Re: svn commit: r668347 - /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/tests/utilities/20.meta.rel.cpp

2008-06-24 Thread Martin Sebor 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Author: vitek
Date: Mon Jun 16 16:35:21 2008
New Revision: 668347

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=668347view=rev
Log:
2008-06-16  Travis Vitek  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[...]

@@ -346,7 +332,7 @@
 TEST (std::is_convertible, int (), int ()(char), false);
 
 TEST (std::is_convertible, int*, void*, true);

-TEST (std::is_convertible, int (*)(), void*, true);
+TEST (std::is_convertible, int (*)(), void*, false);


Should the convertibility of functions with different language
linkages, and that of member function pointers, be exercised
as well?

Martin

RE: svn commit: r668347 - /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/tests/utilities/20.meta.rel.cpp

2008-06-24 Thread Travis Vitek 
 

Martin Sebor wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Author: vitek
 Date: Mon Jun 16 16:35:21 2008
 New Revision: 668347
 
 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=668347view=rev
 Log:
 2008-06-16  Travis Vitek  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
[...]
 @@ -346,7 +332,7 @@
  TEST (std::is_convertible, int (), int ()(char), false);
  
  TEST (std::is_convertible, int*, void*, true);
 -TEST (std::is_convertible, int (*)(), void*, true);
 +TEST (std::is_convertible, int (*)(), void*, false);

Should the convertibility of functions with different language
linkages, and that of member function pointers, be exercised
as well?

Absolutely. Will enhance test.


Martin