Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ EventBridge 1.1.0

2024-03-21 Thread lollipop
+1

On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 2:22 PM 沈林 <2011shen...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for 1.1.0 release of Apache RocketMQ EventBridge. In this
> version, We will be releasing some functionality of EventBridge. Including:
> [+] The runtime of eventbridge.
> [+] Built in demo use case: send events,filter,transform and write to file.
> [+] Supports built-in databases without the need to build MySQL.
> [+] Add file sink connector.
> [+] Add e2e test case.
> [+] Add git workflows check when creating the  pull request.
>
> According to the last suggestion, a new version to be released was
> generated through github workflows:
>
> The artifact:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-eventbridge/1.1.0-rc1/
>
>
> Git tag for the release:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-eventbridge/releases/tag/rocketmq-eventbridge-1.1.0
>
> Hash for the release tag: 0008e7826f0cbf2e61f14565a5229e97be42c8d7
>
> Relate Notes:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-eventbridge/releases/tag/rocketmq-eventbridge-1.1.0
>
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> F1CF7B3B63003270B3EB5B0B66BFD9C8461F1A4A, which can be found in the keys
> file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
>
> Fill in the following:
> [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
> [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> necessary
> [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
> [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Thanks,
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>
> 沈林 <2011shen...@gmail.com> 于2024年2月18日周日 09:02写道:
>
> > Hello RocketMQ Community,
> >
> > This is the vote for 1.1.0 release of Apache RocketMQ EventBridge. In
> this
> > version, We will be releasing some functionality of EventBridge.
> Including:
> > [+] The runtime of eventbridge.
> > [+] Built in demo use case: send events,filter,transform and write to
> file.
> > [+] Supports built-in databases without the need to build MySQL.
> > [+] Add file sink connector.
> > [+] Add e2e test case.
> > [+] Add git workflows check when creating the  pull request.
> >
> > The artifact:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-eventbridge/1.1.0-rc1/
> >
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-eventbridge/releases/tag/rocketmq-eventbridge-1.1.0
> >
> > Hash for the release tag: 6a852f22fb55a2c8c3e80070100547eb9b1a9b51
> >
> > Relate Notes:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-eventbridge/releases/tag/rocketmq-eventbridge-1.1.0
> >
> >
> > The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> > F1CF7B3B63003270B3EB5B0B66BFD9C8461F1A4A, which can be found in the keys
> > file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> >
> >
> > Fill in the following:
> > [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
> > [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> > necessary
> > [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
> > [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
> >
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> > of votes are reached.
> > Please vote accordingly:
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Thanks,
> > The Apache RocketMQ Team
> >
>


Re: [VOTE][RIP-68] RocketMQ ACL 2.0

2024-01-07 Thread lollipop
+1
Glad to see the proposal for Apache RocketMQ ACL 2.0.
I believe this new version will significantly enhance the security features
of RocketMQ and provide users with more granular and flexible access
control.

On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 3:50 PM zhimin li  wrote:

> +1, The design document is very detailed.
>
> 丁双喜  于2024年1月5日周五 14:46写道:
> >
> > Hi, RocketMQ Community,
> >
> > As discussed in the previous email, this is the vote for RIP-68
> > RocketMQ ACL 2.0.
> >
> > links:
> > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/7560
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
> of
> > votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> >
> > Best Regards!
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

2023-10-08 Thread lollipop
+1

I have checked:
[OK ]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the source package.
[OK ]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
release.
[OK ]  License and Notice are correct in the source package.

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 2:01 PM qiaoao  wrote:

> +1
>
> > 2023年9月22日 15:10,L K  写道:
> >
> > Hello RocketMQ Community,
> >
> > This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ.
> >
> > This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
> >
> > The artifacts:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/
> >
> > The staging repo:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4
> >
> >
> > Hash for the release tag:
> > 1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9
> >
> > Release Notes:
> > https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4
> >
> >
> > The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> > 29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys
> file:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> >
> > Checklist for reference,
> > Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking
> releases.
> > Fill in the following:
> >
> > []  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > []  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > []  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release.
> > []  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > []  License and Notice are correct in source package.
> > []  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> > []  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> > []  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > []  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > []  The code can be built success in the source package.
> > []  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> > []  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> >
> > And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> >
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > The Apache RocketMQ Team
>
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ APIs 2.0.3 RC1

2023-06-12 Thread lollipop
+1

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 5:30 PM aaron ai  wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for 2.0.3 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ APIs.
>
> RocketMQ APIs use Protocol Buffers version 3 (proto3) as their Interface
> Definition Language (IDL) to define the API interface and the structure of
> the payload messages.
>
> The artifacts:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-proto/2.0.3-rc1
>
> The staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1231/
>
> Git tag for the release:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/v2.0.3
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/rocketmq-proto-2.0.3
>
> Hash for the release tag:
>
> 70eb1effd4b415678fc7214cedd3a289b0f926b9
>
> Relate Notes:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/v2.0.3
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/rocketmq-proto-2.0.3
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>
> 3A11FEBBD64C807A233BF1F27C46C79BD4D29011, which can be found in the keys
> file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
> Fill in the following:
>
> [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
>
> [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> necessary
>
> [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
>
> [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>


Re: [VOTE] Release gRPC Java Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.5 RC1

2023-03-22 Thread lollipop
+1
I have checked all of the four items.

