Looks like I didn't really think this through yesterday, but it probably doesn't really make sense to transfer the existing Dockerfiles as they only download the zip archives from our homepage and extract them. For this to work, we of course already need those archives to be in place which means that we can't deploy the Docker images together with the rest of TinkerPop. So, I think that it makes more sense to create new Dockerfiles that take the build artifacts from the Console and Server.
> I think we'd somehow need to find a way to redeploy all images if we > tweak/improve the Dockerfile in a way that makes sense to also redeploy prior > images, and not just the latest releases. Do we really need to redeploy images for older TinkerPop versions? Wouldn't it be enough to simply provide a newer version for 3.2.z and 3.3.z, respectively? Why could someone not update for example from 3.2.6 to 3.2.7? Anyhow, I just created a ticket for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1897 so we can discuss the concrete implementation over there. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Jean-Baptiste Musso [mailto:jbmu...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Februar 2018 22:02 An: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org Betreff: Re: [TinkerPop] Re: Docker images: gremlin-server and gremlin-console Sure, +1 on transferring the Dockerfile to TinkerPop. That could be part of the current deployment process. I think we'd somehow need to find a way to redeploy all images if we tweak/improve the Dockerfile in a way that makes sense to also redeploy prior images, and not just the latest releases. Jean-Baptiste On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Florian Hockmann <f...@florian-hockmann.de> wrote: > Thanks to a ticket where someone mentioned that he uses Docker images > of the Gremlin Server (TINKERPOP-1893 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1893>), I noticed > that there aren't any up-to-date Docker images for Gremlin Server or > Console on hub.docker.com: > > The highest version for Gremlin Server is 3.3.0 from this image: > https://hub.docker.com/r/bricaud/gremlin-server/ > and for Gremlin Console it's still version 3.2.4 that Jean-Baptiste > mentioned in the first post of this thread: > https://hub.docker.com/r/jbmusso/gremlin-console/ > > So, I wanted to ask: Are there any updates on this? > > Can't we as a first step simply include the Docker images from > Jean-Baptiste into our main repo and integrate it into our usual build > and deployment process so we always release Docker images with each > release? (Assuming that Jean-Baptiste is willing to transfer the > images to TinkerPop.) > > We can still add more advanced features like an easier configuration > of things like REST vs WebSockets or loading of datasets later when we > have initial versions of both Docker images in place. > > Am 05.07.2017 um 17:02 schrieb Stephen Mallette: > > Nice Josh - thanks for the update on that. Please keep us informed. > > > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Josh Perryman <j...@experoinc.com> > wrote: > > > >> I worked on this a little over the holiday weekend. I've got a > >> gremlin-console image based on OpenJDK:8 and one that uses the > >> Alpine version. They allow you to specify the TinkerPop version as > >> a command > line > >> argument and support anything that's available on > >> https://archive.apache.org/dist/tinkerpop/. > >> > >> That was trivial, and not really of high value. I'm working on > >> gremlin-server images now. My goal is to have server images which > >> allow > you > >> to specify: > >> > >> + Version (if on https://archive.apache.org/dist/tinkerpop/) > >> + Data set (any one included in the distribution) > >> + Access protocol (WebSocket or REST) > >> > >> The idea is that you can just start the image and have a local > >> running gremlin-server in any version, with some data loaded. This > >> could also be the basis for a gremlin-server microservice. I also > >> want to have one > that > >> has both console & server which is more suitable for training. > >> > >> But I don't think that I'll have time to work through all of that > >> for > some > >> weeks, perhaps late July, or more likely in August. When I get > >> these to > a > >> usable point with legible instructions, I'll follow up with this > >> thread > on > >> coordinating with Apache and getting the Dockerfiles hosted properly. > >> > >> *Josh Perryman* > >> > >> mobile: (713) 569-6533 > >> Twitter <https://twitter.com/JoshPerryman> / *LinkedIn* > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Stephen Mallette > >> <spmalle...@gmail.com > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I really don't know Docker too well so I can't really drive this one. > I'm > >>> not sure I understand if what Apache is offering us is suitable > >>> for the needs TinkerPop has wrt Docker. Any volunteers willing to > >>> pick this up > >> and > >>> drive this discussion forward? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Stephen Mallette < > spmalle...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> With help from Humbedooh aka Daniel Gruno, I've got in contact > >>>> with > >> folks > >>>> at Apache Infrastructure regarding projects putting stuff on > >>>> Docker > >> Hub. > >>>> Here was the basic reply: > >>>> > >>>>> We do support the use of Docker Hub under the ASF banner: > >>>>> https://hub.docker.com/u/apache/ The policy for releases on > >>>>> there is still being worked out, but at this moment if you have > >>>>> a dockerfile/ repo we can add that to our org for automated > >>>>> building. > >>>>> Just file a ticket on the INFRA JIRA > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapi > >>>> dView=25&projectKey=INFRA > >>>>> and we can add that repo to the org. > >>>> Is that helpful for what we're talking about here? Are there > >>>> other questions to ask? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Florian Hockmann < > >> f...@florian-hockmann.de > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I think official images would be a very good idea as there exist > >>>>> currently a lot of images, especially for Gremlin Server. Users > >>> typically > >>>>> search for the official image or just take the image with the > >>>>> most > >>> pulls. > >>>>> Images published directly by TinkerPop would get the most > >>>>> attention > so > >>>>> users don't end up with some image that isn't actively maintained. > >>>>> > >>>>> Another advantage of integrating the images in TinkerPop would > >> probably > >>>>> be that the deployment could be integrated into TinkerPop's > >>>>> usual > >>> release > >>>>> cycle. So new images can be published directly for each new version. > >>>>> > >>>>> Am Dienstag, 6. Juni 2017 18:39:09 UTC+2 schrieb Stephen Mallette: > >>>>>> Would it be interesting to anyone for TinkerPop to have an > >>>>>> official docker image? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Benjamin Ricaud < > >> benjami...@gmail.com > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks Jean-Baptiste, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I have also done a container for the gremlin-server 3.2.4, > >> configured > >>>>>>> to be used with gremlin-python: > >>>>>>> https://hub.docker.com/r/bricaud/gremlin-server/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I noticed that you do not need the IP trick for the server to > >>>>>>> be accessed. If you set > >>>>>>> host: 0 > >>>>>>> in your gremlin-conf.yaml, (and open the port with -p > >>>>>>> 8182:8182) > you > >>>>>>> can access the server. > >>>>>>> (see my conf files on the github repo). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>> Benjamin > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Le jeudi 1 juin 2017 00:37:07 UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Musso a écrit : > >>>>>>>> Dear TinkerPop, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I published a couple automatically built Docker images for > >>>>>>>> gremlin-server and gremlin-console (current image tags: > >>>>>>>> latest, > >>> 3.2.4, 3.2 > >>>>>>>> and 3): > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://hub.docker.com/r/jbmusso/gremlin-server/ > >>>>>>>> https://hub.docker.com/r/jbmusso/gremlin-console/ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I built these because I needed to quickly start different > >>>>>>>> configurations of gremlin-server when developing the > >>> gremlin-javascript > >>>>>>>> client. > >>>>>>>> Source repository: > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/jbmusso/docker-tinkerpop > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Start gremlin-server with: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> docker run -p 8182:8182 jbmusso/gremlin-server:3.2.4 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Defaults to conf/gremlin-server.yaml within that container, > >>>>>>>> or > pass > >>>>>>>> another .yaml file: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> docker run -p 8182:8182 jbmusso/gremlin-server:3.2.4 > >>>>>>>> conf/gremlin-server-modern.yaml > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Mounting your own config .yaml file with docker run -v > >>>>>>>> argument > >>> should > >>>>>>>> also work (untested). > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You can play with the console this way (make sure you run > >>>>>>>> with the > >>> -it > >>>>>>>> flags so Docker don't quit and actually lets you type > >>>>>>>> commands > from > >>> your > >>>>>>>> shell): > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> docker run -it jbmusso/gremlin-console:3.2.4 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> If you want to execute a file located on your host from > >>>>>>>> within a gremin-console container (the following assumes that > >>>>>>>> foobar.groovy > >>> file > >>>>>>>> exists in your $HOME dir): > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> docker run -it -v ~/foobar.groovy:/script/foobar.groovy > >>>>>>>> jbmusso/gremlin-console:3.2.4 -e /script/foobar.groovy > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > >>>>>>> Google Groups "Gremlin-users" group. > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from > >>>>>>> it, > >> send > >>>>>>> an email to gremlin-user...@googlegroups.com. > >>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit > >>> https://groups.google.com/d/ms > >>>>>>> gid/gremlin-users/c8141999-2e9d-4fd3-a763-5630866e5c6b%40goo > >>>>>>> glegroups.com > >>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/c8141999- > >>> 2e9d-4fd3-a763-5630866e5c6b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium= > >>> email&utm_source=footer> > >>>>>>> . > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > >>>>> Google > >>> Groups > >>>>> "Gremlin-users" group. > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from > >>>>> it, > send > >>> an > >>>>> email to gremlin-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit > >> https://groups.google.com/d/ms > >>>>> gid/gremlin-users/8cf01027-2ef6-48d5-bc2a-34facea9c0f8%40 > >>> googlegroups.com > >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/8cf01027- > >>> 2ef6-48d5-bc2a-34facea9c0f8%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium= > >>> email&utm_source=footer> > >>>>> . > >>>>> > >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > >>>>> > >>>> > >
