[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #931: TINKERPOP-2029 ConcurrentModificationException ...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/931 ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #931: TINKERPOP-2029 ConcurrentModificationException ...
Github user dkuppitz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/931#discussion_r217759875
--- Diff: docs/src/upgrade/release-3.4.x.asciidoc ---
@@ -29,6 +29,29 @@ Please see the
link:https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.4.0/CHANGELOG.asc
=== Upgrading for Users
+ Changed infix behavior
+
+The infix notation of `and()` and `or()` now supports an arbitrary number
of traversals and `ConnectiveStrategy` produces a traversal with the correct
AND and OR semantics. Furthermore,
+previous versions failed to apply 3 or more `and()` steps in an infix
notation, this is now fixed.
+
+[source,groovy]
+
+gremlin> g.V().has("name","marko").and().has("age",
lt(30)).or().has("name","josh").and().has("age", gt(30)).and().out("created")
+==>v[1]
+==>v[4]
+
+
+In previous versions the above traversal
--- End diff --
Ugh, I was going to remove this piece as I mentioned previous versions in
the comments above.
---
[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #931: TINKERPOP-2029 ConcurrentModificationException ...
Github user robertdale commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/931#discussion_r217720970
--- Diff: docs/src/upgrade/release-3.4.x.asciidoc ---
@@ -29,6 +29,29 @@ Please see the
link:https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.4.0/CHANGELOG.asc
=== Upgrading for Users
+ Changed infix behavior
+
+The infix notation of `and()` and `or()` now supports an arbitrary number
of traversals and `ConnectiveStrategy` produces a traversal with the correct
AND and OR semantics. Furthermore,
+previous versions failed to apply 3 or more `and()` steps in an infix
notation, this is now fixed.
+
+[source,groovy]
+
+gremlin> g.V().has("name","marko").and().has("age",
lt(30)).or().has("name","josh").and().has("age", gt(30)).and().out("created")
+==>v[1]
+==>v[4]
+
+
+In previous versions the above traversal
--- End diff --
Seems like something more is needed here.
---
[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #931: TINKERPOP-2029 ConcurrentModificationException ...
Github user robertdale commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/931#discussion_r217732616
--- Diff: docs/src/upgrade/release-3.4.x.asciidoc ---
@@ -29,6 +29,29 @@ Please see the
link:https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.4.0/CHANGELOG.asc
=== Upgrading for Users
+ Changed infix behavior
+
+The infix notation of `and()` and `or()` now supports an arbitrary number
of traversals and `ConnectiveStrategy` produces a traversal with the correct
AND and OR semantics. Furthermore,
+previous versions failed to apply 3 or more `and()` steps in an infix
notation, this is now fixed.
+
+[source,groovy]
+
+gremlin> g.V().has("name","marko").and().has("age",
lt(30)).or().has("name","josh").and().has("age", gt(30)).and().out("created")
+==>v[1]
+==>v[4]
+
+
+In previous versions the above traversal
+[source,groovy]
+
+gremlin>
g.V().repeat(__.in('traverses').repeat(__.in('develops')).emit()).emit().values('name')
+==>stephen
+==>matthias
+==>marko
+
+
+See:
link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-967[TINKERPOP-967]
--- End diff --
There should be a link to this issue as well -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2029
---
[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #931: TINKERPOP-2029 ConcurrentModificationException ...
Github user robertdale commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/931#discussion_r217731843 --- Diff: docs/src/upgrade/release-3.4.x.asciidoc --- @@ -29,6 +29,29 @@ Please see the link:https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.4.0/CHANGELOG.asc === Upgrading for Users + Changed infix behavior + +The infix notation of `and()` and `or()` now supports an arbitrary number of traversals and `ConnectiveStrategy` produces a traversal with the correct AND and OR semantics. Furthermore, +previous versions failed to apply 3 or more `and()` steps in an infix notation, this is now fixed. + --- End diff -- The graph example is good for those familiar with the graph but it's not immediately clear what the difference in behavior is. I really like the example from the comments. I think it would be good to add here (not necessarily verbatim) for clarity. ``` # BEHAVIOR Input: a.or.b.and.c.or.d.and.e.or.f.and.g.and.h.or.i ## BEFORE Output: or(a, or(and(b, c), or(and(d, e), or(and(and(f, g), h), i ## NOW Output: or(a, and(b, c), and(d, e), and(f, g, h), i) ``` ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #931: TINKERPOP-2029 ConcurrentModificationException ...
GitHub user dkuppitz opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/931 TINKERPOP-2029 ConcurrentModificationException for InlineFilterStrategy https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2029 To fix the original issue, I basically rewrote `ConnectiveStrategy`. The infix notation of `and()` and `or()` now supports an arbitrary number of traversals and `ConnectiveStrategy` produces a traversal with correct `AND` and `OR` semantics. The reason for targeting `master/` is that there were no strict semantics before and thus this needs to be considered a breaking change. ``` # BEHAVIOR Input: a.or.b.and.c.or.d.and.e.or.f.and.g.and.h.or.i ## BEFORE Output: or(a, or(and(b, c), or(and(d, e), or(and(and(f, g), h), i ## NOW Output: or(a, and(b, c), and(d, e), and(f, g, h), i) ``` `docker/build.sh -t -i -n` passed. VOTE +1 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop TINKERPOP-2029-master Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/931.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #931 commit 46ee42686a875baf123176040b2f341218e02e1a Author: Stephen Mallette Date: 2018-09-05T17:08:01Z TINKERPOP-2029 Added tests demonstrating strategy failures Identified potentially two problems, one with ConnectedStrategy and by virtue of its application InlineFilterStrategy. commit e518c9af9a4aca56449af2b743f24d35a8a43b50 Author: Daniel Kuppitz Date: 2018-09-10T18:41:34Z Rewrote `ConnectiveStrategy`. It's a breaking change as it now behaves slightly differently, but now it * produces correct AND and OR semantics. * has fewer recursive calls (at most 1). * is faster in its own execution and produces fewer steps in the final traversal which should make the processed traversal faster as well. commit 2ce9a6def3426b2a2ff89e6b556ae8b2653f6098 Author: Daniel Kuppitz Date: 2018-09-10T18:47:46Z Merge branch 'TINKERPOP-2029' into TINKERPOP-2029-master commit 9330fcbc477e6a64649b6c6aa22f697756d31140 Author: Daniel Kuppitz Date: 2018-09-10T18:49:52Z Removed note about infix restriction for `and()` and `or()` as they are no longer existent. commit 40b21bbd1361712c7b3cef140773ea87da30dbd0 Author: Daniel Kuppitz Date: 2018-09-10T19:21:17Z updated docs ---
