Re: maven 3?

2014-08-18 Thread Andreas Kohn
Hi,

from my point of view: would there be any reason to stick with Maven 2?
Maven 3 seems to be stable since quite a while.

--
Andreas




On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Paul Lindner lind...@inuus.com wrote:

 Would people be willing to make maven 3.0.4 a requirement for building?  I
 could then update to the latest yuicompressor.



Re: maven 3?

2014-08-18 Thread Ryan Baxter
+1

-Ryan

 On Aug 18, 2014, at 6:27 AM, Stanton Sievers ssiev...@apache.org wrote:
 
 +1
 
 I don't see a reason to still support maven 2.
 
 Sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity or typos.
 On Aug 18, 2014 6:26 AM, Andreas Kohn an...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 from my point of view: would there be any reason to stick with Maven 2?
 Maven 3 seems to be stable since quite a while.
 
 --
 Andreas
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Paul Lindner lind...@inuus.com wrote:
 
 Would people be willing to make maven 3.0.4 a requirement for building?
 I
 could then update to the latest yuicompressor.