Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.5.1 (RC2)

2024-02-20 Thread Maxim Gekk 
+1

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 9:50 AM Hyukjin Kwon  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 22:00, Cheng Pan  wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> - Build successfully from source code.
>> - Pass integration tests with Spark ClickHouse Connector[1]
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/housepower/spark-clickhouse-connector/pull/299
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cheng Pan
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 10:56, Jungtaek Lim 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks Sean, let's continue the process for this RC.
>> >
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > - downloaded all files from URL
>> > - checked signature
>> > - extracted all archives
>> > - ran all tests from source files in source archive file, via running
>> "sbt clean test package" - Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS, OpenJDK 17.0.9.
>> >
>> > Also bump to dev@ to encourage participation - looks like the timing
>> is not good for US folks but let's see more days.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 1:49 AM Sean Owen  wrote:
>> > Yeah let's get that fix in, but it seems to be a minor test only issue
>> so should not block release.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024, 9:30 AM yangjie01  wrote:
>> > Very sorry. When I was fixing `SPARK-45242 (
>> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43594)`
>> , I noticed that its
>> `Affects Version` and `Fix Version` of SPARK-45242 were both 4.0, and I
>> didn't realize that it had also been merged into branch-3.5, so I didn't
>> advocate for SPARK-45357 to be backported to branch-3.5.
>> >  As far as I know, the condition to trigger this test failure is: when
>> using Maven to test the `connect` module, if  `sparkTestRelation` in
>> `SparkConnectProtoSuite` is not the first `DataFrame` to be initialized,
>> then the `id` of `sparkTestRelation` will no longer be 0. So, I think this
>> is indeed related to the order in which Maven executes the test cases in
>> the `connect` module.
>> >  I have submitted a backport PR to branch-3.5, and if necessary, we can
>> merge it to fix this test issue.
>> >  Jie Yang
>> >   发件人: Jungtaek Lim 
>> > 日期: 2024年2月16日 星期五 22:15
>> > 收件人: Sean Owen , Rui Wang 
>> > 抄送: dev 
>> > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.5.1 (RC2)
>> >   I traced back relevant changes and got a sense of what happened.
>> >   Yangjie figured out the issue via link. It's a tricky issue according
>> to the comments from Yangjie - the test is dependent on ordering of
>> execution for test suites. He said it does not fail in sbt, hence CI build
>> couldn't catch it.
>> > He fixed it via link, but we missed that the offending commit was also
>> ported back to 3.5 as well, hence the fix wasn't ported back to 3.5.
>> >   Surprisingly, I can't reproduce locally even with maven. In my
>> attempt to reproduce, SparkConnectProtoSuite was executed at third,
>> SparkConnectStreamingQueryCacheSuite, and ExecuteEventsManagerSuite, and
>> then SparkConnectProtoSuite. Maybe very specific to the environment, not
>> just maven? My env: MBP M1 pro chip, MacOS 14.3.1, Openjdk 17.0.9. I used
>> build/mvn (Maven 3.8.8).
>> >   I'm not 100% sure this is something we should fail the release as
>> it's a test only and sounds very environment dependent, but I'll respect
>> your call on vote.
>> >   Btw, looks like Rui also made a relevant fix via link (not to fix the
>> failing test but to fix other issues), but this also wasn't ported back to
>> 3.5. @Rui Wang Do you think this is a regression issue and warrants a new
>> RC?
>> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:38 AM Sean Owen 
>> wrote:
>> > Is anyone seeing this Spark Connect test failure? then again, I have
>> some weird issue with this env that always fails 1 or 2 tests that nobody
>> else can replicate.
>> >   - Test observe *** FAILED ***
>> >   == FAIL: Plans do not match ===
>> >   !CollectMetrics my_metric, [min(id#0) AS min_val#0, max(id#0) AS
>> max_val#0, sum(id#0) AS sum(id)#0L], 0   CollectMetrics my_metric,
>> [min(id#0) AS min_val#0, max(id#0) AS max_val#0, sum(id#0) AS sum(id)#0L],
>> 44
>> >+- LocalRelation , [id#0, name#0]
>>  +- LocalRelation , [id#0,
>> name#0] (PlanTest.scala:179)
>> >   On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 1:34 PM Jungtaek Lim <
>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > DISCLAIMER: RC for Apache Spark 3.5.1 starts with RC2 as I lately
>> figured out doc generation issue after tagging RC1.
>> >   Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>> version 3.5.1.
>> >
>> > The vote is open until February 18th 9AM (PST) and passes if a majority
>> +1 PMC votes are cast, with
>> > a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.5.1
>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> >
>> > To learn more about Apache Spark, please see https://spark.apache.org/
>> >
>> > The tag to be voted on is v3.5.1-rc2 (commit
>> fd86f85e181fc2dc0f50a096855acf83a6cc5d9c):
>> > https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.5.1-rc2
>> >
>> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.5.1 (RC2)

