Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4

[Josh Tynjala]

+1
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/apache-royale-0.9.10-src.tar.gz
Java 17
OS: Mac OS X aarch64 13.3.1
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives: y
No unapproved binaries: y

Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
Binary kit signatures match: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
No unapproved binaries in binary package: y

Additional notes:
1) ApproveRoyale.xml works with both JS/SWF and JS-only packages on my
machine.
2) I confirmed that both of the binary packages may be installed
successfully with npm.
3) I can successfully build the asconfigc tool with all RoyaleUnit tests
passing, and I can use it to build projects that have asconfig.json files.
4) SWF tests were run with Flash Player 32 and AIR 32.

--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC 


On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 10:35 AM Yishay Weiss 
wrote:

> Hi,
> This is the vote for the 0.9.10 release of Apache Royale.  The release
> candidate can be found here;
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/
>
> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on
> approving a release?', at:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>
> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> - SHA and signed packages are correct
> - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> - That the build script completes successfully
> - That you can compile and crosscompile a simple example using the SDK.
>
> The KEYS file is at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>
> The source package is a combination of the 3 main Royale repos.
>
> To use the binary package, unzip it into a folder. The -js package is
> ready-to-use in an IDE or command-line. If you need SWF output, use the
> -js-swf package and use Apache Ant to run the InstallAdobeSDKs script via:
> ant -f InstallAdobeSDKs.xml
>
> You may also get the binarypackages via NPM. The -js package can be
> installed via:
> npm install
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js.tar.gz
>
> The full package with SWF support can be installed via:
>
> npm install
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
>
> Maven artifacts are staged here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1096
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
> +1 Approve the release
> -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>
> The vote passes if there is:
> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> - More positive votes than negative votes
>
> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
> many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC,
> but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that
> folks will have some success trying to use it.  People who are not in PMC
> are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes
> will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
>
> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> version you tested with.
>
> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> steps to validate a release.  Instead of individually downloading the
> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> 1) create an empty folder,
> 2) download into that folder this file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/ApproveRoyale.xml
> 3) run the script:
>ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.10 -Drc=4
>If you want to test SWF support during the approval, use:
>ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.10 -Drc=4
> -Duse-flash=true
>
> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages
> and build results are always encouraged.
>
> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
> this VOTE thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Yishay Weiss
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4

[Piotr Zarzycki]

+1 (Binding)

Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/apache-royale-0.9.10-src.tar.gz

Java 9

OS: Mac OS X x86_64 13.3.1

Source kit signatures match: y

Source kit builds: y

README is ok: y

RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y

NOTICE is ok: y

LICENSE is ok: y

No unapproved licenses or archives: y

No unapproved binaries: y


Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js-swf.tar.gz

Binary kit signatures match: y

NOTICE is ok: y

LICENSE is ok: y

No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y

No unapproved binaries in binary package: y

I have made additional tests:

1) Binaries build by Ant were used to open, build and run in Moonshine two
large Royale applications

2) I have used Maven deployed artifacts to build and run two Royale
applications


Thanks,

Piotr

sob., 13 maj 2023 o 19:38 Yishay Weiss  napisał(a):

> +1
> Package
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/apache-royale-0.9.10-src.zip
> Java 17
> OS: Windows 11 amd64 10.0
> Source kit signatures match: y
> Source kit builds: y
> README is ok: y
> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
> No unapproved licenses or archives: y
> No unapproved binaries: y
>
> Package
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js-swf.zip
> Binary kit signatures match: y
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
> No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
> No unapproved binaries in binary package: y
>
> 
> From: Yishay Weiss 
> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2023 8:35 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org 
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4
>
> Hi,
> This is the vote for the 0.9.10 release of Apache Royale.  The release
> candidate can be found here;
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/
>
> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on
> approving a release?', at:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>
> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> - SHA and signed packages are correct
> - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> - That the build script completes successfully
> - That you can compile and crosscompile a simple example using the SDK.
>
> The KEYS file is at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>
> The source package is a combination of the 3 main Royale repos.
>
> To use the binary package, unzip it into a folder. The -js package is
> ready-to-use in an IDE or command-line. If you need SWF output, use the
> -js-swf package and use Apache Ant to run the InstallAdobeSDKs script via:
> ant -f InstallAdobeSDKs.xml
>
> You may also get the binarypackages via NPM. The -js package can be
> installed via:
> npm install
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js.tar.gz
>
> The full package with SWF support can be installed via:
>
> npm install
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
>
> Maven artifacts are staged here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1096
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
> +1 Approve the release
> -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>
> The vote passes if there is:
> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> - More positive votes than negative votes
>
> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
> many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC,
> but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that
> folks will have some success trying to use it.  People who are not in PMC
> are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes
> will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
>
> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> version you tested with.
>
> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> steps to validate a release.  Instead of individually downloading the
> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> 1) create an empty folder,
> 2) download into that folder this file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/ApproveRoyale.xml
> 3) run the script:
>ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.10 -Drc=4
>If you want to test SWF support during the approval, use:
>ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.10 -Drc=4
> -Duse-flash=true
>
> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages
> and build results are always encouraged.
>
> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
> this VOTE thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Yishay Weiss
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4

