Re: [git] Retiring the old github.com/sling project

2017-11-23 Thread Robert Munteanu 
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 12:59 +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Robert Munteanu  > wrote:
> > - rename sling to sling-archive...
> 
> How about sling-old-svn-mirror instead? That's more specific, we have
> several "archives".

That's a better name, will use that.

Thanks,

Robert

Re: [git] Retiring the old github.com/sling project

2017-11-23 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz 
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Robert Munteanu  wrote:
> - rename sling to sling-archive...

How about sling-old-svn-mirror instead? That's more specific, we have
several "archives".

-Bertrand

RE: [git] Retiring the old github.com/sling project

2017-11-23 Thread Stefan Seifert 
+1

>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Munteanu [mailto:romb...@apache.org]
>Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 10:30 AM
>To: dev@sling.apache.org
>Subject: [git] Retiring the old github.com/sling project
>
>Hi,
>
>We discussed the 'old' github.com/sling mirror on and off, but never
>reached a conclusion.
>
>Based on previous emails, I proposed that we:
>
>- rename sling to sling-archive. Github will generate redirects so
>links are not lost, but the role of the repostiory is now clear
>- change the default branch to 'archived' ( see [1] ) so first-time
>visitors will not clone it or use it for meaningful work.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Robert
>
>[1]: https://github.com/apache/sling/tree/archived

Re: [git] Retiring the old github.com/sling project

2017-11-23 Thread Radu Cotescu 
+1

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 at 11:14 Karl Pauls  wrote:

> +1 - sounds good to me
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Antonio Sanso
>  wrote:
> > +1
> > On Nov 23, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Robert Munteanu 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We discussed the 'old' github.com/sling mirror on and off, but never
> >> reached a conclusion.
> >>
> >> Based on previous emails, I proposed that we:
> >>
> >> - rename sling to sling-archive. Github will generate redirects so
> >> links are not lost, but the role of the repostiory is now clear
> >> - change the default branch to 'archived' ( see [1] ) so first-time
> >> visitors will not clone it or use it for meaningful work.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Robert
> >>
> >> [1]: https://github.com/apache/sling/tree/archived
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> karlpa...@gmail.com
>

Re: [git] Retiring the old github.com/sling project

2017-11-23 Thread Karl Pauls 
+1 - sounds good to me

regards,

Karl

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Antonio Sanso
 wrote:
> +1
> On Nov 23, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Robert Munteanu  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We discussed the 'old' github.com/sling mirror on and off, but never
>> reached a conclusion.
>>
>> Based on previous emails, I proposed that we:
>>
>> - rename sling to sling-archive. Github will generate redirects so
>> links are not lost, but the role of the repostiory is now clear
>> - change the default branch to 'archived' ( see [1] ) so first-time
>> visitors will not clone it or use it for meaningful work.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Robert
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/sling/tree/archived
>



-- 
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com

Re: [git] Retiring the old github.com/sling project

2017-11-23 Thread Antonio Sanso 
+1
On Nov 23, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Robert Munteanu  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We discussed the 'old' github.com/sling mirror on and off, but never
> reached a conclusion.
> 
> Based on previous emails, I proposed that we:
> 
> - rename sling to sling-archive. Github will generate redirects so
> links are not lost, but the role of the repostiory is now clear
> - change the default branch to 'archived' ( see [1] ) so first-time
> visitors will not clone it or use it for meaningful work.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Robert
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/sling/tree/archived

Re: [git] Retiring the old github.com/sling project

2017-11-23 Thread Konrad Windszus 
+1

> On 23. Nov 2017, at 10:30, Robert Munteanu  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We discussed the 'old' github.com/sling mirror on and off, but never
> reached a conclusion.
> 
> Based on previous emails, I proposed that we:
> 
> - rename sling to sling-archive. Github will generate redirects so
> links are not lost, but the role of the repostiory is now clear
> - change the default branch to 'archived' ( see [1] ) so first-time
> visitors will not clone it or use it for meaningful work.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Robert
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/sling/tree/archived

[git] Retiring the old github.com/sling project

2017-11-23 Thread Robert Munteanu 
Hi,

We discussed the 'old' github.com/sling mirror on and off, but never
reached a conclusion.

Based on previous emails, I proposed that we:

- rename sling to sling-archive. Github will generate redirects so
links are not lost, but the role of the repostiory is now clear
- change the default branch to 'archived' ( see [1] ) so first-time
visitors will not clone it or use it for meaningful work.

Thoughts?

Thanks,

Robert

[1]: https://github.com/apache/sling/tree/archived