2024-02-20 Thread Hyukjin Kwon 
+1

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 22:00, Cheng Pan  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Build successfully from source code.
> - Pass integration tests with Spark ClickHouse Connector[1]
>
> [1] https://github.com/housepower/spark-clickhouse-connector/pull/299
>
> Thanks,
> Cheng Pan
>
>
> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 10:56, Jungtaek Lim 
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Sean, let's continue the process for this RC.
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > - downloaded all files from URL
> > - checked signature
> > - extracted all archives
> > - ran all tests from source files in source archive file, via running
> "sbt clean test package" - Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS, OpenJDK 17.0.9.
> >
> > Also bump to dev@ to encourage participation - looks like the timing is
> not good for US folks but let's see more days.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 1:49 AM Sean Owen  wrote:
> > Yeah let's get that fix in, but it seems to be a minor test only issue
> so should not block release.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024, 9:30 AM yangjie01  wrote:
> > Very sorry. When I was fixing `SPARK-45242 (
> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43594)`
> , I noticed that its
> `Affects Version` and `Fix Version` of SPARK-45242 were both 4.0, and I
> didn't realize that it had also been merged into branch-3.5, so I didn't
> advocate for SPARK-45357 to be backported to branch-3.5.
> >  As far as I know, the condition to trigger this test failure is: when
> using Maven to test the `connect` module, if  `sparkTestRelation` in
> `SparkConnectProtoSuite` is not the first `DataFrame` to be initialized,
> then the `id` of `sparkTestRelation` will no longer be 0. So, I think this
> is indeed related to the order in which Maven executes the test cases in
> the `connect` module.
> >  I have submitted a backport PR to branch-3.5, and if necessary, we can
> merge it to fix this test issue.
> >  Jie Yang
> >   发件人: Jungtaek Lim 
> > 日期: 2024年2月16日 星期五 22:15
> > 收件人: Sean Owen , Rui Wang 
> > 抄送: dev 
> > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.5.1 (RC2)
> >   I traced back relevant changes and got a sense of what happened.
> >   Yangjie figured out the issue via link. It's a tricky issue according
> to the comments from Yangjie - the test is dependent on ordering of
> execution for test suites. He said it does not fail in sbt, hence CI build
> couldn't catch it.
> > He fixed it via link, but we missed that the offending commit was also
> ported back to 3.5 as well, hence the fix wasn't ported back to 3.5.
> >   Surprisingly, I can't reproduce locally even with maven. In my attempt
> to reproduce, SparkConnectProtoSuite was executed at third,
> SparkConnectStreamingQueryCacheSuite, and ExecuteEventsManagerSuite, and
> then SparkConnectProtoSuite. Maybe very specific to the environment, not
> just maven? My env: MBP M1 pro chip, MacOS 14.3.1, Openjdk 17.0.9. I used
> build/mvn (Maven 3.8.8).
> >   I'm not 100% sure this is something we should fail the release as it's
> a test only and sounds very environment dependent, but I'll respect your
> call on vote.
> >   Btw, looks like Rui also made a relevant fix via link (not to fix the
> failing test but to fix other issues), but this also wasn't ported back to
> 3.5. @Rui Wang Do you think this is a regression issue and warrants a new
> RC?
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:38 AM Sean Owen  wrote:
> > Is anyone seeing this Spark Connect test failure? then again, I have
> some weird issue with this env that always fails 1 or 2 tests that nobody
> else can replicate.
> >   - Test observe *** FAILED ***
> >   == FAIL: Plans do not match ===
> >   !CollectMetrics my_metric, [min(id#0) AS min_val#0, max(id#0) AS
> max_val#0, sum(id#0) AS sum(id)#0L], 0   CollectMetrics my_metric,
> [min(id#0) AS min_val#0, max(id#0) AS max_val#0, sum(id#0) AS sum(id)#0L],
> 44
> >+- LocalRelation , [id#0, name#0]
>+- LocalRelation , [id#0, name#0]
> (PlanTest.scala:179)
> >   On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 1:34 PM Jungtaek Lim <
> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > DISCLAIMER: RC for Apache Spark 3.5.1 starts with RC2 as I lately
> figured out doc generation issue after tagging RC1.
> >   Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
> version 3.5.1.
> >
> > The vote is open until February 18th 9AM (PST) and passes if a majority
> +1 PMC votes are cast, with
> > a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.5.1
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > To learn more about Apache Spark, please see https://spark.apache.org/
> >
> > The tag to be voted on is v3.5.1-rc2 (commit
> fd86f85e181fc2dc0f50a096855acf83a6cc5d9c):
> > https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.5.1-rc2
> >
> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.5.1-rc2-bin/
> >
> > Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.5.1 (RC2)

