Re: [dev] Can application work well in the system without installing OOo !
I am thinking how to develop a application with odb inside using c++! Maybe it will be used in some machines without OOo ! It can just record the data without open it ! I will open it in my machine ! can it ? On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Mathias Bauer nospamfor...@gmx.de wrote: On 13.05.2010 16:39, Qzi er wrote: Can application work well in the system without installing OOo ! I want to develop a appliciont using mfc OOo uno , but I don't know how can't it work well ! OOo runs without installing it, it's enough to copy another installed instance. Of course this copied instance then will have no system integration. So doubleclicking ODF documents will not start OOo and - perhaps more important for you - simple bootstrapping of UNO connections won't work and you have to connect manually, explicitly specifying OOo's location. Regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de. I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org -- 作智慧的减法 ... 体会生活的微妙的富足 ... 嗯 ...
Re: [dev] Can application work well in the system without installing OOo !
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Qzi er hotseason...@gmail.com wrote: I am thinking how to develop a application with odb inside using c++! Maybe it will be used in some machines without OOo ! It can just record the data without open it ! I will open it in my machine ! can it ? Have a look at JODConverter or PyODconverter they do exactly that. Except is more oriented to just manipulate formats, you could arguably do something else. http://www.artofsolving.com/opensource/jodconverter On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Mathias Bauer nospamfor...@gmx.de wrote: On 13.05.2010 16:39, Qzi er wrote: Can application work well in the system without installing OOo ! I want to develop a appliciont using mfc OOo uno , but I don't know how can't it work well ! OOo runs without installing it, it's enough to copy another installed instance. Of course this copied instance then will have no system integration. So doubleclicking ODF documents will not start OOo and - perhaps more important for you - simple bootstrapping of UNO connections won't work and you have to connect manually, explicitly specifying OOo's location. Regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de. I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org -- 作智慧的减法 ... 体会生活的微妙的富足 ... 嗯 ... -- Alexandro Colorado OpenOffice.org Español http://es.openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Can application work well in the system without installing OOo !
Hello Qzi er, Le 15 mai 2010 à 19:13, Alexandro Colorado a écrit : On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Qzi er hotseason...@gmail.com wrote: I am thinking how to develop a application with odb inside using c++! Maybe it will be used in some machines without OOo ! It can just record the data without open it ! I will open it in my machine ! can it ? Have a look at JODConverter or PyODconverter they do exactly that. Except is more oriented to just manipulate formats, you could arguably do something else. http://www.artofsolving.com/opensource/jodconverter I think that if you want to stick to c ++ you may find more resources here: http://www.odftoolkit.org ; otherwise I'll coin in the project I'm working on: http://www.lpod-project.org :-) Best, Charles. On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Mathias Bauer nospamfor...@gmx.de wrote: On 13.05.2010 16:39, Qzi er wrote: Can application work well in the system without installing OOo ! I want to develop a appliciont using mfc OOo uno , but I don't know how can't it work well ! OOo runs without installing it, it's enough to copy another installed instance. Of course this copied instance then will have no system integration. So doubleclicking ODF documents will not start OOo and - perhaps more important for you - simple bootstrapping of UNO connections won't work and you have to connect manually, explicitly specifying OOo's location. Regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to nospamfor...@gmx.de. I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org -- 作智慧的减法 ... 体会生活的微妙的富足 ... 嗯 ... -- Alexandro Colorado OpenOffice.org Español http://es.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Can application work well in the system without installing OOo !
Le 15 mai 10 à 19:23, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit : I think that if you want to stick to c ++ you may find more resources here: http://www.odftoolkit.org ; otherwise I'll coin in the project I'm working on: http://www.lpod-project.org :-) Can we see your code ? /me curious -- qɔᴉɹə Education Project: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org Blog : http://eric.bachard.free.fr/news
Re: [dev] Can application work well in the system without installing OOo !
Le 15 mai 2010 à 19:46, eric b a écrit : Le 15 mai 10 à 19:23, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit : I think that if you want to stick to c ++ you may find more resources here: http://www.odftoolkit.org ; otherwise I'll coin in the project I'm working on: http://www.lpod-project.org :-) Can we see your code ? /me curious Sure: http://lpod-project.org/get-the-code#get-the-lpod-source Charles. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Can application work well in the system without installing OOo !
I am just learning the uno ! some types of sdk and open , save a document in console ! but I will do that later ! if a app created , I can send you ! On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:46 AM, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr wrote: Le 15 mai 10 à 19:23, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit : I think that if you want to stick to c ++ you may find more resources here: http://www.odftoolkit.org ; otherwise I'll coin in the project I'm working on: http://www.lpod-project.org :-) Can we see your code ? /me curious -- qɔᴉɹə Education Project: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org Blog : http://eric.bachard.free.fr/news -- 作智慧的减法 ... 体会生活的微妙的富足 ... 嗯 ...
Re: [dev] Can application work well in the system without installing OOo !
I am so happy to know more info about OOo like http://www.odftoolkit.org ... - ODFDOM http://odftoolkit.org/projects/odfdom/pages/Home, Java - AODL http://odftoolkit.org/projects/aodl/pages/Home, .NET ( C# ) Can it use in c++ ? On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Qzi er hotseason...@gmail.com wrote: I am just learning the uno ! some types of sdk and open , save a document in console ! but I will do that later ! if a app created , I can send you ! On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:46 AM, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr wrote: Le 15 mai 10 à 19:23, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit : I think that if you want to stick to c ++ you may find more resources here: http://www.odftoolkit.org ; otherwise I'll coin in the project I'm working on: http://www.lpod-project.org :-) Can we see your code ? /me curious -- qɔᴉɹə Education Project: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org Blog : http://eric.bachard.free.fr/news -- 作智慧的减法 ... 体会生活的微妙的富足 ... 嗯 ... -- 作智慧的减法 ... 体会生活的微妙的富足 ... 嗯 ...
[dev] CMake
Hi,
I noticed the discussion about CMake, and wanted a chance to answer some
of the questions raised about CMake. Sorry for starting a new thread,
but I just joined the list. If you want to move this back to the old
thread, please just answer my comments on that thread, I will look for it.
Sure, but CMake does not have target local variables, dynamic evaluation
etc. that make that usable in a large scale project.
I am not sure what the question is here. CMake does have various forms
of local variables.
- All variables in the cmake function command are local to that
function, and can be optionally moved up to a parent scope.
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake-2-8-docs.html#command:function
- CMake also has target properties that can be set. These are
properties that are attached to a target.
See the documentation for set_target_properties here:
cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake-2-8-docs.html#command:set_target_properties
- CMake is certainly being used for many large projects, so I am not
sure what dynamic eval you are asking about.
The biggest problem of a switch to CMake besides the ones already
mentioned is that it does not offer a migration path for us.
Switching our build system to CMake would require a one shot
conversion, including parallel maintenance of makefiles for the whole
duration of the switch (that is estimated to last for several
months).
There are ways to do this. In particular, a recent addition to CMake
call external projects might be useful.
For example, you can build Qt from a cmake file like this:
ExternalProject_Add(Qt
DOWNLOAD_DIR ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}
URL ${qt_file}
UPDATE_COMMAND
SOURCE_DIR ${qt_source}
BUILD_IN_SOURCE 1
CONFIGURE_COMMAND ${qt_configure}
BUILD_COMMAND ${qt_build}
INSTALL_COMMAND ${qt_install}
)
This could be used to drive the existing build system of open office.
So, you could have a tree of CMake built sub-parts of openoffice, and a
tree that still uses the current build system. An umbrella CMake build
file could be constructed to build external projects for each part of
the system. I am pretty sure that you could get there incrementally if
you wanted to.
Another topic that is mentioned is the fact that builds have to be run
from the top. That is not entirely true. You can have subprojects
that are built on their own. Each add_subdirectory can point to a
complete project. If you cd into the sub directory in the build tree,
you can just run make, and it will only build the targets associated
with that sub-project. Also, you could run cmake on the sub-project by
itself if it is written to work as an independent sub-project.
Another aspect of CMake that you do not address in your evaluation is
that fact that with CMake you will be outsourcing the maintenance of
the build system to the CMake developers. CMake will be creating shared
libraries, mac OSX bundles, install rules, rpath manipulation,
potentially packaging in the future, and lots of other features. CMake
is not a static project, and has lots of development going on. Your
project could enjoy some of that effort, and perhaps guide it if you
joined the CMake community. For more general information about the
whole CMake tool set, you might be interested in the google tech talk
that I did:
http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/2
-Bill
--
Bill Hoffman
Kitware, Inc.
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065
bill.hoff...@kitware.com
http://www.kitware.com
518 881-4905 (Direct)
518 371-3971 x105
Fax (518) 371-4573
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] what's the deference between weak reference and hard reference ?
what's the deference between weak reference and hard reference ? I can't understande the wiki below ! http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/ProUNO/C%2B%2B/Using_Weak_References Is there other core code show what is weak distinguish hard ? -- 作智慧的减法 ... 体会生活的微妙的富足 ... 嗯 ...
