Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.1
At Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:03:12 -0400, Ryan Culpepper wrote: * Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu - Racket Tests - Languages Tests - GRacket Tests (Also check that `gracket -z' and `gracket-text' still works in Windows and Mac OS X) - mzc --exe tests - .plt-packing Tests - Games Tests - Unit Tests - Syntax Color Tests - R6RS Tests - JPR's test suite - Create an executable from a BSL program - Run COM tests - Embed-in-c test - Try compiling with -funsigned-char - Try compiling with TEST_ALTERNATE_TARGET_REGISTER Done. Updates: - Racket Updates: update HISTORY (updates should show v6.1 as the most current version) Done. - Update man pages in racket/man/man1: racket.1, gracket.1, raco.1 No change. _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.1
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: * Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu - DrRacket Tests - Framework Tests - Contracts Tests - Games Tests - Teachpacks Tests: image tests - PLaneT Tests - Redex Tests Updates: - DrRacket Updates: update HISTORY - Redex Updates: update HISTORY (updates should show v6.1 as the most current version) - Ensure that previous version of DrRacket's preference files still starts up with new DrRacket - Update man pages in racket/man/man1: drracket.1 Email me to pick the changes when they're done, or tell me if there are no such changes. Done. There are two commits for the HISTORY; just pushed and they are marked in the commit messages. Robby _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] flatten-begin
On 2014-07-17 22:17:18 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: Why doesn't flatten-begin already do this? I'm not sure. I was hoping someone else could tell me. :) Cheers, Asumu _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] flatten-begin
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: On 2014-07-17 22:17:18 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: Why doesn't flatten-begin already do this? I'm not sure. I was hoping someone else could tell me. :) Ha! :) Maybe there's something you might want to do with the intermediate syntax objects in some cases? Properties maybe? I'm not sure. Looks like it's been that way for more than 5 years now, tho, so it seems unwise to change it. Unless someone knows why it is a bad idea, how about adding a #:all? argument that flattens all the way down? I don't see many uses of flatten-begin in our tree, but the one in compatibility/package sure looks like it could use the #:all? argument. Ditto the one in TR (in class-prims.rkt). And I'm pretty sure that replacing the hand-rolled loops in drracket for doing this (they predate that library) would use the #:all? argument if they were rewritten. Robby _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.1
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: * Greg Cooper g...@cs.brown.edu - FrTime Tests Done. Encountered some errors in some of the demos and committed/pushed a fix. _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
