Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
I agree that knowing which roads are toll and which aren't is super interesting. However, there's plenty of trunk roads that are toll in South America and there are quite a few motorways in France that aren't toll. Really, I think we need a road-focused mapstyle that shows paved/unpaved and toll/no toll information first. I don't think trying to convey all of this in OSM-carto is ever going to work. ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
i'm mostly a read-only participant on this list, but i do have a question: i'm currently seeing several places where the map style changes based on my zoom level. i assume this is a caching problem, likely in my browser (google chrome). should i be surprised at this? it's a little disconcerting when the style of a road changes while zooming in or out, or at a single zoom level at a tile boundary, as in this screenshot: http://www.foxharp.boston.ma.us/tmp/sr48-screen.png (at other than zoom 16, the SR48 is amber, not red.) paul =-- paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 50.0 degrees) ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
I find it strange to see many people arguing that there should be a > similarity between street signs and the colour used on the map. Germany, >> for example, uses blue motorway signs exclusively, >> > > I'm not sure if I read this right, but the Netherlands, Belgium and France > also use blue signs to indicate motorways. > > Belgium uses green signs for motorways. On maps I always saw orange/yellow with two red bands. I guess I only look at Michelin's maps before... I had gotten used to the odd 'UK' colour scheme. I guess we'll get used to this new colour scheme as well, eventually. Polyglot ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
Am 02.11.2015 um 10:03 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > > +1, especially tertiary roads now tend to merge into blobs, e.g. here: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/41.85901/12.49464 > > -1 given that you can always find specific situations in which a one size fits all rendering fails, in the previous style there are tons of while blobs made out of residential class roads, didn't stop anybody from using the map. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
2015-11-02 10:33 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole: > Which > interesting enough however doesn't use every imaginable colour for their > road network either > > https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/osmaps/#53.00818632749056,-1.4402046835289466 > and essentially only differentiates between three road types. > and creates misleading / very hard to read situations like this (confusion motorway/rivers): [image: Inline-Bild 1] cheers, Martin ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
On 2015-11-01 18:09, Amaroussi (OpenStreetMap) wrote: Hi all, I have been gathering thoughts from the talk-gb list and my main concern now is how the tertiary roads are shown, especially in countries where people map roads according to quality and hierarchy (and there are more than one). In Greece, tertiary roads connect all villages while in Thailand, tertiary roads have an important use in referring to roads with four digit numbers. While I believe that the new rendering has potential, I am suggesting that in order to resolve concerns about the portrayal of tertiary roads, the motorways on the mainstream style should be blue, purple or violet instead of the current shade of rose. This would free up rose for trunk roads, red for primary roads and so on until yellow for tertiary. I agree that the abandonging of the blue for motorways is a bad choice. It is not only a british color, motorways are signalled in blue also in lots of other countries in europe. But that is not really the issue. It is not that a colorscheme should follow the colorscheme of a particular country per se. The current color scheme just makes it hard to distinguish roads. Teritary roads, being white, are all but unrecognizable. Looking at motorways, trunk roads or primary roads, I can not tell one from the other, except when I see two next to eachother. Furthermore, on high zooms, roads have gotten too fat. It makes the map look bulky. The colorscheme for roads is defintely a step back from the previous. Regards, Maarten ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
Hi, On 11/02/2015 09:40 AM, Maarten Deen wrote: > I agree that the abandonging of the blue for motorways is a bad choice. > It is not only a british color, motorways are signalled in blue also in > lots of other countries in europe. I find it strange to see many people arguing that there should be a similarity between street signs and the colour used on the map. Germany, for example, uses blue motorway signs exclusively, but the first thing that went out of the window when the German OSM style (http://www.openstreetmap.de/karte.html) was created in 2011 was the blue motorways ("nobody apart from the Brits likes that") ;) Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
On 2015-11-02 10:30, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, On 11/02/2015 09:40 AM, Maarten Deen wrote: I agree that the abandonging of the blue for motorways is a bad choice. It is not only a british color, motorways are signalled in blue also in lots of other countries in europe. I find it strange to see many people arguing that there should be a similarity between street signs and the colour used on the map. Germany, for example, uses blue motorway signs exclusively, I'm not sure if I read this right, but the Netherlands, Belgium and France also use blue signs to indicate motorways. But I also say "It is not that a colorscheme should follow the colorscheme of a particular country per se", so IMHO it should not be a consideration. I was merely pointing out that it was not limited to the UK alone. Regards, Maarten ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