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:00 AM aaron ai  wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for 5.0.5 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ client for Java.
>
> Apache RocketMQ clients 5.x series follow the specs of rocketmq-apis
> , and are built on top of
> Protocol
> Buffer and gRPC.
>
> The artifact url:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-clients/rocketmq-client-java/5.0.5-rc1/
>
> The staging repo for maven:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1156/
>
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/java-5.0.5
>
> Hash for the release tag:
> 997d322e71a5f6d8bc189b88eea6caad211105f8
>
> Release Notes:
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/java-5.0.5
>
> The artifact have been signed with
> Key: 3A11FEBBD64C807A233BF1F27C46C79BD4D29011, which can be found in the
> keys file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
> Fill in the following:
>
> [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
> [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> necessary
> [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
> [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Thanks
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>


Re: Re:[VOTE] Release gRPC .NET Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.1.0 RC1

2023-03-19 Thread lollipop
+1

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:01 AM Qingshan Lin  wrote:

> +1
>
> On 2023/03/18 14:12:18 jinrongtong wrote:
> > +1, I checked that Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current
> artifacts
> >
> >
> >
> > At 2023-03-17 14:59:39, "aaron ai"  wrote:
> >
> > Hello RocketMQ Community,
> >
> >
> > This is the vote for 5.1.0 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ client for .NET.
> >
> >
> > Apache RocketMQ clients 5.x series follow the specs of rocketmq-apis,
> and are built on top of Protocol Buffer and gRPC.
> >
> >
> > The artifact url:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-clients/rocketmq-client-csharp/5.1.0-rc1/
> >
> >
> > NuGet url:
> > https://www.nuget.org/packages/RocketMQ.Client/5.1.0-rc1
> >
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/csharp-5.1.0-rc1
> >
> >
> > Hash for the release tag:
> > c4d4ce6dc0364c1b0732688d8a425a5781a28331
> >
> >
> > Release Notes:
> > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/csharp-5.1.0-rc1
> >
> >
> > The artifact have been signed with Key:
> 3A11FEBBD64C807A233BF1F27C46C79BD4D29011, which can be found in the keys
> file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> >
> >
> > Fill in the following:
> >
> > [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
> > [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> necessary
> > [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
> > [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> number of votes are reached.
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Thanks
> > The Apache RocketMQ Team
> >
>


Re: Re:Re: [DISCUSS] Prepare to release Apache RocketMQ 5.0.1

2023-02-12 Thread lollipop
+1

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:47 AM Xin Wang  wrote:

> Great. Thanks, Zhouxiang for managing the release.
>
> Xinyu Zhou  于2023年2月10日周五 10:32写道:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks for volunteering for this release.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 6:16 PM 643422162 <643422...@qq.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > -- 原始邮件 --
> > > *发件人: *"jinrongtong";
> > > *发件时间: *2023-02-09 16:10
> > > *收件人: *"dev";
> > > *收件人: *
> > >
> > > "users";
> > > *主题: *Re:Re: [DISCUSS] Prepare to release Apache RocketMQ 5.0.1
> > >
> > >
> > > +1
> > > At 2023-02-09 16:04:54, "aaron ai" wrote:
> > > >+1, Nice to see it moving forward after the release of 5.0.0
> > > >
> > > >Zhouxiang Zhan 于2023年2月9日周四 14:23写道:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi, RocketMQ community:
> > > >>
> > > >> I'd like to propose releasing Apache RocketMQ 5.0.1. It's been a
> while
> > > >> since RocketMQ 5.0.0 was released.During this time, multiple
> important
> > > >> features were merged into the code trunk, including remoting
> protocol
> > > >> proxy[
> > > >> 1], observability improvement[2], server-side offset management[3],
> > > >> remoting module improvement[4], transaction message[5], pop orderly
> > > >> improvement[6], backporting of remoting client[7], logging module
> with
> > > >> shaded logback[8], tiered storage[9], etc.We also did some stability
> > and
> > > >> bug fixes on the trunk. It's time to release RocketMQ 5.0.1. I would
> > > like
> > > >> to start an email thread to discuss the plan.
> > > >>
> > > >> If you have any important bug fixes or questions, please reply to
> this
> > > >> email.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Zhouxiang Zhan
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-55-Support-remoting-protocol-in-rocketmq-proxy-module
> > > >> [2]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-46-Observability-improvement-for-RocketMQ
> > > >> [3]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-48-Enhance-server-side-offset-management-ability
> > > >> [4]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-49-RocketMQ-remoting-module-improvement
> > > >> [5]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-50-RocketMQ-Transaction-Message-Improvement
> > > >> [6]
> > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-51-Pop-orderly-improvement
> > > >> [7]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-54-Backporting-of-Remoting-based-Client
> > > >> [8]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-56-Replace-Logging-Module-with-Shaded-Logback
> > > >> [9]
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-57-Tiered-storage-for-RocketMQ
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Xin
>


Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-61] RocketMQ EventBridge Runtime

2023-01-31 Thread lollipop
+1 to start the RIP

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:35 AM Qingshan Lin  wrote:

> nice work,this will make a better EventBridge。
>
> On 2023/01/30 12:57:47 Zhanhui Li wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 7:53 PM Xin Wang  wrote:
> >
> > > +1 Nick work. Thanks shenlin.
> > >
> > > Xinyu Zhou  于2023年1月29日周日 22:34写道:
> > >
> > > > +1 to start this RIP.
> > > >
> > > > In most cases, users need an embedded and stateless runtime to adopt
> > > > eventbridge in a single-tenant scenario.
> > > > For large-scale use cases, the rocketmq-connect runtime is another
> > > option.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > yukon
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 5:16 PM 沈林 <2011shen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello RocketMQ Community:
> > > > >
> > > > > We have plans to add Runtime to EventBridge to reduce the
> dependence on
> > > > > external services and improve the service experience of EDA
> > > integration.
> > > > >
> > > > > We have written the proposal, and you can see it by the link below:
> > > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-eventbridge/wiki/EventBridge-Runtime
> > > > >
> > > > > Please reply to this email if you have any suggestions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your response would be highly appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Xin
> > >
> >
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ APIs 2.0.2 RC1

