[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 RC1
I am canceling the RC and fixing the stuff we found to make a perfect RC2 :) Am 18.05.20, 18:15 schrieb "Otto Fowler" : https://gist.github.com/ottobackwards/7f40865c5a1dad8b09c06c5215f40bd8 The error. Chris has reproduced. java -version java version “1.8.0_171" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_171-b11) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.171-b11, mixed mode) On May 18, 2020 at 11:33:49, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: -1 binding. Does not build with java 8 as documented. The rest seems fine. On May 18, 2020 at 05:55:31, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de) wrote: +1 Binding Chris [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory we’ll now call download-dir. [OK] Verify the signature is correct: Additional Apache tutorial on how to verify downloads can be found here. [OK] Check if the signature references an Apache email address. [OK] Verify the SHA512 hashes: [OK] Unzip the archive: [OK] Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. [OK] Verify the content of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. [OK] [RM] Verify the staged source README, RELEASE_NOTE files correspond to those in the extracted source bundle. [OK] [RM] Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. [OK] Search for SNAPSHOT references: Only found in commented out dependencies and disabled parts of the project (Parts not yet deleted) [OK] Search for Copyright references, and if they are in headers, make sure these files containing them are mentioned in the LICENSE file: No findings in a bad form, however it seems some files use other apache headers as others (Some files have apache headers containing the word "copyright" but most don't) [MINOR]Build the project according to the information in the README.md file: One example references a module in the sandbox, so the "with-sandbox" profile needs to be enabled in addition) [OK] [RM] Build the project with all with-xyz profiles and tests enabled and an empty maven local repo: by appendng -Dmaven.repo.local=../.m2. Am 17.05.20, 19:39 schrieb "Robinet, Etienne" <43...@etu.he2b.be>: Hi Chris, +1 Checklist: - Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email - Verify the signature is correct - Check if the signature references an Apache email address. - Verify the SHA512 hashes - Unzip and verify existence and content of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES - Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises (also 7 unknown Licences) apache-plc4x-0.7.0/build-utils/protocol-base-mspec/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/plc4x/plugins/codegenerator/language/mspec/expression/Expression.g4 apache-plc4x-0.7.0/build-utils/protocol-base-mspec/src/remote-resources/UNLICENSE apache-plc4x-0.7.0/licenses/UNLICENSE apache-plc4x-0.7.0/plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/client/asconfig.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/plc4j/tools/scraper/src/test/resources/config.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/sandbox/code-gen/src/main/resources/example.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/sandbox/code-gen/src/main/resources/example2.json -Search for "SNAPSHOT" and "Copyright" reference - Build the project according to the information in the README.md file(./mvnw -P with-sandbox install) OS: Windows 10 Pro. Java: OpenJDK 11.0.2 Maven: 3.6.0 Etienne Le dim. 17 mai 2020 à 11:31, Julian Feinauer a écrit : > Hi, > > my vote is +1 (binding). > > I did: > - Download all artefacts > - Checked Signatures and Hashes > - Checked staged README and RELEASE NOTES is similar to Version in Repo > - Checked content of README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE (Minor: > References 0.7.0 as Snapshot) > - Checked no unexpected binaries > - Build project according to docu (macOS) > > Thank you for the work Chris, well done! > Julian > > Am 16.05.20, 23:58 schrieb "Cesar Garcia" : > > Hi Chris, > > 1+ > > 1. Download all staged artifacts under the url specifie, OK > 2. Verify the signature is correct , OK > 3. Check if the check is successful. OK > 4. Check if the signature references an Apache email address. OK > 5. Verify the SHA512 hashes: OK > 6. Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES > files in > the extracted source bundle. OK > 7. Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK, but 7 > Unknown > Licenses. > 8. Search for SNAPSHOT references: OK > ./plc4j/drivers/ads/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/dummy-driver/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/client/pom.xml >
Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 RC1