[Yishay Weiss]

+1
Package 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/apache-royale-0.9.10-src.zip
Java 17
OS: Windows 11 amd64 10.0
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives: y
No unapproved binaries: y

Package 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js-swf.zip
Binary kit signatures match: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
No unapproved binaries in binary package: y


From: Yishay Weiss 
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2023 8:35 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org 
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4

Hi,
This is the vote for the 0.9.10 release of Apache Royale.  The release 
candidate can be found here;
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/

Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on 
approving a release?', at:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release

At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
- SHA and signed packages are correct
- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
- That the build script completes successfully
- That you can compile and crosscompile a simple example using the SDK.

The KEYS file is at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS

The source package is a combination of the 3 main Royale repos.

To use the binary package, unzip it into a folder. The -js package is 
ready-to-use in an IDE or command-line. If you need SWF output, use the
-js-swf package and use Apache Ant to run the InstallAdobeSDKs script via:
ant -f InstallAdobeSDKs.xml

You may also get the binarypackages via NPM. The -js package can be installed 
via:
npm install 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js.tar.gz

The full package with SWF support can be installed via:

npm install 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js-swf.tar.gz

Maven artifacts are staged here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1096

Please vote to approve this release:
+1 Approve the release
-1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)

This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.

The vote passes if there is:
- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
- More positive votes than negative votes

Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be many 
bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC, but to 
make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that folks will 
have some success trying to use it.  People who are not in PMC are also 
encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes will not be 
binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.

When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR version 
you tested with.

For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common steps to 
validate a release.  Instead of individually downloading the package and 
signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
1) create an empty folder,
2) download into that folder this file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/ApproveRoyale.xml
3) run the script:
   ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.10 -Drc=4
   If you want to test SWF support during the approval, use:
   ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.10 -Drc=4 -Duse-flash=true

You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages and 
build results are always encouraged.

Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not this 
VOTE thread.

Thanks,
Yishay Weiss

[VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4

[Yishay Weiss]

Hi,
This is the vote for the 0.9.10 release of Apache Royale.  The release 
candidate can be found here;
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/

Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on 
approving a release?', at:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release

At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
- SHA and signed packages are correct
- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
- That the build script completes successfully
- That you can compile and crosscompile a simple example using the SDK.

The KEYS file is at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS

The source package is a combination of the 3 main Royale repos.

To use the binary package, unzip it into a folder. The -js package is 
ready-to-use in an IDE or command-line. If you need SWF output, use the
-js-swf package and use Apache Ant to run the InstallAdobeSDKs script via:
ant -f InstallAdobeSDKs.xml

You may also get the binarypackages via NPM. The -js package can be installed 
via:
npm install 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js.tar.gz

The full package with SWF support can be installed via:

npm install 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js-swf.tar.gz

Maven artifacts are staged here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1096

Please vote to approve this release:
+1 Approve the release
-1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)

This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.

The vote passes if there is:
- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
- More positive votes than negative votes

Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be many 
bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC, but to 
make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that folks will 
have some success trying to use it.  People who are not in PMC are also 
encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes will not be 
binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.

When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR version 
you tested with.

For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common steps to 
validate a release.  Instead of individually downloading the package and 
signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
1) create an empty folder,
2) download into that folder this file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.10/rc4/ApproveRoyale.xml
3) run the script:
   ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.10 -Drc=4
   If you want to test SWF support during the approval, use:
   ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.10 -Drc=4 -Duse-flash=true

You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages and 
build results are always encouraged.

Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not this 
VOTE thread.

Thanks,
Yishay Weiss