *always* have to be accepted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development
eric.bach...@free.fr wrote: [...] the most important is to see whether there is or not a real democracy inside OpenOffice.org. requesting democracy is quite striking request and and issue where people might have different understandings: do you mean the meritocratic way (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy) or the egalitaristic (is this an English word ?) way (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egalitarianism). or as others [1] say: We are not voting on every decision. Good feedback, good data are welcome. I don't know if I'm that far going as Mark saying This is not a democracy since I think meritocracy is an established pattern in many Open Source projects. And I consider meritocracy as democratic shape. Martin [1] http://www.webupd8.org/2010/03/ubuntu-is-not-democratic.html Have a nice day, Eric Bachard - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] How to use DBG_foo?
Greetings, What does it take to use, for example, the DBG_ASSERT function defined in debug.hxx? I have poked around on the wiki without success. I have added enough #include lines to get the file to compile, but now the link step is failing with undefined references to DbgFunc() and DbgOut(). I see that these functions are bound into libtlli.so, but how do I tell the build system to--pardon the pun--make the link? Cheers, Terry. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Phase Voting by the Constituency starts for the current Community Council Elections
Hi all, the phase Voting by the Constituency for the current OpenOffice.org Community Council elections starts now. The election process [1] instructs us to allot two weeks for voting. That period begins now and will end by April 15th 2010. The voting for the different seats will be done by the corresponding constituencies (see below). We have compiled a list of those who are eligible to vote and we will invite the members of the constituencies by direct mail which explains how and where to vote. The wiki page [2] provides further information on the current elections. Nevertheless, we are going to vote for ... Native Language Confederation Representative Number of seats: One Constituency: Category leads, project leads and co-leads from native-lang projects, plus project lead and co-leads of l10n project. Candidate: Olivier Hallot http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Community_Council/Elections/2010-03#Native_Language_Confederation_Representative Code Contributor Representative Number of seats: One Constituency: All active code contributors - people who constantly contribute code to the project under the general rules of the project, as defined by following criteria: a) contributor is a domain developer, b) contributor has commit access to the OpenOffice.org code repository, c) contributing code with the established child workspace processes, d) contributing under the accepted term and conditions of the project (SCA, formerly known as JCA or CA)., e) contributor constantly takes over ownership of child workspaces (took ownership of at least one CWS within the last 6 months) Candidate: Eike Rathke http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Community_Council/Elections/2010-03#Code_Contributor_Representative Product Development Representative Number of seats: One Constituency: Category leads, project leads and co-leads of all OpenOffice.org projects (accepted and incubator) but not from the native-lang category or l10n project. Candidate: Thorsten Behrens http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Community_Council/Elections/2010-03#Product_Development_Representative If you run into any problems feel free to contact the commissary and observers listed at [2]. Thank you and enjoy your day! Christoph (on behalf of the OpenOffice.org Community Council) REFERENCES [1] Election Process Bylaw http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Community_Council/Items/Election_Process [2] Election 2010-03 http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Community_Council/Elections/2010-03 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] How to use DBG_foo?
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:40:11 -0400
Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com wrote:
Greetings,
What does it take to use, for example, the DBG_ASSERT function defined
in debug.hxx? I have poked around on the wiki without success.
I have added enough #include lines to get the file to compile, but now
the link step is failing with undefined references to DbgFunc() and
DbgOut(). I see that these functions are bound into libtlli.so, but
how do I tell the build system to--pardon the pun--make the link?
In general -- dont do it. As Michael Stahl pointed out on:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/Code_Conventions
DBG_* is defined in module tools, and therefore evil by definition
Consider using OSL_ENSURE and friends from sal/inc/osl/diagnose.h
instead.
If you still want you use the evil old tools asserts, you would need to
find the makefile where the linking gets done (most on the time
${MODULE}/util) and add the tool lib to the linked lib like this:
SHL[0-9]STDLIBS+= $(TOOLSLIB)
You would also need to make sure that your module depends (directly
or indirectly) on the tools module in the prj/build.lst file.
Best Regards,
Bjoern
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