https://gist.github.com/ottobackwards/7f40865c5a1dad8b09c06c5215f40bd8 The error. Chris has reproduced. java -version java version “1.8.0_171" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_171-b11) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.171-b11, mixed mode) On May 18, 2020 at 11:33:49, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: -1 binding. Does not build with java 8 as documented. The rest seems fine. On May 18, 2020 at 05:55:31, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de) wrote: +1 Binding Chris [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory we’ll now call download-dir. [OK] Verify the signature is correct: Additional Apache tutorial on how to verify downloads can be found here. [OK] Check if the signature references an Apache email address. [OK] Verify the SHA512 hashes: [OK] Unzip the archive: [OK] Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. [OK] Verify the content of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. [OK] [RM] Verify the staged source README, RELEASE_NOTE files correspond to those in the extracted source bundle. [OK] [RM] Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. [OK] Search for SNAPSHOT references: Only found in commented out dependencies and disabled parts of the project (Parts not yet deleted) [OK] Search for Copyright references, and if they are in headers, make sure these files containing them are mentioned in the LICENSE file: No findings in a bad form, however it seems some files use other apache headers as others (Some files have apache headers containing the word "copyright" but most don't) [MINOR]Build the project according to the information in the README.md file: One example references a module in the sandbox, so the "with-sandbox" profile needs to be enabled in addition) [OK] [RM] Build the project with all with-xyz profiles and tests enabled and an empty maven local repo: by appendng -Dmaven.repo.local=../.m2. Am 17.05.20, 19:39 schrieb "Robinet, Etienne" <43...@etu.he2b.be>: Hi Chris, +1 Checklist: - Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email - Verify the signature is correct - Check if the signature references an Apache email address. - Verify the SHA512 hashes - Unzip and verify existence and content of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES - Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises (also 7 unknown Licences) apache-plc4x-0.7.0/build-utils/protocol-base-mspec/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/plc4x/plugins/codegenerator/language/mspec/expression/Expression.g4 apache-plc4x-0.7.0/build-utils/protocol-base-mspec/src/remote-resources/UNLICENSE apache-plc4x-0.7.0/licenses/UNLICENSE apache-plc4x-0.7.0/plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/client/asconfig.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/plc4j/tools/scraper/src/test/resources/config.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/sandbox/code-gen/src/main/resources/example.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/sandbox/code-gen/src/main/resources/example2.json -Search for "SNAPSHOT" and "Copyright" reference - Build the project according to the information in the README.md file(./mvnw -P with-sandbox install) OS: Windows 10 Pro. Java: OpenJDK 11.0.2 Maven: 3.6.0 Etienne Le dim. 17 mai 2020 à 11:31, Julian Feinauer a écrit : > Hi, > > my vote is +1 (binding). > > I did: > - Download all artefacts > - Checked Signatures and Hashes > - Checked staged README and RELEASE NOTES is similar to Version in Repo > - Checked content of README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE (Minor: > References 0.7.0 as Snapshot) > - Checked no unexpected binaries > - Build project according to docu (macOS) > > Thank you for the work Chris, well done! > Julian > > Am 16.05.20, 23:58 schrieb "Cesar Garcia" : > > Hi Chris, > > 1+ > > 1. Download all staged artifacts under the url specifie, OK > 2. Verify the signature is correct , OK > 3. Check if the check is successful. OK > 4. Check if the signature references an Apache email address. OK > 5. Verify the SHA512 hashes: OK > 6. Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES > files in > the extracted source bundle. OK > 7. Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK, but 7 > Unknown > Licenses. > 8. Search for SNAPSHOT references: OK > ./plc4j/drivers/ads/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/dummy-driver/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/client/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/webapp/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-camel/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-edgent/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-kafka/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-nifi/nifi-plc4x-nar/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/logstash-plugin/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/camel/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/eip/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/karaf-itest/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/s7/pom.xml >
Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 RC1
