Den fre 2 feb. 2024 kl 08:20 skrev Jun Omae :
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 10:42 PM Daniel Sahlberg
> wrote:
> >
> > Den fre 19 jan. 2024 kl 07:41 skrev :
> >>
> >> Author: jun66j5
> >> Date: Fri Jan 19 06:40:59 2024
> >> New Revision: 1915317
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1915317=rev
> >> Log:
> >> * STATUS: Nominate r1915316.
> >>
> >> Modified:
> >> subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
> >>
> >> Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS
> >> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1915317=1915316=1915317=diff
> >>
> ==
> >> --- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original)
> >> +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Fri Jan 19 06:40:59 2024
> >> @@ -45,6 +45,14 @@ Candidate changes:
> >> Votes:
> >> +1: dsahlberg
> >>
> >> + * r1915316
> >> + swig-py: Fix `none_dealloc` error caused by reference count issue in
> >> + `apply_textdelta` invoked from `svn.repos.replay()`.
> >> + Justification:
> >> + Fix Python interpreter crash which often occurs with large
> repositories.
> >> + Votes:
> >> + +1: jun66j5
> >> +
> >> Veto-blocked changes:
> >> =
> >
> >
> > Is this serious enough that we should consider a 1.14.4 release? (Didn't
> have time to review the code yet but a quick glance positive).
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Daniel
>
> In my opinion, yes. Python users have no workaround for the issue
> except downgrading to 1.14.2. I think it happens if Python is a
> long-running process like a daemon or with large repositories.
>
> At least, I'm considering to report it with the patch to distributors
> (Debian, Ubuntu, FreeBSD, etc.).
>
> --
> Jun Omae (大前 潤)
>
Alright, since Nathan also thought about a release we should probably do
this.
It seems the above fix is already backported (r1915338).
There are two other fixes with two votes in the STATUS file:
* r1914222
Improve help message for svnmucc PUT.
This is only a help message change, but it is within the "core code" so I
think someone else has to approve it as well (but we can probably bend the
rules since it only affects translations).
* r1912632
Fix `invalid escape sequence` in Python scripts to prevent many
`SyntaxWarning`s since Python 3.12.
This is the patch created by Jun last summer, review by futatuki and
committed by me. Jun, would you consider voting for this?
The two above should be fairly easy fixes and I think it would be good to
include.
Then we have the following group:
* r1890223, r1890668, r1890673
Support building on Win64/ARM64.
It is not approved and I'm not sure if we have someone who can look at it.
There is also the rewrite of mailer.py hook-script (in tools/hook-scripts).
I'm not sure if it is complete yet and I'm not sure if we want to release
it in a patch release. We've said before not to break Python2
compatibility, on the other hand the current script doesn't work at all
under Python3 and I'm leaning towards Python3 is the more important target
at this moment. @Greg Stein can probably comment more on
the current status.
Kind regards,
Daniel