2022-12-14 Thread lollipop
+1

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 11:12 AM aaron ai  wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for 2.0.2 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ APIs.
>
> RocketMQ APIs use Protocol Buffers version 3 (proto3) as their Interface
> Definition Language (IDL) to define the API interface and the structure of
> the payload messages.
>
> The artifacts:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-proto/2.0.2-rc1
>
> The staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1131/
>
> Git tag for the release:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/v2.0.2
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/rocketmq-proto-2.0.2
>
> Hash for the release tag:
>
> e83a1bceacbef5be465a459965d8edee59cad0c2
>
> Relate Notes:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/v2.0.2
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/rocketmq-proto-2.0.2
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>
> 3A11FEBBD64C807A233BF1F27C46C79BD4D29011, which can be found in the keys
> file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
> Fill in the following:
>
> [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
>
> [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> necessary
>
> [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
>
> [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>


Re: [VOTE] Release gRPC Java Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.4 RC1

2022-12-14 Thread lollipop
+1

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:36 AM aaron ai  wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
>
> This is the vote for 5.0.4 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ client for java.
>
>
> Apache RocketMQ clients 5.x series follow the specs of rocketmq-apis
> , and are built on top of
> Protocol
> Buffer and gRPC.
>
>
> The artifact:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-clients/rocketmq-client-java/5.0.4-rc1/
> <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-clients/rocketmq-client-java/5.0.4-rc1/
> >
>
>
> The staging repo for maven:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1130/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1130/
> >
>
>
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/java-5.0.4
>
>
> Hash for the release tag: 33dfa2cebae9a2987f222c2563fd22103dc29588
>
>
> Relate Notes:
>  https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/java-5.0.4
> 
>
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> 3A11FEBBD64C807A233BF1F27C46C79BD4D29011, which can be found in the keys
> file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
>
> Fill in the following:
>
>
> [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
>
>
> [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> necessary
>
>
> [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
>
>
> [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>


Re: [VOTE] Release gRPC Java Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.3 RC1

2022-11-23 Thread lollipop
+1

I have checked all of the four items.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 11:52 AM aaron ai  wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
>
> This is the vote for 5.0.3 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ client for java.
>
>
> Apache RocketMQ clients 5.x series follow the specs of rocketmq-apis
> , and are built on top of
> Protocol
> Buffer and gRPC.
>
>
> The artifact:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-clients/rocketmq-client-java/5.0.3-rc1/
>
>
> The staging repo for maven:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1128/
>
>
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/java-5.0.3
>
>
> Hash for the release tag: ba5c8a718bbd67d03dad0460df1507c7e88cd0f7
>
>
> Relate Notes:
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/java-5.0.3
>
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> 3A11FEBBD64C807A233BF1F27C46C79BD4D29011, which can be found in the keys
> file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
>
> Fill in the following:
>
>
> [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
>
>
> [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> necessary
>
>
> [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
>
>
> [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>


Re: [VOTE][RIP-54] Backporting of Remoting-based Client

2022-10-25 Thread lollipop
+1

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 1:52 PM Zhanhui Li  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:07 AM Xinyu Zhou  wrote:
>
> > +1, make the remoting client more stable.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:52 PM aaron ai  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, RocketMQ Community,
> > >
> > > As discussed in the previous email, this is the vote for* RIP-54
> > > Backporting of Remoting-based Client*.
> > >
> > > links:
> > >
> https://www.yuque.com/docs/share/03d824be-8510-4ab4-ad81-d04969174f81?#
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
> > of
> > > votes are reached.
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards!
> > >
> > > aaron ai  于2022年10月19日周三 15:13写道:
> > >
> > > > Due to the maintenance of shimo docs, I can not get the public share
> > > link.
> > > > Here is the alternative solutions:
> > > >
> > > > * google docs:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Go60u-jPwEx4pfXwRagJQg6qbxAwnufF9IuRcM33suk/edit?usp=sharing
> > > > * yuque:
> > > >
> > https://www.yuque.com/docs/share/03d824be-8510-4ab4-ad81-d04969174f81?#
> > > >
> > > > aaron ai  于2022年10月19日周三 14:49写道:
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> aaron ai  于2022年10月19日周三 14:47写道:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi, RocketMQ Community.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> We intent to migrate some bugfix and several optimizations to
> > RocketMQ
> > > >>> remoting-based SDK.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> We have written the proposal and you can see it by the link below:
> > > >>> https://shimo.im/docs/Ee32MG7bOEURnZA2
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Please reply to this email if you have any suggestions.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>


Re: [VOTE][RIP-56] Replace Logging Module with Shaded Logback

2022-10-24 Thread lollipop
+1

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:53 PM aaron ai  wrote:

> Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>
> As discussed in the previous email, this is the vote for *RIP-56 Replace
> Logging Module with Shaded Logback*.
>
> links:
>
> https://www.yuque.com/docs/share/b2594b77-25f1-40a9-aada-5afe5488ce83?#%20%E3%80%8ARIP-56%20Replace%20Logging%20Module%20with%20Shaded%20logback%E3%80%8B
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
> Best Regards!
>
> jinrongtong  于2022年10月21日周五 20:31写道:
>
> > +1
> > 在 2022-10-21 17:13:59,"fuyou"  写道:
> > >+1
> > >
> > >zhimin li  于2022年10月21日周五 15:38写道:
> > >
> > >> +1,We should focus on rocketmq itself
> > >>
> > >> > 2022年10月21日 11:49,aaron ai  写道:
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi, RocketMQ Community:
> > >> >
> > >> > We noticed that the existing logging module is unnecessary, so there
> > is a
> > >> > proposal to replace it with shaded logback.
> > >> >
> > >> > You can see more details from
> > >> >
> > https://www.yuque.com/docs/share/b2594b77-25f1-40a9-aada-5afe5488ce83?#
> > >> > 《RIP-56 Replace Logging Module with Shaded logback》
> > >> >
> > >> > Please reply to this email if you have any questions.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >--
> > >   =
> > >
> > >  fuyou001
> > >Best Regards
> >
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ EventBridge 1.0.0

2022-10-23 Thread lollipop
+1

I checked:
[OK ]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the source package.
[OK ]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
release.
[OK ]  License and Notice are correct in the source package.