-1 binding. Does not build with java 8 as documented. The rest seems fine. On May 18, 2020 at 05:55:31, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de) wrote: +1 Binding Chris [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory we’ll now call download-dir. [OK] Verify the signature is correct: Additional Apache tutorial on how to verify downloads can be found here. [OK] Check if the signature references an Apache email address. [OK] Verify the SHA512 hashes: [OK] Unzip the archive: [OK] Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. [OK] Verify the content of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. [OK] [RM] Verify the staged source README, RELEASE_NOTE files correspond to those in the extracted source bundle. [OK] [RM] Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. [OK] Search for SNAPSHOT references: Only found in commented out dependencies and disabled parts of the project (Parts not yet deleted) [OK] Search for Copyright references, and if they are in headers, make sure these files containing them are mentioned in the LICENSE file: No findings in a bad form, however it seems some files use other apache headers as others (Some files have apache headers containing the word "copyright" but most don't) [MINOR]Build the project according to the information in the README.md file: One example references a module in the sandbox, so the "with-sandbox" profile needs to be enabled in addition) [OK] [RM] Build the project with all with-xyz profiles and tests enabled and an empty maven local repo: by appendng -Dmaven.repo.local=../.m2. Am 17.05.20, 19:39 schrieb "Robinet, Etienne" <43...@etu.he2b.be>: Hi Chris, +1 Checklist: - Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email - Verify the signature is correct - Check if the signature references an Apache email address. - Verify the SHA512 hashes - Unzip and verify existence and content of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES - Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises (also 7 unknown Licences) apache-plc4x-0.7.0/build-utils/protocol-base-mspec/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/plc4x/plugins/codegenerator/language/mspec/expression/Expression.g4 apache-plc4x-0.7.0/build-utils/protocol-base-mspec/src/remote-resources/UNLICENSE apache-plc4x-0.7.0/licenses/UNLICENSE apache-plc4x-0.7.0/plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/client/asconfig.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/plc4j/tools/scraper/src/test/resources/config.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/sandbox/code-gen/src/main/resources/example.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/sandbox/code-gen/src/main/resources/example2.json -Search for "SNAPSHOT" and "Copyright" reference - Build the project according to the information in the README.md file(./mvnw -P with-sandbox install) OS: Windows 10 Pro. Java: OpenJDK 11.0.2 Maven: 3.6.0 Etienne Le dim. 17 mai 2020 à 11:31, Julian Feinauer a écrit : > Hi, > > my vote is +1 (binding). > > I did: > - Download all artefacts > - Checked Signatures and Hashes > - Checked staged README and RELEASE NOTES is similar to Version in Repo > - Checked content of README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE (Minor: > References 0.7.0 as Snapshot) > - Checked no unexpected binaries > - Build project according to docu (macOS) > > Thank you for the work Chris, well done! > Julian > > Am 16.05.20, 23:58 schrieb "Cesar Garcia" : > > Hi Chris, > > 1+ > > 1. Download all staged artifacts under the url specifie, OK > 2. Verify the signature is correct , OK > 3. Check if the check is successful. OK > 4. Check if the signature references an Apache email address. OK > 5. Verify the SHA512 hashes: OK > 6. Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES > files in > the extracted source bundle. OK > 7. Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK, but 7 > Unknown > Licenses. > 8. Search for SNAPSHOT references: OK > ./plc4j/drivers/ads/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/dummy-driver/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/client/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/webapp/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-camel/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-edgent/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-kafka/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-nifi/nifi-plc4x-nar/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/logstash-plugin/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/camel/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/eip/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/karaf-itest/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/s7/pom.xml > ./plc4j/protocols/ads/pom.xml > ./plc4j/protocols/benchmarks/pom.xml > ./plc4j/protocols/delta-v/pom.xml > ./plc4j/protocols/pom.xml > > 9. Search for Copyright references, and if they are in headers, make > sure > these files containing them are mentioned in the LICENSE file., OK > 10. Build the project according to the information in the README.md > file. > Using:
Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 RC1
