Re: [racket-dev] Fishy directory rename

2013-08-15 Thread Robby Findler
Does it not make sense to you that someone might want to use htdp without
using the tests? As for the docs, the split there is so that someone can
produce a package that re-uses the implementation of the teaching languages
without focusing all clients to get and install the documentation. Think of
someone writing a universe game in the final project and then wanting to
share it with others. Sure seems reasonable to me.

Robby


On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:

>
> Eli is right in that I did not intend this directory to be a real test. It
> is definitely misnamed. But it's no big deal so let's leave it as is.
>
> [[ As I have written privately, I just do not understand the split of htdp
> into three different packages but so be it. ]]
>
> -- Matthias
>
>
>
> On Aug 14, 2013, at 9:17 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
> I moved that because I thought it was a test. I thought it was a test
> because of the directory name and because it has files that are not being
> compiled.
>
> (But I didn't check with Matthias specifically about that directory.)
>
> Robby
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Eli Barzilay  wrote:
>
>> Trying to sort out some apparent mess in the props, I ran into this
>> possibly bad rename:
>>
>> pkgs/htdp-pkgs/htdp-lib/2htdp/utest
>> -->
>> pkgs/htdp-pkgs/htdp-test/2htdp/utest
>>
>> Before the move, the "utest" directory was not considered a test by
>> the old distribution rules (since it wasn't in a "tests" directory),
>> and after the move it is in a *-test package and therefore probably
>> considered as tests that wouldn't be packaged in the release.
>>
>> I *think* that it's wrong, because I vaguely remember Matthias saying
>> that he wants "utest" in the distribution, but I'm not sure.
>>
>> [The more disturbing point is that dealing with two of these paths and
>> comparing it with the old paths made this thing ridiculously difficult
>> to notice.]
>>
>> --
>>   ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))  Eli Barzilay:
>> http://barzilay.org/   Maze is Life!
>> _
>>   Racket Developers list:
>>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>>
>
> _
>  Racket Developers list:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>
>
>
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] Fishy directory rename

2013-08-15 Thread Matthias Felleisen

Eli is right in that I did not intend this directory to be a real test. It is 
definitely misnamed. But it's no big deal so let's leave it as is. 

[[ As I have written privately, I just do not understand the split of htdp into 
three different packages but so be it. ]] 

-- Matthias



On Aug 14, 2013, at 9:17 PM, Robby Findler wrote:

> I moved that because I thought it was a test. I thought it was a test because 
> of the directory name and because it has files that are not being compiled.
> 
> (But I didn't check with Matthias specifically about that directory.)
> 
> Robby
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Eli Barzilay  wrote:
> Trying to sort out some apparent mess in the props, I ran into this
> possibly bad rename:
> 
> pkgs/htdp-pkgs/htdp-lib/2htdp/utest
> -->
> pkgs/htdp-pkgs/htdp-test/2htdp/utest
> 
> Before the move, the "utest" directory was not considered a test by
> the old distribution rules (since it wasn't in a "tests" directory),
> and after the move it is in a *-test package and therefore probably
> considered as tests that wouldn't be packaged in the release.
> 
> I *think* that it's wrong, because I vaguely remember Matthias saying
> that he wants "utest" in the distribution, but I'm not sure.
> 
> [The more disturbing point is that dealing with two of these paths and
> comparing it with the old paths made this thing ridiculously difficult
> to notice.]
> 
> --
>   ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))  Eli Barzilay:
> http://barzilay.org/   Maze is Life!
> _
>   Racket Developers list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
> 
> _
>  Racket Developers list:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] Fishy directory rename

2013-08-14 Thread Robby Findler
I moved that because I thought it was a test. I thought it was a test
because of the directory name and because it has files that are not being
compiled.

(But I didn't check with Matthias specifically about that directory.)

Robby


On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Eli Barzilay  wrote:

> Trying to sort out some apparent mess in the props, I ran into this
> possibly bad rename:
>
> pkgs/htdp-pkgs/htdp-lib/2htdp/utest
> -->
> pkgs/htdp-pkgs/htdp-test/2htdp/utest
>
> Before the move, the "utest" directory was not considered a test by
> the old distribution rules (since it wasn't in a "tests" directory),
> and after the move it is in a *-test package and therefore probably
> considered as tests that wouldn't be packaged in the release.
>
> I *think* that it's wrong, because I vaguely remember Matthias saying
> that he wants "utest" in the distribution, but I'm not sure.
>
> [The more disturbing point is that dealing with two of these paths and
> comparing it with the old paths made this thing ridiculously difficult
> to notice.]
>
> --
>   ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))  Eli Barzilay:
> http://barzilay.org/   Maze is Life!
> _
>   Racket Developers list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


[racket-dev] Fishy directory rename

2013-08-14 Thread Eli Barzilay
Trying to sort out some apparent mess in the props, I ran into this
possibly bad rename:

pkgs/htdp-pkgs/htdp-lib/2htdp/utest
-->
pkgs/htdp-pkgs/htdp-test/2htdp/utest

Before the move, the "utest" directory was not considered a test by
the old distribution rules (since it wasn't in a "tests" directory),
and after the move it is in a *-test package and therefore probably
considered as tests that wouldn't be packaged in the release.

I *think* that it's wrong, because I vaguely remember Matthias saying
that he wants "utest" in the distribution, but I'm not sure.

[The more disturbing point is that dealing with two of these paths and
comparing it with the old paths made this thing ridiculously difficult
to notice.]

-- 
  ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))  Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/   Maze is Life!
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev