[Potlatch-dev] [OpenStreetMap] #4516: GPS track / GPX files - last point of each track segment ignored
#4516: GPS track / GPX files - last point of each track segment ignored -+-- Reporter: Janschejbal | Owner: potlatch-dev@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor| Milestone: Component: potlatch2| Version: Keywords: | -+-- Potlatch 2 seems to ignore the last track point in each track segment in uploaded GPS tracks (GPX files). See attached screenshot for a view of the track (with 2 segments) in potlatch2 (left), JOSM (middle) and the track preview image in my tracks. The rendering in JOSM is as expected. -- Ticket URL: https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4516 OpenStreetMap http://www.openstreetmap.org/ OpenStreetMap is a free editable map of the whole world ___ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
Re: [OSM-dev] [GSoC] Improvements to Vespucci
Am 2012-08-10 12:28, schrieb Marcus Wolschon: Just tried it. Seems to work really fine. :) I can have a look and add missing German translations. I added German and Czech translations for the strings I added. Somebody should check the Czech ones. A new APK is available at http://www.janschejbal.de/temp/vespucci.apk It has: * Proper, osm-compatible GPX export * Support for interrupted/segmented tracks (both for display and GPX export) * A fix for a nasty bug that could cause multiple elements to get the same OsmId. * Translations Some documentation for EasyEdit and the URLs has been provided on the Vespucci wiki page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vespucci Two things remain to be done: Making a decision how to deal with the different license for the preset, and implementing change export (and possibly linking to the help page from within the application). For the change export, I can use either the OsmChange format http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OsmChange, or the JOSM file format http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM_file_format - please decide which one I should implement. I checked the license of the template and icons. These are available under the GPLv2/v3, which means we cannot distribute them under the Apache License (which is the license used by Vespucci). In my opinion, we have the following options: - Include a minimalistic preset and allow the full preset do be downloaded to avoid license issues - Consider the preset and icons a separate module only bundled with Vespucci (not part of it), include it in the APK, and put in a note that these parts are GPLv3. (After all, presets are cleanly separated and can be easily loaded at runtime) - If the preset is considered a part of Vespucci, the full package is a derivative work of both Vespucci and the preset and needs to be licensed under the GPLv3. Dual-licensing Vespucci under the GPLv3 in addition to the Apache License is possible, as Apache License programs may be included in GPLv3 programs. The resulting full package would be GPLv3, while the source of Vespucci would still be usable under the Apache License as long as the preset is removed prior to such use. As I am neither a copyright lawyer nor the maintainer of Vespucci, I do not want to make this decision. Please tell me what to do so I can add/delete the appropriate notices/files to/from the repo. Kind regards, Jan ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] [GSoC] OpenStreetMapWidget
Hey guys, I've made some changes to my project since the last time I've written to you. Any suggestion are, as always, welcome. Sandra P.S. Project demo: http://sandra-milanovic.github.com/OpenStreetMapWidget/ On github: https://github.com/Sandra-Milanovic/OpenStreetMapWidget On Jul 1, 2012 11:40 PM, Aleksandra Milanovic sandraa.milano...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Parveen, Sorry for the late response. Are you using the widget from a cell phone or...? In any case, I use leaflet's (leaflet.js) feature: navigator.geolocation My assumption is, if you're using a PC or a cell phone w/o GPS turned on, the geolocation will not be as precise as it would be in optimal situation (i.e. GPS or Chrome/Chromium on a PC that has an internet connection form a router that was found by a phone with a GPS and it's MAC address mapped by Google - don't know the details about the last one, though) Thanks, Sandra On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Parveen Arora m...@parveenarora.in wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Aleksandra Milanovic sandraa.milano...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Posting my first update. The project: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/2012/OSM_widget_constructor The actual project :) : http://sandra-milanovic.github.com/OpenStreetMapWidget/ Hi Sandra, Its working good and interface is also seems to be pretty good. I want to know which method you have opted for tracking the location, as it has asked me to allow to track your location but tracked at the wrong place. Almost 80km difference from where I am currently living. Thanks. -- Parveen Arora www.parveenarora.in E-Mail: m...@parveenarora.in ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
