Re: How to think about SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s?
we're back. On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 2:30 PM shane knapp ☠ wrote: > btw i just noticed jenkins was down, and i restarted the primary node. > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 12:09 PM Sean Owen wrote: > >> I find that somewhat often, the K8S PR builders will fail on a PR: >> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/ >> >> ... when the PR seems totally unrelated to K8S. I've kind of learned to >> ignore them in that case but that seems wrong. Are they just kind of flaky? >> am I imagining things? Just trying to figure out how much they're >> 'accurate' in catching real vs false failures. >> > > > -- > Shane Knapp > Computer Guy / Voice of Reason > UC Berkeley EECS Research / RISELab Staff Technical Lead > https://rise.cs.berkeley.edu > -- Shane Knapp Computer Guy / Voice of Reason UC Berkeley EECS Research / RISELab Staff Technical Lead https://rise.cs.berkeley.edu
Re: How to think about SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s?
btw i just noticed jenkins was down, and i restarted the primary node. On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 12:09 PM Sean Owen wrote: > I find that somewhat often, the K8S PR builders will fail on a PR: > https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/ > > ... when the PR seems totally unrelated to K8S. I've kind of learned to > ignore them in that case but that seems wrong. Are they just kind of flaky? > am I imagining things? Just trying to figure out how much they're > 'accurate' in catching real vs false failures. > -- Shane Knapp Computer Guy / Voice of Reason UC Berkeley EECS Research / RISELab Staff Technical Lead https://rise.cs.berkeley.edu
How to think about SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s?
I find that somewhat often, the K8S PR builders will fail on a PR: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/ ... when the PR seems totally unrelated to K8S. I've kind of learned to ignore them in that case but that seems wrong. Are they just kind of flaky? am I imagining things? Just trying to figure out how much they're 'accurate' in catching real vs false failures.