Re: [dev] [PATCH] [lsw] Create manpage directory if it's not there
Hey, On 6 June 2011 09:35, Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote: This is self-explanatory... Applied, thanks. Connor
Re: [dev] [PATCH] [lsw] Create manpage directory if it's not there
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:52:32PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote: Hey, On 6 June 2011 09:35, Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote: This is self-explanatory... Applied, thanks. Awesome. While you're updating those small tools, any chance of getting this in? http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1105/8047.html Thanks. -- # Petr Sabata pgpEaYQ6stinM.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [dev] [PATCH] [lsw] Create manpage directory if it's not there
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:35:56 +0200
Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote:
+ @mkdir -p ${DESTDIR}${MANPREFIX}/man1
This is the sort of thing which has people symlinking man - share/man or vice
versa.
Re: [dev] [PATCH] [lsw] Create manpage directory if it's not there
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 04:36:24PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:35:56 +0200
Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote:
+ @mkdir -p ${DESTDIR}${MANPREFIX}/man1
This is the sort of thing which has people symlinking man - share/man or
vice versa.
I really don't see how that could possibly apply to this situation.
--
# Petr Sabata
pgpxx4DszyoVO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [dev] [PATCH] [lsw] Create manpage directory if it's not there
On 6 June 2011 14:05, Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote: While you're updating those small tools, any chance of getting this in? http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1105/8047.html As I just discovered, lsx doesn't appear to have its own repo. I'm unsure why. But no, I apparently can't. ;) cls
Re: [dev] [PATCH] [lsw] Create manpage directory if it's not there
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:42:20 +0200
Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 04:36:24PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:35:56 +0200
Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com wrote:
+ @mkdir -p ${DESTDIR}${MANPREFIX}/man1
This is the sort of thing which has people symlinking man - share/man or
vice versa.
I really don't see how that could possibly apply to this situation.
the -p option creates leading dirs. meh.
