[GitHub] [parquet-mr] martin-g edited a comment on pull request #942: Revert "Improve Travis CI build Performance (#924)"

2021-12-13 Thread GitBox


martin-g edited a comment on pull request #942:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/942#issuecomment-993234716


   @shangxinli I thought the last working solution was to use `dist: focal` 
(Ubuntu 20.04) instead of `bionic` (18.04) . In #939 I see you didn't merged 
from master (https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/941)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@parquet.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [parquet-mr] martin-g commented on pull request #942: Revert "Improve Travis CI build Performance (#924)"

2021-12-13 Thread GitBox


martin-g commented on pull request #942:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/942#issuecomment-993234716


   @shangxinli I thought the last working solution was to use `dist: focal` 
(Ubuntu 20.04) instead of `bionic` (18.04) 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@parquet.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [parquet-mr] shangxinli opened a new pull request #942: Revert "Improve Travis CI build Performance (#924)"

2021-12-13 Thread GitBox


shangxinli opened a new pull request #942:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/942


   This reverts commit 01a5d074829ad4cf4de1f662d54fe7bceb4bef63.
   
   Make sure you have checked _all_ steps below.
   
   ### Jira
   
   - [ ] My PR addresses the following [Parquet 
Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET/) issues and references 
them in the PR title. For example, "PARQUET-1234: My Parquet PR"
 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-XXX
 - In case you are adding a dependency, check if the license complies with 
the [ASF 3rd Party License 
Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   
   ### Tests
   
   - [ ] My PR adds the following unit tests __OR__ does not need testing for 
this extremely good reason:
   
   ### Commits
   
   - [ ] My commits all reference Jira issues in their subject lines. In 
addition, my commits follow the guidelines from "[How to write a good git 
commit message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)":
 1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
 1. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
 1. Subject does not end with a period
 1. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
 1. Body wraps at 72 characters
 1. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"
   
   ### Documentation
   
   - [ ] In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation that describes 
how to use it.
 - All the public functions and the classes in the PR contain Javadoc that 
explain what it does
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@parquet.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




Re: About the security issue of log4j for Parquet

2021-12-13 Thread Aaron Niskode-Dossett
Thank you, that was on my to do list today.

On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 3:39 PM Xinli shang  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Most of you must have known of the severe security issue(
> https://www.randori.com/blog/cve-2021-44228) in log4j. I just want to have
> a short update that Paquet doesn't have a dependency on the log4j versions
> that are impacted. Have a good weekend!
>
> --
> Xinli Shang
>


-- 
Aaron Niskode-Dossett, Data Engineering -- Etsy