[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

PJ Fanning  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #31 from Andreas Beeker  ---
Applied PJ Fannings pull request [1] via r1834165
[1] https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/113

Leaving it open until XmlBeans 3.0.0 is released

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #30 from Andreas Beeker  ---
I have some ideas of how JAXB could be integrated into POI, but currently even
the basics don't work.

If you want to have something to get started with, you could try to solve [1]

This would be only one technical POC. We would need to support also older ECMA
versions, which are not downward compatible.

I thought about having only the xml fragment attached to the usermodel and
parse it on the fly and use the jaxb binder to preserve the xml infoset.

The current issue is about a new xmlbeans version - so we should discuss a JAXB
related solution in a different bugzilla entry.


[1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46869482

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #29 from Scott Coldwell  ---
I'm happy to help with the actual conversion when it comes time for that.  My
company just went through a pretty large xmlbeans -> JAXB conversion involving
many 3rd party schemas in various states of schema authoring best practices.
It's really not that bad once you get the classes compiled properly and we've
been through a bunch of the gotchas with making that happen.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

PJ Fanning  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||578372...@qq.com

--- Comment #28 from PJ Fanning  ---
*** Bug 62004 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

Dominik Stadler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||da...@mobile-360.com

--- Comment #27 from Dominik Stadler  ---
*** Bug 61988 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

PJ Fanning  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||61949


Referenced Bugs:

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61949
[Bug 61949] XSSFTable should support create/update functions
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

Dominik Stadler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||prabinshr007...@gmail.com

--- Comment #26 from Dominik Stadler  ---
*** Bug 61921 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #25 from PJ Fanning  ---
I found some other projects based on POI, that have some usage of spreadsheetml
classes. I raised issues in these projects.
https://github.com/norbert-radyk/spoiwo/issues/28
https://github.com/monitorjbl/excel-streaming-reader/issues/125

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #24 from Greg Woolsey  ---
Another complication is that none of the replacement technologies that have
been discussed so far can handle the arbitrary XML allowed as "extensions" in
the OOXML spec. One benefit of XMLBeans is that it keeps the raw XML around and
returns any properties/attributes present when asked.  That way POI can "pass
through" unknown content while allowing access to all known content in a file. 
This is used quite often by downstream projects, especially ones that start
with custom "template" files containing bits like OLE components, custom Office
extensions, VBA macros, complex pivot tables, etc. and fill in live data on the
fly.  

In the spec this is handled by referencing additional namespaces on the fly by
URL. Any replacement in POI would need to allow similar retention of unknown
XML elements and content.  This completely breaks systems like JAXB, which
needs all possible namespaces and how they fit together to be defined up front.
 There is no dynamic model building or class loading.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #23 from Nick Burch  ---
(In reply to Scott Coldwell from comment #22)
> I think the more appropriate course of action would be to remove xmlbeans as
> a dependency.  The project was terminated over 4 years ago.

Removing XMLBeans is probably something like 3-6 months of work, and would have
the added disadvantage of probably breaking something like half of all the POI
examples for XLSX / PPTX / DOCX on the internet, and probably most of the big
projects which make deep/custom use of POI for XLSX/PPTX/DOCX processing

The first step, for which volunteers are very very much welcome(!) is to locate
all the places in your favourite bit of POI (eg XSSF) that leak the CT*
xmlbeans objects, search public examples / github projects / mailing lists etc
to see how those beans are used, ensure we have a proper Usermodel wrapper for
doing the same thing "properly", then deprecate that CT accessor. Once
everything that's commonly done via the low-level xmlbeans classes in other
people's code can be done cleanly with proper POI classes, we can get people to
migrate, then we're in a position to swap out the POI innards to use something
else. 

It's quite a lot of work though, which is why more volunteers are needed to
help drive it! :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #22 from scott.coldw...@hrworx.com ---
I think the more appropriate course of action would be to remove xmlbeans as a
dependency.  The project was terminated over 4 years ago.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

Dominik Stadler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||l_alexandra2...@yahoo.com

--- Comment #21 from Dominik Stadler  ---
*** Bug 54084 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

Dominik Stadler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sakurot...@gmail.com

--- Comment #20 from Dominik Stadler  ---
*** Bug 58247 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

Dominik Stadler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||61494
 CC||ak.a...@gmail.com

--- Comment #19 from Dominik Stadler  ---
*** Bug 61494 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Referenced Bugs:

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61494
[Bug 61494] Updating meta properties in xlsm/xlsx corrupted equation
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

Dominik Stadler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||58247


Referenced Bugs:

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58247
[Bug 58247] Some UTF-16 characters are not handled correctly (likely surrogate
pair related)
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

Dominik Stadler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||54084
 Depends on|54084   |


Referenced Bugs:

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54084
[Bug 54084] Some Unicode chars(e.g chinese chars) are not written corectly in
xlsx file.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #18 from PJ Fanning  ---
I agree that getting an official apache xmlbeans patch done is preferable to
having people use my forked jar. This jar solves some issues with writing XSSF
workbooks that have unicode surrogate chars.