sent from a phone > Am 02.11.2015 um 09:40 schrieb Maarten Deen: > > Teritary roads, being white, are all but unrecognizable. Looking at > motorways, trunk roads or primary roads, I can not tell one from the other, > except when I see two next to eachother. > Furthermore, on high zooms, roads have gotten too fat. It makes the map look > bulky. +1, especially tertiary roads now tend to merge into blobs, e.g. here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/41.85901/12.49464 cheers, Martin ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
Am 02.11.2015 um 09:40 schrieb Maarten Deen: > > I agree that the abandonging of the blue for motorways is a bad > choice. It is not only a british color, motorways are signalled in > blue also in lots of other countries in europe. And in lots of countries in Europe they are signposted in green. I'm not quite sure why we are being held ransom to a questionable decision which was made (not so long ago) by an unrelated third party. Which interesting enough however doesn't use every imaginable colour for their road network either https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/osmaps/#53.00818632749056,-1.4402046835289466 and essentially only differentiates between three road types. > But that is not really the issue. It is not that a colorscheme should > follow the colorscheme of a particular country per se. The current > color scheme just makes it hard to distinguish roads. Teritary roads, > being white, are all but unrecognizable. Looking at motorways, trunk > roads or primary roads, I can not tell one from the other, except when > I see two next to eachother. > Furthermore, on high zooms, roads have gotten too fat. It makes the > map look bulky. > > The colorscheme for roads is defintely a step back from the previous. I think you'll find that most find that it is a big step forward. if you go back and look at the material provided during the (very very public) development and discussion of the changes, or just compare with the French style (which uses the previous colour scheme), it is very obvious that the road network is rendered substantially better now. Your straw man: "I have to be able to recognize each single road type in isolation" is simply not realistic for a map that is supposed to include everything else too. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
2015-11-02 10:51 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole: > -1 given that you can always find specific situations in which a one > size fits all rendering fails, in the previous style there are tons of > while blobs made out of residential class roads, didn't stop anybody > from using the map. > examples? IMHO, a residential road has to have some minimum width, a 2 metres wide alley (total width, no pavement) in a historic town center should be tagged as an alley, for instance. Similarly, a highway=pedestrian should be a road that is pedestrianized, not a small footway/alley inside a "pedestrian" zone. Cheers, Martin ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
Hi, The only immediate main problem I have is the Tertiary roads due to many countries using it as well, but other than that I still offer to mediate any potential dispute over the road colours, and for that I have suggested that the British/Heritage/Legacy/whatever you like to call it layer be added as soon as a tile server for that goes live. No, I’m not throwing a temper tantrum over the change in the layer, but I was thinking how I could manage the change for UK users. — Amaroussi > On 2 Nov 2015, at 09:30, Frederik Rammwrote: > > Hi, > > On 11/02/2015 09:40 AM, Maarten Deen wrote: >> I agree that the abandonging of the blue for motorways is a bad choice. >> It is not only a british color, motorways are signalled in blue also in >> lots of other countries in europe. > > I find it strange to see many people arguing that there should be a > similarity between street signs and the colour used on the map. Germany, > for example, uses blue motorway signs exclusively, but the first thing > that went out of the window when the German OSM style > (http://www.openstreetmap.de/karte.html) was created in 2011 was the > blue motorways ("nobody apart from the Brits likes that") ;) > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > ___ > dev mailing list > dev@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
+1 Cheers Andy -Original Message- From: Maarten Deen [mailto:md...@xs4all.nl] Sent: 02 November 2015 08:40 To: dev@openstreetmap.org; talk...@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback On 2015-11-01 18:09, Amaroussi (OpenStreetMap) wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been gathering thoughts from the talk-gb list and my main > concern now is how the tertiary roads are shown, especially in > countries where people map roads according to quality and hierarchy > (and there are more than one). In Greece, tertiary roads connect all > villages while in Thailand, tertiary roads have an important use in > referring to roads with four digit numbers. > > While I believe that the new rendering has potential, I am suggesting > that in order to resolve concerns about the portrayal of tertiary > roads, the motorways on the mainstream style should be blue, purple or > violet instead of the current shade of rose. This would free up rose > for trunk roads, red for primary roads and so on until yellow for > tertiary. I agree that the abandonging of the blue for motorways is a bad choice. It is not only a british color, motorways are signalled in blue also in lots of other countries in europe. But that is not really the issue. It is not that a colorscheme should follow the colorscheme of a particular country per se. The current color scheme just makes it hard to distinguish roads. Teritary roads, being white, are all but unrecognizable. Looking at motorways, trunk roads or primary roads, I can not tell one from the other, except when I see two next to eachother. Furthermore, on high zooms, roads have gotten too fat. It makes the map look bulky. The colorscheme for roads is defintely a step back from the previous. Regards, Maarten ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2015.0.6173 / Virus Database: 4455/10932 - Release Date: 11/01/15 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
