Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLIDER-1137
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Jon Maron wrote:
> I certainly would go ahead and file a JIRA. The two sound essentially
> synonymous - the per component setting would allow for distinguishing those
> elements that actually get assigned ports from the specified ranges.
>
> > On Jun 1, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Manoj Samel
> wrote:
> >
> > Any thoughts ?
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Manoj Samel
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> At present the allowed.ports is applied to AM as well as containers
> >>
> >> While this may be a valid use case for certain deployments, there are
> >> other use cases
> >>
> >> 1. The "allowed.ports" should be only applied to certain port(s) for
> >> components that are marked as {ALLOCATED_PORT}{PER_CONTAINER} etc.. The
> >> components expose certain end points to clients outside the firewall.
> Only
> >> those end points should be controlled by allowed.ports. All ports used
> by
> >> AM and containers internal apps should use any available port outside
> the
> >> allowed.ports range since in this case, the AM and containers are within
> >> same firewall zone. This will reduce unnecessary usage of ports that are
> >> open to firewall
> >>
> >> 2. Somewhat related to #1, the allowed.port is a global setting right
> now.
> >> It would be really useful to have a option to specify it per component.
> >> E.g. if different components are serving different customers; it would
> be
> >> great to have a port range specific to a component
> >>
> >> Any thoughts ? Should I file a enhancement Jira ?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
>
>