[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-552:add new config storm.messaging.netty...

2014-12-23 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/311#issuecomment-67976914
  
@caofangkun any update on this?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-552:add new config storm.messaging.netty...

2014-12-23 Thread caofangkun
Github user caofangkun commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/311#issuecomment-68022108
  
@revans2 
Thank you for your explanation  and good advise .
I have renamed storm.messaging.netty.backlog,default  to 
storm.messaging.netty.socket.backlog  and update the patch. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-552:add new config storm.messaging.netty...

2014-11-18 Thread revans2
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/311#issuecomment-63495857
  
@ptgoetz I traced this down in the netty code to the second parameter to 
the call to bind in the socket.


https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/net/ServerSocket.html#bind%28java.net.SocketAddress,%20int%29

It sets the maximum incoming connection queue.  That way if the boss thread 
is unable to keep up with accepting new connections the OS will keep them 
buffered for a while until it can get to them.  This should only be an issue 
when lots of connections are being established very quickly, which would only 
happen for very large topologies.

@caofangkun it would be good to add a better explanation for the config to 
the documentation for the config.  I would also like it if we could rename the 
config to something like ```storm.messaging.netty.socket.backlog``` as I can 
see another backlog being created in the future for tuples, instead of TCP 
connection requests.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-552:add new config storm.messaging.netty...

2014-11-11 Thread caofangkun
GitHub user caofangkun opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/311

STORM-552:add new config storm.messaging.netty.backlog,default value 500

STORM-552:add new config storm.messaging.netty.backlog,default value 500

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/caofangkun/apache-storm storm-552

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/311.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #311


commit d23495056f0b870e1ef4bebbae586965e2f21340
Author: caofangkun caofang...@gmail.com
Date:   2014-11-11T08:56:54Z

STORM-552:add new config storm.messaging.netty.backlog,default value 500




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---