Richard Fairhurst wrote: > other UK cartographers used green for non-primary roads (I meant "primary A roads", of course, or in OSM parlance "trunk") Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/New-Map-Style-feedback-tp5858553p5858638.html Sent from the Developer Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
SimonPoole wrote: > And in lots of countries in Europe they are signposted in green. I'm > not quite sure why we are being held ransom to a questionable > decision which was made (not so long ago) by an unrelated third > party. Which interesting enough however doesn't use every > imaginable colour for their road network either > https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/osmaps/#53.00818632749056,-1.4402046835289466 For the eighty gazillionth time: The old OSM style did not use blue, green and red because these were "Ordnance Survey" colours. The old OSM style used blue, green and red because they were the standard British map colours. In particular, other UK cartographers used green for non-primary roads long before OS did (I think OS only switched in the late '90s). If you want to find a commercial prototype for OSM then the AA maps are a little closer, but actually the colours were directly taken from a map I did for the Cotswold Canals Trust, slightly desaturated: https://twitter.com/richardf/status/632185970037657600 I'm not saying that because I have a particular animus towards the new style (I agree that a change was long overdue, and greatly respect the work that the osm-carto team have put into it); I simply want to squash this erroneous idea that the old colours were OS-derived. Incidentally, the old shields (which should have been taken out back and shot a long time ago, and I'm glad they're gone) were not remotely OS either, as some people have excitedly claimed, but were an unintentional echo of British Railways totem signs from the 1950s: http://website.lineone.net/~alan.c.edwards/railsign.html Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/New-Map-Style-feedback-tp5858553p5858637.html Sent from the Developer Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
[OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
Hi all, I have been gathering thoughts from the talk-gb list and my main concern now is how the tertiary roads are shown, especially in countries where people map roads according to quality and hierarchy (and there are more than one). In Greece, tertiary roads connect all villages while in Thailand, tertiary roads have an important use in referring to roads with four digit numbers. While I believe that the new rendering has potential, I am suggesting that in order to resolve concerns about the portrayal of tertiary roads, the motorways on the mainstream style should be blue, purple or violet instead of the current shade of rose. This would free up rose for trunk roads, red for primary roads and so on until yellow for tertiary. The ability for OSM to render the “British” colours alongside the new style colours would depend on what resources they have, but I will support adding an alternative layer to the main site that uses the “British” colours, as soon as the alternative tile server goes live: it is clear that there is no clear standard for how roads are coloured. I will suggest however that the “British” stylesheet be based from the main openstreetmap-carto style, in order to ease maintenance. Best, — Amaroussi ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
On 01/11/15 17:09, Amaroussi (OpenStreetMap) wrote: The ability for OSM to render the “British” colours alongside the new style colours would depend on what resources they have, but I will support adding an alternative layer to the main site that uses the “British” colours, as soon as the alternative tile server goes live: it is clear that there is no clear standard for how roads are coloured. I will suggest however that the “British” stylesheet be based from the main openstreetmap-carto style, in order to ease maintenance. Why do you think a British style should get special treatment I wonder? Should we have a French style and a US style and a Chinese style and... I mean how exactly do you propose to decide which national styles should get special treatment? Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] New Map Style feedback
sent from a phone > Am 01.11.2015 um 18:26 schrieb Tom Hughes: > > Should we have a French style and a US style and a Chinese style and... > > I mean how exactly do you propose to decide which national styles should get > special treatment? ideally we should cater for all local/regional/national particularities (at least those that can be generally understood), e.g. in the US road shields are important, in cities with an underground/metro system, the specific logo would be nice to have, the japanese have crossings labeled in a typical way, Color schemes for roads seem less important to me, but apparently the British are quite attached to their scheme, so why not (other map providers do indeed use a particular scheme there) cheers Martin ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev