svn commit: r452091 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: ./ webapps/docs/

2006-10-02 Thread remm
Author: remm
Date: Mon Oct  2 08:52:29 2006
New Revision: 452091

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=452091
Log:
- Doc updates.

Added:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml   (with props)
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/class-loader-howto.xml
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/jasper-howto.xml
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/logging.xml
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/manager-howto.xml
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/mbeans-descriptor-howto.xml
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/realm-howto.xml

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES?view=diffrev=452091r1=452090r2=452091
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES Mon Oct  2 08:52:29 2006
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
 * catalina-ha.jar (High availability package)
 * catalina-tribes.jar (Group communication)
 * commons-logging-api.jar (Commons Logging API 1.0.x)
-* el-api.jar (EL 1.0 API)
+* el-api.jar (EL 2.1 API)
 * jasper.jar (Jasper 2 Compiler and Runtime)
 * jasper-el.jar (Jasper 2 EL implementation)
 * jasper-jdt.jar (Eclipse JDT 3.2 Java compiler)

Added: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml?view=autorev=452091
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml (added)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml Mon Oct  2 08:52:29 2006
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+?xml version=1.0?
+!DOCTYPE document [
+  !ENTITY project SYSTEM project.xml
+]
+document url=aio.html
+
+project;
+
+  properties
+titleAdvanced IO and Tomcat/title
+authorRemy Maucherat/author
+  /properties
+
+body
+
+  section name=Introduction
+
+  p
+  /p
+
+  /section
+
+/body
+/document

Propchange: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml
--
svn:eol-style = native

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/class-loader-howto.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/class-loader-howto.xml?view=diffrev=452091r1=452090r2=452091
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/class-loader-howto.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/class-loader-howto.xml Mon Oct  2 
08:52:29 2006
@@ -15,30 +15,9 @@
 body
 
 
-section name=Quick Start
-
-pThe following rules cover about 95% of the decisions that application
-developers and deployers must make about where to place class and resource
-files to make them available to web applications:/p
-ul
-liFor classes and resources specific to a particular web application,
-place unpacked classes and resources under code/WEB-INF/classes/code
-of your web application archive, or place JAR files containing those
-classes and resources under code/WEB-INF/lib/code of your web
-application archive./li
-liFor classes and resources that must be shared across all web applications,
-place unpacked classes and resources under
-code$CATALINA_BASE/shared/classes/code, or place JAR files
-containing those classes and resources under
-code$CATALINA_BASE/shared/lib/code./li
-/ul
-
-/section
-
-
 section name=Overview
 
-pLike many server applications, Tomcat 5 installs a variety of class loaders
+pLike many server applications, Tomcat 6 installs a variety of class loaders
 (that is, classes that implement codejava.lang.ClassLoader/code) to allow
 different portions of the container, and the web applications running on the
 container, to have access to different repositories of available classes and
@@ -53,7 +32,7 @@
 web application class loaders differs slightly from this, as discussed below,
 but the main principles are the same./p
 
-pWhen Tomcat 5 is started, it creates a set of class loaders that are
+pWhen Tomcat 6 is started, it creates a set of class loaders that are
 organized into the following parent-child relationships, where the parent
 class loader is above the child class loader:/p
 
@@ -63,10 +42,8 @@
System
   |
Common
-  /  \
- Catalina   Shared
- /   \
-Webapp1  Webapp2 ... 
+   / \
+  Webapp1   Webapp2 ... 
 /source
 
 pThe characteristics of each of these class loaders, including the source
@@ -77,7 +54,7 @@
 
 section name=Class Loader Definitions
 
-pAs indicated in the diagram above, Tomcat 5 creates the following class
+pAs indicated in the diagram above, Tomcat 6 creates the following class
 loaders as it is initialized:/p
 ul
 listrongBootstrap/strong - This class loader contains the basic runtime
@@ -96,97 +73,41 @@
 build the System class loader from the following repositories:
 ul
 

Re: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Mladen Turk

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:

where is this proposed, 6.0 or 5.5.x dot release?