2024-02-20 Thread Xiao Li 
+1

Xiao

Cheng Pan  于2024年2月20日周二 04:59写道：

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Build successfully from source code.
> - Pass integration tests with Spark ClickHouse Connector[1]
>
> [1] https://github.com/housepower/spark-clickhouse-connector/pull/299
>
> Thanks,
> Cheng Pan
>
>
> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 10:56, Jungtaek Lim 
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Sean, let's continue the process for this RC.
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > - downloaded all files from URL
> > - checked signature
> > - extracted all archives
> > - ran all tests from source files in source archive file, via running
> "sbt clean test package" - Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS, OpenJDK 17.0.9.
> >
> > Also bump to dev@ to encourage participation - looks like the timing is
> not good for US folks but let's see more days.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 1:49 AM Sean Owen  wrote:
> > Yeah let's get that fix in, but it seems to be a minor test only issue
> so should not block release.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024, 9:30 AM yangjie01  wrote:
> > Very sorry. When I was fixing `SPARK-45242 (
> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43594)`
> , I noticed that its
> `Affects Version` and `Fix Version` of SPARK-45242 were both 4.0, and I
> didn't realize that it had also been merged into branch-3.5, so I didn't
> advocate for SPARK-45357 to be backported to branch-3.5.
> >  As far as I know, the condition to trigger this test failure is: when
> using Maven to test the `connect` module, if  `sparkTestRelation` in
> `SparkConnectProtoSuite` is not the first `DataFrame` to be initialized,
> then the `id` of `sparkTestRelation` will no longer be 0. So, I think this
> is indeed related to the order in which Maven executes the test cases in
> the `connect` module.
> >  I have submitted a backport PR to branch-3.5, and if necessary, we can
> merge it to fix this test issue.
> >  Jie Yang
> >   发件人: Jungtaek Lim 
> > 日期: 2024年2月16日 星期五 22:15
> > 收件人: Sean Owen , Rui Wang 
> > 抄送: dev 
> > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.5.1 (RC2)
> >   I traced back relevant changes and got a sense of what happened.
> >   Yangjie figured out the issue via link. It's a tricky issue according
> to the comments from Yangjie - the test is dependent on ordering of
> execution for test suites. He said it does not fail in sbt, hence CI build
> couldn't catch it.
> > He fixed it via link, but we missed that the offending commit was also
> ported back to 3.5 as well, hence the fix wasn't ported back to 3.5.
> >   Surprisingly, I can't reproduce locally even with maven. In my attempt
> to reproduce, SparkConnectProtoSuite was executed at third,
> SparkConnectStreamingQueryCacheSuite, and ExecuteEventsManagerSuite, and
> then SparkConnectProtoSuite. Maybe very specific to the environment, not
> just maven? My env: MBP M1 pro chip, MacOS 14.3.1, Openjdk 17.0.9. I used
> build/mvn (Maven 3.8.8).
> >   I'm not 100% sure this is something we should fail the release as it's
> a test only and sounds very environment dependent, but I'll respect your
> call on vote.
> >   Btw, looks like Rui also made a relevant fix via link (not to fix the
> failing test but to fix other issues), but this also wasn't ported back to
> 3.5. @Rui Wang Do you think this is a regression issue and warrants a new
> RC?
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:38 AM Sean Owen  wrote:
> > Is anyone seeing this Spark Connect test failure? then again, I have
> some weird issue with this env that always fails 1 or 2 tests that nobody
> else can replicate.
> >   - Test observe *** FAILED ***
> >   == FAIL: Plans do not match ===
> >   !CollectMetrics my_metric, [min(id#0) AS min_val#0, max(id#0) AS
> max_val#0, sum(id#0) AS sum(id)#0L], 0   CollectMetrics my_metric,
> [min(id#0) AS min_val#0, max(id#0) AS max_val#0, sum(id#0) AS sum(id)#0L],
> 44
> >+- LocalRelation , [id#0, name#0]
>+- LocalRelation , [id#0, name#0]
> (PlanTest.scala:179)
> >   On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 1:34 PM Jungtaek Lim <
> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > DISCLAIMER: RC for Apache Spark 3.5.1 starts with RC2 as I lately
> figured out doc generation issue after tagging RC1.
> >   Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
> version 3.5.1.
> >
> > The vote is open until February 18th 9AM (PST) and passes if a majority
> +1 PMC votes are cast, with
> > a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.5.1
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > To learn more about Apache Spark, please see https://spark.apache.org/
> >
> > The tag to be voted on is v3.5.1-rc2 (commit
> fd86f85e181fc2dc0f50a096855acf83a6cc5d9c):
> > https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.5.1-rc2
> >
> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.5.1-rc2-bin/
> >
> > Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KE

