Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
For now, we should document every artifacts being created in release doc (and/or website), which can be updated when artifacts get reduced. -Arvind From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 9:13 PM Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback For some reason, I got an impression that artifacts reduction was completed earlier, but apparently its not.We are trying to reduce number of artifacts to avoid confusion to users.This is an issue from earlier releases as well, not being introduced as a part of SystemML 0.11 release. We can address it immediately after SystemML 0.11 goes out. We should not mark this as a blocking issue for SystemML 0.11. -Arvind From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 3:48 PM Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, to quote Justin Mclean: > "It not clear to me what exactly is the release artefacts here, for > instance why does this directory include jars? Can you please clarify." > > From this response, I think it is clear that our large number of artifacts > is causing confusion. We can in part reduce this confusion by dropping our > number of released artifacts, as addressed by > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926. > > Deron > > > Ok, I have marked the jira above as blocker for 0.11 release. Could you guys please make sure all other remaining blocking issues are marked as so for 0.11 release, so it makes it easier for myself to check when the next RC should be created. Thanks -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
For some reason, I got an impression that artifacts reduction was completed earlier, but apparently its not.We are trying to reduce number of artifacts to avoid confusion to users.This is an issue from earlier releases as well, not being introduced as a part of SystemML 0.11 release. We can address it immediately after SystemML 0.11 goes out. We should not mark this as a blocking issue for SystemML 0.11. -Arvind From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 3:48 PM Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, to quote Justin Mclean: > "It not clear to me what exactly is the release artefacts here, for > instance why does this directory include jars? Can you please clarify." > > From this response, I think it is clear that our large number of artifacts > is causing confusion. We can in part reduce this confusion by dropping our > number of released artifacts, as addressed by > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926. > > Deron > > > Ok, I have marked the jira above as blocker for 0.11 release. Could you guys please make sure all other remaining blocking issues are marked as so for 0.11 release, so it makes it easier for myself to check when the next RC should be created. Thanks -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
SYSTEMML-1076, SYSTEMML-1077 issues are related to experimental feature DeepLearning/GPU being added to SystemML 0.11. These issues are specific to condition articulated in Jira's.We should have Jira opened and fixed before we can support DeepLearning/GPU fully.For now these should not be "Blocking" for SystemML 0.11 release. -Arvind From: "dusenberr...@gmail.com" <dusenberr...@gmail.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 4:01 PM Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback There are also two bugs related to max pooling that I'd like to get a fix for into 0.11: SYSTEMML-1076, SYSTEMML-1077. -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone. > On Oct 31, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Also, to quote Justin Mclean: >> "It not clear to me what exactly is the release artefacts here, for >> instance why does this directory include jars? Can you please clarify." >> >> From this response, I think it is clear that our large number of artifacts >> is causing confusion. We can in part reduce this confusion by dropping our >> number of released artifacts, as addressed by >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926. >> >> Deron >> >> >> > Ok, I have marked the jira above as blocker for 0.11 release. Could you > guys please make sure all other remaining blocking issues are marked as so > for 0.11 release, so it makes it easier for myself to check when the next > RC should be created. > > Thanks > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Also, to quote Justin Mclean: "It not clear to me what exactly is the release artefacts here, for instance why does this directory include jars? Can you please clarify." >From this response, I think it is clear that our large number of artifacts is causing confusion. We can in part reduce this confusion by dropping our number of released artifacts, as addressed by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926. Deron On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I mentioned here that the "source-release.zip" is not something I > recognize: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache. > org/msg00960.html > > Is this mystery artifact created by the script to deploy release > candidates? > > It should definitely be removed in my opinion. > > Deron > > > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Glenn Weidner <gweid...@us.ibm.com> > wrote: > >> I've opened JIRA/PR (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-1075) >> for review to address item [2] of https://www.mail-archive.com/g >> ene...@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html. >> >> Thanks, >> Glenn >> >> [image: Inactive hide details for Glenn Weidner---10/29/2016 09:52:05 >> PM---Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip be rem]Glenn >> Weidner---10/29/2016 09:52:05 PM---Can the >> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip >> be removed since there already is a src artifa >> >> From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS >> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org >> Date: 10/29/2016 09:52 PM >> Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback >> -- >> >> >> >> Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip be removed since >> there already is a src artifact systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip? >> >> Thanks, >> Glenn >> >> Luciano Resende ---10/29/2016 07:25:40 PM---Please see IPMC feedback on >> our RC4: >> *https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56* >> <https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56> >> >> From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> >> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org >> Date: 10/29/2016 07:25 PM >> Subject: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback >> -- >> >> >> >> Please see IPMC feedback on our RC4: >> *https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html* >> <https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html> >> >> Please help address these issues, as we are going to have to start a new >> RC >> vote asap. >> >> Also, I am pretty sure some of these issues have been addressed in the >> past, so we need to figure out what is causing some of these regressions. >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975> >> *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Hi, I mentioned here that the "source-release.zip" is not something I recognize: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00960.html Is this mystery artifact created by the script to deploy release candidates? It should definitely be removed in my opinion. Deron On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Glenn Weidner <gweid...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > I've opened JIRA/PR (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-1075) > for review to address item [2] of https://www.mail-archive.com/ > gene...@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html. > > Thanks, > Glenn > > [image: Inactive hide details for Glenn Weidner---10/29/2016 09:52:05 > PM---Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip be rem]Glenn > Weidner---10/29/2016 09:52:05 PM---Can the > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip > be removed since there already is a src artifa > > From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Date: 10/29/2016 09:52 PM > Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback > -- > > > > Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip be removed since > there already is a src artifact systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip? > > Thanks, > Glenn > > Luciano Resende ---10/29/2016 07:25:40 PM---Please see IPMC feedback on > our RC4: *https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56* > <https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56> > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Date: 10/29/2016 07:25 PM > Subject: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback > -- > > > > Please see IPMC feedback on our RC4: > *https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html* > <https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html> > > Please help address these issues, as we are going to have to start a new RC > vote asap. > > Also, I am pretty sure some of these issues have been addressed in the > past, so we need to figure out what is causing some of these regressions. > > -- > Luciano Resende > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975> > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/> > > > > > >
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
I've opened JIRA/PR (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-1075) for review to address item [2] of https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html. Thanks, Glenn From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 10/29/2016 09:52 PM Subject:Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip be removed since there already is a src artifact systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip? Thanks, Glenn Luciano Resende ---10/29/2016 07:25:40 PM---Please see IPMC feedback on our RC4: https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56 From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 10/29/2016 07:25 PM Subject: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback Please see IPMC feedback on our RC4: https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html Please help address these issues, as we are going to have to start a new RC vote asap. Also, I am pretty sure some of these issues have been addressed in the past, so we need to figure out what is causing some of these regressions. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip be removed since there already is a src artifact systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip? Thanks, Glenn From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 10/29/2016 07:25 PM Subject: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback Please see IPMC feedback on our RC4: https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html Please help address these issues, as we are going to have to start a new RC vote asap. Also, I am pretty sure some of these issues have been addressed in the past, so we need to figure out what is causing some of these regressions. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Please see IPMC feedback on our RC4: https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html Please help address these issues, as we are going to have to start a new RC vote asap. Also, I am pretty sure some of these issues have been addressed in the past, so we need to figure out what is causing some of these regressions. -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/