On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 6:02 PM 沈林 <2011shen...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for the 1.0.0 release of Apache RocketMQ EventBridge. Also
> it will be the first release of EventBridge. In this version, We will be
> releasing the overall functionality of EventBridge for the first time.
> Including:
> 1) Lifecycle management of core resources, including EventSource, EventBus
> and EventRule.
> 2) The event api gateway for putting the event to EventBridge.
> 3) The Source Runner and Target Runner on RocketMQ Connect.
> 4) The Source and Target class register.
> 5) The Filter and Transform RocketMQ Connect plugin, before delivering the
> event to the target.
> and so on. (Detail: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-eventbridge)
>
>
> The artifact:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-eventbridge/1.0.0-rc1/
>
>
> Git tag for the release:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-eventbridge/releases/tag/rocketmq-eventbridge-1.0.0
>
> Hash for the release tag: e11edf726ddb564c1fc4ade00fc3103c798c1291
>
> Relate Notes:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-eventbridge/releases/tag/rocketmq-eventbridge-1.0.0
>
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> F1CF7B3B63003270B3EB5B0B66BFD9C8461F1A4A, which can be found in the keys
> file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
>
> Fill in the following:
> [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
> [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> necessary
> [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
> [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Thanks,
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>


Re: [VOTE] RIP-55 Support remoting protocol in rocketmq proxy module

2022-10-21 Thread lollipop
+1
for supporting remoting protocol in rocketmq proxy module.

On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 2:40 PM Zhouxiang Zhan  wrote:

>  Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> There's an issue with remoting protocol in rocketmq proxy module.
>
>  Links:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-55-Support-remoting-protocol-in-rocketmq-proxy-module
>
>  The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
>  number of votes are reached.
>
>  Please vote accordingly:
>  [ ] +1 approve
>  [ ] +0 no opinion
>  [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>  Thanks
>


Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-56] Replace Logging Module with Shaded Logback

2022-10-21 Thread lollipop
+1

On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 1:33 PM zhilia...@163.com  wrote:

> +1
> Glad to see this improvment
>
>
>
> zhilia...@163.com
>
> From: aaron ai
> Date: 2022-10-21 11:49
> To: dev
> Subject: [DISCUSS] [RIP-56] Replace Logging Module with Shaded Logback
> Hi, RocketMQ Community:
>
> We noticed that the existing logging module is unnecessary, so there is a
> proposal to replace it with shaded logback.
>
> You can see more details from
> https://www.yuque.com/docs/share/b2594b77-25f1-40a9-aada-5afe5488ce83?#
> 《RIP-56 Replace Logging Module with Shaded logback》
>
> Please reply to this email if you have any questions.
>


Re: [VOTE] [RIP-51] Pop orderly improvement

2022-10-18 Thread lollipop
 +1

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:04 AM Xinyu Zhou  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 10:41 AM fuyou  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > L K  于2022年10月18日周二 10:31写道:
> >
> > >  Hello RocketMQ Community,
> > >
> > >  We discussed enhancing server side offset management ability for
> > >  RocketMQ, and it's time to start an email thread to enter the voting
> > >  process.
> > >  Links:
> > >  RIP 51 Pop orderly improvement · apache/rocketmq Wiki (github.com)<
> > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-51-Pop-orderly-improvement
> >
> > > [
> > >
> >
> https://opengraph.githubassets.com/0e199bf19dd5a5b128c80c437ed98ca92d995c3dd4a3588a71db8e496ff5ce4f/apache/rocketmq
> > > ]<
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-51-Pop-orderly-improvement
> > >
> > > RIP 51 Pop orderly improvement · apache/rocketmq Wiki<
> > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-51-Pop-orderly-improvement
> >
> > > Apache RocketMQ is a cloud native messaging and streaming platform,
> > making
> > > it simple to build event-driven applications. - RIP 51 Pop orderly
> > > improvement · apache/rocketmq Wiki
> > > github.com
> > >
> > >  The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> > >  number of votes are reached.
> > >
> > >  Please vote accordingly:
> > >  [ ] +1 approve
> > >  [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >  [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > >  Thanks
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >=
> >
> >   fuyou001
> > Best Regards
> >
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ APIs 2.0.1 RC1

2022-10-13 Thread lollipop
+1,
I checked:

[OK]  Extract the zip and check if the source version is correct with 2.0.1;
[OK]  The Apache V2 license file and Notice file is included in the package.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 7:48 PM aaron ai  wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for 2.0.1 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ APIs.
>
> RocketMQ APIs use Protocol Buffers version 3 (proto3) as their Interface
> Definition Language (IDL) to define the API interface and the structure of
> the payload messages.
>
> The artifacts:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-proto/2.0.1-rc1
>
> The staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1107/
>
> Git tag for the release:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/v2.0.1
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/rocketmq-proto-2.0.1
>
> Hash for the release tag:
>
> 7ed3e267292ea971064d86acee47a8ef60181121
>
> Relate Notes:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/v2.0.1
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/rocketmq-proto-2.0.1
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>
> 3A11FEBBD64C807A233BF1F27C46C79BD4D29011, which can be found in the keys
> file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
> Fill in the following:
>
> [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
>
> [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> necessary
>
> [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
>
> [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>


Re: [Vote] Release gRPC Java Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.2 RC1

2022-10-07 Thread lollipop
+1

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 11:01 AM aaron ai  wrote:

> OK
>
> Xinyu Zhou  于2022年9月29日周四 17:30写道:
>
> > +1
> >
> > All is fine, please don't forget to add the release records here:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-site/blob/new-official-website/src/pages/download.md
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:02 PM aaron ai  wrote:
> >
> > > Hello RocketMQ Community,
> > >
> > >
> > > This is the vote for 5.0.2 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ client for java.
> > >
> > >
> > > Apache RocketMQ clients 5.x series follow the specs of rocketmq-apis
> > > , and are built on top of
> > > Protocol
> > > Buffer and gRPC.
> > >
> > >
> > > The artifact:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-clients/rocketmq-client-java/5.0.2-rc1/
> > >
> > >
> > > The staging repo for maven:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1106/
> > >
> > >
> > > Git tag for the release:
> > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/tree/java-5.0.2
> > >
> > >
> > > Hash for the release tag: 1cda3319b637f225bdcdce9683ddbde2bdb6038e
> > >
> > >
> > > Relate Notes:
> > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/java-5.0.2
> > >
> > >
> > > The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> > > 3A11FEBBD64C807A233BF1F27C46C79BD4D29011, which can be found in the
> keys
> > > file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> > >
> > >
> > > Fill in the following:
> > >
> > >
> > > [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
> > >
> > >
> > > [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> > > necessary
> > >
> > >
> > > [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
> > >
> > >
> > > [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> number
> > > of votes are reached.
> > >
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > >
> > >
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >
> > >
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > The Apache RocketMQ Team
> > >
> >
>


Re: [VOTE][RIP-46] Observability improvement for RocketMQ

2022-09-27 Thread lollipop
+1

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 4:43 PM Xinyu Zhou  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 2:36 PM aaron ai  wrote:
>
> > +1, Looking forward to the follow-up pull request.
> >
> > SSpirits  于2022年9月27日周二 14:29写道:
> >
> > > As discussed in the previous email, we discussed adding native metrics
> > for
> > > RocketMQ, and it's time to start an email thread to enter the voting
> > > process.
> > >
> > > Links:
> > > https://shimo.im/docs/m4kML2VzdESO9eqD
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
> > of
> > > votes is reached.
> > >
> > > SSpirits
> > > Email:ad...@lv5.moe
> > >
> >
>


Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ Golang SDK 5.0.0 RC1

2022-09-19 Thread lollipop
+1

On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 5:07 PM heng du  wrote:

> +1
> I checked:
> (1).License and Notice are correct in the source package.
> (2).All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> (3)Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
>
> Xinyu Zhou  于2022年9月19日周一 16:05写道:
>
> > +1
> >
> > A small problem: the artifact contains other language implementations,
> > remember to remove it in the next release.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 11:20 PM Zhanhui Li  wrote:
> >
> > > Hello RocketMQ Community,
> > >
> > > This is the vote for 5.0.0 of Apache RocketMQ Golang SDK.
> > >
> > > Golang SDK 5.x series are built on top of
> > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis, following the same concept
> and
> > > model as those of Java/C++ 5.x;
> > >
> > > The artifacts:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-clients/rocketmq-client-golang/5.0.0-rc1
> > >
> > > Git tag for the release:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/rocketmq-client-golang-5.0.0-rc1
> > >
> > > Hash for the release tag:
> > > 3914b66539ca5216f9f82332769dc76ddac27f5d
> > >
> > > Release Notes:
> > > [1] Support publishing standard/FIFO/timed messages;
> > >
> > > [2] Support consuming messages through SimpleConsumer;
> > >
> > > [3] Support OpenTelemetry compatible metrics exporting;
> > >
> > > The artifacts have been signed by Key:
> > > 462BE3C1C0231675374D0D93B96ECC1229F96FDD, which can be found in the key
> > > file:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> number
> > > of votes is collected.
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > The Apache RocketMQ Team
> > >
> >
>


[ANNOUNCE] New PMC member for Apache RocketMQ: Qiudi Yang

2022-08-29 Thread lollipop
Hi Apache RocketMQ Community,

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache RocketMQ has invited
Qiudi Yang[1][2] (Apache ID:@jodie) to become PMC Member and we are pleased
to announce that she has accepted.

Over the last 10 years, Qiudi Yang has made many noteworthy contributions
to the development of RocketMQ. In order to solve the blast radius problem
of its large-scale cluster, she implemented fault tolerance and fault
isolation to the RocketMQ client. She enhanced the RocketMQ SDK with SPI
capabilities, making it easier for a large community of users to integrate
RocketMQ.

In addition, she gave a major fillip to the stability of RocketMQ by fixing
numerous bugs. We desperately need her considerable insight regarding the
needs of large-scale users of RocketMQ.

Congrats, guy :-)

Notice: Being a PMC member enables assistance with the management and
guides the direction of the project.


[1] https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/commits?author=YangJodie
[2] https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@rocketmq.apache.org:lte=1M:YangJodie

Best Regards,
Apache RocketMQ Team


Re: [Vote] Release gRPC Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.0 RC1

2022-08-01 Thread lollipop
+1

I checked:
[OK ]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package.
[OK ]  License and Notice are correct in source package.

On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 10:32 AM Zhanhui Li  wrote:

> +1
>
> I checked the license, notice and checksum, GPG signature.
>
> I also validated compilation instructions of the CPP SDK on a clean docker.
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 8:39 PM aaron ai  wrote:
>
> > Hello RocketMQ Community,
> >
> > This is the vote for 5.0.0 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ clients.
> >
> > Apache RocketMQ clients 5.x series follow the specs of rocketmq-apis
> > , and are built on top of
> > Protocol Buffer and gRPC.
> >
> > The artifacts:
> >
> >-
> >
> >Java:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-java/5.0.0-rc1/
> >-
> >
> >CPP:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-cpp/5.0.0-rc1/
> >
> >
> > The staging repo for maven:
> >
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1094/
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> >
> >-
> >
> >Java:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/tree/rocketmq-client-java-5.0.0
> >-
> >
> >CPP: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/tree/cpp-5.0.0-rc1
> >
> >
> > Hash for the release tag:
> >
> >-
> >
> >Java: db031977d2e0a1e0d64e43f3daf10eab080a13ac
> >-
> >
> >CPP: 6fcff3207d292d925d06f44148934b8d79c1ab4a
> >
> >
> > Relate Notes:
> >
> >-
> >
> >Java:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/rocketmq-client-java-5.0.0
> >-
> >
> >CPP:
> >https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/cpp-5.0.0-rc1
> >
> >
> > The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> >
> > 3A11FEBBD64C807A233BF1F27C46C79BD4D29011, which can be found in the keys
> > file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> >
> > Fill in the following:
> >
> > [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
> >
> > [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> > necessary
> >
> > [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
> >
> > [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> > of votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> >
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > The Apache RocketMQ Team
> >
> >
> >
>


Re: [VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ APIs 2.0.0 RC1

2022-07-17 Thread lollipop
+1,checked:

[OK ]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package.
[OK ]  License and Notice are correct in source package.

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:13 PM aaron ai  wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for 2.0.0 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ APIs.
>
> RocketMQ APIs use Protocol Buffers version 3 (proto3) as their Interface
> Definition Language (IDL) to define the API interface and the structure of
> the payload messages.
>
> The artifacts:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/2.0.0-rc1
>
> The staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1091/
>
> Git tag for the release:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/v2.0
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/rocketmq-proto-2.0.0
>
> Hash for the release tag:
>
> 303962118171075c3a5a8c395822fecfdf492d6f
>
> Relate Notes:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/v2.0
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/releases/tag/rocketmq-proto-2.0.0
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>
> 3A11FEBBD64C807A233BF1F27C46C79BD4D29011, which can be found in the keys
> file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
> Fill in the following:
>
> [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
>
> [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> necessary
>
> [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
>
> [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>


Re: [VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.4 RC1

2022-06-22 Thread lollipop
+1,
I checked:
[OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
[OK]  The code can be built success in the source package.

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 10:25 AM hill  wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
>
>
>
> This is the vote for 4.9.4 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ.
>
> This release is to improve some features and issues for apache
> rocketmq,such as enhance acl , package dependency optimization,  improve
> encode/decode performance,fix some bugs and issues and so on.
>
>
>
>
> The artifacts:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.9.4-rc1/
>
>
>
>
> The staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1086/
>
>
>
>
> Git tag for the release:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/releases/tag/rocketmq-all-4.9.4
>
>
>
>
> Hash for the release tag:
>
> 06f2208a34907211591114f6b0d327168c250fb3
>
>
>
>
> Release Notes:
>
> https://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.9.4
>
>
>
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>
> D011F2A8C9474A34099477A5C99B3EAC6B119386, which can be found in the keys
> file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
>
>
>
> Checklist for reference,
>
> Note that this is not an official policy but may help with checking
> releases.
>
>
>
>
> Fill in the following:
>
> [ ]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
>
> [ ]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> necessary
>
> [ ]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
>
> [ ]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
>
> [ ]  build the source, start nameserver and broker according to the
> quick-start
>
> [ ]  run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Re: [VOTE][RIP-38] RocketMQ EventBridge

2022-03-17 Thread lollipop
+1

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:28 AM dongeforever 
wrote:

> The  RIP is great!
>
> But I still have a doubt that what's the relationship between
> rocketmq-connect and rocketmq-eventbridge.
>
> Will the two projects go forward independently or be mixed together?
>
> The doubt does not prevent the development of rocketmq-eventbrige.
>
> But it is great if someone can add more explanation to it.
>
>
> Xiaorui Wang  于2022年3月14日周一 10:57写道:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Xiaorui Wang[1] - Apache RocketMQ PMC chair
> > [1] https://github.com/vintagewang
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:40 AM aaron ai  wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:26 AM 沈林 <2011shen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, RocketMQ Community,
> > > >
> > > > This is the vote for RocketMQ EventBridge, and you can read the
> > proposal
> > > by
> > > > the link below:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RWPeORHY_-ukq8qs1a1lH80fH8vSQ44U1R9xbxgEX_c/edit?usp=sharing
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> > number
> > > > of votes are reached.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > And Best Regards!
> > > > Lin Shen 沈林
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Xiaorui Wang  于2022年3月8日周二 12:54写道:
> > > >
> > > > > That’s terrific! It is a milestone that greatly expands the scope
> of
> > > > > RocketMQ, especially on the Cloud Platform. It requires more
> > > easy-to-use
> > > > > capabilities of event integration. Give the thumb-up for
> contributors
> > > of
> > > > > EventBridge.
> > > > >
> > > > > BTW, I would like to call on everyone here to pay more attention to
> > the
> > > > > application of RocketMQ in Cloud Native. It is a once-in-a-lifetime
> > > > > opportunity for architecture upgrade.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cloud IaaS has uncomparable advantages over IDC IaaS. Although the
> > > > > infrastructure software was designed by IDC 10 years ago, I believe
> > > that
> > > > > more and more infrastructure software will be designed for Cloud
> > > Platform
> > > > > in the future.
> > > > >
> > > > > Looking forward to this technology upgrade of RocketMQ can keep
> pace
> > > with
> > > > > the times.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > >
> > > > > Xiaorui Wang 王小瑞
> > > > > Apache RocketMQ PMC Chair
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 10:46 AM 沈林 <2011shen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi, RocketMQ Community:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We are building a new system “rocketmq-eventbridge” based on
> > > rocketmq,
> > > > > > it’s an implementation of an event bus that makes it easier to
> > build
> > > > > > event-driven applications.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We have written the proposal and you can see it by the link
> below:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RWPeORHY_-ukq8qs1a1lH80fH8vSQ44U1R9xbxgEX_c/edit?usp=sharing
> > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RWPeORHY_-ukq8qs1a1lH80fH8vSQ44U1R9xbxgEX_c/edit?usp=sharing
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please reply to this email if you have any suggestions.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol

2022-03-14 Thread lollipop
+1

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:57 PM Zhanhui Li  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:45 PM Xiaorui Wang 
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Xiaorui Wang[1] - Apache RocketMQ PMC chair
> > [1] https://github.com/vintagewang
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM 陈仲良  wrote:
> >
> > > Currently the .NET environment  SDK is very lacking. I hope the new sdk
> > > based on gRPC protocol could solve the problem.
> > >
> >
>