Re: Vote on Dynamic resource allocation for structured streaming [SPARK-24815]

2024-02-20 Thread Krystal Mitchell 
+1

On 2024/01/17 17:49:32 Pavan Kotikalapudi wrote:
> Thanks for proposing and voting for the feature Mich.
>
> adding some references to the thread.
>
>- Jira ticket - SPARK-24815
>
>- Design Doc
>
> 
>
>- discussion thread
>
>- PR with initial implementation -
>https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42352
>
> Please vote with:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal and start with the development.
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thank you,
>
> Pavan
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 9:52 PM Mich Talebzadeh 
> wrote:
>
> >
> > +1 for me  (non binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > *Disclaimer:* Use it at your own risk. Any and all responsibility for any
> > loss, damage or destruction of data or any other property which may arise
> > from relying on this email's technical content is explicitly disclaimed.
> > The author will in no case be liable for any monetary damages arising from
> > such loss, damage or destruction.
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.5.1 (RC2)

2024-02-20 Thread Cheng Pan 
+1 (non-binding)

- Build successfully from source code.
- Pass integration tests with Spark ClickHouse Connector[1]

[1] https://github.com/housepower/spark-clickhouse-connector/pull/299

Thanks,
Cheng Pan


> On Feb 20, 2024, at 10:56, Jungtaek Lim  wrote:
> 
> Thanks Sean, let's continue the process for this RC.
> 
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> - downloaded all files from URL
> - checked signature
> - extracted all archives
> - ran all tests from source files in source archive file, via running "sbt 
> clean test package" - Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS, OpenJDK 17.0.9.
> 
> Also bump to dev@ to encourage participation - looks like the timing is not 
> good for US folks but let's see more days.
> 
> 
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 1:49 AM Sean Owen  wrote:
> Yeah let's get that fix in, but it seems to be a minor test only issue so 
> should not block release.
> 
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024, 9:30 AM yangjie01  wrote:
> Very sorry. When I was fixing `SPARK-45242 
> (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43594)`, I noticed that its `Affects 
> Version` and `Fix Version` of SPARK-45242 were both 4.0, and I didn't realize 
> that it had also been merged into branch-3.5, so I didn't advocate for 
> SPARK-45357 to be backported to branch-3.5.
>  As far as I know, the condition to trigger this test failure is: when using 
> Maven to test the `connect` module, if  `sparkTestRelation` in 
> `SparkConnectProtoSuite` is not the first `DataFrame` to be initialized, then 
> the `id` of `sparkTestRelation` will no longer be 0. So, I think this is 
> indeed related to the order in which Maven executes the test cases in the 
> `connect` module.
>  I have submitted a backport PR to branch-3.5, and if necessary, we can merge 
> it to fix this test issue.
>  Jie Yang
>   发件人: Jungtaek Lim 
> 日期: 2024年2月16日 星期五 22:15
> 收件人: Sean Owen , Rui Wang 
> 抄送: dev 
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 3.5.1 (RC2)
>   I traced back relevant changes and got a sense of what happened.
>   Yangjie figured out the issue via link. It's a tricky issue according to 
> the comments from Yangjie - the test is dependent on ordering of execution 
> for test suites. He said it does not fail in sbt, hence CI build couldn't 
> catch it.
> He fixed it via link, but we missed that the offending commit was also ported 
> back to 3.5 as well, hence the fix wasn't ported back to 3.5.
>   Surprisingly, I can't reproduce locally even with maven. In my attempt to 
> reproduce, SparkConnectProtoSuite was executed at third, 
> SparkConnectStreamingQueryCacheSuite, and ExecuteEventsManagerSuite, and then 
