Re: [dev] Instance of OOo running after unopkg ?
Hi René, On 23.08.2010 16:05, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:01:45PM +0200, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > >> for installing an extension (under Ubuntu in this particular case) in an >> installation script the command-line tool "unopkg" is used. When >> starting OOo thereafter a warning comes up that an instance of OOo would >> be running, and if one would like to proceed. >> >> Is this an expected behaviour? >> > Nope. > > I don't see that in all the packages here which use unopkg > in their preinst/postinst/prerm. > Thank you very much for this hint! Going back because of it, I just noticed that unopkg is not the culprit, but a script that runs afterwards, so it is my own fault probably. Sorry for the wrong alarm. Just a quick question (which would save me a little bit of research which currently would be quite helpful): how can I make sure, having a xContext (from com.sun.star.comp.helper.Bootstrap.bootstrap()) to shutdown OOo gracefully at the end? (Presumably not closing OOo explicitly leavees an instance open.) ---rony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] XDesktop.terminate() Re: [dev] Instance of OOo running after unopkg ?
Hi there, ... cut ... > Just a quick question (which would save me a little bit of research. > which currently would be quite helpful): how can I make sure, having a > xContext (from com.sun.star.comp.helper.Bootstrap.bootstrap()) to > shutdown OOo gracefully at the end? (Presumably not closing OOo > explicitly leavees an instance open.) > > sorry for the noise, just found what I need: XDesktop.terminate(). ---rony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Instance of OOo running after unopkg ?
Hi, On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:01:45PM +0200, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > for installing an extension (under Ubuntu in this particular case) in an > installation script the command-line tool "unopkg" is used. When > starting OOo thereafter a warning comes up that an instance of OOo would > be running, and if one would like to proceed. > > Is this an expected behaviour? Nope. I don't see that in all the packages here which use unopkg in their preinst/postinst/prerm. Grüße/Regards, René - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Instance of OOo running after unopkg ?
Hi there, for installing an extension (under Ubuntu in this particular case) in an installation script the command-line tool "unopkg" is used. When starting OOo thereafter a warning comes up that an instance of OOo would be running, and if one would like to proceed. Is this an expected behaviour? Is there a command-line utility which one could use to make sure that after unopkg OOo gets reliably shutdown? Or with other words: how could one make sure in an un/installation script, that OOo has completely shut down after unopkg, before proceeding ? ---rony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