+1 Binding Chris [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory we’ll now call download-dir. [OK] Verify the signature is correct: Additional Apache tutorial on how to verify downloads can be found here. [OK] Check if the signature references an Apache email address. [OK] Verify the SHA512 hashes: [OK] Unzip the archive: [OK] Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. [OK] Verify the content of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. [OK] [RM] Verify the staged source README, RELEASE_NOTE files correspond to those in the extracted source bundle. [OK] [RM] Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. [OK] Search for SNAPSHOT references: Only found in commented out dependencies and disabled parts of the project (Parts not yet deleted) [OK] Search for Copyright references, and if they are in headers, make sure these files containing them are mentioned in the LICENSE file: No findings in a bad form, however it seems some files use other apache headers as others (Some files have apache headers containing the word "copyright" but most don't) [MINOR]Build the project according to the information in the README.md file: One example references a module in the sandbox, so the "with-sandbox" profile needs to be enabled in addition) [OK] [RM] Build the project with all with-xyz profiles and tests enabled and an empty maven local repo: by appendng -Dmaven.repo.local=../.m2. Am 17.05.20, 19:39 schrieb "Robinet, Etienne" <43...@etu.he2b.be>: Hi Chris, +1 Checklist: - Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email - Verify the signature is correct - Check if the signature references an Apache email address. - Verify the SHA512 hashes - Unzip and verify existence and content of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES - Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises (also 7 unknown Licences) apache-plc4x-0.7.0/build-utils/protocol-base-mspec/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/plc4x/plugins/codegenerator/language/mspec/expression/Expression.g4 apache-plc4x-0.7.0/build-utils/protocol-base-mspec/src/remote-resources/UNLICENSE apache-plc4x-0.7.0/licenses/UNLICENSE apache-plc4x-0.7.0/plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/client/asconfig.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/plc4j/tools/scraper/src/test/resources/config.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/sandbox/code-gen/src/main/resources/example.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/sandbox/code-gen/src/main/resources/example2.json -Search for "SNAPSHOT" and "Copyright" reference - Build the project according to the information in the README.md file(./mvnw -P with-sandbox install) OS: Windows 10 Pro. Java: OpenJDK 11.0.2 Maven: 3.6.0 Etienne Le dim. 17 mai 2020 à 11:31, Julian Feinauer a écrit : > Hi, > > my vote is +1 (binding). > > I did: > - Download all artefacts > - Checked Signatures and Hashes > - Checked staged README and RELEASE NOTES is similar to Version in Repo > - Checked content of README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE (Minor: > References 0.7.0 as Snapshot) > - Checked no unexpected binaries > - Build project according to docu (macOS) > > Thank you for the work Chris, well done! > Julian > > Am 16.05.20, 23:58 schrieb "Cesar Garcia" : > > Hi Chris, > > 1+ > > 1. Download all staged artifacts under the url specifie, OK > 2. Verify the signature is correct , OK > 3. Check if the check is successful. OK > 4. Check if the signature references an Apache email address. OK > 5. Verify the SHA512 hashes: OK > 6. Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES > files in > the extracted source bundle. OK > 7. Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK, but 7 > Unknown > Licenses. > 8. Search for SNAPSHOT references: OK > ./plc4j/drivers/ads/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/dummy-driver/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/client/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/webapp/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-camel/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-edgent/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-kafka/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-nifi/nifi-plc4x-nar/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/logstash-plugin/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/camel/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/eip/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/karaf-itest/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/s7/pom.xml > ./plc4j/protocols/ads/pom.xml > ./plc4j/protocols/benchmarks/pom.xml
Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 RC1
Hi Chris, +1 Checklist: - Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email - Verify the signature is correct - Check if the signature references an Apache email address. - Verify the SHA512 hashes - Unzip and verify existence and content of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES - Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises (also 7 unknown Licences) apache-plc4x-0.7.0/build-utils/protocol-base-mspec/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/plc4x/plugins/codegenerator/language/mspec/expression/Expression.g4 apache-plc4x-0.7.0/build-utils/protocol-base-mspec/src/remote-resources/UNLICENSE apache-plc4x-0.7.0/licenses/UNLICENSE apache-plc4x-0.7.0/plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/client/asconfig.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/plc4j/tools/scraper/src/test/resources/config.