> SparkConnectProtoSuite. Maybe very specific to the environment, not just 
> maven? My env: MBP M1 pro chip, MacOS 14.3.1, Openjdk 17.0.9. I used 
> build/mvn (Maven 3.8.8).
>   I'm not 100% sure this is something we should fail the release as it's a 
> test only and sounds very environment dependent, but I'll respect your call 
> on vote.
>   Btw, looks like Rui also made a relevant fix via link (not to fix the 
> failing test but to fix other issues), but this also wasn't ported back to 
> 3.5. @Rui Wang Do you think this is a regression issue and warrants a new RC?
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:38 AM Sean Owen  wrote:
> Is anyone seeing this Spark Connect test failure? then again, I have some 
> weird issue with this env that always fails 1 or 2 tests that nobody else can 
> replicate. 
>   - Test observe *** FAILED ***
>   == FAIL: Plans do not match ===
>   !CollectMetrics my_metric, [min(id#0) AS min_val#0, max(id#0) AS max_val#0, 
> sum(id#0) AS sum(id)#0L], 0   CollectMetrics my_metric, [min(id#0) AS 
> min_val#0, max(id#0) AS max_val#0, sum(id#0) AS sum(id)#0L], 44
>+- LocalRelation , [id#0, name#0]   
>   +- LocalRelation , [id#0, name#0] 
> (PlanTest.scala:179)
>   On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 1:34 PM Jungtaek Lim  
> wrote:
> DISCLAIMER: RC for Apache Spark 3.5.1 starts with RC2 as I lately figured out 
> doc generation issue after tagging RC1.
>   Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 
> 3.5.1.
> 
> The vote is open until February 18th 9AM (PST) and passes if a majority +1 
> PMC votes are cast, with
> a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.5.1
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> 
> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see https://spark.apache.org/
> 
> The tag to be voted on is v3.5.1-rc2 (commit 
> fd86f85e181fc2dc0f50a096855acf83a6cc5d9c):
> https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.5.1-rc2
> 
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.5.1-rc2-bin/
> 
> Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
> 
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1452/
> 
> The documentation corresponding to this re

Community Over Code Asia 2024 Travel Assistance Applications now open!

2024-02-20 Thread Gavin McDonald 
Hello to all users, contributors and Committers!

The Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) are pleased to announce that
travel assistance applications for Community over Code Asia 2024 are now
open!

We will be supporting Community over Code Asia, Hangzhou, China
July 26th - 28th, 2024.

TAC exists to help those that would like to attend Community over Code
events, but are unable to do so for financial reasons. For more info
on this year's applications and qualifying criteria, please visit the
TAC website at < https://tac.apache.org/ >. Applications are already
open on https://tac-apply.apache.org/, so don't delay!

The Apache Travel Assistance Committee will only be accepting
applications from those people that are able to attend the full event.

Important: Applications close on Friday, May 10th, 2024.

Applicants have until the the closing date above to submit their
applications (which should contain as much supporting material as
required to efficiently and accurately process their request), this
will enable TAC to announce successful applications shortly
afterwards.

As usual, TAC expects to deal with a range of applications from a
diverse range of backgrounds; therefore, we encourage (as always)
anyone thinking about sending in an application to do so ASAP.

For those that will need a Visa to enter the Country - we advise you to
apply
now so that you have enough time in case of interview delays. So do not
wait until you know if you have been accepted or not.

We look forward to greeting many of you in Hangzhou, China in July, 2024!

Kind Regards,

Gavin

(On behalf of the Travel Assistance Committee)