Sorry it's targeted for 6.0
(I thought it was clear from the patches)

Regards,
Mladen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists

[X] I'm for that proposal
[ ] I'm against that proposal
[ ] I don't care

Filip


Mladen Turk wrote:

Hi all,

I would like to propose a simple vote on the thing I consider
as very important. It's probably the first vote ever done for
the commited code, but the reasons are known for the folks reading
tomcat dev list.

The things we have right now for dealing with Keep-Alive is
dependent only on the soTimeout.

I propose that we split that to the real soTimeout which is the
timeout between two consecutive read() on http request and the
additional keepAliveTimeout that will be used for determining the
timeout between two requests.

Few reason why we should need those timeouts separately
configured is:

1. Why not, if its possible without breaking current config ?
2. If the timeout between two request is lower then soTimeout it
   will allow to have much higher number of slow clients
3. If the timeout between two requests is higher then soTimeout
   it will allow to deal with slow clients sending one byte at the
   the time with the unacceptable rate.

So, I'll just throw a vote here:

[ ] I'm for that proposal
[ ] I'm against that proposal
[ ] I don't care

Of course, there is always an option to have an veto.

As many of you already know, the code itself was already
in the SVN, but it was reverted.

Regards,
Mladen.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Bill Barker
 

 -Original Message-
 From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 4:25 AM
 To: tomcat Developers List
 Subject: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout
 
 Hi all,
 
 I would like to propose a simple vote on the thing I consider
 as very important. It's probably the first vote ever done for
 the commited code, but the reasons are known for the folks reading
 tomcat dev list.
 
 The things we have right now for dealing with Keep-Alive is
 dependent only on the soTimeout.
 
 I propose that we split that to the real soTimeout which is the
 timeout between two consecutive read() on http request and the
 additional keepAliveTimeout that will be used for determining the
 timeout between two requests.
 
 Few reason why we should need those timeouts separately
 configured is:
 
 1. Why not, if its possible without breaking current config ?
 2. If the timeout between two request is lower then soTimeout it
 will allow to have much higher number of slow clients
 3. If the timeout between two requests is higher then soTimeout
 it will allow to deal with slow clients sending one byte at the
 the time with the unacceptable rate.
 

I pretty much agree with Remy:  Anything useful this would do has been in
place since the early days of Coyote.  Also, anybody that actually would
care about this option almost certainly wouldn't be using the JIO Connector
:).

 So, I'll just throw a vote here:
 
 [ ] I'm for that proposal
 [ ] I'm against that proposal
 [X] I don't care
 
 Of course, there is always an option to have an veto.
 
 As many of you already know, the code itself was already
 in the SVN, but it was reverted.
 
 Regards,
 Mladen.
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the 
intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and 
CONFIDENTIAL.  If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or 
distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of 
this message and any attachments.

In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through 
the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, 
such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification 
numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Mladen Turk

Bill Barker wrote:




I pretty much agree with Remy:  Anything useful this would do has been in
place since the early days of Coyote.  Also, anybody that actually would
care about this option almost certainly wouldn't be using the JIO Connector
:).



Fair enough.
Someone even said that there is no market for more then
five computers in the entire world :)

Regards,
Mladen.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38898] - Tomcat service fails without error message

2006-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38898.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38898





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-10-02 13:21 ---
You could attach hs_err_pid.log's till you're blue in the face, but nothing
changes the fact that what's wrong here is a *Java Virtual Machine* bug, not a
*Tomcat source* bug.

JVM crashes can happen for as much of a variety of reasons as an OS blue screen
of death - Java Virtual Machine internal coding errors, driver bugs, OS bugs,
hardware quirks, ...

First order of business: use the latest Java VM version (1.5.0_08 as of today).
See if this still happens.

Then, take your application to a different machine (different OS, and preferably
different architecture, e.g. Solaris on Sparc), and try to make it crash the
same way using the *exact same inputs*.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Mark Thomas
Mladen Turk wrote:
 [X] I'm for that proposal
 [ ] I'm against that proposal
 [ ] I don't care

If you believe there is a requirement for it, the implementation can
be done cleanly and you are prepared to support it then go for it.

I would like to echo Yoav's comments that the docs should be updated
at the same time.

