Re: [sc-dev] stable algorithm for statistic functions issue 78250
Regina Henschel wrote: I had a look at the source in interpr3.cxx and have made the proposed changes for the COVAR function. Although I'm a very beginner I think, that I'm able to change some of the other such functions too. The changes need to calculate the mean in a first loop and than calculating the other results in a second loop. My question is, whether you want, that the functions are changed in that way. If yes, I would be glad, to do that job. For COVAR it looks like this (based on OOF680_m18): Yes, this looks very good and should be changed that way. Which other functions do you plan to modify? Niklas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [sc-dev] stable algorithm for statistic functions issue 78250
Hi Regina, On Thursday, 2007-07-05 10:34:37 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: For COVAR it looks like this (based on OOF680_m18): Very nice, indeed. Could you do us a favor though and base your changes on a recent SRC680 milestone (latest available now is m219) instead of OOF680, chances then are much higher that patches seamlessly apply. Thanks Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't send personal mail to this [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use for mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [sc-dev] stable algorithm for statistic functions issue 78250
Hello Eike, Eike Rathke schrieb: Hi Regina, On Thursday, 2007-07-05 10:34:37 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: For COVAR it looks like this (based on OOF680_m18): Very nice, indeed. Could you do us a favor though and base your changes on a recent SRC680 milestone (latest available now is m219) instead of OOF680, chances then are much higher that patches seamlessly apply. m219 is not on the mirrors and I have used CVS not yet. The m218 tarballs are available on the mirros. I would then have to do another 18 hours build. I own only a normal PC with WinXP. Nevertheless, that would be practicable for me. Would it be OK with the m218 version? kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [sc-dev] stable algorithm for statistic functions issue 78250
Hi, Accessing CVS is not really a problem nowadays. Download one of the freely available IDEs (like Netbeans, Eclipse) and your are only away a few clicks from the source and patch tools. Eclipse even provides an specialized download for C++-Developers (CDT [1] [2]) I'm not sure aboute netbeans but I think it also provides such a beast :-) Tom [1] http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/ [2] http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com/2007/06/introducing-cdt-for-windows.html Regina Henschel schrieb: Hello Eike, Eike Rathke schrieb: Hi Regina, On Thursday, 2007-07-05 10:34:37 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: For COVAR it looks like this (based on OOF680_m18): Very nice, indeed. Could you do us a favor though and base your changes on a recent SRC680 milestone (latest available now is m219) instead of OOF680, chances then are much higher that patches seamlessly apply. m219 is not on the mirrors and I have used CVS not yet. The m218 tarballs are available on the mirros. I would then have to do another 18 hours build. I own only a normal PC with WinXP. Nevertheless, that would be practicable for me. Would it be OK with the m218 version? kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [sc-dev] stable algorithm for statistic functions issue 78250
Hello Niklas, Niklas Nebel schrieb: Regina Henschel wrote: I had a look at the source in interpr3.cxx and have made the proposed changes for the COVAR function. Although I'm a very beginner I think, that I'm able to change some of the other such functions too. The changes need to calculate the mean in a first loop and than calculating the other results in a second loop. My question is, whether you want, that the functions are changed in that way. If yes, I would be glad, to do that job. For COVAR it looks like this (based on OOF680_m18): Yes, this looks very good and should be changed that way. Which other functions do you plan to modify? I'll work on CORREL, PEARSON, RSQ, STEYX, SLOPE, INTERCEPT and FORECAST (all in interpr3.cxx), which I think all suffer from the same square-problem. The function GetStVarParams in interpr1.cxx is OK in this respect and therefore also the DEVSQ, STDEV and VAR. kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [sc-dev] stable algorithm for statistic functions issue 78250
Hi Regina, On Thursday, 2007-07-05 13:06:15 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: recent SRC680 milestone (latest available now is m219) m219 is not on the mirrors and I have used CVS not yet. The m218 tarballs are available on the mirros. I would then have to do another 18 hours build. I own only a normal PC with WinXP. Nevertheless, that would be practicable for me. Would it be OK with the m218 version? Sure, m218 is fine. Thank you. Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't send personal mail to this [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use for mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [sc-dev] stable algorithm for statistic functions issue 78250
Regina Henschel wrote: ... I'll work on CORREL, PEARSON, RSQ, STEYX, SLOPE, INTERCEPT and FORECAST (all in interpr3.cxx), which I think all suffer from the same square-problem. The function GetStVarParams in interpr1.cxx is OK in this respect and therefore also the DEVSQ, STDEV and VAR. kind regards Regina Great! Let me know if there are any questions regarding the algorithms or the statistics. I was pretty busy lately (and still am :-( ), but I would try to free some time to solve the problem if there is one. Many thanks, Leonard - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
