[jira] [Commented] (QPID-4973) [Java Broker] Refactor DurableConfigurationStore interface to be in terms of ConfiguredObject rather than implementation classes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13700934#comment-13700934 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-4973: --- Commit 1500047 from [~godfrer] [ https://svn.apache.org/r1500047 ] QPID-4973 : [Java Broker] Refactor DurableConfigurationStore interface to be in terms of ConfiguredObject rather than implementation classes [Java Broker] Refactor DurableConfigurationStore interface to be in terms of ConfiguredObject rather than implementation classes Key: QPID-4973 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4973 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Improvement Components: Java Broker Reporter: Rob Godfrey Assignee: Rob Godfrey As part of the ongoing changes to the Java Broker configuration model, make the DurableConfigurationStore (essentially the config store for a vhost) expose only a generic interface for configured objects, and not restrict to concrete implementation classes such as Queue, Exchange, Binding, etc. (Note that the representation of the objects in the BDB and JDBC/Derby stores is already in a generic form. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (QPID-4973) [Java Broker] Refactor DurableConfigurationStore interface to be in terms of ConfiguredObject rather than implementation classes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13700955#comment-13700955 ] Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-4973: --- Gah - the above commit (r1500047) should have been against QPID-4979 [Java Broker] Refactor DurableConfigurationStore interface to be in terms of ConfiguredObject rather than implementation classes Key: QPID-4973 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4973 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Improvement Components: Java Broker Reporter: Rob Godfrey Assignee: Rob Godfrey As part of the ongoing changes to the Java Broker configuration model, make the DurableConfigurationStore (essentially the config store for a vhost) expose only a generic interface for configured objects, and not restrict to concrete implementation classes such as Queue, Exchange, Binding, etc. (Note that the representation of the objects in the BDB and JDBC/Derby stores is already in a generic form. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (QPID-4973) [Java Broker] Refactor DurableConfigurationStore interface to be in terms of ConfiguredObject rather than implementation classes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13697883#comment-13697883 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-4973: --- Commit 1498976 from [~godfrer] [ https://svn.apache.org/r1498976 ] QPID-4973 : [Java Broker] Refactor DurableConfigurationStore [Java Broker] Refactor DurableConfigurationStore interface to be in terms of ConfiguredObject rather than implementation classes Key: QPID-4973 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4973 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Improvement Components: Java Broker Reporter: Rob Godfrey Assignee: Rob Godfrey As part of the ongoing changes to the Java Broker configuration model, make the DurableConfigurationStore (essentially the config store for a vhost) expose only a generic interface for configured objects, and not restrict to concrete implementation classes such as Queue, Exchange, Binding, etc. (Note that the representation of the objects in the BDB and JDBC/Derby stores is already in a generic form. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (QPID-4973) [Java Broker] Refactor DurableConfigurationStore interface to be in terms of ConfiguredObject rather than implementation classes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13697886#comment-13697886 ] Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-4973: --- First commit exposes the API as a tuple of id, type, attributes and moves the conversion from the implementation objects into DurableConfigurationStoreHelper. Outstanding steps are: 1. Use simple name (e.g. Queue) rather than full class names for types (cf broker json store) 2. move creation/removal logic into a central location 3. allow for saving of additional attributes, and reconcile model names and queue creation names for the attributes [Java Broker] Refactor DurableConfigurationStore interface to be in terms of ConfiguredObject rather than implementation classes Key: QPID-4973 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4973 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Improvement Components: Java Broker Reporter: Rob Godfrey Assignee: Rob Godfrey As part of the ongoing changes to the Java Broker configuration model, make the DurableConfigurationStore (essentially the config store for a vhost) expose only a generic interface for configured objects, and not restrict to concrete implementation classes such as Queue, Exchange, Binding, etc. (Note that the representation of the objects in the BDB and JDBC/Derby stores is already in a generic form. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