Mark

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



svn commit: r452281 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml

2006-10-02 Thread remm
Author: remm
Date: Mon Oct  2 17:17:20 2006
New Revision: 452281

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=452281
Log:
- First pass at docs.

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml?view=diffrev=452281r1=452280r2=452281
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml Mon Oct  2 17:17:20 2006
@@ -16,7 +16,263 @@
   section name=Introduction
 
   p
+With usage of APR or NIO APIs as the basis of its connectors, Tomcat is 
+able to provide a number of extensions over the regular blocking IO 
+as provided with support for the Servlet API.
   /p
+
+  /section
+
+  section name=Comet support
+
+  p
+Comet support allows a servlet to process IO aynchronously, recieving
+events when data is available for reading on the connection (rather than
+always using a blocking read), and writing data back on connections
+asychnonously (most likely responding to some event raised from some
+other source).
+  /p
+
+  subsection name=CometEvent
+  
+  p
+Servlets which implement the 
codeorg.apache.catalina.CometProcessor/code
+interface will have their event method invoked rather than the usual 
service
+method, according to the event which occurred. The event object gives
+access to the usual request and response objects, which may be used in the
+usual way. The main difference is that those objects remain valid and fully
+functional at any time between processing of the BEGIN event until 
processing
+an END or ERROR event.
+The following event types exist:
+  /p
+  
+  ul
+  liEventType.BEGIN: will be called at the beginning 
+ of the processing of the connection. It can be used to initialize any 
relevant 
+ fields using the request and response objects. Between the end of the 
processing 
+ of this event, and the beginning of the processing of the end or error 
events,
+ it is possible to use the response object to write data on the open 
connection.
+ Note that the response object and depedent OutputStream and Writer are 
still 
+ not synchronized, so when they are accessed by multiple threads, 
+ synchronization is mandatory. After processing the initial event, the 
request 
+ is considered to be committed./li
+  liEventType.READ: This indicates that input data is available, and that 
one read can be made
+ without blocking. The available and ready methods of the InputStream or
+ Reader may be used to determine if there is a risk of blocking: the 
servlet
+ should read while data is reported available, and can make one additional 
read
+ without blocking. When encountering a read error or an EOF, the servlet 
MUST
+ report it by either returning false or throwing an exception such as an 
+ IOException. This will cause the error event to be invoked, and the 
connection
+ will be closed. It is not allowed to attempt reading data from the 
request object
+ outside of the execution of this method./li
+  liEventType.END: End may be called to end the processing of the request. 
Fields that have
+ been initialized in the begin method should be reset. After this event has
+ been processed, the request and response objects, as well as all their 
dependent
+ objects will be recycled and used to process other requests./li
+  liEventType.ERROR: Error will be called by the container in the case where 
an IO exception
+ or a similar unrecoverable error occurs on the connection. Fields that 
have
+ been initialized in the begin method should be reset. After this event has
+ been processed, the request and response objects, as well as all their 
dependent
+ objects will be recycled and used to process other requests./li
+  /ul
+
+  p
+As described above, the typical lifecycle of a Comet request will consist 
in a series of
+events such as: BEGIN - READ - READ - READ - ERROR/TIMEOUT. At any 
time, the servlet 
+may end processing of the request by using the close method of the event 
object.
+  /p
+  
+  /subsection
+
+  subsection name=CometFilter
+  
+  p
+Similar to regular filters, a filter chain is invoked when comet events 
are processed.
+These filters should implement the CometFilter interface (which works in 
the same way as 
+the regular Filter interface), and should be declared and mapped in the 
deployment
+descriptor in the same way as a regular filter. The filter chain when 
processing an event
+will only include filters which match all the usual mapping rules, and 
also implement
+the CometFiler interface.
+  /p
+  
+  /subsection
+
+  subsection name=Example code
+  
+  p
+The following pseudo code servlet implments asynchronous chat 
functionality 

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39724] - Bug on StandardPipeline.removeValve(Valve valve) for T5.5.16+

2006-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39724.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39724


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-10-02 18:06 ---
Patch applied to SVN and will be in 5.5.21 onwards.

