[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)

[Luciano Resende]

Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML version
0.10.0-incubating !

The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday,
Wednesday 25 and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

To learn more about Apache SystemML, please see http://systemml.apache.org/

The tag to be voted on is v0.10.0-incubating-rc2
(3d5f9b11741f6d6ecc6af7cbaa1069cde32be838)

https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/3d5f9b11741f6d6ecc6af7cbaa1069cde32be838

The release artifacts can be found at :

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc2/

The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesystemml-1006/


=
== Apache Incubator release policy ==
=
Please find below the guide to release management during incubation:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html

===
== How can I help test this release? ==
===
If you are a SystemML user, you can help us test this release by taking an
existing Algorithm or workload and running on this release candidate, then
reporting any regressions.


== What justifies a -1 vote for this release? ==

-1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related
issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or
regressions should not block this release.

-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)

[Reynold Xin]

+1

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:48 AM,  wrote:

> Yeah I definitely agree that we should aim to release quicker and more
> often. Especially as we continue to work out most of the release build
> issues, making future releases will become much easier.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On May 27, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Luciano Resende 
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Deron Eriksson <
> deroneriks...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Matthias,
> >>
> >> I would definitely be fine with this being fixed in 0.11 and personally
> >> would prefer not to delay the 0.10 release. Perhaps we can work to have
> a
> >> shorter time interval between the 0.10 and 0.11 releases.
> >>
> >> Deron
> > Agree, and btw, we can have 0.11 or just 0.10.1.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>