I have found a related issue in the SXSSF code base.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61246 This means that for
writing SXSSF workbooks, users affected by the unicode surrogate chars issues
will need the fork xmlbeans jar and the latest POI code (or 3.17 beta2 when it
is released).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #15 from PJ Fanning  ---
I added a fix for the duplicate classes in
https://github.com/pjfanning/xmlbeans - I will publish a 2.6.2 jar in the
coming days if there are no other xmlbeans issues to fix.

Feel free to highlight any issues from XMLBeans in the issue tracker for the
github fork.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-513?jql=project%20%3D%20XMLBEANS%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #14 from PJ Fanning  ---
My jar has the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-499 issue with
duplicate ReferenceResolver classes. I'll see if I can work out what in the
xmlbeans build is causing this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #13 from Nick Burch  ---
It'd be good to go through the xmlbeans bugzilla, and see if there are any
other bug fix patches there that'd be worth including in a fix release.

(Not to mention the duplicated classes in the 2.6.0 binary jar that ought to be
solved by a fresh build!)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #12 from PJ Fanning  ---
I have published a patched version of xmlbeans to Maven Central.
com.github.pjfanning:xmlbeans:2.6.1

I have a sample that shows the patched jar in action at
https://github.com/pjfanning/poi-xmlbeans-patch-test

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #11 from PJ Fanning  ---
Do we think it would be possible to issue an xmlbeans patch based on the
changes I've made in github?
The longer term solution is probably to replace xmlbeans.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #10 from PJ Fanning  ---
I made a change on a fork that I have of xmlbeans and it allows the
testBug54084Unicode to pass
(https://github.com/pjfanning/xmlbeans/commit/b4dda3837421835b7a378c4ab83ce48a4c49fe59).

I have other branches on the xmlbeans fork where I go further and start
removing Piccolo parser, the JSR173 classes and the deprecated code supporting
XMLInputStream). These changes break 2 CDATA xmlbeans unit tests but this
doesn't seem to adversely affect the poi usage. They can probably be fixed
without too much effort.
The removal of the Piccolo parser would allow some tidy up in POI code (as it
has some workarounds to avoid using Piccolo).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #9 from PJ Fanning  ---
I had a little trouble building xmlbeans so I made some small changes and
committed them to https://github.com/pjfanning/xmlbeans.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #8 from Dominik Stadler  ---
We also see some bugs related to Unicode handling inside XmlBeans, these are
also candidates for this effort, see e.g. bug 54084.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

Dominik Stadler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||54084


Referenced Bugs:

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54084
[Bug 54084] Some Unicode chars(e.g chinese chars) are not written corectly in
xlsx file.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

Kurt Huwig  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kurthu...@gmail.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #7 from Dominik Stadler  ---
*** Bug 59195 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

Dominik Stadler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||59428
 CC||ijuan...@gmail.com

--- Comment #6 from Dominik Stadler  ---
*** Bug 59428 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #5 from Dominik Stadler  ---
The javax... classes are actually included via the stax-api dependency of
XMLBeans. This one should probably simply be removed together with depending on
Java 6 or higher.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #4 from Dominik Stadler  ---
there are a few commits on trunk after 2.6.0 that might be interesting here:

*
https://github.com/apache/xmlbeans/commit/4e918d97a03f6aa4355a4580933dca9bf23e80a0
*
https://github.com/apache/xmlbeans/commit/0d66e61968149809030bce123ea7a0ef58bccb83
*
https://github.com/apache/xmlbeans/commit/511d8ae119a7a0cc0d822e5997df1ffad3fe7677
*
https://github.com/apache/xmlbeans/commit/6cd06c9c9e0174190b593de7dec372d5cc123305

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

Dominik Stadler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on|59195   |
 Blocks||55149, 59195

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #3 from Dominik Stadler  ---
Another thing that we can look at: bug 55149 - "Usage of XmlBeans triggers
"clearThreadLocalMap" warnings"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #2 from Dominik Stadler  ---
Bonus points for looking at the following locking issue as well:
http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/Alternative-Replacement-for-xmlbeans-tt5722053.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

--- Comment #1 from Dominik Stadler  ---
Comment from Nick in bug #59195: "Maybe we could get together with Tika and
Lucene, and ask the Attic PMC to let us put together a 2.6.1 release with the
packaging fix and some others, if someone fancies spending a little bit of time
to lead that?"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

Dominik Stadler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||59195

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 59268] Work on providing an updated version of XMLBeans

[bugzilla]

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268

Dominik Stadler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||58925

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org