Re: [VOTE][RIP-37] New and unified APIs

2022-03-14 Thread lollipop
+1

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 2:55 PM Rongtong Jin 
wrote:

> +1
>
> aaron ai yangkun@gmail.com写道:
> > Hi, RocketMQ Community,
> >
> > As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to establish
> new
> > and unified APIs and it's time to start an email thread to enter the
> voting
> > process.
> >
> > links:
> > https://shimo.im/docs/m5kv92OeRRU8olqX
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
> of
> > votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> >
> > Best Regards!
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:56 PM Zhanhui Li 
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:53 AM yukon  wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1, and let's start the further discussions on new APIs.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:32 AM aaron ai 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, RocketMQ Community,
> > > > >
> > > > > As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to
> establish
> > > > new
> > > > > and unified APIs and it's time to start an email thread to enter
> the
> > > > voting
> > > > > process.
> > > > >
> > > > > links:
> > > > > https://shimo.im/docs/m5kv92OeRRU8olqX
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary
> number
> > > > of
> > > > > votes are reached.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 2:32 PM yuzhou  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks, glad to see that weakly typed topic will keep exist.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2022/03/10 08:01:46 yukon wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A weakly typed topic that supports all kinds of messages has
> > > > > > > many advantages, it's easy and flexible, while a strongly typed
> > > topic
> > > > > > also
> > > > > > > has other advantages:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. Reinforce the mind that rocketmq supports many integration
> > > > patterns
> > > > > > > which could simplify the development of business applications.
> > > > > > > 2. Fail fast if developers send wrong typed messages to a
> strongly
> > > > > typed
> > > > > > > topic.
> > > > > > > 3. Developers could arrange their applications by topics of
> > > different
> > > > > > > types, actually, it's a best practice of rocketmq
> > > > > > > 4. RocketMQ has a chance to provide more competitive features
> for
> > > > > > different
> > > > > > > topic types separately.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And, we won't disable the weakly typed topic, from an
> > > implementation
> > > > > > > perspective, we just add an attribute for the topic to indicate
> > > > whether
> > > > > > > it's a strongly typed topic, and a strongly typed topic can be
> > > > > converted
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > a weakly typed topic easily.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > yukon
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 2:04 PM aaron ai  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Well, The new design about APIs allows us to focus more on
> the
> > > > > feature
> > > > > > > > itself, rather than the underlying implementation.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It seems that topic type creates more limitations to users,
> > > > actually
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > > simplifies operation of users, we think it is more friendly
> to
> > > > users.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 10:59 AM yuzhou 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi, aaron:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It is a great improvement, especially for some of features
> such
> > > > as
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > constructor use
> > > > > > > > > builder pattern, unified 3 kinds of consumers, unified
> > > exception
> > > > > > types,
> > > > > > > > > transaction API
> > > > > > > > > improvement.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > IMHO, many user scenarios have mixed message types, for
> > > example,
> > > > > > delay
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > normal
> > > > > > > > > message in the same topic, other cases use transaction and
> > > normal
> > > > > > message
> > > > > > > > > in the same
> > > > > > > > > topic. Do we have specail reason to split them into
> defferent
> > > > > topics?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 2022/03/06 08:10:55 aaron ai wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Hi, RocketMQ Community:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regarding the design of RocketMQ APIs, we have put
> forward
> > > some
> > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > ideas,
> > > > > > > > > > hoping to make the definition of messaging model and
> behavior
> > > > > more
> > > > > > > > clear.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We have written the proposal and you can see it by the
> link
> > > > > below:
> > > > > > > > > > 

Re: [VOTE] RocketMQ spring 2.0.3 release.

2019-05-23 Thread lollipop
+ 1

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:18 PM ShannonDing  wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
>
>
>
> This is the vote for the 2.0.3 release of Apache rocketmq-spring
>
>
>
>
> Github repo:
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring
>
>
>
>
> The staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1024/
>
>
>
>
> The main goal of this release is to align with RocketMQ Client 4.5.1 and
>
> supports the new features, e.g. connect name server with domain and set
> delay level in async model. and besides this,
>
> this release also will bring some enhancements for usability.
>
>
>
>
> New Feature:
>
> *  [Feature-36](
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring/issues/36)Support delay level
> configuration in async mode
>
> *  [Feature-46](
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring/issues/46)Support multiple
> RocketMQTemplate & name-server overrides Consumer Listener
>
> *  [Feature-59](
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring/issues/59)Sending batch
> messages with RocketMQTemplate
>
>
>
>
>  Improvement:
>
> *  [ISSUE-61](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring/pull/61) Generate
> spring-configuration-metadata.json for easy configuration tips.
>
> *  [ISSUE-63](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring/issues/63) Update
> README_zh_CN.md
>
>
>
> Bug
>
> *  [ISSUE-53](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring/issues/53) Raise
> a warning log message if no property 'rocketmq.name-server' is defined in
> application.property
>
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
>
>
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>
>
> [] +1 approve
>
> [] +0 no opinion
>
> [] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>
>
>


Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.5.1 RC2.

2019-05-21 Thread lollipop
+1

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:28 PM heng du  wrote:

> +1
>
> dongeforever  于2019年5月22日周三 下午12:07写道:
>
> > +1  Nice
> >
> > huzongt...@cmss.chinamobile.com 
> > 于2019年5月22日周三 上午10:23写道:
> >
> >> +1, we have already verified in our enviroment include master/slave and
> >> dledger pattern when acl enabled,msg tracing and some other cases.
> >>
> >> --
> >> huzongt...@cmss.chinamobile.com
> >>
> >>
> >> *From:* Gosling Von 
> >> *Date:* 2019-05-22 10:04
> >> *To:* users 
> >> *CC:* dev@rocketmq.apache.org
> >> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.5.1 RC2.
> >> +1, Great work ~
> >>
> >> Von Gosling
> >>
> >> > On May 21, 2019, at 2:40 PM, Shannon  wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hello RocketMQ Community,
> >> >
> >> > This is the vote for 4.5.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
> >> >
> >> > This release enabled to connect name server with domain host, and
> >> polished two improvements such as unit tests, user documents, and fixed
> >> some bugs,
> >> > further improved the stability of RocketMQ.
> >> >
> >> > The artifacts:
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.5.1-rc2/ <
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.5.1-rc2/>
> >> >
> >> > The staging repo:
> >> >
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1023/
> >> <
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1023/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Git tag for the release:
> >> > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-4.5.1 <
> >> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-4.5.1>
> >> >
> >> > Hash for the release tag:
> >> > 639cb5c299fdac209bac6ed2aa85d0d87649282d
> >> >
> >> > Release Notes:
> >> > https://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.5.1/ <
> >> https://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.5.1/>
> >> >
> >> > The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> >> > BBC3FBA877D30832E2FBC8F901B994150CD1E262, which can be found in the
> keys
> >> > file:
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS <
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS>
> >> >
> >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number
> of
> >> > votes are reached.
> >> >
> >> > Please vote accordingly:
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 approve
> >> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > The Apache RocketMQ Team
> >>
> >>
> >>
>


Re: [VOTE]RocketMQ-spring 2.0.0 Release and Graduation

2018-12-06 Thread lollipop
+1

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 7:34 PM heng du  wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for the 2.0.0 release and the graduation of Apache
> RocketMQ-spring.
>
> Github repo: *https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring
> *
> This is the first time official release of RocketMQ-Spring-Boot as a
> sub-project of Apache TLP RocketMQ in the community . In this release, it
> includes several new features, improvements and fixed for the issues
> reported for rocketmq-external incubating.
>
> New Feature:
> 1. Sending the message in transactional
> 2. Support send DelayTimeLevel message
> 3. Make RocketMQ native API transparent; only operate with Spring Message
> API rather than RocketMQ client API.
>
> Improvement:
> 1. Add samples to demonstrate the usage of the RocketMQ-spring-boot/starter
> and cover all client scenarios.
> 2. Polish the code with Spring standard (lifecycle, BeanCreating
> conditional, Bean Initialize, AutoConfigure Test, etc)
> 3. Adjust the directory hierarchy and separated the functions with
> different level projects, i.e. spring-boot, spring-boot-starter and sample.
> 4. Refactor the packages and make code clearer with full qualified naming
> and standard java doc comments.
>
> Bug:
> 1. Bean method 'rocketMQTemplate' not loaded
> 2. Inaccurate judgment for message type in defaultRocketMQListenerContainer
> 3. spring-boot-starter Document update
> 4. The annotation @RocketMQMessageListener(consumeThreadMax=4, topic =
> "${sep.queue.meta}" cannot take effect.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Thanks,
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>


Re: [VOTE] RocketMQ-client-cpp 1.2.0 Release And Graduation

2018-12-06 Thread lollipop
+ 1

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:21 AM heng du  wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release and the graduation of Apache
> RocketMQ-client-cpp.
>
> Github repo: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-cpp <
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-cpp>
> This release is a huge step forward in cpp 1.0.1. It 
> provides two kinds of interfaces in C++ and C-style, and a bunch of other
> language bindings will be built on top of it, including python,
> Node.js,C#,golang and so on.We simplified the process of project
> compilation in this version,and you can compile the whole project with just
> one command.
>
> new feature
>C-Style API was added to support multilingual client, such as
> python,node.js, golang, which has not yet implemented all the functions of
> C++ API. The following are the major functions of C-Style API :
>
>
> 1 Support  reliable synchronous,  one-way  and order transmission
> 2 Support push consumer and pull consumer.
> 3 Support setDelayTimeLevel.
> 4 Support message compression.
> 5 Support setting up message consumption mode.
> Improvement:
> 1  Enhanced the capability of multi-platform support, such as linux,
> window,macOS.
> 2  The compilation method of the project is simplified. You can compile
> the entire project with one command.
> Bug:
> 1 Fix an issue about the unique key. When a message is sent, the producer
> cannot get unique.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Thanks,
> The Apache RocketMQ Team


Re: [VOTE] RocketMQ-client-python 1.2.0 Release And Graduation

2018-12-06 Thread lollipop
+1

I've checked  the LICENSE, NOTICE and Copyright, LGTM.

Thanks

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:34 AM heng du  wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release and the graduation of Apache
> RocketMQ-client-python.
>
> Github repo: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-python <
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-python>
>
> The version released this time is the first initial Python client of
> rocketmq. It is based on the kernel of the CPP client and uses boost python
> to encapsulate the API Implementation of C. You can make Python modules
> with a simple command.
> The current version provides the following functions:
> 1.support reliable synchronous sending of messages;
> 2.support reliable push consumption model;
> 3.support default cluster consumption;
> 4.support delayed messages;
> 5.support custom message properties;
> 6.support message Compression.
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Thanks,
> The Apache RocketMQ Team


Re: [STARTUP] Apache RocketMQ Meetup - Hangzhou

2018-11-19 Thread lollipop
Hi all:

I would like to join the meetup to share a topic named 《Alibaba Cloud
Message Queue based on RocketMQ》, aimed to introduce some best practices
for adapting RocketMQ to serve as a cloud product.

Best Regards


On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 11:35 AM Gosling Von  wrote:

> Dear Apache RocketMQ Community,
>
> I am excited to call for the meetup in Hangzhou, China at Nov. 24 am.,
> 2018. Please have a look at your schedule, and consider submitting a talk
> to the community.  The overarching message about this meetup is “Apache
> RocketMQ: Devops and Multi-lingual Cloud Service“, and we wish to highlight
> the fact that Apache RocketMQ is where tomorrow is invented - you are the
> ones inventing it.
>
>
> For further updated about this Meetup, follow us on Twitter,
> @ApacheRocketMQ, or contact me - vongosl...@apache.org - with any
> questions or concerns.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
> Von Gosling