Re: svn commit: r1891416 - /subversion/site/staging/faq.html
Den lör 14 aug. 2021 kl 13:29 skrev Daniel Shahaf : > We could at least say "This entry was last updated in 2003"; that'd be > better than having an entry that still claims Neon is an option (it > hasn't been since 1.7.0). > That is a good idea. I've added a TODO paragraph in r1892340. Kind regards, Daniel > Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 23:04:42 +0200: > > Hi, > > > > Not directly related to this commit but at least in the same FAQ entry, I > > noticed that the link to TortoiseSVN's document describing SSPI > > authentication is no longer working. The actual document is there but the > > the linked section was deleted in 2011 (see > > > https://svn.osdn.net/svnroot/tortoisesvn/trunk/doc/source/en/TortoiseSVN/tsvn_repository/ > , > > r21241). > > > > It seems the whole FAQ entry should be rewritten, looking at the history > it > > seems to be largely unchanged since it was written in 2003. > > > > Unfortunately I don't know enough about this subject to propose anything > > myself. > > > > Kind regards, > > Daniel Sahlberg > > > > Den mån 12 juli 2021 kl 16:46 skrev Bert Huijben : > > > > > Too bad both Neon and Serf support NTLM and SSPI for quite some time, > so > > > the reason is a bit outdated... But I would still recommend enabling > that > > > line, as there are quite some users that want to mix accounts and SSPI > only > > > allows you access with the one configured for NTLM/SSPI. > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 9:02 PM wrote: > > > > > >> Author: hartmannathan > > >> Date: Fri Jul 9 19:02:01 2021 > > >> New Revision: 1891416 > > >> > > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1891416=rev > > >> Log: > > >> * site/staging/faq.html: (#sspi): Fix typo: suppport -> support > > >> > > >> Modified: > > >> subversion/site/staging/faq.html > > >> > > >> Modified: subversion/site/staging/faq.html > > >> URL: > > >> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/staging/faq.html?rev=1891416=1891415=1891416=diff > > >> > > >> > == > > >> --- subversion/site/staging/faq.html (original) > > >> +++ subversion/site/staging/faq.html Fri Jul 9 19:02:01 2021 > > >> @@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ to see the section on SSPI authenticatio > > >> > > >> > > >> Without this line, browsers that support SSPI will prompt for the > > >> user's > > >> -credentials, but clients that do not suppport SSPI such as Subversion > > >> +credentials, but clients that do not support SSPI such as Subversion > > >> will not prompt. (The current release of Neon - Subversion's HTTP > > >> library - handles only basic authentication.) Because the client > never > > >> asks for credentials, any action that requires authentication will > fail. > > >> > > >> > > >> >
Re: svn commit: r1891416 - /subversion/site/staging/faq.html
We could at least say "This entry was last updated in 2003"; that'd be better than having an entry that still claims Neon is an option (it hasn't been since 1.7.0). Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 23:04:42 +0200: > Hi, > > Not directly related to this commit but at least in the same FAQ entry, I > noticed that the link to TortoiseSVN's document describing SSPI > authentication is no longer working. The actual document is there but the > the linked section was deleted in 2011 (see > https://svn.osdn.net/svnroot/tortoisesvn/trunk/doc/source/en/TortoiseSVN/tsvn_repository/, > r21241). > > It seems the whole FAQ entry should be rewritten, looking at the history it > seems to be largely unchanged since it was written in 2003. > > Unfortunately I don't know enough about this subject to propose anything > myself. > > Kind regards, > Daniel Sahlberg > > Den mån 12 juli 2021 kl 16:46 skrev Bert Huijben : > > > Too bad both Neon and Serf support NTLM and SSPI for quite some time, so > > the reason is a bit outdated... But I would still recommend enabling that > > line, as there are quite some users that want to mix accounts and SSPI only > > allows you access with the one configured for NTLM/SSPI. > > > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 9:02 PM wrote: > > > >> Author: hartmannathan > >> Date: Fri Jul 9 19:02:01 2021 > >> New Revision: 1891416 > >> > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1891416=rev > >> Log: > >> * site/staging/faq.html: (#sspi): Fix typo: suppport -> support > >> > >> Modified: > >> subversion/site/staging/faq.html > >> > >> Modified: subversion/site/staging/faq.html > >> URL: > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/staging/faq.html?rev=1891416=1891415=1891416=diff > >> > >> == > >> --- subversion/site/staging/faq.html (original) > >> +++ subversion/site/staging/faq.html Fri Jul 9 19:02:01 2021 > >> @@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ to see the section on SSPI authenticatio > >> > >> > >> Without this line, browsers that support SSPI will prompt for the > >> user's > >> -credentials, but clients that do not suppport SSPI such as Subversion > >> +credentials, but clients that do not support SSPI such as Subversion > >> will not prompt. (The current release of Neon - Subversion's HTTP > >> library - handles only basic authentication.) Because the client never > >> asks for credentials, any action that requires authentication will fail. > >> > >> > >>
Re: svn commit: r1891416 - /subversion/site/staging/faq.html
Hi, Not directly related to this commit but at least in the same FAQ entry, I noticed that the link to TortoiseSVN's document describing SSPI authentication is no longer working. The actual document is there but the the linked section was deleted in 2011 (see https://svn.osdn.net/svnroot/tortoisesvn/trunk/doc/source/en/TortoiseSVN/tsvn_repository/, r21241). It seems the whole FAQ entry should be rewritten, looking at the history it seems to be largely unchanged since it was written in 2003. Unfortunately I don't know enough about this subject to propose anything myself. Kind regards, Daniel Sahlberg Den mån 12 juli 2021 kl 16:46 skrev Bert Huijben : > Too bad both Neon and Serf support NTLM and SSPI for quite some time, so > the reason is a bit outdated... But I would still recommend enabling that > line, as there are quite some users that want to mix accounts and SSPI only > allows you access with the one configured for NTLM/SSPI. > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 9:02 PM wrote: > >> Author: hartmannathan >> Date: Fri Jul 9 19:02:01 2021 >> New Revision: 1891416 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1891416=rev >> Log: >> * site/staging/faq.html: (#sspi): Fix typo: suppport -> support >> >> Modified: >> subversion/site/staging/faq.html >> >> Modified: subversion/site/staging/faq.html >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/staging/faq.html?rev=1891416=1891415=1891416=diff >> >> == >> --- subversion/site/staging/faq.html (original) >> +++ subversion/site/staging/faq.html Fri Jul 9 19:02:01 2021 >> @@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ to see the section on SSPI authenticatio >> >> >> Without this line, browsers that support SSPI will prompt for the >> user's >> -credentials, but clients that do not suppport SSPI such as Subversion >> +credentials, but clients that do not support SSPI such as Subversion >> will not prompt. (The current release of Neon - Subversion's HTTP >> library - handles only basic authentication.) Because the client never >> asks for credentials, any action that requires authentication will fail. >> >> >>
Re: svn commit: r1891416 - /subversion/site/staging/faq.html
Too bad both Neon and Serf support NTLM and SSPI for quite some time, so the reason is a bit outdated... But I would still recommend enabling that line, as there are quite some users that want to mix accounts and SSPI only allows you access with the one configured for NTLM/SSPI. On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 9:02 PM wrote: > Author: hartmannathan > Date: Fri Jul 9 19:02:01 2021 > New Revision: 1891416 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1891416=rev > Log: > * site/staging/faq.html: (#sspi): Fix typo: suppport -> support > > Modified: > subversion/site/staging/faq.html > > Modified: subversion/site/staging/faq.html > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/staging/faq.html?rev=1891416=1891415=1891416=diff > > == > --- subversion/site/staging/faq.html (original) > +++ subversion/site/staging/faq.html Fri Jul 9 19:02:01 2021 > @@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ to see the section on SSPI authenticatio > > > Without this line, browsers that support SSPI will prompt for the > user's > -credentials, but clients that do not suppport SSPI such as Subversion > +credentials, but clients that do not support SSPI such as Subversion > will not prompt. (The current release of Neon - Subversion's HTTP > library - handles only basic authentication.) Because the client never > asks for credentials, any action that requires authentication will fail. > > >
