DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44694] Unable to retrieve SummaryInformation from some Office docs; NoPropertySetStreamException thrown
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44694 Rainer Klute [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dev@poi.apache.org |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Rainer Klute [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-27 23:26:12 PST --- I cannot look into this issue without a document exhibiting the faulty behaviour. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44688] Insertion of multiple comments
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44688 --- Comment #5 from SUMIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-27 23:49:48 PST --- Created an attachment (id=21727) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21727) test case This test file creates object of cell and comment in a loop and the output is--- comment in only one cell this happens even after writing in ByteArrayOutputStream and then reading from ByteArrayInputStream -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44688] Insertion of multiple comments
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44688 SUMIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #21727|test case |test case containing object description||of HSSFComment being created ||in a loop -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44688] Insertion of multiple comments
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44688 --- Comment #6 from SUMIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-27 23:54:40 PST --- Created an attachment (id=21728) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21728) unit test containing one object of comment for all the cells This test file has only one comment for three cells and the output is --comment in only one cell this happens even after writing in ByteArrayOutputStream and then reading from ByteArrayInputStream -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44688] Insertion of multiple comments
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44688 --- Comment #7 from SUMIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-27 23:58:40 PST --- Created an attachment (id=21729) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21729) unit test containing one unused object of HSSFComment IN this test file i have created 3 cells and 2 comment objects and have not used one comment object The comment object which is not used is being displayed in excel file in the first cell which is total disaster... -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44688] Insertion of multiple comments
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44688 SUMIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #21730|test case showing more than |unit test showing more than description|1 comment in a excel file |1 comment in a excel file -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44688] Insertion of multiple comments
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44688
Yegor Kozlov [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution||WONTFIX
--- Comment #9 from Yegor Kozlov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-28 05:00:34 PST
---
Hi,
(1) A comment can be assigned to only one cell. If you assign the same comment
object to multiple cells then only the last cell will have it.
(2) HSSFPatriarch is a sheet-scope object, not comment-scope. Move it out of
the loop and all will be fine:
HSSFPatriarch patr = finalsheet.createDrawingPatriarch();
for(int i=0;i3;i++)
{
HSSFCell cell1=finalsheet.createRow(2).createCell((short) i);
HSSFComment comment1 = patr.createComment(new HSSFClientAnchor(0, 100, 0, 0,
(short)4, 2, (short) 6, 5));
}
I updated the docs to state it.
(3) In the forth example you don't set comment text for comment2 and comment3.
Excel doesn't like it and says the file is corrupted.
Check the code:
HSSFPatriarch patr = finalsheet.createDrawingPatriarch();
HSSFComment comment1 = patr.createComment(new HSSFClientAnchor(0, 100, 0, 0,
(short)4, 2, (short) 6, 5));
comment1.setString(new HSSFRichTextString(help me 1));
HSSFComment comment2 = patr.createComment(new HSSFClientAnchor(0, 100, 0, 0,
(short)4, 2, (short) 6, 5));
//should it be comment2
comment1.setString(new HSSFRichTextString(help me 2));
HSSFComment comment3 = patr.createComment(new HSSFClientAnchor(0, 100, 0, 0,
(short)4, 2, (short) 6, 5));
//should it be comment3
comment1.setString(new HSSFRichTextString(help me 3));
cell1.setCellComment(comment1);
cell2.setCellComment(comment2);
cell3.setCellComment(comment3);
It looks like a copy/paste bug.
(4) Your problem has nothing to do with serialization. It doesn't matter if you
write directly to FileOutputStream or serialize in a byte buffer and then to a
file.
Regards,
Yegor
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Rejection of any ENCUMBERED Microsoft Donation to POI
Gianugo Rabellino wrote: On Mar 27, 2008, at 10:36 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: That would be acceptable so long as it is true. Please help a non-native English speaker in not taking offense at this. Ciao, I meant no offense. What I simply mean is that it is not acceptable for a patent holder to donate work to an open source project and then go tell everyone that uses it that they have to pay up. That isn't open source. I'm -1 until I'm convinced that isn't what is about to happen. Nothing I've read has satisfied me to that effect. Again, I support the work, but simply want it licensed to where it can be distributed as open source. -Andy -- Buni Meldware Communication Suite http://buni.org Multi-platform and extensible Email, Calendaring (including freebusy), Rich Webmail, Web-calendaring, ease of installation/administration. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Rejection of any ENCUMBERED Microsoft Donation to POI
Gianugo Rabellino wrote: On Mar 27, 2008, at 10:36 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: That would be acceptable so long as it is true. Please help a non-native English speaker in not taking offense at this. Ciao, I meant no offense. What I simply mean is that it is not acceptable for a patent holder to donate work to an open source project and then go tell everyone that uses it that they have to pay up. That isn't open source. I'm -1 until I'm convinced that isn't what is about to happen. Nothing I've read has satisfied me to that effect. RAND + non-comm are not satisfactory terms as they fail the OSD. Again, I support the work, but simply want it licensed to where it can be distributed as open source. -Andy -- Buni Meldware Communication Suite http://buni.org Multi-platform and extensible Email, Calendaring (including freebusy), Rich Webmail, Web-calendaring, ease of installation/administration. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44693] HSSFSheet.rowIterator() return more rows than sheet has
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44693 Nick Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #1 from Nick Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-28 06:34:55 PST --- I've just written a unit test using your test excel file. With it, I get exactly the right number of rows back from the iterator (713 rows) You can see the working test in a svn checkout: src/testcases/org/apache/poi/hssf/usermodel/TestBugs.java#test44693() -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44680] autoSizeColumn dislike HSSFFont
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44680 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Lecavelier [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-28 06:41:51 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) I tried to write a new project, illustrating the problem, but the sample project works just fine... If I rerun the original project, the problem is still here: that looks like a race condition. Since the code contains confidential information, I'll try to fork it and mess the content to post here a working project containing the problem. I hope I could do it next week. Thank you for your attention. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Rejection of any ENCUMBERED Microsoft Donation to POI
On Mar 28, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Gianugo Rabellino wrote: On Mar 27, 2008, at 10:36 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: That would be acceptable so long as it is true. Please help a non-native English speaker in not taking offense at this. Ciao, I meant no offense. What I simply mean is that it is not acceptable for a patent holder to donate work to an open source project and then go tell everyone that uses it that they have to pay up. That isn't open source. I'm -1 until I'm convinced that isn't what is about to happen. Nothing I've read has satisfied me to that effect. RAND + non-comm are not satisfactory terms as they fail the OSD. I'm sorry Andy, but while I understand (and support!) where you're coming from, I don't really see what would satisfy you. If you're saying that all the legwork we've done is fine, yet you're challenging my word on this, I don't see how we can really have a conversation. There is evidence in terms of official documents (C/I- CLA), there is an SVN history showing you that all the work has come from Sourcesense, there is my declaration that we haven't been tainted by MS IP and that we are legally authorized to contribute this code... what else can I do? Ciao, -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense - making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com Blogging at http://boldlyopen.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30311] Conditional formatting not implemented
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30311 --- Comment #9 from Dmitriy Kumshayev [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-28 17:12:57 PST --- Created an attachment (id=21733) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21733) unit test for HSSFConditionalFormatting and fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