Thanks for tracking this down and providing the patch.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



svn commit: r452287 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardPipeline.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2006-10-02 Thread markt
Author: markt
Date: Mon Oct  2 18:06:12 2006
New Revision: 452287

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=452287
Log:
Fix bug 39724. Removing the only valve from a pipeline did not return the 
pipeline to its original state. Patched provided by David Gagnon.

Modified:

tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardPipeline.java
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Modified: 
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardPipeline.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardPipeline.java?view=diffrev=452287r1=452286r2=452287
==
--- 
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardPipeline.java
 (original)
+++ 
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardPipeline.java
 Mon Oct  2 18:06:12 2006
@@ -530,6 +530,8 @@
 current = current.getNext();
 }
 
+if (first == basic) first = null;
+
 if (valve instanceof Contained)
 ((Contained) valve).setContainer(null);
 

Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml?view=diffrev=452287r1=452286r2=452287
==
--- tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Mon Oct  2 18:06:12 2006
@@ -29,6 +29,11 @@
 is required to enable this test. (markt)
   /fix
   fix
+bug39724/bug: Removing the last valve from a pipeline did not
+return the pipeline to the original state. Patch provided by
+David Gagon. (markt)
+  /fix
+  fix
 bug40528/bug: Add missing message localisations as provided by
 Ben Clifford. (markt)
   /fix



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



svn commit: r452288 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardPipeline.java

2006-10-02 Thread markt
Author: markt
Date: Mon Oct  2 18:08:32 2006
New Revision: 452288

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=452288
Log:
Port fix for bug 39724. Removing the only valve from a pipeline did not return 
the pipeline to its original state. Patched provided by David Gagnon.

Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardPipeline.java

Modified: 
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardPipeline.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardPipeline.java?view=diffrev=452288r1=452287r2=452288
==
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardPipeline.java 
(original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardPipeline.java 
Mon Oct  2 18:08:32 2006
@@ -530,6 +530,8 @@
 current = current.getNext();
 }
 
+if (first == basic) first = null;
+
 if (valve instanceof Contained)
 ((Contained) valve).setContainer(null);
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



svn commit: r452291 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps: admin/resources/envEntry.jsp docs/changelog.xml

2006-10-02 Thread markt
Author: markt
Date: Mon Oct  2 18:37:46 2006
New Revision: 452291

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=452291
Log:
Fix bug 35968. Make env entry props input a text area. Patch provided by 
Tristan Marly.

Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/admin/resources/envEntry.jsp
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/admin/resources/envEntry.jsp
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/admin/resources/envEntry.jsp?view=diffrev=452291r1=452290r2=452291
==
--- tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/admin/resources/envEntry.jsp (original)
+++ tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/admin/resources/envEntry.jsp Mon Oct  2 
18:37:46 2006
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
   bean:message key=service.value/:
 /controls:label
 controls:data
-  html:text property=value size=24 styleId=value/
+  html:textarea property=value cols=30 rows=3 
styleId=value/
 /controls:data
   /controls:row
 

Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml?view=diffrev=452291r1=452290r2=452291
==
--- tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Mon Oct  2 18:37:46 2006
@@ -50,6 +50,10 @@
 a Windows service. (markt)
   /fix
   fix
+bug35968/bug: Make environment entry properties input a text area.
+Patch provided by Tristan Marly. (markt)
+  /fix
+  fix
 bug40633/bug: Remove references to the DefaultContext from the
 documentation. (markt)
   /fix



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35968] - Please make Environment Entry Properties Value input a textarea

2006-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35968.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35968


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-10-02 18:38 ---
Patch applied. Will be included in 5.5.21 onwards.

Mnay thanks for the patch.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36153] - html:form action is blank

2006-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36153.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36153


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-10-02 20:22 ---
There isn't anything here I can see that points to a Tomcat issue.

Comment 3 suggests you may wish to follow up on the struts users list.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

2006-10-02 Thread Henri Gomez

+0

2006/10/3, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Mladen Turk wrote:
 [X] I'm for that proposal
 [ ] I'm against that proposal
 [ ] I don't care

If you believe there is a requirement for it, the implementation can
be done cleanly and you are prepared to support it then go for it.

I would like to echo Yoav's comments that the docs should be updated
at the same time.

Mark

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]