Re: [VOTE] Move master to Hadoop 3+ and create separate 0.9.x line

2018-04-12 Thread Gopal Vijayaraghavan 
+1

Cheers,
Gopal


On 4/12/18, 5:22 PM, "Eric Wohlstadter"  wrote:

Just a friendly reminder that this vote is still open.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Jason Lowe  wrote:

> There was a discussion thread that was started two weeks before the
> vote thread, see
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tez-dev/201803.mbox/browser.
> Granted there weren't many comments, but there was a discussion thread
> with no voiced objections well in advance of the vote thread.
>
> Jason
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Jonathan Eagles 
> wrote:
> > Thoughts/Inputs/Discussion from Pig/Hive/Flink/Scalding/Scope
> communities?
> >
> > I wish we had used a discussion thread to gather more input from
> > Pig/Hive/Flink/Scalding/Scope community before starting this vote whose
> > outcome affects them. Without discussion or votes from those communities
> > I'm not sure the community support for this decision. Should we consider
> > canceling this vote to gather input first?
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Kuhu Shukla 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1.
> >>
> >> Thank you Eric for floating the proposal.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Kuhu
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Jason Lowe 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > Jason
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Eric Wohlstadter 
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > Please vote (binding or unbinding) on the following proposal. The
> vote
> >> > will
> >> > > be open until 3pm (Pacific) April 13th.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Proposal: Move master to support minimum Hadoop 3+ (0.10.x line) 
and
> >> > create
> >> > > separate branch for Hadoop 2 (0.9.x line)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Details:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >- Tez master branch would support only Hadoop 3+ moving forward
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >- As a general policy, Maven dependencies on master are required
> not
> >> > to
> >> > >have conflicts with the dependencies of the corresponding 
minimum
> >> > >supported Hadoop (the dependency versions can vary between Tez
> >> master
> >> > and
> >> > >Hadoop if the versions are advertised as compatible by the
> >> dependency
> >> > >provider).
> >> > >
> >> > >- As a general policy, dependency conflicts between Tez and
> Hadoop
> >> > >should be resolved by using compatible jars. Shims/Shading could
> be
> >> > used on
> >> > >a case-by-case basis, but not as a general policy.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >- A separate branch and distribution (e.g. on Maven Central)
> will be
> >> > >created to maintain the 0.9.x line with minumum support for
> Hadoop
> >> > 2.7.x
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >- Bug fixes would be required to be pushed to both to master and
> the
> >> > >0.9.x line (unless they are specific to one of them)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >- Major feature or performance improvements would be required to
> be
> >> > >pushed to both master and the 0.9.x line (unless they require
> Hadoop
> >> > 3+ or
> >> > >have dependent library conflicts with Hadoop 2.x, in which case
> they
> >> > may be
> >> > >pushed only to master)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >- Minor feature or performance improvements can be pushed only 
to
> >> > master
> >> >
> >>
>

Re: [VOTE] Move master to Hadoop 3+ and create separate 0.9.x line

2018-04-12 Thread Eric Wohlstadter 
Just a friendly reminder that this vote is still open.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Jason Lowe  wrote:

> There was a discussion thread that was started two weeks before the
> vote thread, see
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tez-dev/201803.mbox/browser.
> Granted there weren't many comments, but there was a discussion thread
> with no voiced objections well in advance of the vote thread.
>
> Jason
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Jonathan Eagles 
> wrote:
> > Thoughts/Inputs/Discussion from Pig/Hive/Flink/Scalding/Scope
> communities?
> >
> > I wish we had used a discussion thread to gather more input from
> > Pig/Hive/Flink/Scalding/Scope community before starting this vote whose
> > outcome affects them. Without discussion or votes from those communities
> > I'm not sure the community support for this decision. Should we consider
> > canceling this vote to gather input first?
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Kuhu Shukla 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1.
> >>
> >> Thank you Eric for floating the proposal.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Kuhu
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Jason Lowe 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > Jason
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Eric Wohlstadter 
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > Please vote (binding or unbinding) on the following proposal. The
> vote
> >> > will
> >> > > be open until 3pm (Pacific) April 13th.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Proposal: Move master to support minimum Hadoop 3+ (0.10.x line) and
> >> > create
> >> > > separate branch for Hadoop 2 (0.9.x line)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Details:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >- Tez master branch would support only Hadoop 3+ moving forward
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >- As a general policy, Maven dependencies on master are required
> not
> >> > to
> >> > >have conflicts with the dependencies of the corresponding minimum
> >> > >supported Hadoop (the dependency versions can vary between Tez
> >> master
> >> > and
> >> > >Hadoop if the versions are advertised as compatible by the
> >> dependency
> >> > >provider).
> >> > >
> >> > >- As a general policy, dependency conflicts between Tez and
> Hadoop
> >> > >should be resolved by using compatible jars. Shims/Shading could
> be
> >> > used on
> >> > >a case-by-case basis, but not as a general policy.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >- A separate branch and distribution (e.g. on Maven Central)
> will be
> >> > >created to maintain the 0.9.x line with minumum support for
> Hadoop
> >> > 2.7.x
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >- Bug fixes would be required to be pushed to both to master and
> the
> >> > >0.9.x line (unless they are specific to one of them)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >- Major feature or performance improvements would be required to
> be
> >> > >pushed to both master and the 0.9.x line (unless they require
> Hadoop
> >> > 3+ or
> >> > >have dependent library conflicts with Hadoop 2.x, in which case
> they
> >> > may be
> >> > >pushed only to master)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >- Minor feature or performance improvements can be pushed only to
> >> > master
> >> >
> >>
>