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/sandbox/code-gen/src/main/resources/example.json apache-plc4x-0.7.0/sandbox/code-gen/src/main/resources/example2.json -Search for "SNAPSHOT" and "Copyright" reference - Build the project according to the information in the README.md file(./mvnw -P with-sandbox install) OS: Windows 10 Pro. Java: OpenJDK 11.0.2 Maven: 3.6.0 Etienne Le dim. 17 mai 2020 à 11:31, Julian Feinauer a écrit : > Hi, > > my vote is +1 (binding). > > I did: > - Download all artefacts > - Checked Signatures and Hashes > - Checked staged README and RELEASE NOTES is similar to Version in Repo > - Checked content of README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE (Minor: > References 0.7.0 as Snapshot) > - Checked no unexpected binaries > - Build project according to docu (macOS) > > Thank you for the work Chris, well done! > Julian > > Am 16.05.20, 23:58 schrieb "Cesar Garcia" : > > Hi Chris, > > 1+ > > 1. Download all staged artifacts under the url specifie, OK > 2. Verify the signature is correct , OK > 3. Check if the check is successful. OK > 4. Check if the signature references an Apache email address. OK > 5. Verify the SHA512 hashes: OK > 6. Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES > files in > the extracted source bundle. OK > 7. Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK, but 7 > Unknown > Licenses. > 8. Search for SNAPSHOT references: OK > ./plc4j/drivers/ads/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/dummy-driver/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/client/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/webapp/pom.xml > ./plc4j/examples/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-camel/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-edgent/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-kafka/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/apache-nifi/nifi-plc4x-nar/pom.xml > ./plc4j/integrations/logstash-plugin/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/camel/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/eip/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/karaf-itest/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/pom.xml > ./plc4j/karaf-features/s7/pom.xml > ./plc4j/protocols/ads/pom.xml > ./plc4j/protocols/benchmarks/pom.xml > ./plc4j/protocols/delta-v/pom.xml > ./plc4j/protocols/pom.xml > > 9. Search for Copyright references, and if they are in headers, make > sure > these files containing them are mentioned in the LICENSE file., OK > 10. Build the project according to the information in the README.md > file. > Using: ">mvn -P with-sandbox install", OK > > > OS: Windows 10 Pro. > Java: openjdk 11.0.4 2019-07-16 > Maven: openjdk 11.0.4 2019-07-16 > > > > El vie., 15 may. 2020 a las 12:52, Christofer Dutz (< > christofer.d...@c-ware.de>) escribió: > > > Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 has been staged under [2] and it’s time to vote > > on accepting it for release. All Maven artifacts are available under > [1]. > > Voting will be open for 72hr. > > > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 > > are required to pass. > > > > Release tag: release/0.7.0 > > Hash for the release tag: c06b73473383405a550ac4f4cee7dd8636325a35 > > > > Per [3] "Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download > > the signed source code package, compile it as provided, and test > > the resulting executable on their own platform, along with also > > verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF policy > > on releases." > > > > You can achieve the above by following [4]. > > > > [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the > non-RM > > items in [4]) > > [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) > > > > > > [1] > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheplc4x-1027 > > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/plc4x/0.7.0/rc1 > > [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > [4] https://plc4x.apache.org/developers/release/validation.html > > > > > > > > -- > *CEOS Automatización, C.A.* > *GALPON
Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 RC1
Hi, my vote is +1 (binding). I did: - Download all artefacts - Checked Signatures and Hashes - Checked staged README and RELEASE NOTES is similar to Version in Repo - Checked content of README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE (Minor: References 0.7.0 as Snapshot) - Checked no unexpected binaries - Build project according to docu (macOS) Thank you for the work Chris, well done! Julian Am 16.05.20, 23:58 schrieb "Cesar Garcia" : Hi Chris, 1+ 1. Download all staged artifacts under the url specifie, OK 2. Verify the signature is correct , OK 3. Check if the check is successful. OK 4. Check if the signature references an Apache email address. OK 5. Verify the SHA512 hashes: OK 6. Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. OK 7. Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK, but 7 Unknown Licenses. 