[Bug 6178] some suggestions for URIBL checking to avoid possible FP causes

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6178

Henrik Krohns  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
 CC||apa...@hege.li

--- Comment #3 from Henrik Krohns  ---
Closing old stale bug.

Reuse has been discussed on list. Well, atleast I've commented on it, but noone
never discusses anything.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 6178] some suggestions for URIBL checking to avoid possible FP causes

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6178

RW  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rwmailli...@googlemail.com

--- Comment #2 from RW  ---
Isn't this covered by "reuse"? Doing look-ups even minutes after the original
scan is unsatisfactory for QA purposes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 6178] some suggestions for URIBL checking to avoid possible FP causes

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6178

Dave Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||da...@apache.org

--- Comment #1 from Dave Jones  ---
Is this still a valid issue after 8+ years?

My ena corpus is the majority of the total corpi now and the ena-week[0-3] is
all less than 5 weeks old.  We should be able to delete all of the stale ham
and spam from old contributors that are no long active.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.