Re: [racket-dev] Right-paren behavior on Definitions window still looks funky

2013-04-02 Thread Danny Yoo 
On Tuesday, April 2, 2013, Robby Findler wrote:

> I've just pushed a fix for this, but when you say "still", do you mean
> that you've reported this before?
>
>
I'm sorry: I should have reported it as a bug much sooner.  I noticed it
some time after 5.3.3, but thought you were experimenting with something,
so I kept quiet.  But the release pre-announcement triggered my concern.
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #26528: master branch updated

2013-04-02 Thread Asumu Takikawa 
On 2013-03-30 10:10:20 -0400, ry...@racket-lang.org wrote:
> 293b208 Ryan Culpepper  2013-03-20 10:52
> :
> | added optional #:grammar clause to defform, etc
> :
>   M collects/scribble/private/manual-form.rkt  |  68 -
>   M collects/scribblings/scribble/manual.scrbl | 132 
> ++

Is this the preferred way of documenting forms now? It does look more
convenient, and I noticed that `defform/subs` and friends are now
relegated to a smaller corner of the docs.

Cheers,
Asumu
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Right-paren behavior on Definitions window still looks funky

2013-04-02 Thread Robby Findler 
I've just pushed a fix for this, but when you say "still", do you mean that
you've reported this before?

Robby


On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Danny Yoo  wrote:

> In the version of DrRacket in HEAD, when I press the two characters
> "[" "]" in sequence in the Definitions pane, I visually see that the
> paren fixing is happening on the "]" in a very distracting way: it
> visually switches between "]", "}", and finally ")".
>
> I don't see this behavior on the Interactions pane.
>
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] The next Racket release is about to begin

2013-04-02 Thread Danny Yoo 
Are there high priority bugs that deserve attention?
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

[racket-dev] Right-paren behavior on Definitions window still looks funky

2013-04-02 Thread Danny Yoo 
In the version of DrRacket in HEAD, when I press the two characters
"[" "]" in sequence in the Definitions pane, I visually see that the
paren fixing is happening on the "]" in a very distracting way: it
visually switches between "]", "}", and finally ")".

I don't see this behavior on the Interactions pane.
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Fix to module reader?

2013-04-02 Thread Danny Yoo 
Following up: I haven't received any input on this yet.

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Danny Yoo  wrote:
> I'm running into an internal error with the syntax/module-reader
> library with the given test program, and wanted to double check with
> someone else before committing the fix upstream.
>
>
> The test file is:
>
> https://gist.github.com/dyoo/5272982
>
>
> When I run this under an unpatched module reader, I see the following error:
>
> 128-110-73-138:Desktop dyoo$ raco test prepend-lang-line.rkt
> testing prepend-lang-line.rkt
> -: contract violation
>   expected: number?
>   given: #f
>   argument position: 2nd
>   other arguments...:
>16
>   context...:
>/Applications/Racket
> v5.3.2/collects/syntax/module-reader.rkt:173:2: wrap-internal
>wrap-internal/wrapper
>/Users/dyoo/Desktop/prepend-lang-line.rkt: [running body]
>/Applications/Racket v5.3.2/collects/compiler/commands/test.rkt:
> [running body]
>/Applications/Racket v5.3.2/collects/raco/raco.rkt: [running body]
>/Applications/Racket v5.3.2/collects/raco/main.rkt: [running body]
>
>
>
>
> My proposed patch is:
>
>
> https://github.com/dyoo/racket/commit/9322570e3e0210b99ec8a85dca52b62b4dde66fd
>
>
>
>
> Does this look ok?  Also, if I do push this upstream, how do I attach
> my test file so it gets run as part of the DrDr regression suite?
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] The next Racket release is about to begin

2013-04-02 Thread Robby Findler 
Any opinions on the version number for the next release?

Robby

On Tuesday, April 2, 2013, Ryan Culpepper wrote:

> The release process for the next Racket release will begin in about
> a week.  If you have any new features that you want in and are
> relatively close to being done, now is a good time to do that.
> _
>  Racket Developers list:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/**dev 
>
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

[racket-dev] The next Racket release is about to begin

2013-04-02 Thread Ryan Culpepper 

The release process for the next Racket release will begin in about
a week.  If you have any new features that you want in and are
relatively close to being done, now is a good time to do that.
_
 Racket Developers list:
 http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

[racket-dev] Measuring # of waiters on a port?

2013-04-02 Thread Danny Yoo 
I'm trying to isolate a "503" error coming from WeScheme occasionally,
and I think I've isolated the problem down to the number of allowed
waiters on a port.

I see that web-server has the default set to 40.

Is there a good way to tell whether or not we do reach this limit at
runtime, or is that not observable from Racket?  I suspect I'm hitting
this limit, but if there's a good way to surface this, I'd be more
comforted.
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev