Re: [dev] TermKitjkjkjn

2011-05-20 Thread Benjamin R. Haskell 

On Fri, 20 May 2011, Connor Lane Smith wrote:


On 20 May 2011 19:58, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
dwm's focus rules still surprise me sometimes (mainly in monocle mode 
where urxvt doesn't occupy the entire screen, due to the screen not 
being evenly divisible by character cells).


static const Bool resizehints = False;

;)



Awesome.  Never knew what that was about.

--
Thanks,
Ben

Re: [dev] TermKitjkjkjn

2011-05-20 Thread Connor Lane Smith 
On 20 May 2011 19:58, Benjamin R. Haskell  wrote:
> dwm's focus rules still surprise me sometimes (mainly in monocle mode where
> urxvt doesn't occupy the entire screen, due to the screen not being evenly
> divisible by character cells).

static const Bool resizehints = False;

;)

cls

Re: [dev] TermKitjkjkjn

2011-05-20 Thread Benjamin R. Haskell 

Subject: Re: [dwm] TermKitjkjkjn


dwm's focus rules still surprise me sometimes (mainly in monocle mode 
where urxvt doesn't occupy the entire screen, due to the screen not 
being evenly divisible by character cells).  The jkjkjn tacked on to the 
subject there was me trying to 'shake' an apparently-frozen vim session, 
which inadvertently sent email from the window I couldn't see...

Re: [dev] TermKitjkjkjn

2011-05-20 Thread Benjamin R. Haskell 

On Fri, 20 May 2011, Andrew Hills wrote:


On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:

[...] wouldn't something akin to

history | sort -r | sed '1d; s/^[ \t]*[0-9]*[ \t]*//'

work just as well?


Didn't realize `sed` didn't have \d, but why [ \t] instead of \s?



[...] (Don't forget to escape your asterisks in sed.)


Why would you escape the asterisks here?  It's not looking for literal 
asterisks.


--
Best,
Ben