8. Search for SNAPSHOT references: OK ./plc4j/drivers/ads/pom.xml ./plc4j/examples/dummy-driver/pom.xml ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/client/pom.xml ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/pom.xml ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/webapp/pom.xml ./plc4j/examples/pom.xml ./plc4j/integrations/apache-camel/pom.xml ./plc4j/integrations/apache-edgent/pom.xml ./plc4j/integrations/apache-kafka/pom.xml ./plc4j/integrations/apache-nifi/nifi-plc4x-nar/pom.xml ./plc4j/integrations/logstash-plugin/pom.xml ./plc4j/karaf-features/camel/pom.xml ./plc4j/karaf-features/eip/pom.xml ./plc4j/karaf-features/karaf-itest/pom.xml ./plc4j/karaf-features/pom.xml ./plc4j/karaf-features/s7/pom.xml ./plc4j/protocols/ads/pom.xml ./plc4j/protocols/benchmarks/pom.xml ./plc4j/protocols/delta-v/pom.xml ./plc4j/protocols/pom.xml 9. Search for Copyright references, and if they are in headers, make sure these files containing them are mentioned in the LICENSE file., OK 10. Build the project according to the information in the README.md file. Using: ">mvn -P with-sandbox install", OK OS: Windows 10 Pro. Java: openjdk 11.0.4 2019-07-16 Maven: openjdk 11.0.4 2019-07-16 El vie., 15 may. 2020 a las 12:52, Christofer Dutz (< christofer.d...@c-ware.de>) escribió: > Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 has been staged under [2] and it’s time to vote > on accepting it for release. All Maven artifacts are available under [1]. > Voting will be open for 72hr. > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 > are required to pass. > > Release tag: release/0.7.0 > Hash for the release tag: c06b73473383405a550ac4f4cee7dd8636325a35 > > Per [3] "Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download > the signed source code package, compile it as provided, and test > the resulting executable on their own platform, along with also > verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF policy > on releases." > > You can achieve the above by following [4]. > > [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM > items in [4]) > [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) > > > [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheplc4x-1027 > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/plc4x/0.7.0/rc1 > [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > [4] https://plc4x.apache.org/developers/release/validation.html > > > -- *CEOS Automatización, C.A.* *GALPON SERVICIO INDUSTRIALES Y NAVALES FA, C.A.,* *PISO 1, OFICINA 2, AV. RAUL LEONI, SECTOR GUAMACHITO,* *FRENTE A LA ASOCIACION DE GANADEROS,BARCELONA,EDO. ANZOATEGUI* *Ing. César García* *Cel: +58 414-760.98.95* *Hotline Técnica SIEMENS: 0800 1005080* *Email: support.aan.automat...@siemens.com *
Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 RC1
Hi Chris, 1+ 1. Download all staged artifacts under the url specifie, OK 2. Verify the signature is correct , OK 3. Check if the check is successful. OK 4. Check if the signature references an Apache email address. OK 5. Verify the SHA512 hashes: OK 6. Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. OK 7. Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. OK, but 7 Unknown Licenses. 8. Search for SNAPSHOT references: OK ./plc4j/drivers/ads/pom.xml ./plc4j/examples/dummy-driver/pom.xml ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/client/pom.xml ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/pom.xml ./plc4j/examples/hello-webapp/webapp/pom.xml ./plc4j/examples/pom.xml ./plc4j/integrations/apache-camel/pom.xml ./plc4j/integrations/apache-edgent/pom.xml ./plc4j/integrations/apache-kafka/pom.xml ./plc4j/integrations/apache-nifi/nifi-plc4x-nar/pom.xml ./plc4j/integrations/logstash-plugin/pom.xml ./plc4j/karaf-features/camel/pom.xml ./plc4j/karaf-features/eip/pom.xml ./plc4j/karaf-features/karaf-itest/pom.xml ./plc4j/karaf-features/pom.xml ./plc4j/karaf-features/s7/pom.xml ./plc4j/protocols/ads/pom.xml ./plc4j/protocols/benchmarks/pom.xml ./plc4j/protocols/delta-v/pom.xml ./plc4j/protocols/pom.xml 9. Search for Copyright references, and if they are in headers, make sure these files containing them are mentioned in the LICENSE file., OK 10. Build the project according to the information in the README.md file. Using: ">mvn -P with-sandbox install", OK OS: Windows 10 Pro. Java: openjdk 11.0.4 2019-07-16 Maven: openjdk 11.0.4 2019-07-16 El vie., 15 may. 2020 a las 12:52, Christofer Dutz (< christofer.d...@c-ware.de>) escribió: > Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 has been staged under [2] and it’s time to vote > on accepting it for release. All Maven artifacts are available under [1]. > Voting will be open for 72hr. > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 > are required to pass. > > Release tag: release/0.7.0 > Hash for the release tag: c06b73473383405a550ac4f4cee7dd8636325a35 > > Per [3] "Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download > the signed source code package, compile it as provided, and test > the resulting executable on their own platform, along with also > verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF policy > on releases." > > You can achieve the above by following [4]. > > [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM > items in [4]) > [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) > > > [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheplc4x-1027 > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/plc4x/0.7.0/rc1 > [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > [4] https://plc4x.apache.org/developers/release/validation.html > > > -- *CEOS Automatización, C.A.* *GALPON SERVICIO INDUSTRIALES Y NAVALES FA, C.A.,* *PISO 1, OFICINA 2, AV. RAUL LEONI, SECTOR GUAMACHITO,* *FRENTE A LA ASOCIACION DE GANADEROS,BARCELONA,EDO. ANZOATEGUI* *Ing. César García* *Cel: +58 414-760.98.95* *Hotline Técnica SIEMENS: 0800 1005080* *Email: support.aan.automat...@siemens.com *
Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 RC1
nm, the keys are in the standard location : https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/plc4x/KEYS On May 15, 2020 at 23:18:24, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: Where is the KEYS file for this project? On May 15, 2020 at 12:52:01, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de) wrote: Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 has been staged under [2] and it’s time to vote on accepting it for release. All Maven artifacts are available under [1]. Voting will be open for 72hr. A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 are required to pass. Release tag: release/0.7.0 Hash for the release tag: c06b73473383405a550ac4f4cee7dd8636325a35 Per [3] "Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." You can achieve the above by following [4]. [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM items in [4]) [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheplc4x-1027 [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/plc4x/0.7.0/rc1 [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release [4] https://plc4x.apache.org/developers/release/validation.html
Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 RC1
Where is the KEYS file for this project? On May 15, 2020 at 12:52:01, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de) wrote: Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 has been staged under [2] and it’s time to vote on accepting it for release. All Maven artifacts are available under [1]. Voting will be open for 72hr. A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 are required to pass. Release tag: release/0.7.0 Hash for the release tag: c06b73473383405a550ac4f4cee7dd8636325a35 Per [3] "Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." You can achieve the above by following [4]. [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM items in [4]) [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheplc4x-1027 [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/plc4x/0.7.0/rc1 [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release [4] https://plc4x.apache.org/developers/release/validation.html
Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 RC1
+1 Tasks i did: - Downloaded all staged artifacts - Checked if the signature references an Apache email address (gpg --verify) - Verified the SHA512 hashes - Verified the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. - Verified the content of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. Build from source with: "mvn -P with-sandbox install" Additional remark: -> could only built successfully with-sandbox OS: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS Java: openjdk version "11.0.7" Maven: Apache Maven 3.6.3 Am Fr., 15. Mai 2020 um 18:52 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 has been staged under [2] and it’s time to vote > on accepting it for release. All Maven artifacts are available under [1]. > Voting will be open for 72hr. > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 > are required to pass. > > Release tag: release/0.7.0 > Hash for the release tag: c06b73473383405a550ac4f4cee7dd8636325a35 > > Per [3] "Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download > the signed source code package, compile it as provided, and test > the resulting executable on their own platform, along with also > verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF policy > on releases." > > You can achieve the above by following [4]. > > [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM > items in [4]) > [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) > > > [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheplc4x-1027 > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/plc4x/0.7.0/rc1 > [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > [4] https://plc4x.apache.org/developers/release/validation.html > > >
[VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 RC1
Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 has been staged under [2] and it’s time to vote on accepting it for release. All Maven artifacts are available under [1]. Voting will be open for 72hr. A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 are required to pass. Release tag: release/0.7.0 Hash for the release tag: c06b73473383405a550ac4f4cee7dd8636325a35 Per [3] "Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." You can achieve the above by following [4]. [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM items in [4]) [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheplc4x-1027 [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/plc4x/0.7.0/rc1 [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release [4] https://plc4x.apache.org/developers/release/validation.html