Re: [OSM-dev] [Tagging] Super-relations or not

2010-11-02 Thread Matthias Julius

On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 01:02:37 +0800, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Peter Budny pet...@gatech.edu wrote:
 As far as I'm concerned, the difference in what's required to tag
things
 is minimal between these concerns.  Therefore, wouldn't it make the
most
 sense to choose whichever is programmatically the easiest and most
 flexible to deal with?
 
 It depends on what the you want to use route relations for. It's quite
 possible that different uses would demand different ways of
 structuring the route relation(s).

I would sey they should be set up that is best for mappers to deal with. 
Software can be made to deal with any scheme as long as there is a
consistent scheme.

Matthias

___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev


Re: [OSM-dev] [Tagging] Super-relations or not

2010-11-01 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Peter Budny pet...@gatech.edu wrote:
 As far as I'm concerned, the difference in what's required to tag things
 is minimal between these concerns.  Therefore, wouldn't it make the most
 sense to choose whichever is programmatically the easiest and most
 flexible to deal with?

It depends on what the you want to use route relations for. It's quite
possible that different uses would demand different ways of
structuring the route relation(s).

___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev