Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
+1 On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:48 AM,wrote: > Yeah I definitely agree that we should aim to release quicker and more > often. Especially as we continue to work out most of the release build > issues, making future releases will become much easier. > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On May 27, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Luciano Resende > wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Deron Eriksson < > deroneriks...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Matthias, > >> > >> I would definitely be fine with this being fixed in 0.11 and personally > >> would prefer not to delay the 0.10 release. Perhaps we can work to have > a > >> shorter time interval between the 0.10 and 0.11 releases. > >> > >> Deron > > Agree, and btw, we can have 0.11 or just 0.10.1. > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
+1 From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 05/26/2016 03:35 PM Subject:Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1) +1 --Glenn Acs S ---05/26/2016 03:30:57 PM---+1 -Arvind From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org> Date: 05/26/2016 03:30 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1) +1 -Arvind From: Niketan Pansare <npan...@us.ibm.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 3:24 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1) Sorry for late reply. +1 for 0.10 release. Thanks, Niketan Pansare IBM Almaden Research Center E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar Luciano Resende ---05/26/2016 02:21:22 PM---On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 05/26/2016 02:21 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1) On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML > version 0.10.0-incubating ! > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday, > Wednesday 25 and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > To learn more about Apache SystemML, please see > http://systemml.apache.org/ > > The tag to be voted on is v0.10.0-incubating-rc1 > (ddf0e0941afe5d9c2cc7c574a6983aadd98c1fc3) > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/ddf0e0941afe5d9c2cc7c574a6983aadd98c1fc3 > > The release artifacts can be found at : > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/ > > > The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesystemml-1005/ > > > = > == Apache Incubator release policy == > = > Please find below the guide to release management during incubation: > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > === > == How can I help test this release? == > === > If you are a SystemML user, you can help us test this release by taking an > existing Algorithm or workload and running on this release candidate, then > reporting any regressions. > > > == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? == > > -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related > issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or > regressions should not block this release. > > Vote passed with +1 from : Matthias Boehm, Mike Dusenberry, Luciano Resende, Deron Eriksson. I will send this to IPMC now, thanks. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
+1 -Arvind From: Niketan Pansare <npan...@us.ibm.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 3:24 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1) Sorry for late reply. +1 for 0.10 release. Thanks, Niketan Pansare IBM Almaden Research Center E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar Luciano Resende ---05/26/2016 02:21:22 PM---On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 05/26/2016 02:21 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1) On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML > version 0.10.0-incubating ! > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday, > Wednesday 25 and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > To learn more about Apache SystemML, please see > http://systemml.apache.org/ > > The tag to be voted on is v0.10.0-incubating-rc1 > (ddf0e0941afe5d9c2cc7c574a6983aadd98c1fc3) > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/ddf0e0941afe5d9c2cc7c574a6983aadd98c1fc3 > > The release artifacts can be found at : > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/ > > > The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesystemml-1005/ > > > = > == Apache Incubator release policy == > = > Please find below the guide to release management during incubation: > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > === > == How can I help test this release? == > === > If you are a SystemML user, you can help us test this release by taking an > existing Algorithm or workload and running on this release candidate, then > reporting any regressions. > > > == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? == > > -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related > issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or > regressions should not block this release. > > Vote passed with +1 from : Matthias Boehm, Mike Dusenberry, Luciano Resende, Deron Eriksson. I will send this to IPMC now, thanks. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Luciano Resendewrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML > version 0.10.0-incubating ! > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday, > Wednesday 25 and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > To learn more about Apache SystemML, please see > http://systemml.apache.org/ > > The tag to be voted on is v0.10.0-incubating-rc1 > (ddf0e0941afe5d9c2cc7c574a6983aadd98c1fc3) > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/ddf0e0941afe5d9c2cc7c574a6983aadd98c1fc3 > > The release artifacts can be found at : > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/ > > > The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesystemml-1005/ > > > = > == Apache Incubator release policy == > = > Please find below the guide to release management during incubation: > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > === > == How can I help test this release? == > === > If you are a SystemML user, you can help us test this release by taking an > existing Algorithm or workload and running on this release candidate, then > reporting any regressions. > > > == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? == > > -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related > issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or > regressions should not block this release. > > Vote passed with +1 from : Matthias Boehm, Mike Dusenberry, Luciano Resende, Deron Eriksson. I will send this to IPMC now, thanks. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
+1 Deron On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:28 PM,wrote: > Great, I created SYSTEMML-710 to track this. Would be good as a simple > starter task as well. > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On May 25, 2016, at 1:16 PM, Luciano Resende > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:47 PM, wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> I ran scripts in Jupyter and Zeppelin using both the Scala and Python > >> MLContext APIs in order to test our notebook integration. > >> > >> One thing to note is that our Python API file, `SystemML.py`, is not > >> included with the main distribution. We can work around this, and it > should > >> not block this release, but we'll want to it add it for the next > release. > > Please raise a jira for this. > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
Hi Luciano, 10 of the 11 artifacts look good to me for LICENSE and NOTICE (as far as I can tell they reflect the artifact contents). However the standalone uberjar (systemml-0.10.0-incubating-standalone.jar) does not have the correct LICENSE and NOTICE (one of my commits in the last week must have affected this, since it worked last week such as at commit e2cb4db...). Can we remove this artifact from the release candidate, or is this a showstopper? I have not heard of anyone using this uberjar. Deron On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Luciano Resendewrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:47 PM, wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I ran scripts in Jupyter and Zeppelin using both the Scala and Python > > MLContext APIs in order to test our notebook integration. > > > > One thing to note is that our Python API file, `SystemML.py`, is not > > included with the main distribution. We can work around this, and it > should > > not block this release, but we'll want to it add it for the next release. > > > > > Please raise a jira for this. > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
I may have found an issue with the standalone (uber) jar LICENSE and NOTICE. Investigating. Deron On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:47 PM, <dusenberr...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > I ran scripts in Jupyter and Zeppelin using both the Scala and Python > MLContext APIs in order to test our notebook integration. > > One thing to note is that our Python API file, `SystemML.py`, is not > included with the main distribution. We can work around this, and it should > not block this release, but we'll want to it add it for the next release. > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On May 24, 2016, at 12:47 AM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > In detail, I ran our performance testsuite on Spark 1.6.1 for data sizes > {80MB, 800MB, 8GB, 80GB}, sparse/dense, intercept 0/1/2, and the algorithm > classes binomial (Mlogreg, L2SVM, MSVM), multinomial (Mlogreg, MSVM, Naive > Bayes), regression (LinregCG, LinregDS, GLM poisson-log, GLM gamma-log, GLM > binomal-probit), clustering (Kmeans), and statistics (Univariate, > Bivariate). The good news is that there are no compiler/runtime issues and > performance is as expected. > > > > On thing, however, is that we get quite often exceptions like the one > below in the logs - these are output in log level WARN and apparently > caused by a race condition in the stop call on the spark context ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12967). Unfortunately, it's > only fixed in 2.0 and there is nothing we can do about it. > > > > java.lang.IllegalStateException: RpcEnv already stopped. > > at > org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Dispatcher.postMessage(Dispatcher.scala:159) > > at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.Dispatcher.postToAll(Dispatcher.scala:109) > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > > > Luciano Resende ---05/20/2016 10:45:17 PM---Please vote on releasing the > following candidate as Apache SystemML version 0.10.0-incubating ! > > > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > Date: 05/20/2016 10:45 PM > > Subject: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML > version > > 0.10.0-incubating ! > > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday, > > Wednesday 25 and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are > cast. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > > To learn more about Apache SystemML, please see > http://systemml.apache.org/ > > > > The tag to be voted on is v0.10.0-incubating-rc1 > > (ddf0e0941afe5d9c2cc7c574a6983aadd98c1fc3) > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/ddf0e0941afe5d9c2cc7c574a6983aadd98c1fc3 > > > > The release artifacts can be found at : > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/ > > > > The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > > found at: > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesystemml-1005/ > > > > > > = > > == Apache Incubator release policy == > > = > > Please find below the guide to release management during incubation: > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > > > === > > == How can I help test this release? == > > === > > If you are a SystemML user, you can help us test this release by taking > an > > existing Algorithm or workload and running on this release candidate, > then > > reporting any regressions. > > > > > > == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? == > > > > -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal > related > > issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or > > regressions should not block this release. > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > >
[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML version 0.10.0-incubating ! The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday, Wednesday 25 and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... To learn more about Apache SystemML, please see http://systemml.apache.org/ The tag to be voted on is v0.10.0-incubating-rc1 (ddf0e0941afe5d9c2cc7c574a6983aadd98c1fc3) https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/ddf0e0941afe5d9c2cc7c574a6983aadd98c1fc3 The release artifacts can be found at : https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/ The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesystemml-1005/ = == Apache Incubator release policy == = Please find below the guide to release management during incubation: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html === == How can I help test this release? == === If you are a SystemML user, you can help us test this release by taking an existing Algorithm or workload and running on this release candidate, then reporting any regressions. == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? == -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or regressions should not block this release. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/